Pradhan Mantri Awaas Yojana - Gramin Meeting with Principal Secretaries / Secretaries 22nd April, 2017

PMAY-G PRC – January 2017

Points of Discussion 1 PMAY-G 2 3 4 PMAY-G – Target, State Share Performance under PMAY-G 2 Mason Training 3 House Design Typologies 4 Meeting with States

Annual PMAY-G Physical Target 1 Year Target (nos.) 2016-17 44,00,000 2017-18 33,00,000 2018-19 23,00,000 Total 1,00,00,000 Meeting with States

Annual Financial Implication 1 Year Target Total cost @ 1.25 lakh Central Share (63% of total cost) State Share (37% of total cost) 1 2 3 4 5 FY Nos. In Crores 2016 - 17 44,00,000 55,000 34,650 20,350 2017 – 18 33,00,000 41,250 25,987 15,263 2018 – 19 23,00,000 28,750 18,113 10,457 Total 1,00,00,000 1,25,000 78,750 46,250 Additionally, nearly Rs. 30,000 crore would be available through convergence with MGNREGA in three years. Meeting with States

Release of State Matching Share 1 States which are yet to be release State matching share for 2016-17 as per AwaasSoft. Himachal Pradesh Jammu & Kashmir Maharashtra Manipur Mizoram Meghalaya Nagaland Odisha Punjab Sikkim Rajasthan Uttar Pradesh (partially released) Telangana Meeting with States

Sanction of house to Beneficiaries 2 Mapping of villages & SECC data verification by Gram Sabha Target Setting By States Registration Uploading of geo-tagged photographs using AwaasApp Mobile No Bank A/c N Aadhaar No. Existing dwelling unit Site for construction SANCTION Meeting with States

Mapping of Villages with SECC Data 2 Unmapped Villages with SECC Data vs Total Villages with SECC Data States with unmapped SECC villages Meeting with States ** As on 18/04/2017 from AwaasSoft

Identification and Selection of Beneficiaries 2 Process Flow Progress 1 Circulation of GP wise list of eligible beneficiaries Target Date for Finalising Permanent Waitlist 15/July/2016 2 Verification of Lists by Gram Sabha Universe for PMAY-G is 4.03 crore households, identified through Socio Economic Caste Census (SECC), 2011 data. After verification of 3.92 crore households by Gram Sabha and review by Appellate Authority, 2.39 crore beneficiaries have been identified to be eligible to receive assistance under PMAY-G. 3 Constitution of Appellate Committee 4 Resolution of Grievances by Appellate Committee 5 Uploading and Publication of Permanent Wait list on AwaasSoft PRC – July 2016

Household Verification by Gram Sabhas 2 Percentage of households verified using SECC 2011 More than 70 % 50 -70 % 30 – 50 % Upto 30 % Arunachal Pradesh, Goa, Karnataka and Telangana are yet to start verification of households from the SECC list

Targets fixed by States 2 Target set by State vs MoRD Target States with 100% Targets set States having less than 100% Targets set Chattisgarh Gujarat Himachal Pradesh Madhya Pradesh Jammu & Kashmir Kerala Meghalaya Punjab Tamil Nadu Rajasthan Uttarakhand West Bengal Karnataka Meeting with States ** As on 18/04/2017 from AwaasSoft

Registrations Completed by States 2 Beneficiaries Registered vs MoRD Target States with over 60% Registration Progress of Remaining States on Registrations Rajasthan Madhya Pradesh Maharashtra Chattisgarh West Bengal Odisha Himachal Pradesh Jharkhand Uttarakhand Gujarat Uttar Pradesh Kerala Haryana Meeting with States ** As on 18/04/2017 from AwaasSoft

Beneficiaries Geo-tagged vis-a-vis MoRD Target Status of Geo-tagging 2 Beneficiaries Geo-tagged vis-a-vis MoRD Target More than 90 % 70 - 90 % 50 – 70 % Upto 50 %

Houses Sanctioned 2 ** As on 18/04/2017 from AwaasSoft Houses Sanctioned vs MoRD Target States with over 70% Houses Sanctioned States with Less Than 70% Houses Sanctioned Himachal Pradesh Madhya Pradesh West Bengal Rajasthan Odisha Maharashtra Chattisgarh Jharkhand Meeting with States ** As on 18/04/2017 from AwaasSoft

1st Instalment Paid 2 Percentage of beneficiaries receiving 1st instalment vis-a-vis MoRD Target More than 50 % 30 - 50 % 10 – 30 % Upto 10 %

Program Management Unit in States 2 Suggested constitution State State Nodal officer Technical Expert in the field of construction of house Expert to look after IT/MIS/PFMS Expert to look after all the Financial matters Social Mobilisation expert and Training Coordinator District Coordinator for all the activities of PMAY-G at District IT Personnel Training Coordinator Block Coordinator for all the activities of PMAY at Block & Village level Every house of PMAY-G to be tagged to village level functionary. Maharashtra and Jharkhand 1 State level PMU to be setup At State Level 2 PMU at all levels -UP, Bihar, Kerala and Haryana, State and District Level in Tripura District PMUs to be setup 3 Block / Block level Panchayat PMUs to be setup Andhra Pradesh, Telangana and Karnataka 4 Have dedicated organizations, viz. Housing Corporations, which look into all the aspects of rural housing Every PMAY-G house to be tagged to a village functionary to monitor completion PRC – July 2016

1 2 3 4 5 Mason Training 3 Process Flow Time lines agreed to in 2016 Engaging a Training Provider in consultation with CSDCI 2nd week of July, Engagement of Training Providers in coordination with CSDCI 3rd week of July Start ToT 4th week of July Start Pilot Mason training 2 Training of trainer 3 Pilot training of mason 4 Pilot trainings taken up in Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Uttarakhand, Gujarat, Rajasthan and Maharashtra Scaling up training for the State 5 Assessment and certification of masons PRC – July 2016

Mason Training 3 40,000 Masons by June 2017 TARGET Target Under Mason Training State Masons to be trained by June, 2017 Maharashtra 20000 Madhya Pradesh 10000 Rajasthan 8000 Andhra Pradesh 6500 Chhattisgarh 5000 Jharkhand UP Total 70100 State Masons to be trained by June, 2017 Bihar 3000 West Bengal Assam 2000 Uttarakhand 1200 Tripura 900 Sikkim 500 Meeting with States

Mason Training 3 Rs. 15 Lakhs has been released to 21 States for conducting pilot training of masons. The pilot training of masons had been conducted in the States of Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Uttarakhand, Gujarat, Rajasthan and Maharashtra. The remaining states to conduct pilot training . All states to scale up training for the entire state based on experiences in the pilot. States may submit proposal for gap funding for organizing training with sufficient justification. Meeting with States

Housing Design Typologies 4 Process Flow Progress 1 Typology study Studies to be conducted in 34 States/UTs Studies in 18 States already taken up Remaining 16 to be taken up this year 2 18 States UNDP – 13 IIT Delhi - 5 Preliminary design type Typology studies conducted in 3 Presentation to Ministry House Design Typologies have been finalized in 14 States (Assam, Chhattisgarh, Himachal Pradesh, Manipur, Meghalaya, Odisha, Rajasthan, Tripura, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal, Mizoram, Sikkim, Uttarakhand) 4 State consultation State consultations remaining in 4 States Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and Jammu & Kashmir State consultations remaining in 10 States . 5 Final design 6 Demo houses taken up in Tripura And Maharashtra Demo building PRC – July 2016

House Design Typologies 4 Compendium of House Design Typologies released by Honorable PM Activities Required at the STATES’ End 1 Construction of Demo Houses 2 Incorporation of Alternate Technologies in SOR 3 Wide publicity to Designs among Beneficiaries Meeting with States

House Design Typologies 4 Progress Tracker   State/Activity Typology study Preliminary design type Presentation to Ministry State consultation Final design Demo building Development of state-level upscaling plan 1 Madhya Pradesh 2 Manipur 3 Sikkim 4 Uttar Pradesh 5 West Bengal 6 Bihar 7 Uttarakhand 8 Himachal Pradesh 9 Mizoram 10 Jammu & Kashmir 11 Chhattisgarh 12 Jharkhand 13 Assam 14 Odisha 15 Rajasthan 16 Meghalaya 17 Maharashtra 18 Tripura Meeting with States

Challenges and policy issues Identification – Mapping of revenue villages to SECC village, beneficiaries to villages, deletion of ineligibe households, addition of eligible households left out of list, wrong capturing of category in SECC, Addressing of grievances through Appellate Mechanism. Land to landless PFMS – Bank account verification, tracking of FTOs, Pending transfer of assistance, False success / reject cases. Mason Training – Identification of Training Provider, Conduct of pilot training, scaling of training, linking of trained masons to the beneficiaries.

Challenges and policy issues Quality – Ensuring quality in construction of house, availability of material at reasonable rates, use of locally available materials Awareness to beneficiaries – about the scheme, eligibility, house designs, quality construction material, loan to willing beneficiaries. Monitoring – Setting up of PMU at different levels, Geo-tagging, disposal of grievances House designs – Identification, construction of demo houses, Penetration / adoption of identified house designs

IAY PRC – January 2017

Points of Discussion IAY 1 Completion of incomplete IAY Houses in 2016-17 1.1 States with Higher Completion Rates 1.2 States with High incomplete houses PRC 2017: PMAY-G

IAY Progress in FY 2016-17 * Total Incomplete Houses 36,39,368 States with Highest completion in 2016-17 States with Largest number of incomplete houses as on 31.3.17 Bihar – 5.76 lakhs Bihar - 4.09 Lakhs * Total Incomplete Houses 36,39,368 UP- 4.58 lakhs Maharashtra – 1.83 Lakhs * As on 1/4/2016 WB- 3.70 lakhs Assam – 1.44 Lakhs * Total Houses Completed 25,42,648 * As on 21/04/2017 From AwaasSoft MP- 2.54 lakhs Karnataka – 1.06 Lakhs Assam- 1.82 lakh Rajasthan – 0.96 Lakhs Houses Completed as per reports of States (status to be updated on AwaasSoft as these could not be uploaded due to IT/Network issues.) 32,14,506 Jharkhand- 1.15 lakh Gujarat – 0.66 Lakhs Meeting with States

% Completed IAY Houses (As on 20.04.2017) Houses Completed vs Houses Sanctioned from 2013-2016 More than 90 % 70 -90 % 50 – 70 % Upto 50 %

% Incomplete IAY Houses (20.04.2017) Incomplete Houses Remaining vs Houses Sanctioned from 2013-2016 More than 70 % 40 – 70 % 20 – 40 % Upto 20 %

Thank you…