Certified Evaluation Orientation

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Updated Training for DPAS II for Administrators

Advertisements

On-the-job Evaluation of Principals Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. Delaware SAELP Director Wallace Foundation National Conference October 25-28, 2006.

Orientation to EVALUATION PROCEDURES August, 2006.

Performance Appraisal Systems

(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and

What You Must Know About Teacher Extension and Renewal Presented by: Maureen Sloane Dianna Hanlon.

New Mexico Public School Department Guidelines for Annual Teacher Performance Evaluation School Year PDP Revision Committee: Dr. Janaan Diemer,

PUSD Site Administrator Evaluation SY 13/14 Governing Board Presentation May 23, 2013 Dr. Heather Cruz, Deputy Superintendent.

Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.

Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.

For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES/OPGES Does NOT Apply Certified Evaluation Orientation For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For.

Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.

The Jordan Performance Appraisal System (JPAS) is designed to help educators in their continuing efforts to provide high quality instruction to all students.

EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.

Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Requirements PCBOE 8/5/2015.

CERTIFIED EVALUATION PLAN TRAINING FOR TEACHERS August 2015 ©2015 Harlan Independent School District.

Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.

PI -34 What Every Educator Should Know R. Schemelin.

EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.

Principal Professional Growth & Effectiveness System Certified Evaluation Orientation Principal Professional Growth & Effectiveness System LaRue County.

Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.

Barren County Schools CERTIFIED EVALUATION PLAN

Kansas Educator Evaluation Bill Bagshaw Asst. Director Kansas State Department of Education February 25, 2015.

Certified Evaluation Orientation August 19, 2011.

Certified Evaluation Orientation Non-Principal Administrative Certified Staff July 20, 2015 Complete Plan posted on District Website

For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES Does NOT Apply Certified Evaluation Orientation For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES.

March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.

SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.

EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.

PGES Updates Second Read of PGES KBE meeting April 1 st. Link to materials located herehere Highlights of Changes: Section 1(Definitions):

EISD Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System T-TESS

EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.

Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Doreen Griffeth, Director.

PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION

Teacher Evaluation Timeline

Certified Evaluation Orientation Professional Growth & Effectiveness System for Teachers & Other Professionals LaRue County Schools Opening Day, 2017.

Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.

Dissemination Training

Evaluation of Tenure-Accruing Faculty

SOESD’s Teacher Evaluation & Support System

Rockingham County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation Process

Evaluations All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. The most important.

Certified Evaluation Orientation For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES/OPGES Does NOT Apply LaRue County Schools Opening Day, 2017 Complete.

Low-Performing Schools Evaluation Requirements

Edgewood T-TESS Updates for

Evaluations All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. The most important.

Teacher Evaluation Process Training

BEFORE/AFTER SCHOOL STAFF EVALUATIONS

Education Employment Procedures Law of 2001

Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process

Evaluations Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.

Teacher Evaluation Training

CLASS KeysSM Module 10: Professional Development Plan For Improvement

DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents

Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY

Evaluations Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.

Performance Review for County Educators

Evaluations Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.

Performance Review for County Educators

Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions

Certified Evaluation Orientation Teachers & Other Professionals

Professional Review Panel

CLASS KeysTM Module 10: Professional Development Plan For Improvement

Life of a Dossier Redelegated Merit Non-Redelegated Merit

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND APPRAISAL SYSTEM (PDAS) TEACHER ORIENTATION This orientation provides an overview of the elements of the PDAS system and.

Evaluations Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.

Certified Evaluation Orientation for Administrators

Pike County Schools Certified Evaluation Annual Training

END-OF-YEAR EVALUATIONS

Prospective Board Member Orientation

Presentation transcript:

Certified Evaluation Orientation Non-Principal Administrative Certified Staff July 24, 2017 Complete Plan posted on District Website http://www.larue.kyschools.us/Content2/plans

Evaluation Notes SB1 eliminated current evaluation regulations which included “PGES”. In 2017-2018, KDE will develop new regulations for certified evaluation, for implementation in 2018-2019 Until then, our prior evaluation system will be the official evaluation for this group. The prior system is included as Appendix P in the 2017-2018 LCS Certified Evaluation Plan. The materials and expectations remain unchanged; page numbers have changed

Orientation Orientation by the end of the first month of employment See pg. 89 for Orientation Agenda Staff must sign and date certifying completion of Orientation.

Formative Evaluation Sequence—Evidence Collection (Portfolio) Each Administrator will organize a portfolio each year under the Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium (ISLLC) Standards At the end of the three-year cycle, administrators will have covered every indicator. Indicators listed on pg. 138 – 133

Formative Evaluation Sequence—Letters & Memos (pg. 90) In addition to district-adopted evaluation forms, letters and memos may be used to document both outstanding performance and performance which needs improvement. Correspondence dated and signed by both parties with a copy provided to Evaluatee Conference highly recommended, but not required

Formative Evaluation Sequence— Professional Growth Plans-pg 95,97-99 Developed collaboratively between Evaluatee and Evaluator tentatively at spring summative evaluation meeting formally by August 30. Reviewed Annually PGP Intent on pg. 95 Instructions on pg. 97-98 Form on pg. 99

Formative Evaluation Sequence—Corrective Action Plan pg 96, 100 A Corrective Action Plan shall be developed when a certified staff member fails to meet district standards OR when an immediate change is required in practice or behavior. Steps in Corrective Action, pg. 96 Evaluator initiates the Corrective Action Plan process Evaluator and evaluatee collaborate to develop the CAP Evaluator and evaluatee develop timeline Evaluator and evaluatee develop appraisal method for CAP Evaluator evaluates improvement of performance at target date Form, pg. 100

Summative Evaluation Sequence DEADLINE: APRIL 1 Steps for Summative Eval.—pg. 92 1. Evaluator completes Summative Conferencing Form for Administrators (pg. 134-136) using observations, portfolio, letters and memos, progress on Professional Growth Plan, and Corrective Action Plan (if necessary). 2. Summative Conference held with Evaluatee. Summary Form completed (pg. 137) 3. Summative Evaluation Report completed (pg. 138) with a copy given to Evaluatee; original Summative Evaluation Report placed in personnel file

Appeal Procedure for Summative Evaluation—See pg. 139-142 1. Evaluatee must submit Appeal Form (pg. 142) to the chairperson of the Appeal Panel within 5 working days of receipt of the evaluation. 2. The Appeal Panel will meet to consider evidence and make a recommendation decision: Upholding all parts of the original evaluation. Voiding the original evaluation or parts of it. Ordering a new evaluation by a second certified employee who shall be a trained evaluator. 3. The Appeal Panel will make a recommendation to the Superintendent within 15 working days from the date of the filing of the Appeal. 4. All parties will be notified of the recommendation with a letter citing evidence to support the decision.