ENEA, National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MINNI IN THE WORLD 2010 E 2011 UTVALAMB-AIR
Advertisements

Some recent studies using Models-3 Ian Rodgers Presentation to APRIL meeting London 4 th March 2003.
The MINNI Project Italian Agency for New Technologies Energy and the Environment Long Range Transboundary Air Pollution Convention TFIAM Meeting, Amiens,
1 st Chimere workshop March 2005Stortini,Bonafe,Deserti,Minguzzi,Jongen Operational implementation of NINFA in Northern Italy ARPA Servizio IdroMeteorologico.
Title EMEP Unified model Importance of observations for model evaluation Svetlana Tsyro MSC-W / EMEP TFMM workshop, Lillestrøm, 19 October 2010.
DEA - Università degli Studi di Brescia Multi-objective optimization to select effective PM10 control policies in Northern Italy C. Carnevale, E. Pisoni,
Simulations of ozone over Israel, West Bank, and Jordan E. Weinroth, M. Luria, A. Ben-Nun, C. Emery, J. Kaplan, M. Peleg and Y. Mahrer Seagram Center for.
Atmospheric modelling activities inside the Danish AMAP program Jesper H. Christensen NERI-ATMI, Frederiksborgvej Roskilde.
Beispielbild Training Programme Air Quality Monitoring, Emission Inventory and Source Apportionment Studies Source Dispersion Modelling Andreas Kerschbaumer.
Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East.
VALIDATION OF THE MINNI ATMOSPHERIC MODEL SYSTEM (AMS) WITH THE TRISAIA FIELD CAMPAIGN DATA Gino Briganti*, Andrea Cappelletti, Luisella Ciancarella, Giuseppe.
Simulation of European emissions impacts on particulate matter concentrations in 2010 using Models-3 Rob Lennard, Steve Griffiths and Paul Sutton (RWE.
TFMM & TFEIP Workshop, Dublin, 2007 Uncertainties of heavy metal pollution assessment Oleg Travnikov EMEP/MSC-E.
The July 2003 dust storm over Italy A strong Saharan dust outbreak occurred from 15 to 19 July 2003 over Italy. The figures below show the SeaWIFS image.
1 JRC – Ispra DG JRC and EC4MACS IPTS Institute for Prospective Technology Studies - Peter Russ - Antonio Soria - Szabolc Szekeres IES Institute for Environment.
Air Quality Forecasting Bas Mijling Ronald van der A AMFIC Annual Meeting ● Beijing ● October 2008.
Mihaela Mircea 1, Massimo D'Isidoro 1, Alberto Maurizi 1, Maria Gabriella Villani 1, Andrea Buzzi 1, Sandro Fuzzi 1, Francesco Tampieri 1 Gabriele Zanini.
Regional Air Quality Plans: assessment of plan efficacy through integrated assessment modelling and other local models G. Vialetto 1, G. Calori 3, I. D’Elia.
Air Quality Forecasting in China using a regional model Bas Mijling Ronald van der A Henk Eskes Hennie Kelder.
7 th Joint TFEIP & EIONET meeting, Thessaloniki, 2006 Heavy metal modelling: Use of different emission inventories Oleg Travnikov EMEP/MSC-E.
Trend analysis of HMs and POPs on the basis of measurements and modelling data Victor Shatalov and Oleg Travnikov, MSC-E.
TEMIS user workshop, Frascati, 8-9 October 2007 TEMIS – VITO activities Felix Deutsch Koen De Ridder Jean Vankerkom VITO – Flemish Institute for Technological.
Progress of HM & POP modelling from global to country scale Ilya Ilyin, Oleg Travnikov, Victor Shatalov, Alexey Gusev Meteorological Synthesizing Centre.
Evaluation of pollution levels of lead and PCB-153 over Central Asian (CA) countries within CAPACT project (preliminary results) Ilia Ilyin, EMEP/MSC-E.
Evaluation of concentrations of air pollutants and depositions of HMs over the EECCA and SEE regions Ilia Ilyin, EMEP/MSC-E EMEP/MSC-E TFHM, May 14-16,
TFEIP Workshop, Istanbul, May 2013 Emissions data for of heavy metal and POP modelling Oleg Travnikov, Alexey Gusev, Ilia Ilyin, Olga Rozovskaya, Victor.
EMEP Steering Body, Geneva, 2011 Co-operation between EMEP/MSC-E and WGE Oleg Travnikov, Ilia Ilyin Meteorological Synthesizing Centre East of EMEP (EMEP/MSC-E)
Evaluation of Polyphemus for 2004 Janusz Zyśk, Yelva Roustan, Artur Wyrwa, Denis Quelo. Atelier Polyphemus Champs-sur-Marne, 28th October 2008.
Georgia Institute of Technology SUPPORTING INTEX THROUGH INTEGRATED ANALYSIS OF SATELLITE AND SUB-ORBITAL MEASUREMENTS WITH GLOBAL AND REGIONAL 3-D MODELS:
Introduction The indicator species are widely used to assess the sensitivity of ozone to the reduction of emissions of its two main precursors: nitrogen.
EMEP/WGE Bureaux, March 2015 MSC-E work plan, 2015 TaskItem Calculations of HMs/POPs for b Testing of HM/POP models in the new EMEP grid1.3.4.
Aerosol simulation with coupled meteorology-radiation- chemistry model WRF/Chem over Europe.
29 th TF meeting of the ICP-Vegetation, March, 2016, Dubna, Russia ANALYSIS OF LONG-TERM TRENDS OF ATMOSPHERIC HEAVY METAL POLLUTION IN THE EMEP COUNTRIES.
How official national inventory data is used as input data for EMEP models Katarina Mareckova, Robert Wankmueller CEIP - Centre on Emission Inventories.
17 th TFMM Meeting, May, 2016 EMEP Case study: Assessment of HM pollution levels with fine spatial resolution in Belarus, Poland and UK Ilia Ilyin,
Albert Oliver, Raúl Arasa, Agustí Pérez-Foguet, Mª Ángeles González HARMO17 Budapest May 2016 Simulating large emitters using CMAQ and a local scale finite.
PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF THE MINERAL DUST MODEL IMPLEMENTED IN BOLCHEM
Progress in 2017 Work-plan elements
Joint thematic session on B(a)P pollution: main activities and results
Overview of country-specific studies of heavy metal and POP pollution
Model assessment of heavy metal pollution from global to local scales
Emissions data for of heavy metal and POP modelling
M. Samaali, M. Sassi, V. Bouchet
Heavy metal pollution assessment within EMEP
Progress of HM & POP modelling from global to country scale
EMEP case study on heavy metal pollution assessment:
POPs and HMs Summary , EMEP TFMM.
A. Aulinger, V. Matthias, M. Quante, Institute for Coastal Research
Joanna Struzewska Warsaw University of Technology
Alexey Gusev, Victor Shatalov, Olga Rozovskaya, Nadejda Vulyh
10th TFMM meeting, June, 2009, France, Paris
Contribution from Natural Sources of Aerosol Particles to PM in Canada
EMEP Case study: Assessment of HM pollution levels with fine spatial resolution in Belarus, Poland and UK Ilia Ilyin, Olga Rozovskaya, Oleg Travnikov.
CMAQ model as a tool for generating input data for HM and POP modeling
PM modelling assessment in Northern Italy
Linking the meteorological conditions to air pollution in Italy
Uncertainties of heavy metal pollution assessment
EMEP case studies on HMs: State of the art
Title Why do we underestimate Elemental Carbon in PM?
Model uncertainties because of inconsistencies of emissions
C. Carnevale1, G. Finzi1, E. Pisoni1, P. Thunis2, M. Volta1
Research of heavy metal pollution on regional (EMEP) and national (Germany) scales Ilyin I, Travnikov O. EMEP/MSC-E.
Multi-scale approach to HM and POP modelling
MSC-W support to national contributions to the EMEP Assessment Report
Trend analysis for HMs and POPs
Oleg Travnikov EMEP/MSC-E
Experience with the new 0.1°x0.1° EMEP emissions
Ilyin I., Travnikov O., Varygina M.
Model assessment of HM and POP pollution of the EECCA region
Atmospheric modelling of HMs Sensitivity study
Presentation transcript:

ENEA, National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Changes in HM concentrations from 2005 to 2010 in Italy: Preliminary analysis of observations and model results Mihaela Mircea, Mario Adani, Andrea Cappelletti, Gino Briganti, Massimo D’Isidoro, Antonio Piersanti, Lina Vitali, Luisella Ciancarella, Gabriele Zanini ENEA, National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, via Martiri di Monte Sole 4, 40129, Bologna, Italy 16th Task Force on Measurement and Modelling Meeting 5 - 8 May 2015 in Krakow, Poland

Outline Annual changes between 2010 and 2005 for As, Ni, Cd and Pb. Description of AMS-MINNI modelling system and of simulations setup Spatial distribution of concentrations Changes in spatial distribution of emissions and concentrations Model changes versus measurement changes Summary of results

Space, time, species info AMS-MINNI Air Quality Emissions Meteorology RAMS Local data ECMWF fields Reference meteo year Ref. inventory Space, time, species info Emission Manager Emission scenario Conc & dep. fields EMEP B.C. FARM FARM main features: Emission of pollutants from area and point sources, with plume rise calculation and mass assignment to vertical grid cells 3D dispersion by advection and turbulent diffusion Flexible gas-phase mechanism (SAPRC-99, POPs-Hg) through KPP (Kinetic Pre-Processor: Damian et al., 2002). Treatment of PM10 and PM2.5 (aero3 modal aerosol module) Dry removal of pollutants dependent on local meteorology and land-use Removal through precipitation scavenging processes

Simulations Setup 2005& 2010: 20 km grid resolution Meteorology had been produced with the RAMS model using initial and boundary conditions from ECMWF analyses Initial/Boundary condition: EMEP W/MSC-E output at 6 hour time resolution for HM and POPs, EMEP/MSC-W output at 3 hour time resolution for the other gas and aerosol species ; both EMEP models had a spatial horizontal resolution of 50 km; Emission inventories: national territory ISPRA 2009 for 2005 and ISPRA Informative Inventory Report 2013 for 2010, EMEP inventory for foreign countries Natural HM emissions associated to soil dust and sea-salt aerosols have been included in the simulations following the methodology used by Travnikov and Ilyin (2007). 2010: 4 km grid resolution Meteorology and air quality were simulated with initial/boundary condition from 20 km grid resolution run Emissions ere the same as for 20 km grid resolution run, but spatialized with more detailed proxies.

Emissions changes between 2010 and 2005: tonnes/year S01 Combustion in energy and transformation industries S02 Non-industrial combustion plants S03 Combustion in manufacturing industry S04 Production processes S05 Extraction and distribution of fossil fuels and geothermal energy S06 Solvent and other product use S07 Road transport S08 Other mobile sources and machinery S09 Waste treatment and disposal S10 Agriculture S11 Other sources and sinks

As: EMEP vs MINNI EMEP 50x50km MINNI 20x20km MINNI 4x4km 2005 2010 Target Value: 6 ng/m3

Ni: EMEP vs MINNI EMEP 50x50km MINNI 20x20km MINNI 4x4km 2005 2010 Target Value: 20 ng/m3

Cd: EMEP vs MINNI EMEP 50x50km MINNI 20x20km MINNI 4x4km 2005 2010 Target Value: 5 ng/m3

Pb: EMEP vs MINNI EMEP 50x50km MINNI 20x20km MINNI 4x4km 2005 2010 Target Value: 500 ng/m3

As: Emissions changes between 2010 and 2005 point emissions other emissions anthropogenic emissions no point emissions

As: Emissions vs Concentrations differences between 2010 and 2005

Ni: Emissions vs Concentrations differences between 2010 and 2005 point emissions other emissions anthropogenic emissions no point emissions

Ni: Emissions vs Concentrations differences between 2010 and 2005

Cd: Emissions vs Concentrations differences between 2010 and 2005 point emissions other emissions anthropogenic emissions no point emissions

Cd: Emissions vs Concentrations differences between 2010 and 2005

Pb: Emissions vs Concentrations differences between 2010 and 2005 point emissions other emissions anthropogenic emissions no point emissions

Pb: Emissions vs Concentrations differences between 2010 and 2005

Available measurements 2010 2005

Observed and simulated concentrations changes for As: (2010-2005)/2005

Observed and simulated concentrations changes for Ni: (2010-2005)/2005

Observed and simulated concentrations changes for Cd: (2010-2005)/2005

Observed and simulated concentrations changes for Pb: (2010-2005)/2005

Summary of results generally, the most significant changes in concentrations are explained by the changes in anthropogenic emissions Ni concentrations decreased below 3 ng/m3 in 2010 in spite of an overall increasing of As emissions (S03) and Pb emissions (S02, S07, S08) in 2010 with respect to 2005, their concentrations in the Po Valley had decreased Cd and Pb concentrations had increase around Torino and Brescia in correspondance of an increase in anthropogenic emissions significativ increase of concentrations close to the boundaries is observed caused by BCs from EMEP/MSC-E model and foreign emissions inventories simulations reproduce well the observed changes at most of the stations; the increase of grid resolution does not improve always the agreement with measurements due to complex interactions between orography, meteorology and emissions