Advanced indicators Bruno Lapillonne, Vice President, Enerdata Reunión Técnica de Trabajo del Proyecto BIEE 24 – 26 de febrero, 2014, San José, Costa Rica.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Interpretation of household indicators Bruno Lapillonne, Vice President, Enerdata Reunión Técnica de Trabajo del Proyecto BIEE 24 – 26 de febrero, 2014,
Advertisements

11 Challenging the indicators Maria Rugina ICEMENERG-ROMANIA Supported by the European Commission under the ICT PS Programme Manchester, 12 th of October.
Interpretation of indicators in industry Bruno Lapillonne, Vice President, Enerdata Reunión Técnica de Trabajo del Proyecto BIEE 24 – 26 de febrero, 2014,
Interpretation of transport indicators Bruno Lapillonne, Vice President, Enerdata Reunión Técnica de Trabajo del Proyecto BIEE 24 – 26 de febrero, 2014,
DAC PROJECT Capacity Building in Balcan Countries for the Abatement of Greenhouse Gases Setting priorities for GHG emissions reduction George Mavrotas.
SAVE-ODYSSEE MONITORING TOOLS FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN EUROPE Energy efficiency index ODEX B Lapillonne,, K Pollier, Enerdata D Bosseboeuf, ADEME Septembre.
Said Chehab ALMEE Ramses Amman Workshop June 2010 Enhancement of Energy Efficiency Policies and Renewable Energy Sources in the Mediterranean region, a.
October 8, 2013 Eric Fox and Mike Russo. AGENDA »Recent Sales and Customer Trends »Preliminary State Sales and Demand Forecast »Building a No DSM Forecast.
HEATING WITHOUT GLOBAL WARMING Euroheat & Power Conference, Brussels, 5 June 2008 Calculating savings from Final to Primary Energy Tomas Bruce.
WORKING DRAFT Last Modified 8/13/2010 4:05:09 PM Central Europe Standard Time Printed :22:48 Central Europe Standard Time Seminar The role.
Interpretation of indicators on agriculture and fishing Bruno Lapillonne, Vice President, Enerdata Reunión Técnica de Trabajo del Proyecto BIEE 24 – 26.
1 European ICT network for energy efficiency Maria Rugina ICEMENERG-ROMANIA Supported by the European Commission under the ICT PS Programme ICT21-EE Inaugural.
Sofia Workshop 8 June 2007 Modelling the impact of policy and measures with MURE: The Czech Republic Case study.
CAFE baseline scenario CAFE project for Environment DG Stakeholders Meeting 27-28/05/2003 Dr. L. Mantzos E 3 M-Lab / ICCS-NTUA contact:
The contribution of electro-technologies to energy efficiency Paul Baudry, Marie-Ann Evans UIE (International Union for Electricity applications) Conference.
Assessing the Potential of Energy Efficiency Programmes in South Africa by Modelling Selected Policy Interventions Alison Hughes Energy Research Centre,
1 Dr. Christo Christov Energy Institute JSCo Sofia, Bulgaria Bulgaria GHG Emission Projections - Results and Methodological Problems Dr. Christo Christov.
1 WORKSHOP ON THE PREPARATION OF THE FOURTH NATIONAL COMMUNICATION FROM ANNEX I PARTIES Dublin, 30 September – 1 October 2004 National circumstances in.
11 Energy in Denmark Observed energy consumption and adjusted gross energy consumption.
Earth’s Changing Environment Lecture 22 Energy Conservation in Heating and Cooling.
CLIMATE CHANGE AND SME FINANCING 9 – 10 October 2013, Sofia Greenhouse gases emission assessment in SME and Household sectors – current status and tendency.
EU Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050
An Introdution of Energy Situation and Policy of ROK September 2010 Park, Jimin.
© OECD/IEA – 2011 Key Insights from IEA Indicator Analysis ENERGY INDICATORS Efficient Power Generation 2011 Roundtable 4: Efficient use of energy in the.
College of Management & Economics, Tianjin University Projections of energy services demand for residential buildings: Insights from a bottom-up methodology.
Energy balances in Sweden Per Anders Paulson Swedish Energy Agency.
TRIBRID CONCEPT FOR ENERGY REDISTRIBUTION WITHIN TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS By Lev Britvin & Boris Schapiro ICSAT 2010, TRIBRID CONCEPT, February 26, 2010,
Domestic Energy Demand: Projections to 2030 Diana Dixon.
An Introduction to Energy. Why do we care? 1. Fossil fuels are finite a fuel (as coal, oil, or natural gas) formed in the earth from plant or animal.
1 N.K. Tovey ( 杜伟贤 ) M.A, PhD, CEng, MICE, CEnv Н.К.Тови М.А., д-р технических наук Energy Science Director CRed Project HSBC Director of Low Carbon Innovation.
The cement - EU ETS Kaleidoscope Holcim Group Support Bruno Vanderborght Vice President Environmental Strategy Holcim Group Paris, 05 September 2006.
DAC PROJECT Capacity Building in Balcan Countries for the Abatement of Greenhouse Gases Setting priorities for GHG emissions’ reduction George Mavrotas.
LIEN – Reporting Energy & CO 2 Emissions for Carbon Tax and Emissions Trading. Fuel Use and Distribution in Ireland.
Interpretation of macro indicators of energy intensities Bruno Lapillonne, Vice President, Enerdata Reunión Técnica de Trabajo del Proyecto BIEE 24 – 26.
ESCM Chapter 7 Martin Howley. Overview Background Responses Outline Issues Emissions Decomposition analysis.
Energy Systems AnalysisArnulf Grubler Energy Data A brief summary.
Energy Conservation Physics /24/03. Reducing energy consumption may help alleviate environmental problems: Conserve fossil fuel resources Reduce.
Industrial Energy Consumption.Anna Martin. 24 th February 2005.
Canada’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions Kyoto and Beyond.
Energy sector Special sector: –Depend on energy inputs (imported) –Strategic sector (linkages) –Non-competitive markets, high regulation Liberalization.
© OECD/IEA INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY Worldwide Trends in Energy Use and Efficiency Key Insights from IEA Indicator Analysis ENERGY INDICATORS.
Interpretation of energy efficiency indicators from BIEE Bruno Lapillonne, Vice President, Enerdata Reunión Técnica de Trabajo del Proyecto BIEE 24 – 26.
Efficiency in industry through electro-technologies Paul Baudry, EDF / R&D The future of Energy in Enlarged Europe, Warsaw 7-8th october 2004.
Oliver Schaefer Policy Advisor EREC - European Renewable Energy Council Renewable Energy Development and Prospects – an Industry Point of View
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Energy statistics, part 2 Production and use of energy 1 Business statistics and registers.
11 Energy in Denmark Observed energy consumption and adjusted gross energy consumption.
Domestic Demand Victoria Roberts February 24 th 2005.
A Closer Look at Energy Demands: Quantification and Characterisation.
0 Primary energy factors for electricity in buildings Edith Molenbroek, Eva Stricker, Thomas Boermans September 22 nd, 2011.
© OECD/IEA 2011 Indicator 25: Final Energy Consumption United Nations Economic Commission for Europe 30 October – 1 November 2012, Geneva Anna Zyzniewski.
Climate Action Meeting the EU’s Kyoto commitments & Avoiding a gap after 2012 Doha, 27 November 2012 Paolo CARIDI Policy Coordinator DG Climate Action.
Update On The ROK Energy Sector and The ROK LEAP Model May 13, 2005.
Renewable Energy Statistics Keep-on-Track! 1 st Policy Workshop 23 January
Domestic Energy Consumption A Projection to 2030 Mark Fessy 24 th February 2005.
How Carbon Intensity Effects Kaya. Population 2014 Population Growth Rates USA:.77 Definition: The average annual percent change in the population, resulting.
The Second Capacity Building Workshop on “Low Carbon Development and Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions” Alternative Policy Scenarios For Renewable.
PRELIMINARY DRAFT EXCERPT RECOMMENDATIONS ON MEASUREMENT AND VERIFICATION METHODS IN THE FRAMEWORK OF DIRECTIVE 2006/32/EC ON ENERGY END-USE EFFICIENCY.
Workshop on the Criteria to establish projections scenarios Sectoral projection guidance: Residential and services Mario Contaldi, TASK-GHG Emanuele Peschi,
International Energy Workshop Venice, June Energy and CO 2 Efficiency in the European Manufacturing Sector: A Decomposition Analysis Dirk.
World Energy and Environmental Outlook to 2030
EMEES bottom-up case application 5: Energie-efficiënt cold appliences and washing machines An example of the use of a standardised calculation method.
Gestão de Energia: 2016/17 Energy Analysis: Process Analysis (cont.)
Energy Policy Statistical Support Unit
Achievable savings in the medium to long term B .Lapillonne Enerdata
Energy Technology Policy Progress and Way Forward
Energy in Denmark 2014 Danish Energy Agency.
Energy Efficiency and Renewables role in the future energy needs
An integrated assessment model: the global CLEWS
What's new on energy efficiency at DG ENERGY in 2016
The EEA’s energy efficiency index
Presentation transcript:

Advanced indicators Bruno Lapillonne, Vice President, Enerdata Reunión Técnica de Trabajo del Proyecto BIEE 24 – 26 de febrero, 2014, San José, Costa Rica

Outline 1.Energy efficiency index 2.Energy savings 3.Decomposition of power sector consumption

How energy efficiency progress is measured in ODYSSEE? 3 Progress in energy efficiency for final consumers is measured in ODYSSEE through an indicator, called ODEX, that is as much as possible cleaned from structural changes or other factors that have nothing to do with energy efficiency (e.g. increase in comfort or in equipment ownership, structural changes in industry, climate variations from one year to the other) For each end-use sector (industry, transport, households, services), energy efficiency progress is measured at a detailed level by sub-sector (or end- use, or mode of transport), through reduction in specific energy consumption measured in physical units, to get an energy efficiency index by sector. Energy efficiency progress is then evaluated at the level of the whole economy by weighting energy efficiency progress of each end-use sector, on the basis of their share in the final energy consumption.  ODEX (“ODYSSEE energy efficiency index”)

How ODEX is calculated for each sector? 4 ODEX by sector is calculated from unit consumption trends by sub – sector (or end-use or mode of transport ) o By aggregation of unit consumption indices by sub-sector in one index for the sector on the basis of the current weight of each sub-sector in the sector’s energy consumption; o Unit consumption by sub-sector are expressed in different physical units so as to be as close as possible to energy efficiency evaluation : toe/ m2, toe/employee, kWh/appliance, toe/ton, litre/100km,… ODEX is calculated on the basis of up to 35 sub- sectors (up to 7 modes in transport, 9 end-uses for households, 14 branches in industry and 5 sub-sectors in services.

Energy efficiency index (ODEX) for final consumers (EU-27) 5  ODEX= 88 in 2010  12% energy efficiency improvement between 2000 and  Regular and larger gains for households (1.6%/year).  No progress for industry since the beginning of the economic crisis (1.2%/year until 2007)  Lower progress for transport (0.9%/year), due to negative savings for the transport of goods since the economic crisis. ODEX calculated as a 3 years moving average to avoid short term fluctuations (imperfect climatic corrections, behavioural factors, business cycles). Services not included due to the difficulty of measuring energy savings. ODEX indicators: case of EU averaage ESD

Energy efficiency improvement for final consumers in EU countries 6 Energy efficiency improvement from ODEX can also be expressed in %/year to assess the average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements; 12% energy efficiency improvement between 2000 and 2010 at EU level means an average rate of improvement of 1.2%/year; Rate of annual energy efficiency progress based on ODEX

Energy efficiency index for industry  Evaluation carried out at the level of up to 14 branches, of which 3 energy intensive branches: steel, cement and pulp & paper.  For each branch energy efficiency improvement is measured from the decrease of the specific energy consumption expressed in terms of energy used  per ton produced for energy intensive products (steel, cement, glass and paper)  per unit of production index for the other branches

Around 25% progress in energy efficiency in industry in the EU-27 since 1990; slow progression since 1998 (1,4 %/year compared to 2.2%/year from 1990 to 1998) Not all branches are shown for sake of clarity Trends in ODEX in industry (EU-27)

Energy efficiency index: principle of calculation : 1 Calculation of indices by branch and weighting Energy ratios Chemicals (toe/100) (index) 8.5 (100) 8.3 (98) 8.2 (96) 8.2 (96) Steel (toe/tonne) (index) 0.30 (100) 0.29 (97) 0.26 (87) 0.25 (83) Energy consumption (weight) Chemicals (Mtoe) (%) 20 (50) 20 (48) 20 (44) 22 (46) Steel ( Mtoe) (%) 20 (50) 22 (52) 25 (56) 26 (54)

Energy efficiency index: principle of calculation: 2 Calculation of sector index (year t-1 as reference) Energy efficiency index Chemicals Steel Total 10097,490,988,6 IE 91 = IE 1990 x (98 x x 0.52) = 97,4 IE 92 = IE 1991 x (96/98 x /97 x 0.56) = 90.9 IE 93 = IE 1990 x (96/96 x /87 x 0.54) = 88,6  gains of 11.4% in 1993 compared to 1990

Energy efficiency index for households Calculated on 8 end-uses/appliances : heating, water heating, cooking, 5 large appliances (refrigerators, freezers, washing machine, dishwashers and TV) Indicators used:  Heating: unit consumption per m2 at normal climate (toe/m2) (per dwelling equivalent with central heating)  Water heating: unit consumption per dwelling with water heating  Cooking: unit consumption per dwelling  Large elec. appliances: specific consumption per appliance (kWh/year)

Energy efficiency progress for households in the EU-27 ODEX is an index weighting the energy efficiency progress for 8 end-uses/appliances.  Energy efficiency improved by 20% over the period , ie by 1.9%/year;  Since 1990 the improvement reaches 31% (or about 1.6%/year).  The efficiency improvement for heating reaches 20% since 2000 and 14% for large electrical appliances 12

Outline 1.ODEX 2.Energy savings 3.Decomposition of of power sector consumption

How to measure energy savings  Two methods that are equivalent can be used to calculate energy savings by sector (in ktoe or GWh):  Sum the energy savings for each sub-sector (or end-use);  Direct calculation at sector level with ODEX indicator

15 Calculation of energy savings by end-use or sub-sector : example of refrigerators  The savings are given by the reduction in the specific consumption, in kWh/year for refrigerators or liters/100 km for cars.  A reduction of the average specific consumption of the refrigerator 'stock from 400 to 300 kWh per year in a country with 2 million of refrigerators will result in total electricity savings equal to 100 GWh in 2007 compared to 1990.

Calculation of energy savings by sub-sector: case of cement industry  Definition : at the level of an industrial branch i, energy savings are calculated from the variation of the consumption Ei due to a reduction in the specific energy consumption Ei/Qi between year t and a base year, as : Qt*(Eit/Qit-Eio/Qio) (Qi= output)  Example: case of energy savings in cement production between 1990 and 2010 – 1990 : Consumption : 0.85 Mtoe; production 10 Mt and specific energy consumption 0,085 toe/tonne – 2010: Consumption : 1.2 Mtoe; production 15 Mt and 0,08 toe/tonne Energy savings 15* (0,085- 0,08)= Mtoe

Calculation of energy sector directly at sector level with ODEX Energy Savings (ES) can be directly derived from ODEX ODEX is equal to the ratio between the energy consumption at year t (E) and a fictive consumption that would have happened without energy savings (ES): ODEX=E/(E+ES)*100  ES = E x ((100/ODEX)-1) If energy consumption = 50 Mtoe and ODEX =80  Energy savings =50* ((100/80)-1)=12.5 Mtoe

Mtoe Energy savings fro households (EU-27)  Energy savings for households exceeded 70 Mtoe since 2000 : without energy efficiency improvement, the energy consumption would have been 70 Mtoe higher in 2012, ie the equivalent of the total consumption for water heating, electrical appliances and lighting;

Evaluation of energy savings for final consumers (EU-27) 19 About 120 Mtoe energy savings in 2010 compared to 2000 (i.e. 12% of final energy consumption). In other words without energy savings the final energy consumption would have been 12% higher in Around 40% of total savings in households, 31% for industry, 29% for transport Indicators of energy savings

Outline 1.ODEX 2.Energy savings 3.Decomposition of power sector consumption

Principles of the decomposition of the power sector Three main effects explain the variation of the net consumption for power generation over a period*:  The increased consumption of electricity, that all things being equal, contribute to increase the losses in power generation;  Changes in the power mix between different sources with very different efficiencies o wind, hydro, PVs (100% efficiency); o Thermal (between 30 and 50% depending on fuel mix and technology); o geothermal and nuclear (respectively 10% and 33%);  Variation in the efficiency of thermal power generation * net consumption for power generation= sum of input and outputs for electricity generation

Decomposition of consumption for power generation: effects of increased electricity consumption Mtoe + 1,6 Mtoe The increase in the electricity consumption (+1,6 Mtoe) translates into a much larger consumption in the power sector (+ 4 Mtoe); Efficiency and power mix assumed constant and equal to 40%

Principles of the decomposition of the power sector (cont’d) 23  Apart from the effect of the increased consumption of electricity, the actual consumption of the power sector is in addition depending on changes in the power mix % (power mix effect) and changes in the efficiency of thermal power generation (efficiency effect).  These two effects are calculated as the difference between the actual consumption of the power sector in 2010 and a fictive consumption : o at 1990 power mix and 2010 power efficiency for the power mix effect o At 1990 efficiency and 2010 power mix for the efficiency effect

Decomposition of consumption for power generation: effect of changes in power mix and thermal efficiency Mtoe The increase in the electricity consumption increased consumption in the power sector by 4 Mtoe all things being equal; the actual variation in the power sector consumption is lower (3 Mtoe) due to savings from changes in power mix (0,7 Mtoe) and efficiency gains in thermal power generation (0,3 Mtoe) -0.7 Mtoe -0.3 Mtoe + 3 Mtoe

The increasing share of thermal power generation between 2005 and 2011 in Costa Rica from 3 to 9% contributed to increase the power sector consumption, and thus the primary energy consumption by around 800 ktoe, all things being equal. The increase of the thermal power generation efficiency from 31 to 37% resulted in marginal savings (40ktoe) due to te low share of thermal power.

Power sector consumption variation (-6.6 Mtoe) In Spain, the primary consumption increased much less than the final consumption (- 4,4 Mtoe), due to significant savings in the power sector (9,3 Mtoe), of which 5,2 Mtoe due to increased efficiency of thermal power generation (penetration of CCGT) and 4.1 Mtoe due to a rapid penetration of wind and solar; these savings were partially offset by the increased consumption of electricity that contributed to raise the consumption of the power sector by 2,7 Mtoe -4,4 Mtoe 2,2 Mtoe

Decomposition of the final energy consumption variation  A decomposition can be carried out for each main end-use sector (industry, transport, household and services... As shown for electrical appliances in the household sector.  For each sector, the decomposition is calculated as the sum of the decomposition for each end-use or sub-sector, since, as we are dealing with volumes in ktoe the factors can be added

Decomposition of the final energy consumption variation  Consumption increased by 16 Mtoe between 2000 and 2010  Economic activity contributed to an increase of 122 Mtoe (of which 48 Mtoe due to traffic increase in transport, 42 Mtoe to more dwellings), the effect of which was more than offset by energy savings (128 Mtoe).  Other drivers were: structural changes (+2 Mtoe), lifestyles (18 Mtoe), climate variation ( 32 Mtoe) and other factors (mainly behavioural changes; 26 Mtoe). Drivers of the variation of the final energy consumption in the EU between 2000 and 2010

Decomposition of the final energy consumption variation  Primary energy consumption increased by 34 Mtoe between 2000 and 2010  More activity (including lifestyle and penetration of electricity) contributed to an increase of 172 Mtoe;  Part of the effect was offset by energy savings (162 Mtoe).  Other drivers were: climate variation (32 Mtoe) and other factors (mainly behavioural changes 26 Mtoe). Drivers of the variation of the primary energy consumption in the EU between 2000 and 2010