Seat Time Waiver Program Evaluation and Legislative Report – Due February 15, 2011 – Bruce Umpstead State Director Educational Technology and Data Coordination Barb Fardell Manager Educational Technology and Data Coordination Office of Education Improvement and Innovation Michigan Department of Education February 11, 2011 STW Evaluation 2/11/2011 Slide 01

Memo to the Field STW Evaluation 2/11/2011 Slide 02

Update to 5-O-B STW Evaluation 2/11/2011 Slide 03

Program Evaluation STW Evaluation 2/11/2011 Slide 04

Program Evaluation Column A:Enrolled District Code Column B:Unique Identifier Code (UIC) for each student Column C:Beginning Michigan Merit Curriculum (MMC) Credits –As of September 7, 2010 Column D:Beginning Total Credits –As of September 7, 2010 STW Evaluation 2/11/2011 Slide 05

Last Year’s Report STW Evaluation 2/11/2011 Slide 06

STW Evaluation 2/11/2011 Slide 07 Legislative Requirements #1

Legislative Requirements #2 STW Evaluation 2/11/2011 Slide 08

Legislative Reporting #1 Column E.District EEM code for the district in which pupil was enrolled in during the school year. Column F.Was the pupil considered a dropout at time of enrollment? (1=yes, 0=no) Column G.Is the pupil considered expelled? (1=yes, 0=no) Column H.Anticipated annualized direct cost of instruction per pupil (i.e., cost of online courses, mentor staff costs, computer, internet, or any cost directly incurred resulting from enrolling individual pupil, etc.). Column I.Anticipated annualized indirect cost of instruction per pupil (i.e., facilities, program administration, or any cost allocated to every pupil in the district or program that is not direct attributable to the enrollment of an individual student).

Legislative Reporting #2 Column J.Is the instruction provided the student provided by an organization other than the school district? (1=yes, 0=no) Column K.If answering “yes” to Column J, what is the name of the organization? (If multiple organizations, provide name of organization receiving a majority of the funding), If answering “no” to Column J, enter 0. Column L.If answering “yes” to Column J, what is resident state of the organization listed in Column K? If answering “no” to Column J, enter 0. Column M.If answering “yes” to Column J, what is the anticipated annualized cost of instruction paid to organization list in Column K? If answering “no” to Column J, enter 0. STW Evaluation 2/11/2011

Create and Send in Excel Spreadsheet to Genesee ISD By February 22, 2011, participating districts will a completed, password protected Microsoft Excel file to By February 22, 2011, in a separate , participating districts will the Microsoft Excel file password to STW Evaluation 2/11/2011 Slide 11

Updated 5-O-B, Section B.1 & B.2 STW Evaluation 2/11/2011 Slide 12

Updated 5-O-B, Section B.3 Students must login on count day + 9 additional days within 30 day count period. –If absent on count day, then 10 days within 30 day count period. Schools must document weekly, two-way interaction between on-site mentor and pupil each week during count period. –I.E., exchanges, phone logs, Skype records, etc. –The student must respond. STW Evaluation 2/11/2011 Slide 13

Updated 5-O-B, Section B.5 On-site Mentor must be assigned as the Teacher of Record. State law requires the teacher to be a certified Michigan teacher. –The mentor is required to have week, two-way interaction with the student. STW Evaluation 2/11/2011 Slide 14

Updating Seat Time Waiver Process Proposed Discussion Timeline Internal MDE Consensus External Stakeholder Feedback Draft to the Field STW Request for Applications Program Admin/ Mentor Training Oct 2010 Nov-Feb Feb 2011 March 2011 June-August 2011 Slide 15 STW Evaluation 2/11/2011

Additional Comments Please any comments that you did not get time to share today. Bruce Umpstead Barb Fardell Thank you for joining us! Slide 16 STW Evaluation 2/11/2011