CBP Strategic Communications Plan

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LAO PDR Summary Findings from NOSPA Mission and Possible Next Steps.
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Planning for Our Future:
MASFAA Strategic Plan Mission Statement The Massachusetts Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators empowers its members to be educated,
Carin Bisland, Associate Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office Environmental Protection Agency December 4, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing.
Sustainability Planning Pat Simmons Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services.
Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.
TCA Strategic Planning Where We’ve Been Where We’re Going.
Do it pro bono. Key Messages & Brand Strategy Service Grant.
IFTA, INC. STRATEGIC PLAN IFTA ANNUAL BUSINESS MEETING JULY 19, 2008 New Orleans, LA Edgar Roberts (NV) IFTA, Inc. Board of Trustees.
Region III Activities to Implement National Vision to Improve Water Quality Monitoring National Water Quality Monitoring Council August 20, 2003.
How to Build a Network. Overview: Recruiting and Mobilizing Community Organizations Together, the Steering Committee and the Community Action Team: Identify.
Chesapeake Bay Program: Governance and Goals Options for Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration March 7, 2013.
Working Definition of Program Evaluation
WELCOME Strategic Directions Finale May 1, SETTING THE STAGE Planning for BC’s Future 2015—2018.
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
Communications Strategy Consolidation & Engagement John Chenery Director of Media and Communications iBOL Board Meeting New York, NY.
General Capacity Building Components for Non Profit and Faith Based Agencies Lakewood Resource and Referral Center nd Street, suite 204 Lakewood,
VGIN Advisory Board Presentation VGIN Strategic Planning for GIS in Virginia Touchstone Consulting Group October 14, 2009 Virginia Geographic Information.
IFTA, INC. STRATEGIC PLAN. Vision Statement The model organization striving for full partner cooperation and member compliance.
Progress Update- August IDENTITY Solidify UME’s identity as the provider of excellent research-based educational programs in defined priority areas.
Citizen Stewardship Outcome Kick Off Meeting 11/18/2014.
LCC NETWORK STRATEGIC PLANNING Orientation Webinar for Strategic Planning Training and Workshop Participants July 21, 2014 Presenter: Michael Gale, LCC.
January 23,  Balance state’s higher education long range plan and agency operations in the required strategic plan;  Involve agency staff in.
Strategic planning A Tool to Promote Organizational Effectiveness
Chesapeake Bay Program
Master Plan Updates February 2015 Salem, Oregon
Environmental Literacy
MODULE 15 – ORGANISATIONAL COMMUNICATION
Kentucky college & career connection coalition
Strategic Planning Forum Number Three
Update on development EBM Walnut Creek April 2017
VONL Annual Meeting September 23, 2016 Equinox Resort, Manchester, VT
CBP Biennial Strategy Review System
University Career Services Committee
Responding to Times of Challenge ATMCH Meeting March 5, 2006 Jeffrey G
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
SOUTH ATLANTIC ALLIANCE “PRIMER” FOR TRAIN-THE-TRAINER
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
Meeting Planners Association
IFMA Southeast Michigan Strategic Plan Summary Report
Annual Plan Earlier this week, the SNA Board reviewed the progress we have made to date on the new Strategic Plan that was introduced last year.
Creating Priority Objectives
Equity, Opportunity, Results
Chesapeake Bay Program Office and Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay
Strategic Communications Plan: Initial Findings
Highlights From Prior Strategic Plans
Getting to an Inclusive, Regional Economic Development Strategy
Support for the AASHTO Committee on Planning (COP) and its Subcommittees in Responding to the AASHTO Strategic Plan Prepared for NCHRP 8-36, TASK 138.
FISH HABITAT OUTCOME Gina Hunt MD. Department of Natural Resources
Highlights From Prior Strategic Plans
CBP Biennial Strategy Review System ~Meetings Detail~ DRAFT August 29, /6/2018 DRAFT.
CBP Biennial Strategy Review System
Board of Trustees Update
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
Communications Workgroup Retreat July 25, 2018 | Harrisburg, PA
I AM RACHEL FELVER. Hello!
Communicating the Midpoint Assessment and Phase III WIPs
Great Lakes Wind Collaborative: Who We Are and What We Do
Engaging Local Government in Watershed Protection & Restoration:
Conducting Needs Assessments for UF/IFAS Extension
Management Approaches in CBP Diversity Workplan
IFTA, INC. STRATEGIC PLAN
Troy School District External Review Exit Report April 21-24, 2013.
16 September 2010 Strategy Mark Dickinson, Director Planning and Performance Mark Dickinson, Director Planning and Performance.
The GEF Public Involvement Policy
Curriculum and Programs
Curriculum and Programs
Title I Document Training, Revision, Input Meeting
2019 Alumni Leadership Conference
Presentation transcript:

CBP Strategic Communications Plan 2016-2021 Rachel Felver, communications director Chesapeake bay program August 4, 2016

Plan Status It’s finished! It’s being reviewed! Our ask…. Please review and provide edits within two weeks of receiving plan. If all goes to plan, you will receive the plan for review on Monday, August 22. We are giving CBP leadership two weeks for review and they will receive it on Friday.

Research and Findings Three focus groups 16 one-on-one interviews Online survey Internal communications audit As a refresher – we had three focus groups consisting of CBP leadership, CAC members, LGAC members, the Goal Implementation Team chair, and federal partners. We had 16 one-on-one interviews with state partners, nonprofits, EPA, federal partners, local government and the Chesapeake Bay Commission. Our online survey was sent to 157 people, with 62 people responding, making for a 39% response rate. Findings from the Communications Team internal communications audit were also used.

What is the intent of this plan? Goals and Recommendations CBP Communications Team Action Plan I’m happy to answer any questions you may have about the plan during this presentation. I ask that specific comments on content and structure be saved for the formal review of the plan. The intent of this plan is to provide direction for CBP communications over the next five years. It is an evergreen document that will be evaluated each year and updated as necessary to add new activities and report on progress made towards meeting the goals and recommendations. The goals and recommendations of this plan are high-level with the intent of influencing communications for all members of the CBP partnership. The plan also includes an action plan for the CBP communications team that specifically outlines the activities they will take to meet the goals and recommendations of the plan.

Definition of Terms Chesapeake Bay Program Chesapeake Bay Program partners Chesapeake Bay Program partnership One of the biggest issues we encountered in developing this plan is defining who we are talking about. After a lot of discussion and for the purposes of this plan, we will refer to the CBP partnership as EPA representing the federal agencies, the CBC, and the seven watershed jurisdictions. CBP partners will include the members of the partnership, plus all organizations that serve on a goal team, committee and workgroup. CBP is a broad term encompassing all of those entities. The CBP communications team serves the communications priorities of the CBP partnership.

Mission and Vision Statements Mission Our mission is to communicate and support the policy, science and data of the Chesapeake Bay Program and its partners through media outreach, web- and print–based products, high-quality multimedia, an established and consistent brand, targeted messaging, and collaboration and engagement with stakeholders around the watershed. I want to quickly point out some other highlights of the plan. We agreed it was important to define a mission and a vision for CBP communications.

Mission and Vision Statements Through the communications of the Chesapeake Bay Program and its partners, the public will be engaged, educated and inspired about the protection and restoration of the Chesapeake Bay and its waterways. That mission supports our vision.

Audiences Elected and appointed officials at the federal, state and local levels. Non-governmental organizations that focus on Chesapeake Bay restoration (e.g. Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay, Chesapeake Bay Trust, Chesapeake Funders Network). Academic and research partners (e.g. University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Virginia Institute of Marine Science). Chesapeake Bay Program partners Goal Implementation Team members Advisory Committees Workgroup members Communicators Media Federal, state, local, academic and nonprofit communications professionals Interested public Watchdog organizations – nonprofit organizations that monitor the progress of the Chesapeake Bay watershed restoration and protection and/or participate in clean-up efforts (e.g. Riverkeepers associations). One thing we can agree on – we have a lot of audiences!

SWOT Analysis Small staff. Limited funding. STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES CBP is the authoritative source for science, data, policy and analytics for the Chesapeake Bay watershed. CBP Communications Team, while small, is dedicated, strong and educated. Possess highly-regarded website. CBP Communications Team has access to a wealth of resources, namely respected experts. Adept at communicating to internal CBP partners. Skilled at sharing content and data across our networks. Small staff. Limited funding. Size of watershed – large area to represent and multiple audiences to communicate with. Lack of consistent brand. CBP partners not engaged to collaborate on communications; lack of strategic aspects to communications. OPPORTUNITIES THREATS Outreach to new audiences (local governments, elected officials, minority stakeholders, etc.) Collaboration past our silos (cross-GIT, workgroups, etc.) Work to become more strategic across communications. Strengthen relationships with our partners (e.g. focus on Communications Workgroup). Develop a recognizable brand. Funding impacts. Competition from other organizations. Communications barriers that make program inaccessible to the public (e.g. federal government restrictions on certain types of messaging). Difficult to connect with audiences removed from the Chesapeake Bay. Competing interests among our partners. Difficult to communicate science and data for general public understanding.   The CBP Communications Team performed a SWOT analysis to discover our strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats.

Goals and Recommendations Goal #1: Enhance and strengthen internal communications across the Chesapeake Bay Program. Next, I want to present the goals we are recommending everyone works toward in their communications priorities.

Goals and Recommendations Goal #2: Increase outreach efforts that prioritize engagement with local governments, local elected officials and minority stakeholders to communicate the work of the Chesapeake Bay Program, its partners and the importance of protecting/restoring the Chesapeake Bay watershed.

Goals and Recommendations Goal #3: Expand knowledge of the work of the Chesapeake Bay Program, its partners and the importance of protecting/restoring the Chesapeake Bay watershed.

Measuring Success CBP Communications Team Action Plan 6 month review with Communications Workgroup Annual review with Management Board

Questions? Rachel Felver, Communications Director Chesapeake Bay Program, Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay rfelver@chesapeakebay.net (410) 267-5740