Certified Evaluation Orientation Teachers & Other Professionals

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Advertisements

Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Performance Based Teacher Evaluation March 10, 2006.
PGES SUMMER ADMINISTRATOR’S TRAINING 2014 Mark & Debbie.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
© 2013, KDE and KASA. All rights reserved. TEACHER PROFESSIONAL GROWTH AND EFFECTIVENESS SYSTEM What the year holds.
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES/OPGES Does NOT Apply Certified Evaluation Orientation For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Requirements PCBOE 8/5/2015.
CERTIFIED EVALUATION PLAN TRAINING FOR TEACHERS August 2015 ©2015 Harlan Independent School District.
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Principal Professional Growth & Effectiveness System Certified Evaluation Orientation Principal Professional Growth & Effectiveness System LaRue County.
Barren County Schools CERTIFIED EVALUATION PLAN
Welcome to todays session!  Please take a moment to check your connection and audio settings.  If this is your first time using LYNC please see the resources.
Certified Evaluation Orientation August 19, 2011.
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Teacher Appraisal and Development System Update Training HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Certified Evaluation Orientation Non-Principal Administrative Certified Staff July 20, 2015 Complete Plan posted on District Website
For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES Does NOT Apply Certified Evaluation Orientation For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES.
Fleming County Schools July  OneDrive Documentation System Certified Evaluation Professional Learning & EILA  Certified Evaluation Schedules (Drafts)
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Educator Supervision and Evaluation Clarke and Diamond MS September 2013.
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Professional Growth & Effectiveness System for Teachers & Other Professionals Certified Evaluation Orientation Professional Growth & Effectiveness System.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Doreen Griffeth, Director.
MSBSD Educator Evaluation
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Certified Evaluation Orientation Professional Growth & Effectiveness System for Teachers & Other Professionals LaRue County Schools Opening Day, 2017.
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Evaluation of Tenure-Accruing Faculty
SOESD’s Teacher Evaluation & Support System
Rockingham County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation Process
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
Evaluations All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. The most important.
Certified Evaluation Orientation For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES/OPGES Does NOT Apply LaRue County Schools Opening Day, 2017 Complete.
Teacher Evaluation System
CAEP Orientation: Newcomers
Certified Evaluation Orientation
Alternative Education Programs
Evaluations All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. The most important.
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
Evaluations Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Teacher Evaluation Training
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY
MSBSD Educator Evaluation
Evaluations Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Evaluations Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Owatonna Public Schools Teacher Development PLAN (TDE)
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Resident Educator Program
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
Certified Evaluation Orientation for Administrators
PUBLIC SCHOOL CHOICE RENEWAL PROCESS
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
Pike County Schools Certified Evaluation Annual Training
END-OF-YEAR EVALUATIONS
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Special Education District Validation Review (DVR) Team Member Training and School Preparation Information
Certified Evaluation Plan
Presentation transcript:

Certified Evaluation Orientation Teachers & Other Professionals LaRue County Schools Opening Day, 2018 Complete Plan and forms posted on the District Website http://www.larue.kyschools.us/Content2/plans

Notes for 2018-2019 Amendments to Action Research Project Form Elimination of Student Voice Survey Elimination of Peer Observation for evaluation plan purposes, however, peer observation is still encouraged in our schools REVISED Forms are posted on district website No KTIP this year Teachers and Other Professionals use different “frameworks”, however the evaluation process is similar. Differences are noted in the Certified Evaluation plan and this orientation document

Orientation Orientation by the end of the first 30 calendar days of employment Staff must sign and date certifying completion of Orientation.

Tenure & Cycles Non-Tenured Certified Staff Tenured Certified Staff One to Four Years in LaRue Co. OR First Year in LaRue Co., but came to us Tenured from another KY District Tenured Certified Staff More than Four Years in LaRue Co. OR More than One Year in LaRue Co., but came to us Tenured from another KY District One-Year Cycle Teacher/Other Prof. Non-Tenured OR Tenured, but identified for a one-year summative cycle (pg. 9) Three-Year Cycle Teacher/Other Prof. Tenured teachers who have been identified for a three-year summative cycle (pg. 9)

Kentucky Framework for Teaching—pg. 13 Separate framework for teachers, guidance counselors, library/media specialists, speech pathologists Pre-School uses Teacher Framework + “Pre-School Guidance” companion document Domains DOMAIN 1: Planning & Preparation DOMAIN 2: T - Classroom Environment Other Prof. - “The Environment” DOMAIN 3: T - Instruction Other Prof. - “Delivery of Services” DOMAIN 4: Professional Responsibilities

Sources of evidence, Framework, & Multiple Measure Alignment—PG. 14

Sources of Evidence For Personnel Decisions Self-Reflection Professional Growth Plan Supervisor Observation Other Professional may be site visit Other Products of Practice Letters & Memos Action Research Project (REVISED)

Timeline, 18-19

Timeline Exceptions, pg. 11 Observation windows, timelines, and other requirements may be adjusted by the primary supervisor in special circumstances where the evaluatee has been absent due to extenuating circumstances or is a late hire. Supervisor completes the Modified CEP Timeline for Teachers & Other Professionals (Appendix A) within 10 working days of the evaluatee’s return to work. Superintendent/designee should approve the form and notify the evaluatee within 5 additional working days.

Appendix A

Self-Reflection—pg. 15 Developed and submitted by the end of the 1st quarter Completed using paper forms in Appendix B Teacher, pg 47-48 Counselor, pg 49-50 Library/Media, pg 51-52 Therapeutic Specialist, pg 53-54 Forms include 2 boxes for on-going reflection throughout the year Self-Reflection is required for ALL teachers & other professionals every year

Professional Growth Plans—pg. 15 Developed and approved by the end of the 1st quarter Completed using paper form—Appendix C Same form for all teachers & other professionals Includes space for on-going reflection and summative reflection Reviewed by summative conference or closing day Must align with school or district improvement plans (CSIP or CDIP) Professional Growth Plan are required for ALL teachers & other professionals every year

Supervisor Observations— pg. 16-18 Supervisor Mini Supervisor Full Unscheduled No Pre-Conference Observation 20-30 min Post-Conference within 5 working days 1 Yr Cycle: In Person 3 Yr Cycle: Electronic Scheduled Pre-Conference using Pre-Conference form, Appendix D Electronic Observation Full Class (45 min) Post-Conference within 5 working days In Person Observation Evidence Entered on “Supervisor Observation & Summative” Forms—Appendix E

Other Professional Site Visit Model—pg. 16 Option for other professionals who do not regularly “teach classes” Observation of duties and discussion of activities May choose with supervisor to use traditional observation model, site visit model or combination

Same form used for observation or other professional site visit model

Supervisor Obs.—pg. 16-18 Supervisor Mini Supervisor Full 1 Yr Cycle 1 Mini after 1st 30 days & prior to end of 2nd Nine Weeks 3 Yr Cycle—Year 1 1 Mini after 1st 30 days & prior to last 14 instructional days 3 Yr Cycle—Year 2 3 Yr Cycle—Year 3 No Mini 1 Yr Cycle 1 Full during 3rd or 4th Nine Weeks 3 Yr Cycle—Yr 1 & 2 No full observation 3 Yr Cycle—Year 3 1 Full after the 1st 30 days

Supervisor Training—pg. 18-20 Observations may not be completed until the supervisor successfully completes Initial Certification (Year 1) Calibration (Each Year After) If your supervisor does not successfully complete training requirements, another observer will be assigned. The supervisor will observe with them.

Action Research Project, pg. 20-21 Replaces Local Student Growth Goal One of the multiple measures for overall evaluation decisions Teachers and other professionals complete one action research project annually Anything you have used in the past for SGG will still work for ARP, but the ARP opens up more choice and flexibility for you

Action Research Project, pg. 20-21 Classroom Action Research is a method of finding out what works best in your own classroom so you can improve student learning. Action research is either research initiated to solve an immediate problem or a reflective process of progressive problem solving led by individuals working with others in teams or as part of a "community of practice" to improve the way they address issues and solve problems.

Action Research Project—pg. 20-21 ALL Teachers & Other Professionals Choose skills/standards you know your students need to improve Yearlong enduring skill OR skills within a specific unit Choose one or more classes to participate in the ARP ALL students enrolled in those classes will participate Class choice(s) must include at least 10 students whenever possible Develop an Action Plan for what you’re going to do to help students improve

Action Research Project—pg. 20-21 ALL Teachers & Other Professionals Develop assessments that will be used for pre- and post-data Could be a single measure or multiple measures Mid-point assessment is optional A rubric is required to define your ratings and to define “proficiency” based on grade level standards PLCs will review ARP’s together to provide feedback/clarity prior to supervisor approval

Action Research Project—pg. 20-21 ALL Teachers & Other Professionals Timeline: By September 30, meet with supervisor to approve your ARP using the ARP form (Appendix F). If you want to choose a unit that starts prior to Sept 30 you may do so, but you would have to meet with your supervisor early. ARP must be something that can be completed by the end of the 3rd nine weeks (typically mid-March)

Action Research Project—pg. 20-21 ALL Teachers & Other Professionals

Action Research Project—pg. 20-21 ALL Teachers & Other Professionals

Action Research Project—pg. 20-21 ALL Teachers & Other Professionals Pre-assess students, listing ratings for each student on the ARP Tracking Sheet (App. G)

Action Research Project—pg. 20-21 ALL Teachers & Other Professionals Teach the content, following through with your action plan After instruction is complete, post-assess students using your approved rubric and record your final ratings on the same ARP Tracking Sheet, including final % Proficient (Appendix G)

Action Research Project—pg. 20-21 ALL Teachers & Other Professionals Complete page 2 of the ARP Form Post-Project Reflection Next Steps Post-ARP conference with supervisor. Reflective conversation about your results & next steps. Supervisor uses pg. 3 of the ARP Form for notes to be used in your next summative evaluation For next summative evaluation, supervisor will use evidence from the ARP as one of the multiple sources of evidence when determining domain ratings

Action Research Project pg. 20-21 Notes for Specialized Groups LCMS Related Arts Due to NW rotation, full ARP process during 2nd or 3rd NW. May be 1st NW if it’s a later unit Intervention Teachers & Special Education Teachers If you are co-teaching all students in the class must be included in the ARP, not just your caseload students. You can choose to work together with your co-teaching partner on the same ARP or work separately. If working together, the Action Plan must be specific to your actions. Alternative Settings Published KDE SGG Guidance for Alternative settings may be used to provide additional alternatives when appropriate (behavior rather than academic goals, etc.). “Alternative settings” = The Life Connection, The N.E.S.T., or specialized units

Action Research Project pg. 20-21 Notes for Specialized Groups Pre-School Published KDE SGG Guidance for pre-school may still be used to provide alternatives when appropriate (social & emotional goals, etc.) Other Professionals For other professionals who do not teach a consistent group of students regularly, published KDE SGG Guidance for OPGES may be used to provide alternatives when appropriate. A goal may be used tracking school data rather than individual student data if you and your supervisor find this to be more appropriate. Late Hires Adjusted timeline for anyone hired after Sept 1. Modified CEP Timeline (Appendix A) will be used to document any timeline adjustments

Other Products of Practice—pg. 21 program assurance evidence team-developed curriculum units lesson plans communication logs timely, targeted feedback from mini or informal observations student data records student work student formative and/or summative course evaluations/feedback minutes from PLCs teacher reflections and/or self-reflections teacher interviews teacher committee or team contributions parent engagement activities/surveys records of student and/or teacher attendance video lessons engagement in professional organizations action research student survey results state assessment results To be made available to the principal in a timely manner upon request. To be used to determine ratings for Domains in the summative year.

Letters & Memos—pg. 21 In addition to district-adopted evaluation forms, letters and memos may be used to document both outstanding performance and performance which needs improvement. Correspondence dated and signed by both parties with a copy provided to Evaluatee Conference recommended, but not required

Summative Rating—pg. 22 Deadline: May 1 1 Yr Cycle & 3 Yr Cycle in Yr 3 All formative sources of data will be completed prior to the summative conference Summative evaluation will be completed using the “Summative” tab of the Supervisor Observation & Summative Form (Appendix E); printed/signed/filed in the personnel file housed at central office Form is specific to teachers, counselors, library/media, and therapeutic specialists

Summative Rating—pg. 22

Decision Rules—pg. 23

Corrective Action Plan—pg. 24-25 A Corrective Action Plan shall be developed to assist a certified staff member who has failed to meet a district standard OR when an immediate change is required in practice or behavior. Steps in Corrective Action Administrator initiates the Corrective Action Plan process Administrator and teacher collaborate to develop the CAP Administrator and teacher develop timeline Administrator and teacher develop appraisal method for CAP Administrator evaluates improvement of performance at target date “Up to 12-Month Improvement Plan” is a CAP-pg. 25 CAP entered on PGP form (Appendix C) and clearly noted in the text that it’s a CAP

Appeal Procedure for Summative Evaluation—pg. 42-44, 100 1. Evaluatee must submit Appeal Form (Appendix U) to the chairperson of the Appeal Panel within 5 working days of receipt of the evaluation. 2. The Appeal Panel will meet to consider evidence and make a recommendation decision. Upholding all parts of the original evaluation. Voiding the original evaluation or parts of it. Ordering a new evaluation by a second certified employee who shall be a trained evaluator.

Appeal Procedure for Summative Evaluation—pg. 42-44, 100 (Cont.) 3. The Appeal Panel will make a recommendation to the Superintendent within 15 working days from the date of the filing of the Appeal. 4. All parties will be notified of the recommendation with a letter citing evidence to support the decision.