Support and Intervention

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. LOCAL.
Advertisements

Local Control Funding Formula & Local Control Accountability Plan Stakeholders Meeting March 12, 2014.
Local Control Funding Formula Local Control and Accountability Plan An exciting time for our kids and our schools.
LCFF & LCAP. Key Precepts of LCFF Based on specific considerations: Equity, additional resources for students with greater needs Low-income students English.
Local Control Accountability Plan Elvin Momon, Superintendent Board of Trustees Barbara Dew, Board President Timothy Hauk, Board Vice President Rita Jackson,
Local Control Funding Formula & Local Control Accountability Plan A Basic Introduction Sacramento City Unified School District DELAC Meeting February 18,
LOCAL CONTROL FUNDING FORMULA (LCFF) & LOCAL CONTROL ACCOUNTABILITY PLAN (LCAP)
Local Control and Accountability Plan: Performance Based Budgeting California Association of School Business Officials.
Local Control Funding Formula and Local Control Accountability Plan Cat’s Cradle.
A Presentation For Mojave Unified School District.
Derk Garcia, Interim Chief Academic Officer. LCFF and LCAP Through the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) flexibility and Local Control Accountability.
Alhambra Unified School District
Contra Costa County LCAP Collaborative Planning Development & Technical Assistance Workshop Series January 21, 2014.
Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) Implications for Accountability Planning Stanislaus County Office of Education 9/30/2013.
The Local Control Funding Formula and the Local Control Accountability Plan Irma Villanueva Sr. Director of Educational Projects Hueneme Elementary School.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Local Control Funding Formula: Overview of Accountability.
An Overview of the Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP) January 25, 2014 FREMONT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Educate Challenge Inspire.
LCFF & LCAP PTO Presentation April, 2014 TEAM Charter School.
Local Control accountability Plan (LCAP) Parent Meeting.
LCFF & LCAP. Key Precepts of LCFF Based on specific considerations: Equity, additional resources for students with greater needs Low-income students English.
Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) Connecting the Pieces Presented by Mary Stires Director School Support, SCOE 1/21/2014.
Los Angeles Unified School District Edgar Zazueta, Chief of Staff-External Affairs Valley Schools Task Force 1/29/14 Los Angeles Unified School District.
Local Control Accountability Plan. LCAP  The Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) is a document that provides details regarding the District’s services,
CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Considerations for Developing a New Accountability System Nancy S. Brownell, Senior Fellow, State Board of Education.
CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION State Board of Education Update CISI Spring Workshop May 26, 2015 Sue Burr, Member, California State Board of Education.
LCAP Butte County Office of Education. STATE FUNDING $ per ADA Revenue Limit $ Categorical Programs $ K-3 CSR $
Developing a New Accountability System
LCFF and LCAPs Presented to the 4 th District PTA March 18, 2014.
IMPORTANCE OF CLEAR VISION. EIGHT +2 STATE PRIORITIES AND 3 CATEGORIES Who can name them?
Presented by: Mr. Kurt Madden, Superintendent Mr. Walter J. Con, Asst. Superintendent – Business Services November 12 th,
Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP) Process Cambrian School District April 17, 2014.
Contra Costa County Office of Education May 2015 Local Control Funding Formula: Supporting Continuous Improvement.
The State Budget  IT’S A BRAND NEW WORLD  Local Control Funding Formula Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) Common Core Standards CAASPP:
Local Control Funding Formula and Local Control Accountability Plan Cat’s Cradle.
County Office of Education LCAP Update Peter Birdsall – CISI W ORKSHOP S ACRAMENTO C OUNTY O FFICE OF E DUCATION.
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
BY LINA DURAZO AND MARISOL GUILLEN Hueneme Elementary School District.
Building the Parent Voice
CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Update on Developing a New Accountability System Nancy S. Brownell, Senior Fellow, State Board of Education Staff Local.
Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) & Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) School Board Meeting, March 20,
Local Control Accountability Plan Update, Renewal, Review Santa Barbara Unified School District
Danielle Tenner Attorney, Education Program Molly Dunn Attorney, Policy Program Toolkit for Foster Youth Education Success Writing LCAP Goals February.
Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) Overview Understanding LCFF Accountability.
TRANSITIONING TO A NEW ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM EVERY STUDENT SUCCEEDS.
1 Local Control Funding and Accountability A Community Conversation.
CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Transitioning to a New Accountability System: Moving California Forward Nancy S. Brownell, Senior Fellow State Board.
Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP SKUSD 2015/16.
understanding LCFF & LCAP 101
California’s New LCFF Accountability Rubrics and School DAshboard
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015: Highlights and
understanding LCFF & LCAP LCAP Priorities: Engagement
CTE and your LCAP Carolyn Zachry, Ed.D.
understanding LCFF & LCAP LCAP Priorities: Conditions of Learning
Driving Through the California Dashboard
California's Accountability System
California School Dashboard
State Board of Education Meeting Update May 11-12, 2016
UNDERSTANDING LCFF & LCAP 101
Studio School Title I Annual Meeting Title I Program Overview for Schoolwide Program (SWP) Schools Federal and State Education Programs Branch.
UNDERSTANDING LCFF & LCAP LCAP Priorities: PUPIL OUTCOMES
Assessment & Accountability
Support and Intervention
Developing a New Accountability System
UNDERSTANDING LCFF & LCAP LCAP Priorities: Conditions of Learning
Assistant Superintendents’ Meeting
Driving Through the California Dashboard
UNDERSTANDING LCFF & LCAP LCAP Priorities: Engagement
DELAC Meeting March 14, 2017.
Lodi USD LCAP Data Review
Lodi USD LCAP Data Review
Presentation transcript:

Support and Intervention

What If the LCAP Is Not Approved? A County Superintendent of Schools (CSOS) must provide technical assistance if: The CSOS does not approve an LEA’s Plan. The CSOS does not approve an LEA’s annual update. The governing board of an LEA request technical assistance. 52071. (a) If a county superintendent of schools does not approve a local control and accountability plan or annual update to the local control and accountability plan approved by a governing board of a school district, or if the governing board of a school district requests technical assistance, the county superintendent of schools shall provide technical assistance, including, among other things, any of the following:

Support and Intervention Options CSOS may: Identify the LEA’s strengths and weaknesses. 52071. (a) If a county superintendent of schools does not approve a local control and accountability plan or annual update to the local control and accountability plan approved by a governing board of a school district, or if the governing board of a school district requests technical assistance, the county superintendent of schools shall provide technical assistance, including, among other things, any of the following: (1) Identification of the school district’s strengths and weaknesses in regard to the state priorities described in subdivision (d) of Section 52060, communicated in writing to the school district. This identification shall include a review of effective, evidence-based programs that apply to the school district’s goals.

Support and Intervention Options CSOS may: Assign a team of academic experts to assist the LEA. Solicit another LEA to act as a partner to the LEA in need of technical assistance. 52071. (a) If a county superintendent of schools does not approve a local control and accountability plan or annual update to the local control and accountability plan approved by a governing board of a school district, or if the governing board of a school district requests technical assistance, the county superintendent of schools shall provide technical assistance, including, among other things, any of the following: (2) Assignment of an academic expert or team of academic experts to assist the school district in identifying and implementing effective programs that are designed to improve the outcomes for all pupil subgroups identified pursuant to Section 52052. The county superintendent of schools may also solicit another school district within the county to act as a partner to the school district in need of technical assistance.

Support and Intervention Options CSOS may: Request that the SSPI assign the California Collaborative for Educational Excellence (CCEE). 52071. (a) If a county superintendent of schools does not approve a local control and accountability plan or annual update to the local control and accountability plan approved by a governing board of a school district, or if the governing board of a school district requests technical assistance, the county superintendent of schools shall provide technical assistance, including, among other things, any of the following: (3) Request that the Superintendent assign the California Collaborative for Educational Excellence to provide advice and assistance to the school district.

Who Is Assigned Technical Assistance? LEAs that fail to improve student achievement: -- More than one state priority. -- One or more pupil subgroups. (b) Using an evaluation rubric adopted by the state board pursuant to Section 52064.5, the county superintendent of schools shall provide the technical assistance described in subdivision (a) to any school district that fails to improve pupil achievement across more than one state priority described in subdivision (d) of Section 52060 for one or more pupil subgroup identified pursuant to Section 52052. Reference slides on rubrics, state priorities and on numerically significant subgroups. The type of technical assistance is based on the evaluation rubric.

LEAs who request TA pay for services. Technical Assistance LEAs who request TA pay for services. 52071. (a) If a county superintendent of schools does not approve a local control and accountability plan or annual update to the local control and accountability plan approved by a governing board of a school district, or if the governing board of a school district requests technical assistance, the county superintendent of schools shall provide technical assistance, including, among other things, any of the following: (c) Technical assistance provided pursuant to this section at the request of a school district shall be paid for by the school district requesting the assistance. Very similar process for County LCAPs.

State Intervention What warrants State Superintendent intervention? The LEA did not improve outcomes for three or more subgroups in three out of four consecutive years. After advice and assistance to the LEA, the CCEE reports: The LEA has failed to implement recommendations. Inadequate performance is persistent or acute. 52072. (a) The Superintendent may, with the approval of the state board, identify school districts in need of intervention. (b) The Superintendent shall only intervene in a school district that meets both of the following criteria: (1) The school district did not improve the outcomes for three or more pupil subgroups identified pursuant to Section 52052 or, if the school district has less than three pupil subgroups, all of the school district’s pupil subgroups, in regard to more than one state or local priority in three out of four consecutive school years. (2) The California Collaborative for Educational Excellence has provided advice and assistance to the school district pursuant to Section 52071 and submits either of the following findings to the Superintendent: (A) That the school district has failed, or is unable, to implement the recommendations of the California Collaborative for Educational Excellence. (B) That the inadequate performance of the school district, based upon an evaluation rubric adopted pursuant to Section 52064.5, is either so persistent or acute as to require intervention by the Superintendent. (c) For school districts identified pursuant to subdivision (a), the Superintendent may, with the approval of the state board, do one or more of the following: (1) Make changes to a local control and accountability plan adopted by the governing board of the school district. (2) Develop and impose a budget revision, in conjunction with revisions to the local control and accountability plan, that the Superintendent determines would allow the school district to improve the outcomes for all pupil subgroups identified pursuant to Section 52052 in regard to state and local priorities. (3) Stay or rescind an action, if that action is not required by a local collective bargaining agreement, that would prevent the school district from improving outcomes for all pupil subgroups identified pursuant to Section 52052 in regard to state or local priorities. (4) Appoint an academic trustee to exercise the powers and authority specified in this section on his or her behalf.   52072.5. (Describes the same intervention possibilities for COEs)

Make changes to an LEA’s LCAP. State Intervention Options Make changes to an LEA’s LCAP. Kjascbnosnoadasnlancascn:olxnSCasp”adae aDVMADPMDMADasclnasasneoiinqaonqaocnoascnopnonzxwDMaSQACOWDNPQWEMW”p’qw”WDPMQKSDUHBNBCDAIICCNEIOWNALKANCQPOQWEYTJHBPCKLOACNPEIHWOIQNQEOPINQQZCINLWQWCINQLINEQLWQIONOLIQNOCQINONXOEINCOWINECOIWEN;NEW;wowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowoeccnewioneweocineqohqubcibaksjcbnlenql;cm;eqocvnoqnwocnqioeucnqineqoicneqlihcqiouecbqoueioucbqeiouvboqevboqubvoqeubvoqeuboquebncobnoqewpen Wiyakcbubaekcuaebcukebkuebkaubckauecbkebkebakubakubqsdnvsimsmvimslifvslidvnslifndlvinilisindfvilsnvio;aa;;osd;osdi;nosdivnonos;ioaiosnoiasdnosdinoisdnoaisnoisnaosdinosadinaoinoasindoasnoasdinvoivanosdnioasdfn) All of the following are state priorities: (1) The degree to which the teachers of the school district are appropriately assigned in accordance with Section 44258.9, and fully credentialed in the subject areas, and, for the pupils they are teaching, every pupil in the school district has sufficient access to the standards-aligned instructional materials as determined pursuant to Section 60119, and school facilities are maintained in good repair as specified in subdivision (d) of Section 17002. (2) Implementation of the academic content and performance standards adopted by the state board, including how the programs and services will enable English learners to access the common core academic content standards adopted pursuant to Section 60605.8 and the English language development standards adopted pursuant to Section 60811.3 for purposes of gaining academic content knowledge and English language proficiency. (3) Parental involvement, including efforts the school district makes to seek parent input in making decisions for the school district and each individual schoolsite, and including how the school district will promote parental participation in programs for unduplicated pupils and individuals with exceptional needs. (C) The percentage of pupils who have successfully completed courses that satisfy the requirements for entrance to the University of California and the California State University, or career technical education sequences… (F) The percentage of pupils who have passed an advanced placement examination with a score of 3 or higher. (G) The percentage of pupils who participate in, and demonstrate college preparedness pursuant to, the Early Assessment Program…or any subsequent assessment of college preparedness. (C) Ot7-12, respectively)…including the programs and services developed and provided to unduplicated pupils and individuals with exceptional needs, and the program and services that are provided to benefit these pupils as a result of the funding received pursuant to Section 42238.02 (LCFF)… (8) Pupil outcomes, if available, in the subject areas described in Section 51210 and subdivisions (a) to (i), inclusive, of Section 5 (D) The percentage of English learner pupils who make progress toward English proficiency… (4) Pupil achievement, as measured by all of the following, as applicable: (5) Pupil engagement, as measured by all of the following, as applicable: Cbiqebcebqeqqecubqocuneqochnenqoencoqeicninqocuoubecocucb (6) School climate, as measured by all of the following, as applicable: (B) The Academic Performance Index… (E) The English learner reclassification rate. (A) Statewide assessments… (A) School attendance rates. (B) Chronic absenteeism rates. (C) Middle school dropout rates… (D) High school dropout rates. (E) High school graduation rates. (A) Pupil suspension rates. (B) Pupil expulsion rates. 52072. (a) The Superintendent may, with the approval of the state board, identify school districts in need of intervention. (c) For school districts identified pursuant to subdivision (a), the Superintendent may, with the approval of the state board, do one or more of the following: (1) Make changes to a local control and accountability plan adopted by the governing board of the school district. (2) Develop and impose a budget revision, in conjunction with revisions to the local control and accountability plan, that the Superintendent determines would allow the school district to improve the outcomes for all pupil subgroups identified pursuant to Section 52052 in regard to state and local priorities. (3) Stay or rescind an action, if that action is not required by a local collective bargaining agreement, that would prevent the school district from improving outcomes for all pupil subgroups identified pursuant to Section 52052 in regard to state or local priorities. (4) Appoint an academic trustee to exercise the powers and authority specified in this section on his or her behalf.   52072.5. (Describes the same intervention possibilities for COEs) LCAP

State Intervention Options Develop and impose a budget revision in conjunction with a revised LCAP. 52072. (a) The Superintendent may, with the approval of the state board, identify school districts in need of intervention. (c) For school districts identified pursuant to subdivision (a), the Superintendent may, with the approval of the state board, do one or more of the following: (1) Make changes to a local control and accountability plan adopted by the governing board of the school district. (2) Develop and impose a budget revision, in conjunction with revisions to the local control and accountability plan, that the Superintendent determines would allow the school district to improve the outcomes for all pupil subgroups identified pursuant to Section 52052 in regard to state and local priorities. (3) Stay or rescind an action, if that action is not required by a local collective bargaining agreement, that would prevent the school district from improving outcomes for all pupil subgroups identified pursuant to Section 52052 in regard to state or local priorities. (4) Appoint an academic trustee to exercise the powers and authority specified in this section on his or her behalf.   52072.5. (Describes the same intervention possibilities for COEs)

State Intervention Options Stay or rescind an that would prevent student improvement. action 52072. (a) The Superintendent may, with the approval of the state board, identify school districts in need of intervention. (c) For school districts identified pursuant to subdivision (a), the Superintendent may, with the approval of the state board, do one or more of the following: (1) Make changes to a local control and accountability plan adopted by the governing board of the school district. (2) Develop and impose a budget revision, in conjunction with revisions to the local control and accountability plan, that the Superintendent determines would allow the school district to improve the outcomes for all pupil subgroups identified pursuant to Section 52052 in regard to state and local priorities. (3) Stay or rescind an action, if that action is not required by a local collective bargaining agreement, that would prevent the school district from improving outcomes for all pupil subgroups identified pursuant to Section 52052 in regard to state or local priorities. (4) Appoint an academic trustee to exercise the powers and authority specified in this section on his or her behalf.   52072.5. (Describes the same intervention possibilities for COEs)

Appoint an academic trustee to exercise powers on his/her behalf. State Intervention Options Appoint an academic trustee to exercise powers on his/her behalf. 52072. (a) The Superintendent may, with the approval of the state board, identify school districts in need of intervention. (c) For school districts identified pursuant to subdivision (a), the Superintendent may, with the approval of the state board, do one or more of the following: (1) Make changes to a local control and accountability plan adopted by the governing board of the school district. (2) Develop and impose a budget revision, in conjunction with revisions to the local control and accountability plan, that the Superintendent determines would allow the school district to improve the outcomes for all pupil subgroups identified pursuant to Section 52052 in regard to state and local priorities. (3) Stay or rescind an action, if that action is not required by a local collective bargaining agreement, that would prevent the school district from improving outcomes for all pupil subgroups identified pursuant to Section 52052 in regard to state or local priorities. (4) Appoint an academic trustee to exercise the powers and authority specified in this section on his or her behalf.   52072.5. (Describes the same intervention possibilities for COEs)

State Intervention If any action is taken, the SSPI will notify: CSOS CBOE LEA Superintendent LEA Governing Board 52072. (a) The Superintendent may, with the approval of the state board, identify school districts in need of intervention. (b) The Superintendent shall only intervene in a school district that meets both of the following criteria: (1) The school district did not improve the outcomes for three or more pupil subgroups identified pursuant to Section 52052 or, if the school district has less than three pupil subgroups, all of the school district’s pupil subgroups, in regard to more than one state or local priority in three out of four consecutive school years. (2) The California Collaborative for Educational Excellence has provided advice and assistance to the school district pursuant to Section 52071 and submits either of the following findings to the Superintendent: (A) That the school district has failed, or is unable, to implement the recommendations of the California Collaborative for Educational Excellence. (B) That the inadequate performance of the school district, based upon an evaluation rubric adopted pursuant to Section 52064.5, is either so persistent or acute as to require intervention by the Superintendent. (c) For school districts identified pursuant to subdivision (a), the Superintendent may, with the approval of the state board, do one or more of the following: (1) Make changes to a local control and accountability plan adopted by the governing board of the school district. (2) Develop and impose a budget revision, in conjunction with revisions to the local control and accountability plan, that the Superintendent determines would allow the school district to improve the outcomes for all pupil subgroups identified pursuant to Section 52052 in regard to state and local priorities. (3) Stay or rescind an action, if that action is not required by a local collective bargaining agreement, that would prevent the school district from improving outcomes for all pupil subgroups identified pursuant to Section 52052 in regard to state or local priorities. (4) Appoint an academic trustee to exercise the powers and authority specified in this section on his or her behalf.   52072.5. (Describes the same intervention possibilities for COEs)

California Collaborative for Educational Excellence (CCEE) Purpose: Assist COEs and LEAs in achieving LCAP goals. 52074. (a) The California Collaborative for Educational Excellence is hereby established. (b) The purpose of the California Collaborative for Educational Excellence is to advise and assist school districts, county superintendents of schools, and charter schools in achieving the goals set forth in a local control and accountability plan adopted pursuant to this article. (c) The Superintendent shall, with the approval of the state board, contract with individuals, local educational agencies, or organizations with the expertise, experience, and a record of success to carry out the purposes of this article. The areas of expertise, experience, and record of success shall include, but are not limited to, all of the following: (1) State priorities as described in subdivision (d) of Section 52060. (2) Improving the quality of teaching. (3) Improving the quality of school district and schoolsite leadership. (4) Successfully addressing the needs of special pupil populations, including, but not limited to, English learners, pupils eligible to receive a free or reduced-price meal, pupils in foster care, and individuals with exceptional needs. (d) The Superintendent may direct the California Collaborative for Educational Excellence to advise and assist a school district, county superintendent of schools, or charter school in any of the following circumstances: (1) If the governing board of a school district, county board of education, or governing body or a charter school requests the advice and assistance of the California Collaborative for Educational Excellence. (2) If the county superintendent of schools of the county in which the school district or charter school is located determines, following the provision of technical assistance pursuant to Section 52071 or 47607.3 as applicable, that the advice and assistance of the California Collaborative for Educational Excellence is necessary to help the school district or charter school accomplish the goals described in the local control and accountability plan adopted pursuant to this article. (3) If the Superintendent determines that the advice and assistance of the California Collaborative for Educational Excellence is necessary to help the school district, county superintendent of schools, or charter school accomplish the goals set forth in the local control and accountability plan adopted pursuant to this article.

Who Is the CCEE? Individuals, LEAs or organizations with the expertise, experience, and a record of success in: State priorities. Improving the quality of teaching. Improving the quality of school district and school-site leadership. Addressing needs of special populations. 52074. (a) The California Collaborative for Educational Excellence is hereby established. (b) The purpose of the California Collaborative for Educational Excellence is to advise and assist school districts, county superintendents of schools, and charter schools in achieving the goals set forth in a local control and accountability plan adopted pursuant to this article. (c) The Superintendent shall, with the approval of the state board, contract with individuals, local educational agencies, or organizations with the expertise, experience, and a record of success to carry out the purposes of this article. The areas of expertise, experience, and record of success shall include, but are not limited to, all of the following: (1) State priorities as described in subdivision (d) of Section 52060. (2) Improving the quality of teaching. (3) Improving the quality of school district and schoolsite leadership. (4) Successfully addressing the needs of special pupil populations, including, but not limited to, English learners, pupils eligible to receive a free or reduced-price meal, pupils in foster care, and individuals with exceptional needs. (d) The Superintendent may direct the California Collaborative for Educational Excellence to advise and assist a school district, county superintendent of schools, or charter school in any of the following circumstances: (1) If the governing board of a school district, county board of education, or governing body or a charter school requests the advice and assistance of the California Collaborative for Educational Excellence. (2) If the county superintendent of schools of the county in which the school district or charter school is located determines, following the provision of technical assistance pursuant to Section 52071 or 47607.3 as applicable, that the advice and assistance of the California Collaborative for Educational Excellence is necessary to help the school district or charter school accomplish the goals described in the local control and accountability plan adopted pursuant to this article. (3) If the Superintendent determines that the advice and assistance of the California Collaborative for Educational Excellence is necessary to help the school district, county superintendent of schools, or charter school accomplish the goals set forth in the local control and accountability plan adopted pursuant to this article.

Who Does the CCEE Assist? Governing boards who request the advice and assistance of the CCEE. LEAs for whom the CSOS believes the advice and assistance of the CCEE is necessary to help the school district or charter school accomplish the LCAP goals. LEAs for whom the SSPI believes the advice and assistance of the CCEE is necessary to help the school district or charter school accomplish the LCAP goals. 52074. (a) The California Collaborative for Educational Excellence is hereby established. (d) The Superintendent may direct the California Collaborative for Educational Excellence to advise and assist a school district, county superintendent of schools, or charter school in any of the following circumstances: (1) If the governing board of a school district, county board of education, or governing body or a charter school requests the advice and assistance of the California Collaborative for Educational Excellence. (2) If the county superintendent of schools of the county in which the school district or charter school is located determines, following the provision of technical assistance pursuant to Section 52071 or 47607.3 as applicable, that the advice and assistance of the California Collaborative for Educational Excellence is necessary to help the school district or charter school accomplish the goals described in the local control and accountability plan adopted pursuant to this article. (3) If the Superintendent determines that the advice and assistance of the California Collaborative for Educational Excellence is necessary to help the school district, county superintendent of schools, or charter school accomplish the goals set forth in the local control and accountability plan adopted pursuant to this article.

Also must identify evidence based programs that could be used to meet goals If LEA is identified as persistently underperforming 52071. (a) If a county superintendent of schools does not approve a local control and accountability plan or annual update to the local control and accountability plan approved by a governing board of a school district, or if the governing board of a school district requests technical assistance, the county superintendent of schools shall provide technical assistance, including, among other things, any of the following: (1) Identification of the school district’s strengths and weaknesses in regard to the state priorities described in subdivision (d) of Section 52060, communicated in writing to the school district. This identification shall include a review of effective, evidence-based programs that apply to the school district’s goals. (2) Assignment of an academic expert or team of academic experts to assist the school district in identifying and implementing effective programs that are designed to improve the outcomes for all pupil subgroups identified pursuant to Section 52052. The county superintendent of schools may also solicit another school district within the county to act as a partner to the school district in need of technical assistance. (3) Request that the Superintendent assign the California Collaborative for Educational Excellence to provide advice and assistance to the school district. (b) Using an evaluation rubric adopted by the state board pursuant to Section 52064.5, the county superintendent of schools shall provide the technical assistance described in subdivision (a) to any school district that fails to improve pupil achievement across more than one state priority described in subdivision (d) of Section 52060 for one or more pupil subgroup identified pursuant to Section 52052. (c) Technical assistance provided pursuant to this section at the request of a school district shall be paid for by the school district requesting the assistance. Very similar process for County LCAPs.

Also must identify evidence based programs that could be used to meet goals If LEA is identified as persistently underperforming and had CCEE 52072. (a) The Superintendent may, with the approval of the state board, identify school districts in need of intervention. (b) The Superintendent shall only intervene in a school district that meets both of the following criteria: (1) The school district did not improve the outcomes for three or more pupil subgroups identified pursuant to Section 52052 or, if the school district has less than three pupil subgroups, all of the school district’s pupil subgroups, in regard to more than one state or local priority in three out of four consecutive school years. (2) The California Collaborative for Educational Excellence has provided advice and assistance to the school district pursuant to Section 52071 and submits either of the following findings to the Superintendent: (A) That the school district has failed, or is unable, to implement the recommendations of the California Collaborative for Educational Excellence. (B) That the inadequate performance of the school district, based upon an evaluation rubric adopted pursuant to Section 52064.5, is either so persistent or acute as to require intervention by the Superintendent. (c) For school districts identified pursuant to subdivision (a), the Superintendent may, with the approval of the state board, do one or more of the following: (1) Make changes to a local control and accountability plan adopted by the governing board of the school district. (2) Develop and impose a budget revision, in conjunction with revisions to the local control and accountability plan, that the Superintendent determines would allow the school district to improve the outcomes for all pupil subgroups identified pursuant to Section 52052 in regard to state and local priorities. (3) Stay or rescind an action, if that action is not required by a local collective bargaining agreement, that would prevent the school district from improving outcomes for all pupil subgroups identified pursuant to Section 52052 in regard to state or local priorities. (4) Appoint an academic trustee to exercise the powers and authority specified in this section on his or her behalf. (d) The Superintendent shall notify the county superintendent of schools, the county board of education, the superintendent of the school district, and the governing board of the school district of any action by the state board to direct him or her to exercise any of the powers and authorities specified in this section.   52072.5. (Describes the same intervention possibilities for COEs) 52074. (a) The California Collaborative for Educational Excellence is hereby established. (b) The purpose of the California Collaborative for Educational Excellence is to advise and assist school districts, county superintendents of schools, and charter schools in achieving the goals set forth in a local control and accountability plan adopted pursuant to this article. (c) The Superintendent shall, with the approval of the state board, contract with individuals, local educational agencies, or organizations with the expertise, experience, and a record of success to carry out the purposes of this article. The areas of expertise, experience, and record of success shall include, but are not limited to, all of the following: (1) State priorities as described in subdivision (d) of Section 52060. (2) Improving the quality of teaching. (3) Improving the quality of school district and schoolsite leadership. (4) Successfully addressing the needs of special pupil populations, including, but not limited to, English learners, pupils eligible to receive a free or reduced-price meal, pupils in foster care, and individuals with exceptional needs. (d) The Superintendent may direct the California Collaborative for Educational Excellence to advise and assist a school district, county superintendent of schools, or charter school in any of the following circumstances: (1) If the governing board of a school district, county board of education, or governing body or a charter school requests the advice and assistance of the California Collaborative for Educational Excellence. (2) If the county superintendent of schools of the county in which the school district or charter school is located determines, following the provision of technical assistance pursuant to Section 52071 or 47607.3 as applicable, that the advice and assistance of the California Collaborative for Educational Excellence is necessary to help the school district or charter school accomplish the goals described in the local control and accountability plan adopted pursuant to this article. (3) If the Superintendent determines that the advice and assistance of the California Collaborative for Educational Excellence is necessary to help the school district, county superintendent of schools, or charter school accomplish the goals set forth in the local control and accountability plan adopted pursuant to this article.

A Gift of More Local Control A gift with layers: All of the factors that affect a child’s learning. Accountability. Stakeholders we serve. It’s a seven layer cake with eight layers of funding.

After All – Who’s This Cake For?