Community: the Chicago School
Social Darwinism Popular intellectual fashion in late C19th early C20th USA Treated social and economic competition as “natural” Connected to eugenics: preserving the race
Social Darwinism Suggested that those groups which dominated society, economy somehow deserved it
Chicago School University of Chicago emerging in the 1890s as an innovative research centre Chicago a new kind of city Application of new ideas
Chicago School UofC Philosophy programme: John Dewey as leading influence Strong on pragmatism Influenced by Darwin’s ideas on evolution
Chicago School University Settlement House Jane Addams and Ellen Starr lead Hull House programme to aid the poor immigrant
Chicago School of Human Ecology Ernest W Burgess Robert Ezra Park Roderick D McKenzie
"The human community may be considered as an ecological product" -- Roderick Mckenzie 1923
Park on Community Community results from competition with other social groups for living space Size, resources, location, internal organization Internal workings and institutions
Park, Burgess, and McKenzie (1925) The City
Burgess concentric ring model
Traffic jam 1910
Old Park triangle
Chicago Astor St
Michigan Ave 1910
1910
1920 Chicago River
23rd St Tracks 1907
Chicago 1934
Maxwell & Jefferson 1905
12th & Jefferson 1905
Stockyards district 1904
1912
31st St 1910
Tenement 1910
Stockyard strike 1904
Kenilworth Ave 1925
Lakeshore Dr 1905
Lincoln Park 1907
Oak Park
Social Ecology Competition people compete for living space in the city, like plants and animals in a jungle
Social Ecology Ecological dominance some groups, and land uses achieve dominance over others analogous to ecological dominance
Social Ecology Invasion & succession social groups can colonize new areas, and create the conditions for other groups to invade like plant communities
Critique Developed for early C20th Chicago, but does not apply in other places/times. 1920s Chicago a city of the streetcar and the El
The El 1915
Homer Hoyt 1930s Expert on real-estate and land economics Designed shopping plazas By 1930s arterial highways beginning to distort rings into sectors and wedges Sector model
Harris & Ullman 1945 Ullman 1940s freeways in LA lead to the Multiple nuclei model
Harris & Ullman 1945
Critique Competition represented as a process of “natural”. Makes capitalism seem “natural” Makes racism seem “natural”
Critique Race, ethnicity etc., treated as “natural” categories, not social constructions.
Critique Residential areas treated as if they have uniform social character actually more diverse Shows ignorance of subsequent critics Park, Burgess, McKenzie knew the city to be diverse
1910
Critique Implied moral judgements Valentine plays the same game too Burgess et al viewed middle-class white heterosexual households as normal, everyone else as deviant Valentine plays the same game too
Critique Humans do not behave like plant communities
Critique Represents power as a product of “natural” competitive processes Discourages more serious consideration of power in the urban landscape
Legacy Classic urban models (Burgess concentric ring etc.,) Continue to fascinate
Mike Davis (1992) Ecology of fear
Legacy The term “ecological” in sociology Schools of Social Ecology ecological correlation ecological fallacy Schools of Social Ecology
Social Ecology grads at a California university