Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Adequate Yearly Progress 2010-11 [Our School District]

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Adequate Yearly Progress 2010-11 [Our School District]"— Presentation transcript:

1 Adequate Yearly Progress 2010-11 [Our School District]

2 Measures Evaluated Reading/ELA – Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who are Proficient in Reading/ELA – Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who Participate in Reading/ELA Math – Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who are Proficient in Math – Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who Participate in Math Other – Attendance Rate For elementary and middle school campuses Districts not offering 12 th grade – Graduation Rate For high school campuses Districts offering 12 th grade

3 Standards for Performance 2011-122012-132013-142010-112009-10 67 75 83 92 100 % Proficient Math 73 80 87 93 Reading % of students must pass in 2014

4 Student Groups Evaluated Performance Accountability Subset Participation All Students Enrolled Other Indicator Attendance & Graduation All Students Group African American* Hispanic* White* Economically Disadvantaged* Special Education* Limited English Proficient* All Students Group African American* Hispanic* White* Economically Disadvantaged* Special Education* Limited English Proficient* All Students Group only Provided that these groups meet the Minimum Size Requirement. 200 = Always Evaluated | 50-200 = Evaluated if equal to at least 10% of the All Student group *

5 AYP Status Labels Met AYP Missed AYP – (Reason) Reasons include: Math (Proficiency and/or Participation) Reading (Proficiency and/or Participation) Attendance Rate Graduation Rate

6 2 3 1 Accessing the AYP Report

7 2011 AYP Report Overview Page One Performance: Reading/ELA – 80% Proficient Reading Performance, 2010-2011 – Used to demonstrate proficiency. Reading Performance, 2009-2010 – Used to calculate improvement (Safe Harbor).

8 Performance: Mathematics – 75% Proficient Math Performance, 2010-2011 – Used to demonstrate proficiency. Math Performance, 2009-2010 – Used to calculate improvement (Safe Harbor). 2011 AYP Report Overview Page Two

9 Participation: Reading/ELA & Mathematics – 95% Participation Reading/ELA & Math Participation, 2010- 2011 – Used to demonstrate participation. Reading/ELA & Math Participation, 2009- 2010 – Used to calculate 2 year average, if needed. 2011 AYP Report Overview Page Three

10 Graduation Rate (75%) or Attendance Rate (90%) Graduation or Attendance Rate, 2010-2011 – Used to calculate whether or not the campus or district met the target rate. Graduation or Attendance Rate, 2009-2010 – Used to demonstrate improvement. 5 Year Longitudinal Graduation Rate, 2010- 2011 – Class of 2009 2011 AYP Report Overview Page Four

11 AYP Explanation Table Summarizes the results of the AYP report 2011 AYP Report Overview Page Five

12 2011 AYP Status [Our School District] Campus Name2011 StatusStage Sample Campus A Met AYP (Reading) Missed AYP (Math Stage 1, Year 1 Math Sample Campus BMet AYPNone

13 2011 AYP Performance Reading/English Language Arts - (Grades 3-8 and 10)

14 2011 AYP Performance Mathematics- (Grades 3-8 and 10)

15 2011 AYP Participation Reading/English Language Arts - (Grades 3-8 and 10)

16 2011 AYP Participation Mathematics- (Grades 3-8 and 10)

17 2011 AYP Graduation Rate For High Schools and Districts with a 12 th Grade

18 2011 AYP Attendance Rate For Elementary & Middle Schools and Districts Not Offering 12 th Grade


Download ppt "Adequate Yearly Progress 2010-11 [Our School District]"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google