TFEIP Workshop, Istanbul, May 2013 Emissions data for of heavy metal and POP modelling Oleg Travnikov, Alexey Gusev, Ilia Ilyin, Olga Rozovskaya, Victor.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Czech Hydrometeorological Institute Assessment of air pollution by cadmium CZECH REPUBLIC EMEP Heavy metal case study Milan Váňa, Pavel Machálek + MSC-E.
Advertisements

Uncertainty Assessment of HM Emission Inventories TFEIP/TFMM workshop on uncertainties in emission inventories and atmospheric models Stefan Reis, Jozef.
Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East.
EMEP Steering Body, Geneva, 2013 Heavy metal and POP pollution: Dissemination of output information Oleg Travnikov on behalf of MSC-E and CCC.
Assessment of HM and POP pollution in EMEP domain Long-term trends ( ) Pollution levels (2012) Transboundary transport Intercontinental transport.
TFMM & TFEIP Workshop, Dublin, 2007 Uncertainties of heavy metal pollution assessment Oleg Travnikov EMEP/MSC-E.
Alexey Gusev, Victor Shatalov, Olga Rozovskaya
Modelled results vs. emission estimates S.Dutchak, I.Ilyin, O.Travnikov, O.Rozovskaya, M.Varygina EMEP/MSC-East Modelled results vs. emission estimates.
1 Relations between PM and persistent toxic substances Alexey Ryaboshapko, Meteorological Synthesizing Center “East” EG on Particulate Matter, Berlin,
Wish-list to the Emission community.  TFMM annual meeting held in Zagreb on the 6-8 May 2013  Main issues :  Review of the implementation of the EMEP.
Reporting and use of air pollutant emission data under the ECE CONVENTION ON LONG-RANGE TRANBOUNDARY AIR POLLUTION Krzysztof Olendrzynski ECE/Air Secretariat.
Monitoring/modelling activities on POPs in 2015 and future work Victor Shatalov on behalf of MSC-E and CCC.
Hugo Denier van der Gon Hugo Denier van der Gon, Maarten van het Bolscher & Antoon Visschedijk Uncertainties in POP emission data.
T TNO Environment, Energy and Process Innovation A study to the effectiveness of the HM and POP Protocols and costs of additional measures Task Force on.
7 th Joint TFEIP & EIONET meeting, Thessaloniki, 2006 Heavy metal modelling: Use of different emission inventories Oleg Travnikov EMEP/MSC-E.
Trend analysis of HMs and POPs on the basis of measurements and modelling data Victor Shatalov and Oleg Travnikov, MSC-E.
EMEP Steering Body, Geneva, 2014 Activities on monitoring and modelling of POPs in 2014 and future work Victor Shatalov on behalf of MSC-E and CCC.
Progress of HM & POP modelling from global to country scale Ilya Ilyin, Oleg Travnikov, Victor Shatalov, Alexey Gusev Meteorological Synthesizing Centre.
Evaluation of pollution levels of lead and PCB-153 over Central Asian (CA) countries within CAPACT project (preliminary results) Ilia Ilyin, EMEP/MSC-E.
Joint EMEP/WGE meeting, Geneva, 2015 Heavy metal pollution assessment within EMEP Oleg Travnikov on behalf of MSC-E and CCC.
Improving the Quality of HM Emission Inventories Expert estimates for Heavy Metals from the ESPREME Project TFEIP - Thessaloniki Oct 2006.
A study to the effectiveness of the HM & POP Protocols and costs of additional measures Phase II - Emission reduction and cost of a possible revision of.
Evaluation of concentrations of air pollutants and depositions of HMs over the EECCA and SEE regions Ilia Ilyin, EMEP/MSC-E EMEP/MSC-E TFHM, May 14-16,
EMEP Steering Body, Geneva, 2011 Co-operation between EMEP/MSC-E and WGE Oleg Travnikov, Ilia Ilyin Meteorological Synthesizing Centre East of EMEP (EMEP/MSC-E)
EMEP/WGE Bureaux, March 2015 MSC-E work plan, 2015 TaskItem Calculations of HMs/POPs for b Testing of HM/POP models in the new EMEP grid1.3.4.
EMEP WGSR, EMEP Progress on HMs, 2006  Review and evaluation of the MSCE-HM model (TFMM)  Atmospheric pollution in 2004 (emissions, monitoring.
29 th TF meeting of the ICP-Vegetation, March, 2016, Dubna, Russia ANALYSIS OF LONG-TERM TRENDS OF ATMOSPHERIC HEAVY METAL POLLUTION IN THE EMEP COUNTRIES.
EMEP/WGE Bureau, Geneva, March 2016 Main results of Long-term trends of HMs and POPs on the basis of modeling results and measurements.
17 th TFMM Meeting, May, 2016 EMEP Case study: Assessment of HM pollution levels with fine spatial resolution in Belarus, Poland and UK Ilia Ilyin,
17 th TFMM Meeting, 17 – 20 May, 2016 Progress of HM and POP modelling: main activities and results Alexey Gusev, Ilia Ilyin, Olga Rozovskaya, Victor Shatalov,
Evaluation of pollution levels in urban areas of selected EMEP countries Alexey Gusev, Victor Shatalov Meteorological Synthesizing Centre - East.
Joint EMEP/WGE meeting, Geneva, 2016 Evaluation of B[a]P pollution in the EMEP region: temporal trends and spatial variability Alexey Gusev, Olga Rozovskaya,
Assessment of POP pollution in EMEP region
Progress in 2017 Work-plan elements
Heavy metal pollution assessment within EMEP
Joint thematic session on B(a)P pollution: main activities and results
Progress in assessment of POP pollution in EMEP region.
Overview of country-specific studies of heavy metal and POP pollution
Model assessment of heavy metal pollution from global to local scales
Emissions data for of heavy metal and POP modelling
Heavy metal pollution assessment within EMEP
Progress of HM & POP modelling from global to country scale
EMEP case study on heavy metal pollution assessment:
POPs and HMs Summary , EMEP TFMM.
A. Aulinger, V. Matthias, M. Quante, Institute for Coastal Research
Alexey Gusev, Victor Shatalov, Olga Rozovskaya, Nadejda Vulyh
10th TFMM meeting, June, 2009, France, Paris
10th TFMM meeting, June, 2009, France, Paris
MSC-E: Alexey Gusev, Victor Shatalov, Olga Rozovskaya, Nadejda Vulykh
ENEA, National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable
EMEP Case study: Assessment of HM pollution levels with fine spatial resolution in Belarus, Poland and UK Ilia Ilyin, Olga Rozovskaya, Oleg Travnikov.
9th TFMM, Bordeaux, France, April 2008
Status of development of the MSC-E Hemispheric/global model
MSC-E contribution concerning heavy metals
Use of non-Party estimates in EMEP modelling: HMs and POPs
Update of MSC-E research activities on POPs.
Progress and problems of POP modelling
Uncertainties of heavy metal pollution assessment
EMEP case studies on HMs: State of the art
Trend analysis of contamination in the EMEP region by HMs & POPs
Research of heavy metal pollution on regional (EMEP) and national (Germany) scales Ilyin I, Travnikov O. EMEP/MSC-E.
Multi-scale approach to HM and POP modelling
Trend analysis for HMs and POPs
Wish list for modelling (first priority)
Emissions What are the most sensitive parameters in emissions to improve model results (chemical species, spatio-temporal resolution, spatial distribution,
Ilyin I., Travnikov O., Varygina M.
Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs)
Model assessment of HM and POP pollution of the EECCA region
Comparison of model results with measurements
Assessment of heavy metal pollution within EMEP
Presentation transcript:

TFEIP Workshop, Istanbul, May 2013 Emissions data for of heavy metal and POP modelling Oleg Travnikov, Alexey Gusev, Ilia Ilyin, Olga Rozovskaya, Victor Shatalov

TFEIP Workshop, Istanbul, May 2013 Requirements to emissions data for modelling Spatially resolved data for the whole EMEP region Multi-year emissions for assessment of long-term trends Additional emission parameters: -Chemical speciation and congener composition -Temporal variation of emissions -Height of emission sources Historical emissions and emissions to other media for multi-media modelling Emissions in other regions/continents for assessment of intercontinental transport

TFEIP Workshop, Istanbul, May 2013 EMEP officially reported emissions data Completeness of reported HMs emission totals for  Complete datasets of emission totals are available for 28 countries  There is no national emissions data for 9 EMEP countries

TFEIP Workshop, Istanbul, May 2013 EMEP officially reported emissions data Completeness of reported POPs emission totals for  Complete datasets of emission totals are available for 22 countries  There is no national emissions data for 8 EMEP countries

TFEIP Workshop, Istanbul, May 2013 Data completeness: Emission sectors Contribution of major source categories to HCB emissions Public electricity and heat production (1A1a) Road transport (1A3) Iron and steel production (2C1) Agriculture (4G) Waste incineration (6C) Other FranceSpain United Kingdom

TFEIP Workshop, Istanbul, May 2013 EMEP domain Spatial distribution and gaps filling - National totals- TNO totals t cell -1 y -1 Emission totals:  Reported data (40 countries)  TNO inventory for 2000 and projections for 2010 Gridded data:  Reported grids (27 countries)  TNO inventory for 2000 and projections for 2010  CGEIC global Pb emissions inventory (1°×1°) for 1989 scaled to present Example: Pb anthropogenic emissions in 2011

TFEIP Workshop, Istanbul, May 2013 Contribution of regional vs. global sources to HM and POP pollution Global sources EMEP sources Hg deposition over the globe and in EMEP region (2010) Global sources and intercontinental transport

TFEIP Workshop, Istanbul, May 2013 Available ‘expert estimates’ DatasetChemicalsYearsResolution Europe TNO inventoryPb, Cd, Hg, BaP, PCDD/Fs, HCB 2000, 2010/20 (projections) 50×50 km 2 POPCYCLING-BalticBaP, PCDD/Fs, HCB ×50 km 2 ESPREMEPb, Cd, Hg, …200050×50 km 2 DROPSPCDD/Fs, PCBs200050×50 km 2 Global NILU/CGEICPb19891°×1° AMAP/UNEPHg °×0.5° Tao et al., 2009PAHs2004n/a Bailey et al., 2001HCB1995n/a NILU inventoryPCBs °×1° No global data for Cd and PCDD/Fs

TFEIP Workshop, Istanbul, May 2013 Chemical speciation of emissions: Hg Hg species: Hg 0, Hg(II) gas, Hg(II) part Reported emissions: total Hg Expert estimates: Axenfeld et al., 1991; Pacyna et al., 2001 Effect of emission speciation on Hg deposition (2010) All Hg emissions as Hg 0 All emissions as Hg(II)

TFEIP Workshop, Istanbul, May 2013 Chemical speciation of emissions: PAHs PAH indicator compounds: B[a]P, B[b]F, B[k]F, IP Reported emissions: depends on a country Expert estimates: TNO inventory No data 5 countries (11%) All 4 PAHs 30 countries (64%) Only some PAHs 5 countries (11%) Sum of 4 PAHs 7 countries (14%) Reporting of PAHs emissions (2011)

TFEIP Workshop, Istanbul, May 2013 Chemical speciation of emissions: PCDD/Fs PCDD/F composition: 17 toxic congeners Reported emissions: total toxicity equivalent Expert estimates: POPCYCLING-Baltic project Congener composition of PCDD/Fs emissions (EMEP region)

TFEIP Workshop, Istanbul, May 2013 Temporal variation of emissions Sectors of BaP emissions in EMEP countries (2010) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Others Waste incineration Industrial processes Road transport Residential heating Industry and road transport (Schaap et al., 2005) Residential heating (Aulinger et al., 2010) Single location in Czech Republic Seasonal variation of BaP air concentration at Kosetice (CZ3) Observations Model (no variation) Observations Model (emission)

TFEIP Workshop, Istanbul, May 2013 Arcelor-Mittal Ostrava Steel Plant Emission: 859 kg/y (26%) Prunéřov II Power Station Emission: 207 t/y (6%) Contribution (%) Contribution of large point sources to Cd deposition Note: Contribution of single LPS can exceed 10-20% of Cd total anthropogenic deposition over large areas of the country Emissions from large point sources

TFEIP Workshop, Istanbul, May 2013 h Required parameters:  Stack height  Stack diameter  Gas outflow velocity  Gas temperature Emissions from large point sources Prunéřov II Power Plant Estimates of effective emissions height (Brigg’s approach) Stack height m Change in annual Pb deposition due to vertical redistribution of emissions Percents

TFEIP Workshop, Istanbul, May 2013 HCB air concentration (2011) EMEP anthropogenic sources Global anthropogenic sources Global secondary sources EMEP secondary sources EMEP Historical emissions of POPs 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Air Soil Ocean HCB accumulation in different media HCB global emissions ( )

TFEIP Workshop, Istanbul, May 2013 Emissions of POPs to other media PCDD/Fs emissions in Europe (17 EU countries) to land 85% to air 15% [Wenborn et al., 1999] PCDD/Fs emissions to land Pesticide production Accidental fires Waste incineration Waste disposal Pesticide use Other PCDD/F air concentration (model vs. observations) Underestimation by a factor of 5

TFEIP Workshop, Istanbul, May 2013 Pb concentration in air (2007) Adjoint modelling Application of adjoint modelling for evaluation of emission fields Košetice (CZ3) Adjoint model: An adjoint model to a CTM provides estimates of spatially resolved influence functions ∂ C /∂ E for a chosen receptor : Applied approach: Model simulation of influence functions for particular receptor Analysis of the optimized fields from the view point of possible emission uncertainties Variational optimization of emission fields to minimize model- measurement discrepancies at selected receptor Influence function for CZ3 October 2007 Influence function CZ3

TFEIP Workshop, Istanbul, May 2013 What can be improved? Officially reported data: Completeness of national totals and gridded emissions Emissions differentiation by source categories and coverage of all emission sectors Information on large point sources (emissions, co-ordinates, height, etc.) Projections of future emissions Uncertainty estimates or lower/upper limits

TFEIP Workshop, Istanbul, May 2013 What can be improved? Expert estimates: Updated inventories for EMEP countries and non- EMEP regions Global scale emissions data (Hg, HCB) Chemical speciation or congener composition of emissions (Hg, PCDD/Fs, PAH, PCBs) Temporal variation of emissions (e.g. by sectors) Historical emissions (HCB, PCDD/Fs, Hg) Emissions to other media (soil, water)

TFEIP Workshop, Istanbul, May 2013 Pb concentration in air (2007) Optimized (anthrop.) Application of adjoint modelling Optimization of HM anthropogenic emissions distribution Changes of total Pb emission October 2007 Influence function CZ3 Optimization coefficients CZ3 Anthrop. emissions