LKr readout: present and future R. Fantechi 30/8/2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Controller Tests Stephen Kaye Controller Test Motivation Testing the controller before the next generation helps to shake out any remaining.
Advertisements

Status of the CTP O.Villalobos Baillie University of Birmingham April 23rd 2009.
LKr for the dry run (and not only…) R. Fantechi 23/5/2012.
The LAr ROD Project and Online Activities Arno Straessner and Alain, Daniel, Annie, Manuel, Imma, Eric, Jean-Pierre,... Journée de réflexion du DPNC Centre.
Alice EMCAL Meeting, July 2nd EMCAL global trigger status: STU design progress Olivier BOURRION LPSC, Grenoble.
“A board for LKr trigger interface and proto-L0TP” G.Lamanna (CERN) NA62 Collaboration Meeting in Brussels LKr-WG
ATF2 Q-BPM System 19 Dec Fifth ATF2 Project Meeting J. May, D. McCormick, T. Smith (SLAC) S. Boogert (RH) B. Meller (Cornell) Y. Honda (KEK)
Status of the digital readout electronics Mauro Raggi and F. Gonnella LNF Photon Veto WG CERN 13/12/2011.
TE-MPE-EP, VF, 11-Oct-2012 Update on the DQLPU type A design and general progress. TE-MPE Technical Meeting.
GBT Interface Card for a Linux Computer Carson Teale 1.
R. Fantechi. DAQ tools My feelings Not dealing with readout stuff No TEL62, no CREAMS, etc But the auxiliary software needed to run the experiment After.
LKr Calorimeter Control and monitoring R. Fantechi 19/02/2010 R. Fantechi.
14 Sep 2005DAQ - Paul Dauncey1 Tech Board: DAQ/Online Status Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
Status of NA62 straw electronics and services Peter LICHARD, Johan Morant, Vito PALLADINO.
PHENIX upgrade DAQ Status/ HBD FEM experience (so far) The thoughts on the PHENIX DAQ upgrade –Slow download HBD test experience so far –GTM –FEM readout.
The MINER A Operations Report All Experimenters Meeting Howard Budd, University of Rochester Aug 5, 2013.
1 Online Calibration of Calorimeter Mrinmoy Bhattacharjee SUNY, Stony Brook Thanks to: D. Schamberger, L. Groer, U. Bassler, B. Olivier, M. Thioye Institutions:
Status of Global Trigger Global Muon Trigger Sept 2001 Vienna CMS-group presented by A.Taurok.
R. Fantechi. TDAQ commissioning Status report on Infrastructure at the experiment PC farm Run control Network …
Mobile DAQ Testbench ‘Mobi DAQ’ Paulo Vitor da Silva, Gerolf Schlager.
J. Prast, G. Vouters, Arlington, March 2010 DHCAL DIF Status Julie Prast, Guillaume Vouters 1. Future CCC Use in DHCAL Setup 2. Calice DAQ Firmware Implementation.
TELL-1 and TDC board: present status and future plans B. Angelucci, A. Burato, S. Venditti.
TALK, LKr readout and the rest… R. Fantechi, G. Lamanna 15/12/2010.
Status of NA62 straw electronics Webs Covers Services Readout.
24/03/2010 TDAQ WG - CERN 1 LKr L0 trigger status report V. Bonaiuto, G. Carboni, L. Cesaroni, A. Fucci, G. Paoluzzi, A. Salamon, G. Salina, E. Santovetti,
LKR Working group Introduction R. Fantechi October 27 th, 2009.
John Coughlan Tracker Week October FED Status Production Status Acceptance Testing.
Overview, remarks, lamentations, hope and despair M. Sozzi TDAQ WG meeting CERN - 4 June 2013 Introduction, news and appetizer.
NA62 straw tracker readout status Georgios Konstantinou
1 07/10/07 Forward Vertex Detector Technical Design – Electronics DAQ Readout electronics split into two parts – Near the detector (ROC) – Compresses and.
HBD electronics status All the ADC and XMIT boards are installed. –Top 3 crates are for the ADC, XMIT boards –Bottom crate is for test pulse boards/future.
15 April 2008 B.Hallgren, M.Piccini and H.Wendler 1 A Proposal for the Readout of the NA62 LKr Calorimeter.
Beam Line BPM Filter Module Nathan Eddy May 31, 2005.
1 April 2009 NA62 DAQ meeting1 LKr calorimeter readout project H.Boterenbrood, A.Ceccucci, B.Hallgren, M.Piccini, H. Wendler.
R. Fantechi. Cream specifications Prototype board.
Installation status Control Room PC farm room DetectorsEB Infrastructure 918 ECN3.
R. Fantechi. Shutdown work Refurbishment of transceiver power supplies Power supplies dismounted Shipped to Orsay this week Refurbishment work to start.
1 Calorimeters LED control LHCb CALO meeting Anatoli Konoplyannikov /ITEP/ Status of the calorimeters LV power supply and ECS control Status of.
“Planning for Dry Run: material for discussion” Gianluca Lamanna (CERN) TDAQ meeting
TEL62 AND TDCB UPDATE JACOPO PINZINO ROBERTO PIANDANI CERN ON BEHALF OF PISA GROUP 14/10/2015.
R. Fantechi. Shutdown work Refurbishment of transceiver power supplies Work almost finished in Orsay Small crisis 20 days ago due to late delivery of.
LKr readout and trigger R. Fantechi 3/2/2010. The CARE structure.
Talk board status R. Fantechi, D. Gigi, G.Lamanna TDAQ meeting, Mainz
Status of the NA62 network R. Fantechi 23/5/2012.
NA62: The LKr Electronics Matt Huszagh. Installation & Setup (1/5) Crate Setup 8 vertical columns of 4 crates Almost all installed.
Straw readout status Status and plans in Prague compared with situation now Choke and error Conclusions and plans.
29 May 2009 Henk Boterenbrood, Augusto Ceccucci, Bjorn Hallgren, Mauro Piccini and Helmut Wendler 1 The Calorimeter Recorder CARE.
TELL1 readout in RICH test: status report Gianluca Lamanna on behalf of TDAQ Pisa Group (B.Angelucci, C.Avanzini, G.Collazuol, S.Galeotti, G.L., G.Magazzu’,
“TALK board status” R.Fantechi, G.Lamanna & D.Gigi (CERN)
Evelyn Thomson Ohio State University Page 1 XFT Status CDF Trigger Workshop, 17 August 2000 l XFT Hardware status l XFT Integration tests at B0, including:
Plans for the 2015 Run Michal Koval, Peter Lichard and Vito Palladino TDAQ Working Group 25/3/2015.
Status of LAV electronics commissioning Mauro Raggi, Francesco Gonnella Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati 1 Mauro Raggi - Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati4.
R. Fantechi 2/09/2014. Milestone table (7/2014) Week 23/6: L0TP/Torino test at least 2 primitive sources, writing to LTU, choke/error test Week.
Software and TDAQ Peter Lichard, Vito Palladino NA62 Collaboration Meeting, Sept Ferrara.
LAV electronics status report Mauro Raggi and Francesco Gonnella TDAQ meeting NA62 Collboration Meeting 1-5 September 2014 Ferrara.
DAQ 1000 Tonko Ljubicic, Mike LeVine, Bob Scheetz, John Hammond, Danny Padrazo, Fred Bieser, Jeff Landgraf.
August 24, 2011IDAP Kick-off meeting - TileCal ATLAS TileCal Upgrade LHC and ATLAS current status LHC designed for cm -2 s 7+7 TeV Limited to.
Sumary of the LKr WG R. Fantechi 31/8/2012. SLM readout restart First goal – Test the same configuration as in 2010 (rack TS) – All old power supplies.
Test beam preparations Florian Lütticke, Mikhail Lemarenko, Carlos Marinas University of Bonn (Prof. Norbert Wermes) DEPFET workshop Ringberg (June 12-15,
PC-based L0TP Status Report “on behalf of the Ferrara L0TP Group” Ilaria Neri University of Ferrara and INFN - Italy Ferrara, September 02, 2014.
Straw (T)DAQ Peter Lichard, Vito Palladino NA62 Collaboration Meeting, Sept Ferrara.
Summary of IAPP scientific activities into 4 years P. Giannetti INFN of Pisa.
“Technical run experience” Gianluca Lamanna (CERN) TDAQ meeting
RICH Readout Plans F. Bucci, M. Piccini on behalf of the RICH WG.
A. Salamon - TDAQ WG Pisa 27/03/ Lkr/L0 Trigger V. Bonaiuto, N. De Simone, L. Federici, A. Fucci, G. Paoluzzi, A. Salamon, G. Salina, E. Santovetti,
Gu Minhao, DAQ group Experimental Center of IHEP February 2011
Status of NA62 straw readout
Initial check-out of Pulsar prototypes
LKr status R. Fantechi.
PyBAR Firmware Structure and Operation Experience
Presentation transcript:

LKr readout: present and future R. Fantechi 30/8/2012

Present: SLM readout during dry and technical runs

Hardware - 1 Power supplies – Despite a first positive attempt to switch on racks 7 and 8 with the old power supplies, the second one was negative All old power supplies not working, even the two for the clock distribution crates – New power supplies moved to the crates in racks clock Thanks to Phil for the help Positive operation for long periods Fuses on power distribution boxes to be changed (need now 16 A) – 11 power supplies available Need rethinking of the CPD layout for the Technical run See later…

Hardware - 2 Trigger supervisor (NA48 legacy) – As already explained, the idea was to restart the complete system (rack 7-8, trigger supervisor, SLM PCs) as it was in Have a reference system to test the new trigger distribution – The trigger supervisor was working, but… 30 calibration trigger sent, 260K received However with reasonable content in terms of trigger word and timestamp, no funny data – Some time spent to understand the bad behaviour Old experts consulted No way Decided to go straight to the new trigger distribution

Hardware - 3 Trigger distribution (NA62 way) – Use a TALK board with a test TAXI receiver and a logic state analyzer Compare the data received from the old TS with the ones from the TALK: same structure and sequence – The same reading the TAXI FIFO in the trigger receiver Read correctly the data from the TALK board – Connect the TALK output to the LKr trigger receiver Run the standard LKRSBC software Data are transferred to the SLM Time to tune the PC readout software – All this done when the dry run was already advanced, as soon as the trigger distribution has been debugged

Software (from last meeting) Slm_scheduler – Used in each PC to start/stop the relevant readout processes after a run control interaction – Ready, tested with a run control simulator – To be tested with the real run control test done, to be done with multiple copies and real readout program Run control to harness interface – Needed because the LKr hw control is still in the NA48 style – It is just a translator of run control command from NA62 to NA48 style – Code written, to be tested – tested standalone, to be done with the harness Timestamp collection – Read timestamp from the TALK board at EOB, write them on a file to be read by all the readout processes – To be written, template exists working, started at sys startup

Software Readout software – First occasion to test the mods by Christina Timestamp matching, zero suppression, new format – Test almost completed, several small bugs fixed The actual triggers are basically random ones, no calibration pulses, only pedestals So no easy way to test the zero suppression feature Otherwise pedestal data have been readout from all the available CPDs in rack 7 and 8 Files available – A program by Christina to decode the new format has been implemented to make histograms and for a first evaluation of noise.

Looking forward the technical run CPD configuration – Move from the 5120 channel configuration to a 4096 one (64*64 cells around the center) This will leave one spare power supply See Giuseppe’s talk for the physics interest – Investigation will start for a possible use of the transceiver sums to have a coarse coverage of all the calorimeter 2*8 sums done analogically inside the transceivers The same type of cables to the CPD (but they are hidden below the false floor….) One additional CPD should host almost all the sums (512 out of 570, for the channels not read individually) Use the spare supply – Two main goals: Read the entire calorimeter in 2012 Have a way to check now if all the channels are ok: could be done later with an oscilloscope when the old system will be dismounted and the cables will be free. May be to late?

Looking forward the technical run Hardware – Install power supplies for the selected area – Change fuses – Configure the Fastbus branch structure accordingly – Test all CPDs and CPDAS cards and make repairs – Resurrect the CPD configuration database – Configure the calibration trigger – Adjust the delays for calibration and physics triggers – Configure the connections between SLMs and PCs – Configure the data output links on the SLM PCs – Commissioning of the new UPS for the readout The old broke down during the dry run… No way to repair it, just anticipate the installation of the new one.

Looking forward the technical run Software – Firmware adjustments for the trigger transmission – Tune the operation of slm_scheduler and rctoharness – Test the zero suppression mechanism – Little implementation of the timestamp distribution Add the transmission of the trigger word And consequently modify the class setup by Christina Get rid of the 9 fake triggers sent to the CPDs – Implement the protocol to receive L1 requests and transmit data – Implement the SLM decoding inside NA62Reconstruction – Monitor software

Future: CREAM readout

Work at CAEN Main focus in the last months – Board layout – DDR3 simulation – To choose between 1 8GB DDR or 2 4GB DDR modules Impact on the board layout As the main access to the DDR is for small blocks, it is needed to check the timing – Decision taken for 1 DDR module PCB designers working all along August to develop the PCB – The daughter board layout and connections has been freezed – The communication firmware for the prototype will be the standard TCP/IP suite implemented on a NIOS processor But for the production we have to define the proper “fast” protocol to read data at L1

This means a 3.2  s window 128 samples written in the circular buffer in 1.5  s Evaluation to be completed with random L0/L1, now periodic

Daughter board PCB – side a

Daughter board PCB – side b

Plans – The prototypes will be available at CERN not before mid October Some clash with the technical run Will it be possible to have some test with beam in the last period? It depends obviously by how many problems will be found in the debugging Setup of the test bench to start soon Stefano Venditti in PH/ESE starting October 1 st – Crates and VME bridges ordered One crate already at CERN for evaluation – Production of the prototype clock distribution board now