1. OCOEE MIDDLE SCHOOL Oms data overview Achievement & Growth
Grade Level meetings
September 18, 2014

2. Kid President’s Pep Talk to Teachers & Students (3:55)
Finding Joy –Simple Truths
Kid President’s Pep Talk to Teachers & Students (3:55)

3. OCOEE MIDDLE SPRING 2014 TCAP
ACHIEVEMENT DATA
OCOEE MIDDLE
SPRING 2014 TCAP

4. OMS as a Whole… READING & MATH 44.5 49.9 56.5 55.2 47.2 44.7 46.7 50.4
rd-8th grade Math
rd-8th grade math
rd-8th grade Reading
rd - 8th grade reading
50.7
51.3
50.3
49.5 55 52 56 59
READING & MATH
State
OMS
School
th Grade Math
th Grade Math
th Grade Reading
th grade Reading
th Grade Math
th Grade Math
th Grade Reading
th grade reading
th grade Math
th grade math
th Grade Reading
th Grade Reading
State
44.5
49.9
56.5
55.2
47.2
44.7
46.7
50.4
48.3
47.1
46.9
46.5
OMS 52 50 66 60 55 56 62 59 54 57
RED = DROP FROM PREVIOUS YEAR.
GREEN = INCREASE FROM PREVIOUS YEAR.
ARROW INDICATES RELATIONSHIP TO STATE.

5. Science & Social Studies
rd-8th grade science
rd-8th grade science
rd-8th grade social studies
rd - 8th grade social studies
62.6
63.6
84.8 85
64.1
69.4
85.4
89.6
State
OMS
School
th Grade science
th Grade science
th Grade social studies
th grade social studies
th Grade science
th Grade science
th Grade social studies
th grade social studies
th grade science
th grade science
th Grade social studies
th Grade social studies
State 62
62.3
86.8 87
63.5
65.1
81.2
83.7
63.8
65.8
82.1
82.5
OMS
58.6
58.5
90.4
89.7
74.1
91.9
70.3
75.4
81.9
87.2
RED = DROP FROM PREVIOUS YEAR.
GREEN = INCREASE FROM PREVIOUS YEAR.
ARROW INDICATES RELATIONSHIP TO STATE.

6. AMOs - Annual Measurable Objectives= Accountability
Targets MET:
3-8 RLA – % Target % +
3-8Math % Target % SH
7th RLA % Target % +
7th Math % Target % SH
Gap Closures MET:
BHN Math GAP 17.5% T % +
ED Math – 2013 GAP 24.7% T % +
ED RLA GAP 26.5% T % +
SH = Safe Harbor – based on relationship with the % of change in P/A compared to state.
GAP Closures – apply to disaggregated groups/populations as compared to % P/A of the whole &/or Non…
B- 38
H- 49
SWD- 109
ED- 537

7. AMOs - Annual Measurable Objectives= Accountability
GAP Closures MISSED:
BHN RLA – % T % (-.8)
SWD Math % T % (-13.6)
SWD RLA – % T % (-4.9)
GAP = comparison to the whole % P/A - should be within a certain range. Should not be a ‘gap’, or more than a certain difference in percentages.
State will determine what our ‘TARGET’ must be for 2015.

8. 2015 TARGETS… 3-8 RLA – 58.9% to 61.5% (increase +2.6%)
3-8 Math – 52.3% to 55.3% (increase +3.0%)
7th RLA – 62.1% to 64.5% (increase +2.4%)
7th Math – 56% to 58.8% (increase +2.8%)
GAPS:
BHN: Math- 8.3% to 7.8% (decrease .5%) Reading- 10.5% to 9.8% (decrease .7%)
ED: Math- 22.4% to 21.0% (decrease 1.4%) Reading- 23.4% to 21.9% (decrease 1.5%)
SWD: Math- 32.3% to 30.3% (decrease 2%) Reading- 35.4% to 33.2% (decrease 2.2%)

9. 2012-2014 TCAP REPORTING CATEGORIES COMPARISON 6th Grade RLA P/A
School
RLA
Language
Vocabulary
Writing & Research
Communication & Media
Logic
Informational Text
Literature
2013
2014
State 57 56 54 55 58 52
Ocoee Middle 67 60 66 61 64 59 68
6th Grade Math
School
Math
Mathematical Processes
Numbers and Operations
Algebra
Geometry & Measurement
Data Analysis, statistics, and Probability
2013
2014
State 45 50 47 51 49 46
Ocoee Middle 52 53 54 55
RCPI Reports – Each CORE teacher receives these—(Plastic sleeve -week of in-service). Self-reflection—see which category shows most strength & which shows more challenge.

10. 7th Grade RLA
School
RLA
Language
Vocabulary
Writing & Research
Communication & Media
Logic
Informational Text
Literature
2013
2014
State 47 51 46 52 50 48 53
Ocoee Middle 62 60 64 55 61 59
7th Grade Math
School
Math
Mathematical Processes
Numbers and Operations
Algebra
Geometry & Measurement
Data Analysis, statistics, and Probability
2013
2014
State 47 44 48 46 45
Ocoee Middle 55 56 54 58 57
RCPI Reports – Each CORE teacher receives these—(Plastic sleeve -week of in-service). Self-reflection—see which category shows most strength & which shows more challenge.

11. 8th Grade RLA 47 49 48 46 52 57 50 54 56 59 51 58 53 8th Grade Math 43
School
RLA
Language
Vocabulary
Writing & Research
Communication & Media
Logic
Informational Text
Literature
2013
2014
State 47 49 48 46
Ocoee Middle 52 57 50 54 56 59 51 58 53
8th Grade Math
School
Math
Mathematical Processes
Numbers and Operations
Algebra
Geometry & Measurement
Data Analysis, statistics, and Probability
2013
2014
State 43 41 44 42 47
Ocoee Middle 59 54 61 60 62 55 57
RCPI Reports – Each CORE teacher receives these—(Plastic sleeve -week of in-service). Self-reflection—see which category shows most strength & which shows more challenge.

12. 2012-2014 5th Grade RLA @60% P/A FEEDER 73 56 67 62 39 School State
2013
2014
State 55 52
District 60 58
FEEDER 65 73 71 56
NONFEEDER 68 74 51 50 67 62 57 48 42 39
FEEDER ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS:
CHARLESTON, HOPEWELL, MICHIGAN AVENUE, NORTH LEE, PROSPECT, *PARK VIEW.

13. 2012-2014 5th Grade Math @51% P/A FEEDER 80 63 51 60 23 School Math
2013
2014
State 57 62
District 54 55
FEEDER 80 83 63 58 51 82 60
NONFEEDER 29 61 73 74 33 50 28 23 71 39 40 35
FEEDER ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS:
CHARLESTON, HOPEWELL, MICHIGAN AVENUE, NORTH LEE, PROSPECT, *PARK VIEW.

14. Overview of Achievement…
Achievement trends show higher than state percentages P/A.
Trends showing some decreases in percentages of P/A from previous year testing.
Proficiency level for ED subgroup show strong gains in RLA. (+5.4%)
Decrease in BHN subgroup percent P/A in RLA highest in H. (-16.1%)
SWD subgroup our biggest challenge.

15. OCOEE MIDDLE SPRING 2014 TCAP
GROWTH DATA
OCOEE MIDDLE
SPRING 2014 TCAP
OMS is a high-achieving school!
Now Proficiency levels do not matter. Did student make a year’s growth? ‘0’ = year’s growth.

16. Math is truly a GROWING subject… Skills are built upon & expounded & become more in-depth.

17. Needs Assessment:
6th grade BIG Transitional Year.

20. Strengths & Challenges
Math
6th grade, 7th grade, 8th grade
RLA
Science
Social Studies

21. SCHOOL PERFORMANCE DIAGNOSTIC REPORTS
SCHOOL PERFORMANCE DIAGNOSTIC REPORTS. (Students are grouped by ‘predicted’ performance level.)
Teachers can create these with your own ‘tested’ students. Self-reflection—can see which level group you get the most growth.
Can click and see student names in each group.

33. Needs Assessment… OMS School Improvement Plan
Prioritized List of Needs
SWD Achievement Gaps
&
6th grade Growth
SIP Leadership Committee:
7th: S. Green, J. Holland, A. Jordan
8th: N. Carver, J. Morris
6th: J. McGuire, A. Morris, E. Policastro
K. Covington, B. Ledford, R. Spangler
Needs Assessment… established our priorities.
SIP Leadership Committee will come together to develop specific Goals & then align Strategies/Action Steps that need to be taken to reach these Goals.

34. Teacher Effectiveness Report
TVAAS login directions:
User name: First name (period .) Last name
Password: If you do not have it, click ‘forgot password’ and they should ask for to send you another.
When you get Password entered, you click REPORTS, under TEACHER REFLECTION choose ‘Teacher Report’.
*When you enter your License Number—only the last 6 digits Be sure to click ‘accept’ box before submit.
If you need help understanding report, on the TVAAS home page top bar click ‘Help’, choose ‘Learning Modules’. You will see a long list of several topics. Find Teacher Report – TCAP.
Wealth of information can be located on the TVAAS site. Both from last year’s students & current students.
Can help you reflect on your teaching practices & see your own strengths & challenges. (RCPI reports also—plastic sleeve in August.)

35. Teacher Data... Teachers with individual growth scores
50 percent of the evaluation to be comprised of student achievement data—
35 percent based on student growth as represented by the Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS) or a comparable measure
15 percent based on additional measures of student achievement adopted by the State Board of Education and chosen through mutual agreement by the educator and evaluator.
50 percent of the evaluation is determined through qualitative measures such as teacher observations, student perception surveys, personal conferences, and review of prior evaluations and work.

36. Teacher Data… Teachers without individual growth scores
40 percent of the evaluation to be comprised of student achievement data—
25 percent based on school-wide or system-wide student growth as represented by the Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS)
15 percent based on additional measures of student achievement adopted by the State Board of Education and chosen through mutual agreement by the educator and evaluator.
60 percent of the evaluation is determined through qualitative measures such as teacher observations, student perception surveys, personal conferences, and review of prior evaluations and work.

37. COLTS - Considering Others while Learning Together Successfully…
OMS has a lot of celebrations concerning data!
Challenges we will face together!
“We are ALL IN….”