29 th TF meeting of the ICP-Vegetation, March, 2016, Dubna, Russia ANALYSIS OF LONG-TERM TRENDS OF ATMOSPHERIC HEAVY METAL POLLUTION IN THE EMEP COUNTRIES.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Czech Hydrometeorological Institute Assessment of air pollution by cadmium CZECH REPUBLIC EMEP Heavy metal case study Milan Váňa, Pavel Machálek + MSC-E.
Advertisements

ICP VEGETATION 29 th session WGE Integrated science for our changing world European moss survey 2010/11  Confirmed participation: HM & N.
EUROPEAN UNION INITIATIVES AND REQUIREMENTS : AIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT AS A POLICY MECHANISM Sonja Vidič Meteorological and Hydrological Service of Croatia.
Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East.
IMPLEMENTATION OF EU AQ LEGISLATION IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC J. FIALA Czech Hydrometeorological Institute Prague, Czech Republic.
EMEP Steering Body, Geneva, 2013 Heavy metal and POP pollution: Dissemination of output information Oleg Travnikov on behalf of MSC-E and CCC.
TFMM & TFEIP Workshop, Dublin, 2007 Uncertainties of heavy metal pollution assessment Oleg Travnikov EMEP/MSC-E.
Alexey Gusev, Victor Shatalov, Olga Rozovskaya
Modelled results vs. emission estimates S.Dutchak, I.Ilyin, O.Travnikov, O.Rozovskaya, M.Varygina EMEP/MSC-East Modelled results vs. emission estimates.
Reporting and use of air pollutant emission data under the ECE CONVENTION ON LONG-RANGE TRANBOUNDARY AIR POLLUTION Krzysztof Olendrzynski ECE/Air Secretariat.
EMEP Steering Body, Geneva, 2014 Heavy metal pollution assessment within EMEP Oleg Travnikov on behalf of MSC-E and CCC.
Monitoring/modelling activities on POPs in 2015 and future work Victor Shatalov on behalf of MSC-E and CCC.
7 th Joint TFEIP & EIONET meeting, Thessaloniki, 2006 Heavy metal modelling: Use of different emission inventories Oleg Travnikov EMEP/MSC-E.
Trend analysis of HMs and POPs on the basis of measurements and modelling data Victor Shatalov and Oleg Travnikov, MSC-E.
Progress of HM & POP modelling from global to country scale Ilya Ilyin, Oleg Travnikov, Victor Shatalov, Alexey Gusev Meteorological Synthesizing Centre.
Evaluation of pollution levels of lead and PCB-153 over Central Asian (CA) countries within CAPACT project (preliminary results) Ilia Ilyin, EMEP/MSC-E.
Joint EMEP/WGE meeting, Geneva, 2015 Heavy metal pollution assessment within EMEP Oleg Travnikov on behalf of MSC-E and CCC.
Joint TFEIP/TFMM workshop October 22, Dublin Understanding discrepancies between atmospheric model results and measurements given uncertainties in emission.
WGE September 20111Brit Lisa Skjelkvåle Trends in precipitation chemistry, surface water chemistry and aquatic biota in acidified areas in Europe.
Evaluation of concentrations of air pollutants and depositions of HMs over the EECCA and SEE regions Ilia Ilyin, EMEP/MSC-E EMEP/MSC-E TFHM, May 14-16,
TFEIP Workshop, Istanbul, May 2013 Emissions data for of heavy metal and POP modelling Oleg Travnikov, Alexey Gusev, Ilia Ilyin, Olga Rozovskaya, Victor.
EMEP Steering Body, Geneva, 2011 Co-operation between EMEP/MSC-E and WGE Oleg Travnikov, Ilia Ilyin Meteorological Synthesizing Centre East of EMEP (EMEP/MSC-E)
30th WGE, September 2011Berit Kvaeven, chairwoman ICP Waters International Cooperative Programme on Assessment and Monitoring Effects of Air Pollution.
Air Quality trend analyses under EMEP/TFMM and link to EEA work Augustin COLETTE (INERIS), Chair of the TFMM/CLRTAP TFMM National Experts, CCC, MSC-E,
Hemispheric transport – Why is EMEP interested? Peringe Grennfelt, Jurgen Schneider.
EMEP/WGE Bureaux, March 2015 MSC-E work plan, 2015 TaskItem Calculations of HMs/POPs for b Testing of HM/POP models in the new EMEP grid1.3.4.
EMEP WGSR, EMEP Progress on HMs, 2006  Review and evaluation of the MSCE-HM model (TFMM)  Atmospheric pollution in 2004 (emissions, monitoring.
EMEP/WGE Bureau, Geneva, March 2016 Main results of Long-term trends of HMs and POPs on the basis of modeling results and measurements.
17 th TFMM Meeting, May, 2016 EMEP Case study: Assessment of HM pollution levels with fine spatial resolution in Belarus, Poland and UK Ilia Ilyin,
17 th TFMM Meeting, 17 – 20 May, 2016 Progress of HM and POP modelling: main activities and results Alexey Gusev, Ilia Ilyin, Olga Rozovskaya, Victor Shatalov,
Evaluation of pollution levels in urban areas of selected EMEP countries Alexey Gusev, Victor Shatalov Meteorological Synthesizing Centre - East.
Joint EMEP/WGE meeting, Geneva, 2016 Evaluation of B[a]P pollution in the EMEP region: temporal trends and spatial variability Alexey Gusev, Olga Rozovskaya,
Assessment of POP pollution in EMEP region
Progress in 2017 Work-plan elements
Heavy metal pollution assessment within EMEP
Joint thematic session on B(a)P pollution: main activities and results
Extended Bureaux EMEP & WGE, Geneva March 21th 2017
ICP waters; use of data from EMEP …and some results Brit Lisa Skjelkvåle and Heleen de Wit Norwegian Institute for Water Research.
Overview of country-specific studies of heavy metal and POP pollution
Model assessment of heavy metal pollution from global to local scales
Heavy metal pollution assessment within EMEP
EMEP case study on heavy metal pollution assessment:
POPs and HMs Summary , EMEP TFMM.
Alexey Gusev, Victor Shatalov, Olga Rozovskaya, Nadejda Vulyh
10th TFMM meeting, June, 2009, France, Paris
10th TFMM meeting, June, 2009, France, Paris
ENEA, National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable
EMEP Case study: Assessment of HM pollution levels with fine spatial resolution in Belarus, Poland and UK Ilia Ilyin, Olga Rozovskaya, Oleg Travnikov.
The Heavy Metal Case study for the Netherlands
MSC-E contribution concerning heavy metals
Use of non-Party estimates in EMEP modelling: HMs and POPs
9th CAFE Steering Group meeting
Progress and problems of POP modelling
Uncertainties of heavy metal pollution assessment
EMEP case studies on HMs: State of the art
Heavy metal emissions, measurements and needs for modelling in Croatia
Case study lead concentration & deposition in the Netherlands
Model uncertainties because of inconsistencies of emissions
Trend analysis of contamination in the EMEP region by HMs & POPs
Research of heavy metal pollution on regional (EMEP) and national (Germany) scales Ilyin I, Travnikov O. EMEP/MSC-E.
Multi-scale approach to HM and POP modelling
Trend analysis for HMs and POPs
Emissions What are the most sensitive parameters in emissions to improve model results (chemical species, spatio-temporal resolution, spatial distribution,
Oleg Travnikov EMEP/MSC-E
Ilyin I., Travnikov O., Varygina M.
Model assessment of HM and POP pollution of the EECCA region
Comparison of model results with measurements
Heavy Metal Case Study for the Netherlands
Atmospheric modelling of HMs Sensitivity study
Assessment of heavy metal pollution within EMEP
Presentation transcript:

29 th TF meeting of the ICP-Vegetation, March, 2016, Dubna, Russia ANALYSIS OF LONG-TERM TRENDS OF ATMOSPHERIC HEAVY METAL POLLUTION IN THE EMEP COUNTRIES BASED ON MOSS SURVEY DATA AND MODELING RESULTS Ilia Ilyin EMEP/MSC-E

29 th TF meeting of the ICP-Vegetation, March, 2016, Dubna, Russia - in air - wet deposition - collocated Data for the analysis of trends for Modelled deposition in the EMEP region (Pb, Cd, Hg) 2. Observed and modelled data at monitoring stations Selection of stations: data available from to (Pb, Cd) from 1995 to (Hg) Pb, Cd Hg

29 th TF meeting of the ICP-Vegetation, March, 2016, Dubna, Russia Evaluation of modelling results against monitoring data (all stations, ) Rcor = 0.73 Bias = -14% Rcor = 0.50 Bias = -51% Rcor = 0.69 Bias = +28% Pb, wet dep. Hg, wet dep. Cd, wet dep.

29 th TF meeting of the ICP-Vegetation, March, 2016, Dubna, Russia Trends: Changes in the whole EMEP domain Long-term trends of Pb, Cd, Hg deposition ( ) Total reduction: 78%Total reduction: 53%Total reduction: 23% DepositionTrend

29 th TF meeting of the ICP-Vegetation, March, 2016, Dubna, Russia Trends: Changes in the whole EMEP domain Long-term trends of Pb, Cd, Hg deposition ( ) AnthropRe-suspensionnon-EMEP Total reduction: 78%Total reduction: 53%Total reduction: 23%

29 th TF meeting of the ICP-Vegetation, March, 2016, Dubna, Russia Reductions of pollution levels in the EMEP countries mean median 25 th percentile 75 th percentile 5 th percentile minimum maximum 95 th percentile

29 th TF meeting of the ICP-Vegetation, March, 2016, Dubna, Russia Peculiarities of HM trends in particular countries  Fast reduction rate in  Low reduction rate after 2000  Almost uniform reduction rate  Slow decline in the beginning of the period  Stabilization or slow increase in the end of the period

29 th TF meeting of the ICP-Vegetation, March, 2016, Dubna, Russia HM sites EMEP monitoring stations (2010) Why do we need data on concentrations in mosses?

29 th TF meeting of the ICP-Vegetation, March, 2016, Dubna, Russia EMEP monitoring stations + moss measurements HM sites wider spatial coverage more detailed spatial resolution Measurements in mosses provide: Why do we need data on concentrations in mosses?

29 th TF meeting of the ICP-Vegetation, March, 2016, Dubna, Russia Data involved in the study Data used:  Concentrations of HMs (Pb, Cd, Hg) in mosses (surveys of 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010); provided by experts from ICP-Vegetations  Modelled deposition of HMs for Compared parameters:  Spatial distributions of HMs deposition and of concentrations in mosses in individual countries (correlation)  Long-term trends Data processing:  Concentrations in mosses are averaged over EMEP 50-km grid cells  Deposition values averaged over 3 years preceding each moss survey

29 th TF meeting of the ICP-Vegetation, March, 2016, Dubna, Russia Selection of area for analysis of long-term trends, Pb Grid-cell averaged Pb concentrations in mosses surveyed in

29 th TF meeting of the ICP-Vegetation, March, 2016, Dubna, Russia Long-term trends of lead and cadmium in the selected region for period Area, selected for analysis of trends (Pb, Cd) Reductions (1990/2010) Deposition 79 % Conc. in mosses 82 % Deposition 56 % Conc. in mosses 53 %

29 th TF meeting of the ICP-Vegetation, March, 2016, Dubna, Russia Area, selected for analysis of trends (Hg) Reductions (1995/2010) Deposition 14% Conc. in mosses 16% Long-term trends of mercury in the selected region for period

29 th TF meeting of the ICP-Vegetation, March, 2016, Dubna, Russia Long-term trends in particular countries Regions involved in analysis of trends

29 th TF meeting of the ICP-Vegetation, March, 2016, Dubna, Russia Changes of pollution levels (Pb) in the EMEP countries

29 th TF meeting of the ICP-Vegetation, March, 2016, Dubna, Russia Changes of pollution levels (Cd) in the EMEP countries

29 th TF meeting of the ICP-Vegetation, March, 2016, Dubna, Russia Changes of pollution levels (Hg) in the EMEP countries

29 th TF meeting of the ICP-Vegetation, March, 2016, Dubna, Russia Spatial distribution of changes of lead deposition and concentrations in mosses

29 th TF meeting of the ICP-Vegetation, March, 2016, Dubna, Russia Spatial distribution of changes of lead deposition and concentrations in mosses Reduction (%) of modelled total deposition Reduction (%) of observed conc. in mosses

29 th TF meeting of the ICP-Vegetation, March, 2016, Dubna, Russia Modelled and observed Pb wet deposition and concentrations in mosses in particular grid points in

29 th TF meeting of the ICP-Vegetation, March, 2016, Dubna, Russia Spatial distribution of changes of Cd deposition and concentrations in mosses

29 th TF meeting of the ICP-Vegetation, March, 2016, Dubna, Russia Spatial distribution of changes of Cd deposition and concentrations in mosses Reduction (%) of modelled total deposition Reduction (%) of observed conc. in mosses

29 th TF meeting of the ICP-Vegetation, March, 2016, Dubna, Russia % % Changes of calculated deposition emissions of Cd for Deposition change Emission change

29 th TF meeting of the ICP-Vegetation, March, 2016, Dubna, Russia Conclusions  Data on measured concentrations of HMs in mosses is important supplementary information for analysis of pollution levels and their trends in the EMEP region, especially in areas with scarce monitoring network.  Long-term trends of modeled total deposition and concentrations of heavy metals in mosses agree reasonably well. Both deposition and concentrations in mosses demonstrate similar relative reduction for period 1990 – 2010 for Europe as a whole and in most of individual countries.  Lead, cadmium and mercury pollution levels in the EMEP region reduced for by 78, 53 and 23%, respectively. In particular countries the reduction may differ significantly from the EMEP-mean value.  The presented results were obtained in tight cooperation between EMEP and experts from WGE (ICP-Vegetation). Further cooperation between EMEP and WGE is appreciated, in particular, for joint analysis of discrepancies between concentrations in mosses and modelled deposition.

29 th TF meeting of the ICP-Vegetation, March, 2016, Dubna, Russia

Trends in individual countries

29 th TF meeting of the ICP-Vegetation, March, 2016, Dubna, Russia Reduction (%) of total deposition Reduction (%) of conc. in mosses Spatial distribution of changes of lead deposition and concentrations in mosses

29 th TF meeting of the ICP-Vegetation, March, 2016, Dubna, Russia Trends: Changes in the whole EMEP domain Long-term trends of Pb, Cd, Hg deposition ( ) Total reduction: 23% Total reduction: 53% Total reduction: 78%