1. 2017 Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability

2. Overview Page

3. Traditional Report Card
10 measures
Grades for 10 measures

4. Graded Measures Indicators Met Performance Index Value-Added: Overall
Value-Added: Gifted Students
Value-Added: Lowest 20%
Value-Added: Students with Disabilities
Annual Measurable Objectives
4-Year Graduation Rate
5-Year Graduation Rate
K-3 Literacy

5. Report Card Components
Achievement
Performance Indicators
Performance Index

6. Indicators Met Measure
35 Tests in Tests* in Tests* in Gifted Indicator Total 36 Indicators – 2015 Total 32* Indicators – 2016 Total 27* Indicators
*Physical Science is phasing out

7. Established Indicators
Exam
2015 Indicators
2016 Indicators
Indicators and Beyond
Grade 10 OGT Math
80%
No 2016 Indicator
No 2017 Indicator
Grade 10 OGT Reading
Grade 10 OGT Science
Grade 10 OGT Social Studies
Grade 10 OGT Writing
Grade 11 OGT Math
85%
Grade 11 OGT Reading
Grade 11 OGT Science
Grade 11 OGT Social Studies
Grade 11 OGT Writing

8. Science and Social Studies Indicators
Exam
2015 Indicators
2016 Indicators
Indicators and Beyond
Grade 4 Social Studies
70%
75%
80%
Grade 5 Science
62%
71%
Grade 6 Social Studies
56%
68%
Grade 8 Science
60%
Physical Science*
63%
72%
Biology
N/A
American History
76%
American Government
67%
74%
*Physical Science is phasing out

9. Math and English Language Arts Indicators - 3-8
Exam
2015 Indicators
2016 Indicators
Indicators and Beyond
Grade 3 Math
65%
73%
80%
Grade 3 English Language Arts
68%
Grade 4 Math
64%
72%
Grade 4 English Language Arts
69%
75%
Grade 5 Math
74%
Grade 5 English Language Arts
66%
Grade 6 Math
67%
Grade 6 English Language Arts
Grade 7 Math
Grade 7 English Language Arts
Grade 8 Math
51%
Grade 8 English Language Arts

10. Math and English Language Arts Indicators - HS
Exam
2015 Indicators
2016 Indicators
Indicators 2017 and Beyond
Algebra 1
64%
72%
80%
Geometry
Integrated Math I
60%
70%
Integrated Math II
English Language Arts I
73%
77%
English Language Arts II
76%
78%

11. Retake Rules
Retakes included if all prior year ( and/or ) scores are below 3
Once a student scores 3 or higher, that year’s score is included; no additional retakes count
Each student counts as one student in an indicator – regardless of how many times the student tests in the current year
Summer 2016 scores included 2017 indicator

12. 2016 Gifted Indicator Gifted Value-Added Gifted PI Gifted Input Points
“C” or higher
Gifted PI
Score of 116
or higher
Gifted Input Points
60 points or more

13. 2017 Gifted Indicator and Beyond
Gifted Value-Added
“C” or higher
Gifted PI
Score of 117
or higher
Gifted Input Points
80 points or more

14. Performance Index
Performance Index measures the achievement of every student. Schools receive points for every achievement level, with more points earned for higher achievement.

15. Performance Index
Per state law, at HS level, only ELA and math are included in the PI score

16. Report Card Components
Progress
Value-Added Overall
Gifted Students
Progress with Lowest 20%
Students with Disabilities

17. Value-Added
The Value-added measures use test data from multiple years to determine if students made growth during the school year.

18. Progress Component
All Students (Overall rating of a school or district using all accountable students) Gifted Students (Academic gifted or superior cognitive only) Students with Disabilities (All students who have an IEP and take the tests) Students in the Lowest 20 Percent of Achievement Statewide (Based on distribution of scores for the entire state)

19. 2016 Measure and Beyond Tests Used Prior to 2016
Reading – Grades 4-8
Math – Grades 4-8
New in 2016; Continuing in Future Years
Science 5 & 8
Social Studies 6*
Algebra 1, Geometry
Integrated Math 1 and 2*
ELA 1 and 2*
*4th grade social studies is not used, nor are end-of-course science/social studies tests

20. Report Card Components
Gap Closing
Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs)

21. Annual Measurable Objectives (AMO)
The AMO measure allows us to determine if achievement gaps exist among student subgroups by comparing the performance of specific groups of students against the collective performance of all students in Ohio.

22. AMO
In flux because of the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) – New State Plan for 2018 Adopted by Congress Replaces No Child Left Behind

23. AMO Targets
Traditional districts and community schools (Using only new state assessments)
2016 Targets
Reading – 74.2%
Math – 68.5%
Graduation – 82.8%
2017 Targets
Reading – 77.1%
Math – 72.0%
Graduation – 85.1%

24. Report Card Components
Graduation Rate
4 Year Graduation Rate
5 Year Graduation Rate

25. Graduation Rate
No changes Same calculation used since 2010 Graduating classes of 2015 and 2016 are graded in 2017

26. Graduation Rate
Four-year Graduation Rate includes students who complete high school within four years of entering ninth grade. Five-year Rate includes students who complete high school within five years of entering ninth grade.

27. Report Card Components
K-3 Literacy
K-3 Literacy Improvement

28. K-3 Literacy Improvement Measure
The K-3 Literacy Improvement Measure looks at how well schools and districts are helping students read on grade level.
3rd ELA

29. K-3 Literacy Calculation
Of students who were not-on-track in Previous Year, which students are on-track in the Current Year
Previous Year students that were
not-on-track
Per-student demotion for every student
not proficient on OAA and not on a plan

30. No RIMP Failing Student Demotions
K-3 Literacy Measure K
25 Not
On Track
1st
15/25
On Track
Kindergarten Improvement
1st
30 Not
On Track
2nd
25/30
On Track
First Grade Improvement
2nd
20 Not
On Track
3rd
15/20
On Track
15 Not On Track
3rd AIR
12/15
Pass
3rd AIR 5
Demotions
Second Grade
Improvement
Third Grade
Improvement
No RIMP Failing Student Demotions

31. K-3 Literacy Calculation 62 90
= %

32. 2016 K-3 Literacy Calculation
Score of 700 to be deemed ‘proficient’ for report card measure
Third Grade Reading Guarantee
Reading sub-score of 42 used for promotion to 4th grade

33. K-3 Literacy Letter Grades
Ohio law ties letter grades to the state average percentage of improvement**
State average is bottom of “C” grade
Range above state average divided in thirds for “A”, “B”, “C” grades
Equal interval subtracted from state average for “D”
**In 2014 the current year (i.e. 2014) average was used. For 2015 and beyond we will use the prior year’s average (i.e. – we will use 2015’s state average for 2016)

34. A = 81.4% – 100% B = 62.6% – 81.3% C = 43.8% – 62.5% D = 25% – 43.7%%
2016 K-3 Grade Scale
A = 81.4% – 100%
B = 62.6% – 81.3%
C = 43.8% – 62.5%
D = 25% – 43.7%%
F = 0.0% – 24.9%
2017’s scale will be calculated soon

35. K-3 Literacy Calculation
Ohio Law:
No grade issued when fewer than five percent of students score ‘not on track’ on the Kindergarten diagnostic

36. K-3 Literacy Calculation
Summer scores not included
(data returned too late)
Alternative test data not included
(MAP, Terra Nova, Iowa)
Retained students K-2 included in their second year
Retained 3rd graders not included in their second year

37. Components 6 Components
10 Graded measures are combined to create 6 Component grades (2017)
Achievement
Progress
Gap Closing
Graduation
K-3 Literacy Improvement
Prepared for Success

38. Report Card Components
Prepared for Success
College Admission Test
Dual Enrollment
Industry Credentials
Honors Diplomas
Advanced Placement and International Baccalaureate

39. Prepared for Success
Measures how well a school or district is doing to prepare students for college and careers 6 ungraded measures that become a graded component

40. Prepared for Success Component Grade
By law the component is tied to the four-year and five-year graduation cohorts**
Denominator of each graduation rate calculation is the denominator of Prep. For Success Component
**ODE would like to change this to only tie the grade to the 4-year cohort

41. Component Framework 4-Year Cohort Denominator +

42. A student must have one of these
Component Framework
To be in the numerator a student must be remediation free, obtain an industry credential, or earn an Honors Diploma Any of these students who also have AP, IB, or post secondary credits will earn a bonus weight of 0.3
Remediation Free
Honors Diploma
Industry Credentials
Advanced Placement
International Baccalaureate
Dual Enrollment
A student must have one of these
Bonus points if a student has one of these AND has one of the first three

43. PFS Example

44. Prepared for Success Component Grade Scale - 2016
Scale increases in each year
2016 Grade
Range A
85% - 100% B
65% % C
34% % D
15% % F
0% %

45. Prepared for Success Component Grade Scale - 2017
Range A
90% - 100% B
70% % C
45% % D
25% % F
0% %

46. Prepared for Success Component Grade Scale – 2018 & Beyond
Range A
93% - 100%* B
75% % C
60% % D
40% % F
0% %
*The percentage for the “A” range aligns to the four-year graduation rate

47. Prepared for Success Component

48. PFS Component

49. Combining Measures: Achievement Component
The Achievement Component grade combines the Performance Index grade and the Indicators Met grade
75/25 with emphasis on Performance Index
Points earned based on where in the grade range the measure falls (high, middle, low)
Points combined with the weights to assign component grade

50. Achievement

51. Achievement Component

52. Achievement Examples

53. Combining Measures: Graduation Component
The Graduation Component grade combines the 4-year and 5-year graduation rates grades.
60/40 with emphasis on the 4-year graduation rate
Points earned based on where in the grade range the measure falls (high, middle, low)
Points combined with the weights to assign component grade

54. Graduation Component

55. Graduation Component

56. Graduation Examples

57. Combining Measures: Progress Component
The Progress Component grade combines the Overall Value-Added grade with the Gifted, Disabled, and Lowest 20% grades
55/45 with emphasis on Overall Value-added
Points combined with the weights to assign component grade

58. Progress Component
No weighted points due to calculation being infinite at the ends and small in the middle

59. Progress Component

60. Progress Examples

61. Combining Measures: Gap Closing and K-3 Literacy
These two components contain only one measure
The measure grade is the component grade
Points will be assigned (high, medium or low grade) to be used for the overall grade.

62. Gap Closing Component

63. Gap Closing Component

64. Gap Closing Examples

65. K-3 Literacy Component

66. K-3 Component

67. K-3 Examples

68. Combining Components into the Overall Grade (2018)
Emphasize Progress and Achievement
Achievement – 20%
Progress – 20%
Prepared for Success – 15%
Gap Closing – 15%
Graduation Rate – 15%
K-3 Literacy Improvement – 15%

69. District Details
Miscellaneous ungraded or “report only” measures including:
Staff Data
Teacher Average Salary
Teacher/Principal Degrees Attained
Teachers by Program Area
Teacher Attendance Rate
School Options Data
Chronic Absenteeism Rates

70. District Details Teacher and Principal Effectiveness Ratings Displayed
Other education service personnel data reported
***Long-term goal to reorganize the details data into categories (staff, student, course, etc.)

71. Getting to this Point
Interactive Report Card with 10 graded measures in 2013
6 Components Graded in 2016
Overall Grade in 2018
High School Value-added Reported in 2015
Safe Harbor from most
consequences until 2018

72. Guide to Ohio School Report Cards

73. Ohio School Report Cards

74. Director of Accountability
Marianne Mottley
Director of Accountability

75. Questions