LUSI X-ray Correlation Spectroscopy WBS 1.4

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stefan Moeller XES FAC Review – April 16, 2006 X-Ray Endstation Systems (XES) Status Stefan Moeller.
Advertisements

Richard M. Bionta XTOD October 12, 2004 UCRL-PRES-XXXXX X Ray Transport, Optics, and Diagnostics, Overview Facility Advisory Committee.
Aymeric Robert XCS 11/12/2008 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory 1 X -ray C orrelation S pectroscopy Instrument Aymeric.
John Arthur Photon Systems April 16, LCLS Photon Systems Status Technical status and accomplishments Response to.
XCS Aymeric ROBERT 1 LUSI X-ray Correlation Spectroscopy Instrument Advanced Procurement Review : Large Angle Detector Mover.
David Saenz FAC November 11, 2008 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory 1 Far Experimental Hutches David Saenz Project Manager.
David Fritz XPP June 17, The X-ray Pump-Probe Instrument Instrument Scientist: David Fritz Second Scientist:
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
LINACs Michael Bevins May 17, GeV Upgrade - Beam Transport Injection, Linac, Extraction, & Correctors Preliminary Design and Safety Review.
XCS Aymeric ROBERT 1 LUSI X-ray Correlation Spectroscopy Instrument Advanced Procurement Review : Large Offset Monochromator.
WBS1 SBS Basic: Magnet and Infrastructure Robin Wines 11/4/ SBS DOE Review.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Project Baseline Jim Yeck NSLS-II Deputy Project Director NSLS-II PAC Meeting November 20, 2007.
1 E. Bong 1 XCS Final Instrument Design Review Engineering Status April 21, 2009 LUSI WBS 1.4 X-Ray Correlation Spectroscopy Final.
W.J. Foyt LUSI DOE Review July 23, 2007 Project Management 1 Project Management W. J. Foyt Project Scope Timeline Cost Estimate.
Spreaders & Recombiners Beam Transport Michael Bevins May 30, GeV Upgrade - Beam Transport Spreader/Recombiner Dipoles and Layout, & Installation.
Cost and Schedule Paul Weinman Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
CBETA Project ALD’s Cost and Schedule Review February 6, 2017
Camera PDR/CD1 Planning 19 September 2008
Page Headline Project Management Cost & Schedule Review Rob Michnoff.
Nadine Kurita - LUSI Chief Engineer
Project Management W. J. Foyt
WBS 1.03 Readout Systems Scope, Cost and Schedule
The ILC Control Work Packages
X-ray Correlation Spectroscopy (WBS 1.4) Aymeric Robert
LUSI Diagnostics & Common Optics WBS 1.5
LCLS Ultrafast Science Instruments
Management Breakout: MREFC Budget Summary Victor L
X-ray Pump-Probe Instrument
LUSI X-ray Pump-Probe Instrument WBS 1.2
Far Experimental Hall Hutches Civil Construction
Development of LCLS Far Experimental Hall Hutches
Far Experimental Hall Hutches Civil Construction
Coherent X-ray Imaging WBS 1.3
X-ray Pump-Probe Instrument
Installation of Photon Beam Transport to FEH
Electron Beam Systems ETC and Methodology
Thomas Fornek Project Manager July 15, 2009
X-Ray Endstation Design & Management/Commissioning
X-Ray Transport, Optics, and Diagnostics WBS Alan J
X-ray Pump-Probe Instrument
X-Ray Endstations Update
LUSI Controls and Data Systems W.B.S. 1.6
Tom Fornek Project Manager April 20-22, 2009
Conventional Facilities (WBS 1
LUSI MANAGEMENT OVERVIEW
Undulator Cost & Schedule Patric Den Hartog, ANL April 24, 2002
Project Management Issues John N. Galayda, SLAC April 24, 2002
LCLS Undulator System Status and Schedule
LUSI WBS 1.2 X-ray Pump Probe Status Review
Endstation Systems, Installation Costs and Schedule J. Hastings
Experimental Program and Endstations System (WBS ) J
NEH - Status Stefan Moeller.
Coherent X-ray Imaging Instrument WBS 1.3
LCLS Personnel Protection System and Beam Containment System
X-ray Correlation Spectroscopy Instrument
LCLS Undulator System Status and Schedule
LCLS Injector System Overview D. H
Installation Status & Operational Readiness Process
NSS integrated installation plan workshop Introduction
DOE Review of the LCLS Project October 2006
Preliminary Project Execution Plan
Conventional Facilities
X-Ray Endstation Design & Management/Commissioning
CF Scope, Management & Organization
DOE Review of the LCLS Project 7-9 February 2006
X-Ray Endstation Systems (XES) 2006 Schedule
SNS-PPU upgrades the existing accelerator structure
LCLS Instrument MIE Project: Staffing, Schedule
LUSI Controls and Data Systems W.B.S. 1.6
Presentation transcript:

LUSI X-ray Correlation Spectroscopy WBS 1.4 Aymeric Robert – XCS Instrument Scientist Eric Bong – XCS Lead Engineer CD2 Lehman Review August 20, 2008 Team Leader: Brian Stephenson

Outline Physics Requirements Instrument Configuration Engineering/Design Status Value Engineering/Management Basis Of Estimate Procurement Plan Cost & Schedule Critical Path Summary Page

XCS Staff Instrument Scientist Engineering Staff Aymeric Robert E. Bong - Lead Engineer Ted Osier – Mechanical Engineer Jim Delor – Mechanical Engineer Don Arnett- Design Supervision Page

Science Team Specifications and instrument concept developed with the science team. The XCS team leaders Brian Stephenson, Argonne Natl. Lab. (leader) Gerhard Grübel, DESY , Germany Karl Ludwig, Boston University Page

XCS SCOPE - WBS 1.4 WBS Scope/CD-2 Estimate Includes: 1.4.1 Physics support & engineering integration 1.4.2 X-ray optics & support tables 1.4.3 2D XCS Detector from BNL by MoU 1.4.4 Sample Environment & Diffractometer system 1.4.5 Hutch facilities 1.4.6 Vacuum system 1.4.7 Installation Other related WBS 1.5 Diagnostics & Common Optics, incl. Monochromator 1.6 Controls and data system In kind contribution Split and Delay setup ( from SLAC/DESY MoU in process) Page

Component Physics Requirements 1.4.2 XCS X-ray optics and support tables Stabilize the optics with respect to each other Stabilize the optics with respect to the global coordinate system X-ray Supports in XRT Fixed table X-ray Support in XCS experimental hutch Translating tables XCS stoppers Not PPS stoppers Allow to align optics sections in XRT independently

Component Physics Requirements 1.4.3 XCS 2D Detector Developed at BNL (MoU) 1024 x 1024 pixels 35 x 35 mm2 pixel size High DQE 10 2 dynamic range Noise << 1 photon 120 Hz Readout Rate /=1.410-4 20m, Flat 20m, Focussed Pink : /=1.5% 12m, Focussed change optics beam size Page

Component Physics Requirements 1.4.4 XCS Sample Env. & Diffractometer System 1.4.4.1 XCS Diffractometer Horizontal scattering 4-circle diffractometer (SoC<75μm) No interference with CXI beamline (600mm) No interference with Large Angle Detector Stage Same platform-to-COR distance as XPP diffractometer Possibility to remove from the beam path to accommodate large sample environments

Component Physics Requirements 1.4.4 XCS Sample Environment. & Diffractometer System 1.4.4.3 Large Angle Detector Mover Sample/detector distance 7-8m Decoupled from diffractometer SAXS, WAXS, GI 2θ up to 55º Vertical tilt -0.5º to 2º Height adjustment 2θ Page

Component Physics Requirements 1.4.5 XCS Hutch Facility Respect Instrument stay clear Compressed air Cable trays Processed water Power/network Power distribution Drop Floor

Component Physics Requirements 1.4.6 XCS Vacuum System 1.4.6.1 XCS XRT Vacuum System 200 meter long (located in the XRT) 1.4.6.2 XCS Hutch Vacuum System 1.4.7 XCS Installation

XCS System Description Split and Delay unit in kind contribution from DESY, via SLAC/DESY MoU Provided by DESY/SLAC MoU Prototype existing 1st Commissioning May 07 (ESRF, Troika beamline) 2nd Commissioning May 08 (ESRF, Troika beamline) pulse duration < delay < 3 ns based on Si (511) E=8.389 keV G. Grübel W. Roseker Page

Safety LUSI Hazard Analysis Report (PM-391-001-34) complete Safety issues are considered at every stage of the design, fabrication and installation process Safety considerations (some examples) Ionizing Radiation Hutch walls will comply with SLAC Radiation Safety memo RP-RPG-080606-MEM-01 Hutch PPS Pressure/Vacuum Vessel Safety Compliant with 10CFR851 Seismic Safety Designs compliant with: Seismic Design Specification for Buildings, Structures, Equipment, and Systems, SLAC-I-720-0A24E-002-R002 Mechanical Engineered solutions that prevent potential “pinch-points” with moving machinery Hoisting and Rigging Positioning of devices that require the use of the FEH H4 overhead crane shall be performed by qualified personnel only with an approved lift plan. Page

XCS Configuration, Regions X-Ray Transport Tunnel (XRT) ~200m Hutch 4 Monochrometer, Split & Delay and Diagnostics Drift-End Diagnostics Long Vacuum Drift ~150m Optics, Diagnostics, Diffractometer, Large Angle Detector & Mover X-Ray Transport Tunnel Monochromator - DCO WBS 1.5 Split & Delay - In kind contribution DESY Diagnostics - DCO WBS 1.5 Supports & Tables - XCS WBS1.4.2.1 Vacuum System - XCS WBS 1.4.6.1 PPS Stoppers (LCLS) Diagnostics Stoppers XCS WBS 1.4.2.3 Hutch 4 Optics & Diagnostics - DCO WBS 1.5 Supports & Tables – XCS WBS 1.4.2.2 Vacuum System – XCS 1.4.6.2 Diffractometer - XCS WBS 1.4.4.1 Large Angle Detector Mover – XCS WBS 1.4.4.3 Detector – XCS WBS 1.4.3 (MoU /BNL) Page

XRT Drift-End Diagnostics XRT Configuration XCS X-Ray Transport Tunnel Region Divided into Vacuum Sections (5) Sections bounded by valves Two pumps minimum per section Offset Monochromator Section Monochromator and diagnostics are provided to XCS from WBS 1.5 Split & Delay Section Split & Delay in kind contribution DESY Diagnostics are provided to XCS from WBS 1.5 Long Drift Section Long drift divided into two pumping sections by a valve Drift-End Diagnostics Section XCS Responsible for Vacuum Equipment, Drifts, Floor Stands, Girders, Stoppers and overall integration. XRT Drift-End Diagnostics Long Drift Section Split & Delay & Diagnostics Section Offset Monochromator & Diagnostics Section Page

Hutch 4 Configuration XCS Hutch 4 Region Local Optics Table Diagnostics Table Large Angle Mover & Detector XCS Hutch 4 Region Diffractometer Local Optics Table - provides location for experiment specific conditioning optics – uses modification of XPP design Diagnostics Table – provides mounting location for final diagnostics– uses modification of XPP design Large Angle Detector Mover – positions detector LCLS XRT Pump Supports (LLNL) Page

XRT Engineering Status Offset Monochromator Section Split & Delay Section Drift-End Section Integration – XTR definitive layout complete XRT Supports WBS 1.4.2.1 ~$114k XRT Supports – preliminary layout complete, ready for design Support Rafts are a modification of an existing SSRL design Stoppers WBS 1.4.2.3 ~$186k PPS Stoppers provided by LCLS Diagnostics stoppers modification of LCLS design Costs from fabrication of LCLS stoppers adjusted for planned modification Vacuum System WBS 1.4.6.1 ~$703k XRT Vacuum System – preliminary layout complete, ready for design Cost of vacuum system components vendor quotes Pump & Valve Support costs from vendor quotes for LCLS XRT designs Long drift vacuum system costs same as LCLS XRT system XRT Vacuum system and support designs LCLS and safety committee approved Page

Hutch 4 Engineering Status Integration Hutch definitive layout complete Ready to start component design Hutch Supports WBS 1.4.2.2 Utilizes modification of XPP support table for fine positioning of diagnostics components Cost consistent with XPP estimate ~$199k Hutch Vacuum System WBS 1.4.6.2 Cost of vacuum system components from vendor quotes Pump Support costs from vendor quotes for LCLS XRT designs Pump support designs LCLS and safety committee approved ~$386k Page

Hutch 4 Engineering Status Hutch Utilities WBS 1.4.5 Provides infrastructure for XCS instrument not provided by other LUSI WBS section nor from LCLS Ongoing meetings established to define infrastructure requirements and generation of ESDs Positions of walls, raised floor, crane, granite floor insert established and incorporated into hutch model Instrument stay-clears defined modeled and incorporated in hutch utility model Detailed cost estimate established for hutch utilities and incorporated into resource loaded schedule ~$375k Page

Diffractometer Engineering Status Diffractometer WBS 1.4.4.1 Definitive layout complete ESD draft complete Provides sufficient degrees of freedom to position sample relative to beam Cost based on quotes from potential vendor Components assembled at SLAC Diffractometer base required to move off beam-line on air-pads, requires granite floor insert ~$699k Page

Large Angle Detector Mover Status Large Angle Detector Mover WBS 1.4.4.3 Definitive layout complete Performance Parameters Detector Arm : 8 meters Angular Range : 0 to 55 degrees Vertical Tilt : -0.5 to +2.0 degrees Vertical Offset : +/- 20 mm Subsystems Vacuum : Initial design for UHV Position Diode : Finds maximum signal center Slits : Defines signal delivered to diode Beamstop : Blocks large intensities at the detector Detector Positioner : Translates detector relative to signal pattern Provides mount for BNL detector Similar to ANL HERIX detector mover, without complex chamber Cost based on quote to reproduce HERIX Search performed to establish availability of rails and lead screw Requests to bid received from multiple vendors ~ $860k Page

Large Angle Detector Mover Motion Page

Engineering – Milestone Look-Ahead Near Term Limit design effort to fit within FY09 funding constraint Milestones Through End CY08 Complete XCS ESDs Other System Dependent Design XCS uses designs created by other LUSI WBS sections (1.5 Diagnostics/Common Optics and 1.6 Controls) XCS must participate in design reviews of components for other systems to assure usability in the XCS instrument XCS must monitor design activities at XCS instrument interface boundaries to assure connectivity and integration Page

Value Management - XCS XCS uses outside expert vendors for critical procurements – e.g. Diffractometer, Large Angle Detector Mover XCS utilizes expertise in outside labs for specialized equipment – e.g. Split & Delay, Detector XCS uses components designed for other LUSI instruments – e.g. XPP Tables XCS uses components designed for other SLAC departments – e.g. SSRL Rafts in XRT LUSI places XCS last in schedule allows XCS to choose the best of recent designs in XCS construction. Page

Procurement Strategy A variety of sources are used to design – build - install XCS components based on experience and cost (coded in P3). Previous designs and Off-The-Shelf components are used whenever available. Page

Cost & Schedule BOE & Manpower Loaded Schedule developed in the same way as the other LUSI instruments XCS budget stats Peak spending = CY11 SLAC Labor = ~56% SLAC Non-Labor = ~44% Page

Cost & Schedule Durations Person quarter = 444h Person year = 1776h Person month = 148h Page

XCS Schedule Critical Path Driving Milestones LL Approval, CD-3, CD-4 & Funding M/S Delayed Design Start due to Funding XCS Path moves to DCO Procurements XCS Instrument Installation effort Page

XCS Schedule Critical Path Procurement of DCO components delayed to FY11 due to funding Page

XCS Schedule Critical Path XCS critical path includes Delay in support design due to funding DCO procurement, delayed by funding Instrument installation, requires DCO components Minimum float is 80 days Due to funding limitations, XCS schedule is essentially compressed to two years instead of three Without funding limitations, XCS float is 182 days Schedule risk could be reduced by funding XCS design and procurements earlier All XCS Scope is CD4 deliverable Page

Risk Identification LUSI – XPP risk addressed per “LCLS Risk Management Plan” document number PMD 1.1-002-R4 WBS items with risk analysis – risk severity of medium or high forwarded for inclusion in LUSI Risk Registry Page

Risk Identification & Mitigation Diffractometer System Diffractometer & LA-Detector Mover sub-systems share similar risks. Systems are either vendor build or design/build Risk Assessment: schedule delay : late placement of PO to vendor. Seek pre-approval of elements prior to BA. Insure all stake holders are aware of status and their requirements. Closely track document flow to insure timely sign-off / forwarding. schedule delay: late vendor engineer-design review approval (LAD Mover) Insure initial vendor buy in of timeline. Closely track vendor progress during design stage. Establish contact with sub-vendors to insure timely deliveries. Complete periodic spot review of designs to insure suitability. schedule delay: late fabrication-assembly. Request periodic status updates. Start partial acceptance testing as soon as suitable sub-assemblies are completed. schedule delay : requirements not met during vendor site acceptance testing. Replace individually deficient element. Temporarily immobilize deficient element. Deploy interim hardware with reduced capability. Technical requirements not met in commissioning. Investigate alternative hardware for interim use. BNL Detector System (Addressed in detector breakout) Page

XCS CD-2 Project Readiness XCS designs are mature and technically meets the requirements for CD-2 All CD-2 criteria met Management WBS Dictionary  Milestone Dictionary Risk Registry Resource Loaded Schedule Basis of Estimate Hazard Analysis Report Technical Fully define scope of project, document & review Instrument Physics Requirement Document (PRD) Instrument Engineering Specification Document (ESD) Instrument Start-Up Plan Component PRDs - Released Component ESDs - Pre-released Advance technical designs to meet the CD-2 requirement to provide sufficient information to develop performance baseline Preliminary Instrument Design Review

Summary XCS is ready for CD2 ! Instrument concept is based on proven developments made at 3rd generation Synchrotron Radiation sources Scope of instrument defined Resource loaded schedule developed Many of the materials estimates come from vendor quotations, catalogs, previous orders or work performed by other LUSI instrument teams The XCS Critical Path is dominated by late start of engineering work and DCO procurement; constrained by funding profile Preliminary design of key components is well advanced Quantify types of components Estimate component costs Specify acquisition methods Establish baseline schedule XCS is ready for CD2 ! Page