1. 2006-2007 School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD

2. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)  Indicates satisfactory progress by a district or a school toward the goal of proficiency for all students

3. Participation Rate Elementary-Middle Level  40 or more students in an accountability group  95% of students enrolled must have valid scores on an appropriate assessment

4. Participation Rate Secondary Level  40 or more students in an accountability group  95% of seniors must take the appropriate assessment by June of their senior year

5. Performance Index (PI)  A value from 0 to 200 assigned to an accountability group  Indicates how that group performed on a required State test

6. Measuring Performance  At the elementary and middle levels, performance measured using assessments in ELA, math, and science  At the secondary level, performance measured using assessments in ELA and math, and graduation rate  Assessment performance is defined by four levels: Level 1 = Not meeting learning standards Level 2 = Partially meeting learning standards Level 3 = Meeting learning standards Level 4 = Meeting learning standards with distinction

7. Effective Annual Measurable Objectives  The lowest performance index that an accountability group is expected to achieve  If an accountability group’s performance index equals or exceeds the Effective AMO, AYP has been reached

8. Greenville Central School District OVERVIEW OF DISTRICT PERFORMANCE IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, AND SCIENCE

9. Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts AYPParticipationTest PerformancePerformance Objectives Student GroupStatus Merit Criterion Percentage Tested Merit Criterion Performance Index Effective AMO Safe Harbor Target 2005 - 062006 - 07 All Students (623:610)  100%  156118 Ethnicity White (601:591)  100%  157118 Other Groups Students with Disabilities (115:113)  99%X94112108105 Economically Disadvantaged (165:160)  100%  131114 Final AYP Determination  4 of 4

10. GCS Compared to NYS Public- 3-5 ELA GCSNYS Grade 364%69% Grade 463%69% Grade 571%67%

11. GCS Compared to NYS Public- 6-8 ELA GCSNYS Grade 655%60% Grade 758%56% Grade 866%49%

12. Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics AYPParticipationTest PerformancePerformance Objectives Student GroupStatus Merit Criterion Percentage Tested Merit Criterion Performance Index Effective AMO Safe Harbor Target 2005 - 062006 - 07 All Students (617:600)  99%  16382 Ethnicity White (598:581)  99%  16481 Other Groups Students with Disabilities (115:109)  97%  10676 Economically Disadvantaged (158-156)  100%  14778 Final AYP Determination  4 of 4

13. GCS Compared to NYS Public 3-5 Mathematics GCSNYS Grade 381%78% Grade 482%68% Grade 573%60%

14. GCS Compared to NYS Public 6-8 Mathematics GCSNYS Grade 665%60% Grade 774%56% Grade 843%54%

15. Elementary/Middle-Level Science AYPParticipationTest PerformancePerformance Objectives Student Group Safe Harbor Qualification Met Criterion Percentage Tested Merit Criterion Performance Index Effective AMO Safe Harbor Target 2005 - 062006 - 07 All Students (209:205)Qualified  100%  192100 Ethnicity White (205:201)Qualified  100%  192100 Other Groups Students with Disabilities (38:37)---  181100 Economically Disadvantaged (42:42)Qualified  100%  183100 Final AYP Determination  1 of 1

16. GCS Compared to NYS Public 4 and 8 Science GCSNYS Grade 498%86% Grade 888%64%

17. Secondary-Level English Language Arts AYPParticipationTest PerformancePerformance Objectives Student GroupStatus Merit Criterion Percentage Tested Merit Criterion Performance Index Effective AMO Safe Harbor Target 2005 - 062006 - 07 All Students (82:75)  99%  169143 Ethnicity White (79:72)  99%  169143 Other Groups Students with Disabilities (16:16)------ Economically Disadvantaged (7:8)------ Final AYP Determination  2 of 2

18. GCS Compared to NYS Public Secondary ELA GCSNYS 2002 Cohort71%69% 2001 Cohort71%68%

19. Secondary-Level Mathematics AYPParticipationTest PerformancePerformance Objectives Student GroupStatus Merit Criterion Percentage Tested Merit Criterion Performance Index Effective AMO Safe Harbor Target 2005 - 062006 - 07 All Students (82:75)  98%  183135 Ethnicity White (79:72)  97%  183135 Other Groups Students with Disabilities (16:16)------ Economically Disadvantaged (7:8)------ Final AYP Determination  2 of 2

20. GCS Compared to NYS Public Secondary Mathematics GCSNYS 2002 Cohort80%71% 2001 Cohort85%67%

21. GCS Compared to NYS Public Secondary Graduation Rate GCSNYS 2002 Cohort78%55%

22. Greenville Central School District Summary Elementary/Middle LevelSecondary Level Student Group English Language ArtsMathematicsScience English Language ArtsMathematics Graduation Rate All Students  Ethnicity White  Other Groups Students with Disabilities  -- Economically Disadvantaged  -- Student Groups Making AYP in each subject4 of 4 1 of 12 of 2 1 of 1

23. Greenville CSD Receives Special Recognition  GCSD-Title I High Performing, Gap Closing District, May 2007  Leading New York forward to accomplish dual goal of increasing student achievement while closing the gap in student performance

24. Greenville CSD Future Implications  K-12 Curriculum Alignment  Professional development concerning research based instruction