Marshall Public SchoolS MCA II Results

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Miami ISD Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)
Advertisements

‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Assessment Dashboard March 2013 Page Unified School District Curriculum AssessmentInstruction Data.
PCS CST Data Meeting PCS Proficient and Advance
MCA II /09 Demographics StateDistrict Number of Students823, Ethnicity24%5% LEP8%0 Special Education13%16% Free & Reduced33%42% Attendance.
2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study.
Assessment Dashboard January 2013 Page Unified School District Curriculum AssessmentInstruction Data.
Montana’s statewide longitudinal data system Project Montana’s Statewide Longitudinal Data System (SLDS)
OCTORARA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT “CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES - MORE THAN PSSA AND AYP”
Review Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY.
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-7:00.
MARTINEZ UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CST DATA ANALYSIS STAR RESULTS Presented by Audrey Lee Director, Curriculum & Educational Technology 10 September.
1 STUDENT PROGRESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2013 September 10, 2013 HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Hawthorne Elementary Board Report 2008 – 2009 Kennewick School District.
School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.
MARSHALL PUBLIC SCHOOLS MCA RESULTS. Demographics StateDistrict Number of Students Ethnicity25.6%20.4% LEP7.7%11.1% Special Education14.8%16.8%
September 2015 Amanda Grinager, Director of Teaching and Learning.
Timmerman Public Hearing February 4, :00-4:00.
Assessment Dashboard August 2012 Page Unified School District Curriculum AssessmentInstruction Data.
Park County School District #6 MAP and PAWS DATA REPORT FOR
ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Accountability Services.
Department of Research and Planning November 14, 2011.
Spring 2012 Testing Results. GRANT API HISTORY
Helping EMIS Coordinators prepare for the Local Report Card (LRC) Theresa Reid, EMIS Coordinator HCCA May 2004.
Gail Straus, Assistant Director, Special Services Shelton School District State, School District and individual school results for AYP results can be found.
1.  Grades  Credits  GPA  Graduation Requirements 2.
Welcome and Introductions H.O.B. – Helping Our students “BE” successful!
PRHS SAT REPORTS DISTRICT AYP REPORTS. WHAT IS THE SAT TEST? The SAT is a globally recognized college admissions exam. It tests your knowledge of reading,
Your High School Name 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
No tests are dropped No tests are given over No extra time is given Calculators can be used Partial Credit is given Non – calculator No partial credit/multiple.
1 Student Achievement Data Displays Mathematics, Reading & Writing-Grade 7 Revised: October 30, 2009 Official WASL Results AYP Status District Reading.
OAASFEP Report Card Update Marianne Mottley – October 13, 2015.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Special Populations Michigan Department of Education Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Paul Bielawski.
MCC MCA Data Discoveries. What does Minnesota think is important? What do we want kids to do?  Pass important tests “Be Proficient”  Grow.
March 2013 Presenter: Nancy Webster Director of Instructional Measurement and Accountability.
District 11 CSAP Results School Year D11 Board Presentation August 9,2006.
Completed forms may be placed in the box at the back of the room or mailed to C/SAC, Office of Staff Development. Questions? See Dixie at the registration.
2015 State PARCC Results Presented to the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education Robert Lee MCAS Chief Analyst and Acting PARCC Coordinator October.
WCPSS Student Achievement Evaluation and Research Dept. August 19, 2008.
1 AYP for 2007 Haywood County Schools George Chapman Superintendent.
Annual Progress Report Summary September 12, 2011.
2014 Data Book Caledonia School District Nick Christensen HVED Data Management Coordinator Nick Christensen HVED Data Management Coordinator 1 * NOTE:
FES State of the Schools. Reading – 85% of FES students will meet or exceed state standards on the MCA-II in reading. We will improve scores on DIBELS.
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
Braintree Public Schools Spring 2007 MCAS Tests Braintree High School.
Every Student Matters Understanding the Indexes, the Tests, and Targeted Goal for STAAR 2016.
Measuring College and Career Readiness
PARCC 2015 Summary Twin Peaks Academy.
Spring 2016 PARCC and MCAS Results: Newton Public Schools
Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Freshman Course Registration
Bixby Public Schools OCCT Data and AYP/API December 12, 2011.
Data Review and Discussion David Holland
Hickory Public Schools Accountability Update - Math
Accountability Rating
Marshall Public SchoolS MCA Results
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
OCOEE MIDDLE SCHOOL Oms data overview Achievement & Growth
Lauren Kinsella Dr. Wright ITEC 7305
Online Data Workshop SIP Office of Curriculum and Instruction Office of School Improvement.
Evergreen Elementary School
In the Michigan School Improvement Framework
Annual Report on Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment
2009 California Standards Test (CST) Results
Ola High School 11/12/16 Ola High School Data Team
Data Overview West Forsyth High School Forsyth County Schools, Georgia
Freshman Course Registration
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Shelton School District SY 11-12
End of the Year Data Review
Presentation transcript:

Marshall Public SchoolS 2010-2011 MCA II Results

2010-2011 Demographics State District Number of Students 824333 2168 Ethnicity 26% 20% LEP 8% 11% Special Education 13% 14% Free & Reduced 37% 34% Attendance Rate 95% Graduation Rate 93%

AYP Information 2011

Screen shot of your district’s accountability report. Identify areas of concern by circling any ‘B’ in the box and SH (safe harbor).

Screen shot of your school’s accountability report. Identify areas of concern with circling any ‘B’ in the box and SH (safe harbor).

Screen shot of your school’s accountability report. Identify areas of concern with circling any ‘B’ in the box and SH (safe harbor).

Screen shot of your school’s accountability report. Identify areas of concern with circling any ‘B’ in the box and SH (safe harbor).

Screen shot of your school’s accountability report. Identify areas of concern with circling any ‘B’ in the box and SH (safe harbor).

2011 STATE AYP ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT

2011 STATE AYP ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT

Achievement Levels for Proficiency Does Not Meet = 0 points Partially Meets = .5 point Meets = 1 point Exceeds = 1 point Example: Total Students = 30 Points Earned 3 “Did not Meet” = 0 10 “Partially Met” = 5 13 “Met” = 13 4 “Exceeded” = + 4 Total Index Points = 22 Total Points ÷ Total Students = Index Rate 22 ÷ 30 = .73 Index Rate

MCA 2011 Reading Achievement Levels by Percent Does Not Meet State / District Partially Meets Meets Exceeds 3rd 11 / 13.5 11 / 9.6 25 / 25 54 / 51.9 4th 10 / 11.8 15 / 11.8 37 / 43.4 38 / 32.9 5th 7 / 8 13 / 13.1 40 / 38 40 / 40.9 6th 8 / 11.5 16 / 14.6 32 /31.5 43 / 42.3 7th 11 / 10.8 19 /11.5 32 / 33.8 38 / 43.9 8th 12 /10.9 20 /20.4 30 /27.7 38 /40.9 10th 8 /8.9 17 /19.2 39 /40.2 36 / 31.7 Updated on 9/20/11 by MKT and BJ Updated on 9.20.11 by MKT and BJ Does Not Meet and Partially Meets – If >10 = red, and <5 = green, then white Meets and Exceeds - >5=green, >5 and <10 = white, if <10=red Green = Strength (+2) White = Average Red = Concern (-2)

MPS MCAII Reading Results

3RD GRADE READING Trend Data (2008-2011) Sub-strands   2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 Vocabulary 79.2 83.38 87.81 77 Comprehension 71.17 75.08 78.36 76.89 Literature 72.19 79.46 79 75.07 Take out the state % - show longitudinal data MCA II Reading Grade 3 (ONLY) – Longitudinal Data of Achievement Levels ADD TITLES TO THE SLIDES SO GROUPS ARE AWARE OF THE GRAPH THAT SHOULD BE LOADED ONTO THEM

3RD GRADE READING Trend Data (2008-2011) Special Education

3RD GRADE READING Trend Data (2008-2011) Free & Reduced

4TH GRADE READING Trend Data (2008-2011) Sub-strands Take out the state % - show longitudinal data MCA II Reading Grade 3 (ONLY) – Longitudinal Data of Achievement Levels ADD TITLES TO THE SLIDES SO GROUPS ARE AWARE OF THE GRAPH THAT SHOULD BE LOADED ONTO THEM   2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 Vocabulary 82.17 85.31 79.49 77.96 Comprehension 69.71 73.79 73.61 78.25 Literature 67.63 70 65.89 70.58

4TH GRADE READING Trend Data (2008-2011) Special Education Take out the state % - show longitudinal data MCA II Reading Grade 3 (ONLY) – Longitudinal Data of Achievement Levels ADD TITLES TO THE SLIDES SO GROUPS ARE AWARE OF THE GRAPH THAT SHOULD BE LOADED ONTO THEM

4TH GRADE READING Trend Data (2008-2011) Free & Reduced Take out the state % - show longitudinal data MCA II Reading Grade 3 (ONLY) – Longitudinal Data of Achievement Levels ADD TITLES TO THE SLIDES SO GROUPS ARE AWARE OF THE GRAPH THAT SHOULD BE LOADED ONTO THEM

5TH GRADE READING Trend Data (2008-2011) Sub-strands Take out the state % - show longitudinal data MCA II Reading Grade 3 (ONLY) – Longitudinal Data of Achievement Levels ADD TITLES TO THE SLIDES SO GROUPS ARE AWARE OF THE GRAPH THAT SHOULD BE LOADED ONTO THEM   2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 Vocabulary 78.18 83.22 82.68 70.7 Comprehension 71.13 70.36 75.11 72.87 Literature 68.99 75.42 71.49 78.29

5TH GRADE READING Trend Data (2008-2011) Special Education Take out the state % - show longitudinal data MCA II Reading Grade 3 (ONLY) – Longitudinal Data of Achievement Levels ADD TITLES TO THE SLIDES SO GROUPS ARE AWARE OF THE GRAPH THAT SHOULD BE LOADED ONTO THEM

5TH GRADE READING Trend Data (2007-2011) Free & Reduced Take out the state % - show longitudinal data MCA II Reading Grade 3 (ONLY) – Longitudinal Data of Achievement Levels ADD TITLES TO THE SLIDES SO GROUPS ARE AWARE OF THE GRAPH THAT SHOULD BE LOADED ONTO THEM

6TH GRADE READING Trend Data (2008-2011) Sub-strands Take out the state % - show longitudinal data MCA II Reading Grade 3 (ONLY) – Longitudinal Data of Achievement Levels ADD TITLES TO THE SLIDES SO GROUPS ARE AWARE OF THE GRAPH THAT SHOULD BE LOADED ONTO THEM   2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 Vocabulary 81.09 81.13 77.11 77.18 Comprehension 70.3 78.6 69.14 76.52 Literature 61.31 76.13 79.95 69.9

6TH GRADE READING Trend Data (2008-2011) Special Education Take out the state % - show longitudinal data MCA II Reading Grade 3 (ONLY) – Longitudinal Data of Achievement Levels ADD TITLES TO THE SLIDES SO GROUPS ARE AWARE OF THE GRAPH THAT SHOULD BE LOADED ONTO THEM

6TH GRADE READING Trend Data (2007-2011) Free & Reduced Take out the state % - show longitudinal data MCA II Reading Grade 3 (ONLY) – Longitudinal Data of Achievement Levels ADD TITLES TO THE SLIDES SO GROUPS ARE AWARE OF THE GRAPH THAT SHOULD BE LOADED ONTO THEM

7TH GRADE READING Trend Data (2008-2011) Sub-strands Take out the state % - show longitudinal data MCA II Reading Grade 3 (ONLY) – Longitudinal Data of Achievement Levels ADD TITLES TO THE SLIDES SO GROUPS ARE AWARE OF THE GRAPH THAT SHOULD BE LOADED ONTO THEM   2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 Vocabulary 69.82 74.13 84.3 79.65 Comprehension 70.4 73.37 74.65 76.11 Literature 68.08 68.56 78.07 73.18

7TH GRADE READING Trend Data (2006-2011) Special Education Take out the state % - show longitudinal data MCA II Reading Grade 3 (ONLY) – Longitudinal Data of Achievement Levels ADD TITLES TO THE SLIDES SO GROUPS ARE AWARE OF THE GRAPH THAT SHOULD BE LOADED ONTO THEM

7TH GRADE READING Trend Data (2007-2011) Free & Reduced Take out the state % - show longitudinal data MCA II Reading Grade 3 (ONLY) – Longitudinal Data of Achievement Levels ADD TITLES TO THE SLIDES SO GROUPS ARE AWARE OF THE GRAPH THAT SHOULD BE LOADED ONTO THEM

8TH GRADE READING Trend Data (2008-2011) Sub-strands   2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 Vocabulary 86.36 70.7 81.34 82.12 Comprehension 63.62 69.06 72.78 71.64 Literature 68.48 65.72 76.47 74.41 Take out the state % - show longitudinal data MCA II Reading Grade 3 (ONLY) – Longitudinal Data of Achievement Levels ADD TITLES TO THE SLIDES SO GROUPS ARE AWARE OF THE GRAPH THAT SHOULD BE LOADED ONTO THEM

8TH GRADE READING Trend Data (2008-2011) Special Education Take out the state % - show longitudinal data MCA II Reading Grade 3 (ONLY) – Longitudinal Data of Achievement Levels ADD TITLES TO THE SLIDES SO GROUPS ARE AWARE OF THE GRAPH THAT SHOULD BE LOADED ONTO THEM

8TH GRADE READING Trend Data (2007-2011) Free & Reduced Take out the state % - show longitudinal data MCA II Reading Grade 3 (ONLY) – Longitudinal Data of Achievement Levels ADD TITLES TO THE SLIDES SO GROUPS ARE AWARE OF THE GRAPH THAT SHOULD BE LOADED ONTO THEM

10TH GRADE READING Trend Data (2008-2011) Sub-strands Updated on 9.20.11 by MKT and BJ   2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 Vocabulary 78.75 81.66 79.48 78.12 Comprehension 74.52 73.37 74.93 71.29 Literature 71.83 68.86 71.88

10TH GRADE READING Trend Data (2008-2011) Special Education Updated on 9.20.11 by MKT and BJ

10TH GRADE READING Trend Data (2008-2011) Free & Reduced Updated on 9.20.11 by MKT and BJ

2011 MCA III Math Achievement Levels Does Not Meet State / District Partially Meets Meets Exceeds 3rd 13 / 17.4 16 / 14.2 41 / 43.9 29 / 24.5 4th 16 / 11.8 16 / 17.1 37 / 43.4 31 / 27.6 5th 20 / 26.3 27 / 30.7 38 / 34.3 16 / 8.8 6th 23 / 22.3 27 / 25.4 32 / 30.8 18 / 21.5 7th 19 /15 29 /20.7 33 /40 18 /24.3 8th 21 / 12.6 26 / 11.1 32 /24.4 21 /51.9 11th (MCA II) 33 /35.8 19 /21.4 27 /28.3 21 /14.4 Updated on 9.20.11 by MKT and BJ Does Not Meet and Partially Meets – If >10 = red, and <5 = green, then white Meets and Exceeds - >5=green, >5 and <10 = white, if <10=red Green = Strength White = Average Red = Concern

MPS MCAII (Grade 11) & MCAIII (Grades 3-8) Math Results

3RD GRADE MATH MCA III - Sub-strands MPS compared to State Take out the state % - show longitudinal data MCA II Reading Grade 3 (ONLY) – Longitudinal Data of Achievement Levels ADD TITLES TO THE SLIDES SO GROUPS ARE AWARE OF THE GRAPH THAT SHOULD BE LOADED ONTO THEM

3RD GRADE MATH MPS compared to State Special Education Take out the state % - show longitudinal data MCA II Reading Grade 3 (ONLY) – Longitudinal Data of Achievement Levels ADD TITLES TO THE SLIDES SO GROUPS ARE AWARE OF THE GRAPH THAT SHOULD BE LOADED ONTO THEM

3RD GRADE MATH MPS compared to State Free & Reduced Take out the state % - show longitudinal data MCA II Reading Grade 3 (ONLY) – Longitudinal Data of Achievement Levels ADD TITLES TO THE SLIDES SO GROUPS ARE AWARE OF THE GRAPH THAT SHOULD BE LOADED ONTO THEM

4TH GRADE MATH MCA III - Sub-strands MPS compared to State Updated on 9.20.11 by MKT and BJ

4TH GRADE MATH MPS compared to State Special Education Take out the state % - show longitudinal data MCA II Reading Grade 3 (ONLY) – Longitudinal Data of Achievement Levels ADD TITLES TO THE SLIDES SO GROUPS ARE AWARE OF THE GRAPH THAT SHOULD BE LOADED ONTO THEM

4TH GRADE MATH MPS compared to State Free & Reduced Take out the state % - show longitudinal data MCA II Reading Grade 3 (ONLY) – Longitudinal Data of Achievement Levels ADD TITLES TO THE SLIDES SO GROUPS ARE AWARE OF THE GRAPH THAT SHOULD BE LOADED ONTO THEM

5TH GRADE MATH MCA III - Sub-strands MPS compared to State Updated on 9.20.11 by MKT and BJ

5TH GRADE MATH MPS compared to State Special Education Take out the state % - show longitudinal data MCA II Reading Grade 3 (ONLY) – Longitudinal Data of Achievement Levels ADD TITLES TO THE SLIDES SO GROUPS ARE AWARE OF THE GRAPH THAT SHOULD BE LOADED ONTO THEM

5TH GRADE MATH MPS compared to State Free & Reduced Take out the state % - show longitudinal data MCA II Reading Grade 3 (ONLY) – Longitudinal Data of Achievement Levels ADD TITLES TO THE SLIDES SO GROUPS ARE AWARE OF THE GRAPH THAT SHOULD BE LOADED ONTO THEM

6TH GRADE MATH MCA III - Sub-strands MPS compared to State Updated on 9.20.11 by MKT and BJ

6TH GRADE MATH MPS compared to State Special Education Take out the state % - show longitudinal data MCA II Reading Grade 3 (ONLY) – Longitudinal Data of Achievement Levels ADD TITLES TO THE SLIDES SO GROUPS ARE AWARE OF THE GRAPH THAT SHOULD BE LOADED ONTO THEM

6TH GRADE MATH MPS compared to State Free & Reduced Take out the state % - show longitudinal data MCA II Reading Grade 3 (ONLY) – Longitudinal Data of Achievement Levels ADD TITLES TO THE SLIDES SO GROUPS ARE AWARE OF THE GRAPH THAT SHOULD BE LOADED ONTO THEM

7TH GRADE MATH MCA III - Sub-strands MPS compared to State Updated on 9.20.11 by MKT and BJ

7TH GRADE MATH MPS compared to State Special Education Take out the state % - show longitudinal data MCA II Reading Grade 3 (ONLY) – Longitudinal Data of Achievement Levels ADD TITLES TO THE SLIDES SO GROUPS ARE AWARE OF THE GRAPH THAT SHOULD BE LOADED ONTO THEM

7TH GRADE MATH MPS compared to State Free & Reduced Take out the state % - show longitudinal data MCA II Reading Grade 3 (ONLY) – Longitudinal Data of Achievement Levels ADD TITLES TO THE SLIDES SO GROUPS ARE AWARE OF THE GRAPH THAT SHOULD BE LOADED ONTO THEM

8TH GRADE MATH MCA III - Sub-strands MPS compared to State Updated on 9.20.11 by MKT and BJ

8TH GRADE MATH MPS compared to State Special Education Take out the state % - show longitudinal data MCA II Reading Grade 3 (ONLY) – Longitudinal Data of Achievement Levels ADD TITLES TO THE SLIDES SO GROUPS ARE AWARE OF THE GRAPH THAT SHOULD BE LOADED ONTO THEM

8TH GRADE MATH MPS compared to State Free & Reduced Take out the state % - show longitudinal data MCA II Reading Grade 3 (ONLY) – Longitudinal Data of Achievement Levels ADD TITLES TO THE SLIDES SO GROUPS ARE AWARE OF THE GRAPH THAT SHOULD BE LOADED ONTO THEM

11TH GRADE MATH Trend Data (2008-2011) Sub-strands Updated on 9.20.11 by MKT and BJ

11TH GRADE MATH Trend Data (2008-2011) Special Education Updated on 9.20.11 by MKT and BJ

11TH GRADE MATH Trend Data (2008-2011) Free & Reduced Updated on 9.20.11 by MKT and BJ

NWEA Spring 2011 READING MATH Mean National / District Refinement Areas Lowest Strand 1st 160 / NA 162.5 / 179.9 Measurement & Geometry 2nd 175.9 / 192.1 Word Recognition/Vocab 178.7 / 198.3 Number & Operation + Algebra 3rd 190.2 / 201.6 192.3 / 206 Data Analysis & Probability 4th 199.6 / 210.2 203.5 / 218.7 Number & Operation 5th 207.1 / 217.3 212.7 / 226.8 6th 212.5 / 218.9 Comprehension: Information 220.1 /235 Algebra 7th 216.6 / 224.6 Comprehension: Narrative 225.7 / 239.6 8th 219.5 / 228.7 230.0 / 238.4 9th 221.8 / 230.1 233.2 / 247.2 10th 222.9 / 232.5 235.3 / 250.8

MCA II Science Trend Data 2008-2011

MCA 2011 Science Achievement Levels by Percent Does Not Meet State / District Partially Meets Meets Exceeds 5th 24 / 18.2 30 / 24.1 37.4/40.9 8.6/16.8 8th 20.6 /22.8 35 /35.3 30.6/29.4 13.8 /12.5 10th 17.7 /14.3 28.5 /28.1 45.4 /48.6 8.4 / 9 Updated on 9/20/11 by MKT and BJ Updated on 9.20.11 by MKT and BJ Does Not Meet and Partially Meets – If >10 = red, and <5 = green, then white Meets and Exceeds - >5=green, >5 and <10 = white, if <10=red Green = Strength (+2) White = Average Red = Concern (-2)

5TH GRADE SCIENCE Sub-strands MPS compared to State

8TH GRADE SCIENCE Sub-strands MPS compared to State History & Nature   History & Nature Physical Earth & Space Life Science MPS 60.11% 61.83% 55.88% 62.90% State 61.26% 62.55% 58.44% 62.88%

10TH GRADE SCIENCE Sub-strands MPS compared to State

Questions?