“TRANSFER CONNECTOR” G9 briefing September

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Work at Height Regulations 2005
Advertisements

A Free Resource From The presentation is from Mark Sutton For SAFEHANDS Health & Safety Consultants Ltd A Free Resource From
An Introduction to Risk Assessment
[Organisation’s Title] Environmental Management System
PowerPoint presentation
Environmental Management System (EMS)
Fall Protection. Section I Introduction 2 Types of falls Falls from same level Falls from same level -Slips -Trips -High frequency rate -Low injury severity.
Stairways and Ladders 1926 Subpart X - Stairways and Ladders
Environmental Management System Bruce Barnard Terry Parish Teresa Woodley.
OSHAX.org - The Unofficial Guide to the OSHA1 Stairways and Ladders.
Understanding the management of risks to health and safety on the premises of a retail business Unit 352.
Managing Contractor Safety Operator Forum. Roundtable Goals PICS – The Nature of the Consortium – An Operator’s Perspective (Tommy Braaten) Services –
Contractor Management and ISO 14001:2004
Title slide PIPELINE QRA SEMINAR. PIPELINE RISK ASSESSMENT INTRODUCTION TO GENERAL RISK MANAGEMENT 2.
SHE Code 4: Safety and Safe Use of Work Equipment
Health, Safety & Wellbeing Induction Organisational HealthReviewed: January V2 Department of Education and Training Uncontrolled when printed.
Safety for Working in High Places
Business Continuity Check List PageOne. - Why Does Your Business Need A Continuity Checklist? Should the unexpected occur, your business will be able.
v Falls from same level ◦ Slips ◦ Trips ◦ High frequency rate ◦ Low injury severity rate 1a.
UK’s CDM Regulations 2007 and its Applications in Singapore
Risk Management (Safe Work Method Statements)
The most precious commodity in your organisation?
Codex Guidelines for the Application of HACCP
TRAINING MANUAL Fall arresters categories. SUMMARY 1.Some figures 2.Safety solutions 3.Fall arrest system 4.Restraining system/work positioning 5.Cautions.
Occupational Health and Safety
Basics of OHSAS Occupational Health & Safety Management System
Produced 27/06/05 Seeing the Future First Tom Welland Fire Services Manager.
Walking-Working Surfaces: Preventing Falls. Start Safe and Stay Safe In order to Start Safe and Stay Safe in the areas where you walk and work, you should.
HEALTH AND SAFETY Including Manual Handling RCHT Induction CMP/FS/CIEH/MAY2007.
Work at Height Regulations Health and Safety Executive.
Software Project Management
What you will learn in this session 1.Sources of information about health & safety, including national legislation or guidance and local policies 2.Work.
Leaders Meeting Monday 8 th May Contents AimsVideo Duty of Care Leader Responsibilities –Risk Assessment –Environmental Issues and Equipment –Emergency.
4/1/20101 Contractor Management of Change: Implementation of Vehicle and Equipment Spotting Pre-Task Analysis Card Start Date: May 2010 Texas Operations.
Risk Management and PINs Why risk management is so important Why HSRs should be “qualified” to issue PINs 1 Training & Safety Consultants.
Hazards Identification and Risk Assessment
September 2002 (Version 1) CIWMD Training and Risk Assessment.
CDM 2007 Mike Lewis 6 th February New Construction (Design and Management) Regulations Revisions to the Construction (Design and Management) (CDM)
Two of the most important pieces of the health and safety legislation affecting educational establishments across the UK are the Health and Safety at.
PROJECT TITLE Project Leader: Team: Executive Project Sponsor (As Required): Date: Month/Day/Year 16/25/2015 V2.
ISO DOCUMENTATION. ISO Environmental Management Systems2 Lesson Learning Goals At the end of this lesson you should be able to:  Name.
Biosafety Clearing House Training Workshop date place.
National Corporate Training Pty Ltd0. Topics Follow safe work practices Maintain personal safety standards Assess risks Follow emergency procedures National.
Generic competencesDescription of the Competence Learning Competence The student  possesses the capability to evaluate and develop one’s own competences.
1Fall FALL PROTECTION. 2Fall CONTENTS  Introduction  Purpose  Same Level Falls  Lower Level Falls  Fall Prevention  Summary.
OHSAS Occupational health and safety management system.
Development, Validation, Implementation and Enhancement for a Voluntary Protection Programs Center of Excellence (VPP CX) Capability for the Department.
Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center of Excellence Development, Validation, Implementation and Enhancement for a Voluntary Protection.
ICAJ/PAB - Improving Compliance with International Standards on Auditing Planning an audit of financial statements 19 July 2014.
Fire and Rescue Service Manual Volume 2 – Fire Service Operations SAFE WORK at HEIGHT.
1/05 Fall Protection 2 Notice  This presentation is provided to all Educational Service District 101 (ESD 101) schools at no cost.  This presentation.
Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center of Excellence Development, Validation, Implementation and Enhancement for a Voluntary Protection.
SHE Requirements Clarification Meeting Date:17 November 2014 Compiled: Nompumelelo Kaule.
Risk Assessment Process Bradford OHS Forum May 2016.
What you will learn in this session 1.Sources of information about health & safety, including national legislation or guidance and local policies 2.Work.

Safety Systems & Practices for Project Delivery – The Hatch Way
Risk management - HIRAC awareness presentation
HSE Case: Risk Based Approach.
Ladders and Stairs in Construction
STFC Safety, Health and Environment (SHE) Codes
Safety is part of our culture at Halliburton
Building Emergency Evacuation Plan (BEEP) Training for Building Emergency Coordinators and Alternates.
Fall Protection.
FALL PROTECTION.
Control of Knife and Hand Cutting Tools
Fall Protection.
Welcome to the CSBM workshop:
All Service Providers Monthly LPS Stats October 2015.
Building Emergency Evacuation Plan (BEEP) Training for Building Emergency Coordinators and Alternates.
Presentation transcript:

“TRANSFER CONNECTOR” G9 briefing September 30. 2014 Siemens instruction for transfer between CTV & TP using a Self Retracting Lifeline (INS 17871 & INS 17871 Ap. 1.) “TRANSFER CONNECTOR” G9 briefing September 30. 2014 Agenda: Why revise and update the CTV / TP transfer concept? Why did we chose the “FROG” connector and developed the Transfer Connector? Details on the Transfer Connector Details on Siemens ”Transfer instruction” Video! Questions & answers

PROCEDURE IMPROVEMENT PRE-STUDY 1. WHY (1): PROCEDURE IMPROVEMENT PRE-STUDY Disclaimer: The statistical material is unofficial, intended for internal use and serves the only purpose of indicating, the relationship between offshore transfer “CTV drop in swell” KRIMA notifications and KRIMA notifications related to “falls, trips & slips on the access ladders in WTG”. Remarks: All the reported incidents were “near misses” or “dangerous situations” – no injury has been reported. The statistical material must be evaluated with the following reservations: 2010 KRIMA information is not included as E W & E S SR WP split KRIMA reporting databases primo 2011 and the workload of retrieving info will be immense! Vessel design and quality continuous has improved in the period 2011 - 2014. Siemens KRIMA Reporting culture has improved significantly over the latest two years. NOTE: Approximately 85 % of the reported incidents occurred during egress!

1. Why (2): Siemens conclusions based on pre-study Risk Assessment executive summary: Aspects of transfer in general: Considering ALARP the risk related to all hazards of CTV/TP transfers are in general evaluated to be mitigated to an acceptable level; EXCEPT the primarily environmental and CTV design conditioned hazard of: vessels relatively unpredictably loosing friction on a TP and unexpected drop an undefined distance in the swell. The primary hazardous consequence is: That transferees connected to TP mounted SRL will be uncontrolled suspended above the vessel deck when the SRL locks - assessed as potentially fatal (5). The likelihood is assessed to be: Very dependent on ”human factors” and weather limitations as ”unlikely /possible” (3). (C and L combined and unmitigated = Risk: H) Mitigation perspective: Refrain from CTV/TP transfer / Substitute with different vessel design / An alternative method or Alternatively limit occurrence by setting strict weather limitations. PPE. Training, procedures & Instructions. Result of current mitigation: Most entrepreneurs operate at a residual risk level “in the high end of M” based on an accepted operational risk to obtain maximum WTG accessibility!

1. Why (3): Siemens conclusions based on pre-study (As the majority of offshore operations currently are anchored in UK the setoff has been the conditions applicable in UK!) There is no individual set of legislation setting requirements for the combined process of transferring OF between a vessel and a structure (TP). A TP is a structure planted in the sea bed – consequently WAH is governed by the relevant UK WHA legislation & requirements. A vessel a float, and all activity on it. is governed by the Maritime legislation and requirements. Transfer between vessels and structures are addressed by IMCA guidelines which under the Maritime legislation is considered “best practice”. IMCA refers WAH on structures to the local WAH regulations. Siemens statistics indicates a clear incitement to apply effective fall arrest when climbing TP ladders (WAH). Siemens has not been able to identify any suitable alternative to the use of SRL as an operational and effective fall arrest during transfer between CTV and TP. Siemens statistics clearly indicate that connecting to a SRL, while on a vessel, represent a significant hazard requiring additional mitigation.

2. Transfer Connector: Based on the conclusion – what can we do? Reduce impact of “human factors” to the lowest possible level! Reduce the time connected to a SRL device, while on deck, to the shortest possible. Define procedures and implement a single hand operated ”quick release” connector to facilitate bullets 1&2: Connection to the SRL without the involvement of a Deck Hand - and TP access immediately when connecting to the SRL ensuring that the transferee can maintain 3 points of contact and proceed relatively fast up the ladder. Disconnection from the SRL during egress from the TP - without the involvement of a Deck Hand. Enhance competence and the individual awareness during transfer by defining clear and unambiguous procedures together with clearly defined roles and responsibilities. Siemens INS 17871 and introducing the Transfer Connector facilitates the bullets 1- 4.

2. Transfer Connector: What did we do? Reached out to business partners with no productive result (2012 / At that time we had an aspiration to complete the process on a very short deadline aiming to introduce the product mid 2013!). Scanned the market for PPE solutions in cooperation with “ICM ArSiMa” (2013) Requirements: Single hand operated. EN 362 approved Ability to give sufficient clearance to life vests. Easy to operate – also with heavy gloves. Compatible to Siemens global range of approved PPE & safety equipment. Tested various products – decided on the connector “FROG” from the manufacturer “Kong”. Developed and tested procedure(2013-14) . Preformed field trials without any incidents and only very positive feed back (2014). Released procedure – communicated to customers, contractors and training providers. Rollout and implementation ongoing Siemens wind dialogue

3. Transfer Connector: Siemens patented connector to facilitate singel hand operated quick connection to SRL during access & quick release from SRL during egress, in transfer operations between vessels and structures – Without direct interference from the Deck Hand!.. The connector facilitates 100 % tie-off & fall arrest during transfer WAH. Use of the Transfer Connector in combination with INS 17871 Ap. 1 mitigates the risk of being suspended on a locked SRL, if a vessel unexpected drops in the swell during the transfer, to a likelihood assessed as ”very unlikely” (L). The Transfer Connector combines the elements: 1 FROG connector (EN 362;04/A/T), 1Trippel Action self-locking karabiner (EN362;04/A) and 1 standard webbing strap (EN 354), into one piece of PPE. Spec: Breaking load: >22 KN Length: 24 cm (9, 45 in) Max. Opening: 13 mm (0, 51 in). Price range: <50 EUR Transfer Connector Steel Karabiner: Triple action self locking steel karabiner (EN 362;4/B) facilitate Transfer Connector connection to work pieces with a diameter > 13 mm Total length of Transfer Connector in combination with Steel Karabiner: 33 cm (12, 99 in).

4. INS 17871 & INS 17871 Appendix 1: Outlines a clear and unambiguous step by step procedure. Strict conformance to the procedure will effectively reduce the risk of a transferee getting suspended by a locking SLR if a vessel should unexpected drop in the swell during the transfer operation: When SRL connection is performed during access the transferee will be in the process of stepping on to the ladder and will quickly gain balance and can commence climb to relatively safety immediately - while attached to the fall arrest. When disconnecting from the SRL during egress the transferee will be in the process of stepping on to the vessel – the transferee can potentially experience a “fall on a level” onto the vessel deck. Enhances focus and awareness due to: A clear and unambiguous communication procedure. Unambiguous split in roles & responsibilities allowing the Transferee to focus on the transfer and the Deck Hand to focus on the transfer conditions.

Questions welcomed!