1. Hickory Public Schools 2013-14 Accountability Update - Math
Shawn Clemons
Director of Accountability
September 19, 2014

2. The goal is to transform DATA into INFORMATION and
Data is meaningless.
The goal is to transform
DATA into INFORMATION
and
INFORMATION into ACTION
that directly affects student learning.

3. District Subgroups: Grades 9-12
All
Asian
Black
Hispanic
2+ Races
White
EDS
LEP
SWD
AIG
HCAM X
HHS
HPS

4. State AMO Targets Met: 2013-14
# of Targets
# Targets Met
% Targets Met
Targets Met
Jenkins 27
100%
(33 / 33) 100%
Longview 25 17
68.0%
(20 / 29) 69.0%
Oakwood 31 29
93.5%
(27 / 29) 93.1%
Southwest 15
60.0%
(21 / 27) 77.8%
Viewmont 35 30
85.7%
(35 / 39) 89.7%
Grandview 46 36
78.3%
(45 / 47) 95.7%
Northview 52 48
92.3%
(50 / 50) 100%
HCAM 23 14
60.9%
(12 / 18) 66.7%
HHS 73 58
79.5%
(60 / 72) 83.3%
HPS
140
103
73.6%
(118 / 138) 85.5%

5. Opportunities for Growth: AMO Targets NOT Met
Reading: Grades 3-8
All, Asian, Black, Hispanic, EDS
Math: Grades 3-8
All, Asian, Black, Hispanic, Multi-Racial, EDS
Science: Grades 5 and 8
Asian, Black, Hispanic, EDS

6. Opportunities for Growth: AMO Targets NOT Met Reading: Grades 9-12
All, Black, Hispanic, EDS
Reading Participation: SWD
Math: Grades 9-12
All, Asian, Black, Hispanic, EDS
Science: Grade 11
All, Black, Hispanic, White, EDS, AIG
Reading Participation - SWD. 32 out of 36 (89%) students had successfully passed English II by their 10th grade year. Needed three more students to have successfully passed English II by their 10th grade year.

7. Opportunities for Growth: AMO Targets NOT Met
ACT Performance: Grade 11
All, Hispanic EDS
ACT Math (benchmark readiness score = 17)
50 of 242 (20.7%) met benchmark score.
42 of 124 (33.9%) White students met benchmark.
2 of 46 (4.3%) Hispanic students met benchmark.
4 of 55 (7.3%) Black students met benchmark.
WorkKeys Performance: Grade 12
All Students

8. Some Things to Ponder... What are some trends you see in the data?
Does your school data reflect district trends?
How will you begin conversations around the data with your staff?

9. Grade 7 Math
The graph below shows how the same group of students performed in grade 6 ( ) and grade 7 ( ).
Performance
23 out of 62 Hispanic students proficient level 4/5)
12 out of 68 Black students proficient level 4/5)
100 out of 159 White students proficient level 4/5)
1 out of 35 SWD proficient level 4/5)
57 out of 202 EDS students proficient level 4/5)
1 out of 18 LEP students proficient level 4/5)

10. Grade 7 Math: Data
Subgroup
# Tested #
CCR %
Proficient
All
325
132
40.6%
153
47.1%
Black 68 11
16.2% 12
17.6%
Hispanic 62 17
27.4% 23
37.1%
White
159 88
55.3%
100
62.9%
2+ Race 24 10
41.7%
50.0%

11. Grade 8 Math
The graph below shows how the same group of students performed in grade 7 ( ) and grade 8 ( ).
Performance
21 out of 71 Hispanic students proficient level 4/5)
16 out of 89 Black students proficient level 4/5)
102 out of 164 White students proficient level 4/5)
4 out of 30 SWD students proficient level 4/5)
15 out of 215 EDs students proficient level 4/5)
Asian and Hispanic students declined in performance from
7 out of 16 Asian students proficient in ; 5 out of 15 students proficient in
23 out of 69 Hispanic students proficient in ; 21 out of 71 Hispanic students proficient in

12. Grade 8 Math: Data
Subgroup
# Tested #
CCR %
Proficient
All
357
132
37.0%
153
42.9%
Black 89 9
10.1% 16
18.0%
Hispanic 71 20
28.2% 21
29.6%
White
164 95
57.9%
102
62.2%
2+ Race 18 4
22.2%
50.0%

13. For ,
36 out of 81 level 4 or 5) Hispanic students were proficient;
30 out of 122 level 4 or 5) Black students were proficient;
177 out of 255 level 4 or 5) White students were proficient;
100 out of 276 level 4 or 5) EDs students were proficient;
10 out of 57 level 4 or 5) SWD proficient

14. Math I: Data
Subgroup
# Tested #
CCR %
Proficient
All
497
218
43.9%
266
53.5%
Black
122 17
13.9% 30
24.6%
Hispanic 81 28
34.6% 36
44.4%
White
255
153
60.0%
177
69.4%
2+ Race 21 9
42.9% 11
52.4%

15. Data
10 out of 12 Asian Students graduated
54 out of 67 Black students graduated
21 out of 27 (77.8%) Black Males graduated
33 out of 40 (82.5%) Black females graduated
42 out of 52 Hispanic students graduated
24 out of 27 (88.9%) Hispanic males graduated
18 out of 25 (72%) Hispanic females graduated
11 out of 18 Multi-racial students graduated
118 out of 130 White student graduated
46 out of 52 (86.5%) White males graduated
72 out of 78 (92.3%) White females graduated
5 out of 12 LEP students graduated
111 out of 143 EDS graduated
15 out of 22 SWD graduated
Several groups of students did not show an increase in the 4-year CGR
LEP cohort is a small group of students - 12/15 in ; 5/12 in
Multi-racial - 6/8 in ; 11/18 in

16. Students must have a minimum composite score of 17 to reach the ACT benchmark
There was an overall decline in the percent of students meeting the minimum composite score
data
4 out of 6 Asian students met the benchmark
17 out of 54 Black students met the benchmark
14 out of 46 Hispanic students met the benchmark
3 out of 10 Multi-racial students met the benchmark
89 out of 123 White students met the benchmark
33 out of 113 EDS met the benchmark
6 out of 26 SWD met the benchmark

17. Math Course Rigor - the graduating students who successfully complete Math I, II and III.

18. What is your plan? What trends do you see?
Are trends consistent across all grade spans? If so, is that a positive, or an opportunity for growth/change?
What is your plan?