Building an ENI CBC project

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Il Project Cycle Management :A Technical Guide The Logical Framework Approach 1 1.
Advertisements

Results Based Monitoring (RBM)
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation
EVALUATION as an instrument of governance for a regional social plan Dr. Annamaria Casini (sociopolitical management expert) SULMONA - 22nd October 2012.
European Social Fund Evaluation in Italy Stefano Volpi Roma, 03 maggio 2011 Isfol Esf Evaluation Unit Human Resources Policies Evaluation Area Rome, Corso.
Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Presentation to Geneva Group - Paris Hans d’Orville Director, Bureau of Strategic.
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
RBM in the context of Operations and Programme and Project Management Material of the Technical Assistance Unit (TAU)
Project Cycle Management for International Development Cooperation Logical Framework approach Teacher Pietro Celotti Università degli Studi di Macerata.
INSTITUTO DE ESTUDIOS POLÍTICOS PARA ÁMERICA LATINA Y ÁFRICA LOGICAL FRAMEWORK APPROACH HUMANA.
Comprehensive M&E Systems
Project Cycle Management (PCM)
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
MONITORING PROJECTS: QUALITY AND RESULTS. DAY ONE ASSESSMENT DAY TWO DESIGN DAY THREE MONITORING MORNING Intro. Training Intro. Assessment Intro. DesignIntro.
CASE STUDIES IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Developing the Logical Frame Work …………….
1 CASE STUDIES IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT Lecture 3 Project management methodologies.
This project is funded by the EUAnd implemented by a consortium led by MWH Logical Framework and Indicators.
1 Framework Programme 7 Guide for Applicants
Lesson 5 – Logical Framework Approach (LFA)
1 RBM Background Development aid is often provided on a point to point basis with no consistency with countries priorities. Development efforts are often.
Project design & Planning The Logical Framework Approach An Over View Icelandic International Development Agency (ICEIDA) Iceland United Nations University.
KEYWORDS REFRESHMENT. Activities: in the context of the Logframe Matrix, these are the actions (tasks) that have to be taken to produce results Analysis.
MOD 6050 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND FUND RAISING TOPIC – PROPOSAL WRITING AND FUNDRAISING (WK 6 &8) LECTURER: DR. G. O. K’AOL.
Promising Ideas and Issues to Consider in Reaching Reading and Literacy Goals Logistics of supervision, training, support to teachers Sakil Malik Director.
1 PROJECT CYCLE MANAGEMENT Gilles Ceralli TR Methodology – HI Luxembourg 06/2008.
EDPQS in 10 minutes: Overview of European Drug Prevention Quality Standards (EDPQS) With financial support from the Drug Prevention and Information Programme.
Monitoring and Evaluation
Advanced Engineering Projects Management Dr. Nabil I El Sawalhi Associate Professor of Construction Management 1AEPM 4.
Logical Framework Slide 1 Mekong Institute & UNESCO Regional Office-Bangkok 23 February – 6 March 2009; Khon Kaen, Thailand Prepared by the Education Policy.
0 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute While there is no prescribed format for a good delivery plan, it should answer 10 questions What a good delivery.
Key Components of a successful Proposal OAS / IACML Workshop on Technical Assistance. San José, Costa Rica May 8, 2007 By: José Luis Alvarez R. Consultant.
Logical Framework Approach 1. Approaches to Activity Design Logical Framework Approach (LFA) – Originally developed in the 1970s, this planning process.
S3.1 session day 5 2 Programme management download resources from Approved by the Advisory Group: Programme management Programme and project.
Logical Framework Approach An Evaluation Toolbox Presentation
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
Num Dum Case Study.
Template Contents of the Low Carbon Development Strategy (LCDS)
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 9. Periodic data collection methods.
Translating ideas into proposals for action programmes
Gender-Sensitive Monitoring and Evaluation
Gender-Sensitive Monitoring and Evaluation
Interreg V-A Romania-Bulgaria Programme
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 2. Session 6. Developing indicators.
Measuring Outcomes of GEO and GEOSS: A Proposed Framework for Performance Measurement and Evaluation Ed Washburn, US EPA.
Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Presentation to Geneva Group - Paris Hans d’Orville Director, Bureau of Strategic.
Draft OECD Best Practices for Performance Budgeting
منهج الإطار المنطقي وإطار الرصد والتقييم وإطار النتائج
Session 9 Recap on LFM and IL.
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
Project Management Training
Translating ideas into proposals for action programmes
TITLE Business Case YOUR LOGO BUSINESS CASE PRESENTATION 00/00/0000
Understanding logic, structure and documentation of the project
Session 4: Project Management in Humanitarian Context
Translating ideas into proposals for action programmes
Monitoring programs and projects
Monitoring and evaluation
Translating ideas into proposals for action programmes
Field monitoring Project (number and title)
MAIN CHANGES TO LOGFRAME TEMPLATE – PRAG 2015 / PRAG 2016
What is your impact pathway?
Civil Society Facility and Media Programme Call for proposals: EuropeAid/162473/DH/ACT/Multi Webinar no. 3: Preparing effective Concept Note.
Project intervention logic
Integrating Gender into Rural Development M&E in Projects and Programs
INFORMATION SEMINAR Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania programme
How is an M & E framework derived from the logframe?
Project intervention logic
Gender Training Workshop Name of Institution Place Date
M & E Plans and Frameworks
Presentation transcript:

Building an ENI CBC project Introducing the Logical Framework Matrix Notes for trainers: note that the terminology used in this presentation, as well as last slide, need to be adapted to the terminology and specificities of the programme documents for the call ENI CBC Programme Latvia-Lithuania-Belarus 2014-20120 Seminar for Potential Applicants and Beneficiaries Minsk, 18 October 2016

Change for the best value project better change change project good good bad A project is instrument for delivering actual change This change must bring concrete benefits These benefits must be measurable/evaluable The ultimate value of the benefits must significantly exceeding the project costs Notes for trainers (suggested comments): Project in an instrument for delivery positive change

Aiming at a positive change impact PROJECT outcomes outputs Notes for trainers (suggested comments): Describe mechanism of delivery specific change using this example activities Situation Change input

A project intervention logic impact Primary and secondary, long term effects produced by the Action Likely or achieved short-term and medium-term effects of an Action’s outputs Products, capital goods and services which result from an Action’s activities Project operations requiring utilization of assigned resources Physical and non physical resources (financial, administrative, regulatory, facilities, equipment and etc.) PROJECT outcomes outputs Notes for trainers (suggested comments): Key components of the project Practically, here is a project implementation logic activities inputs

Causes of the key problem A project development logic Effects Means Ends Key problem Impact OO Stakeholders Final beneficiaries Causes of the key problem Outcomes SOs Target groups Needs Outputs Activities Causes

LFM: intervention logic Overall Objective (impact) Intervention logic: rationale Indicators Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objectives: outcomes Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Specific Objectives (outcomes) SO1 … SO(N) Impact Outcomes Outputs Op1 (№№ of SO(s)) … Op(n) (№№ of SO(s)) Outputs Activities Activities A1 (№№ of Op(s)) … A(n) (№№ of Op(s))

LFM: project feasibility Intervention logic: rationale Indicators Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objectives: outcomes Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Factors outside direct project management control Impact Necessary for providing planned impact Outcomes Necessary for achievement of the project outcomes Outputs Activities Necessary for implementation of the project activities

LFM: indicators Intervention logic: rationale Indicators (ref. year) Baseline (ref. date Current value Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Intervention logic: rationale Indicators Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs:

LFM: progress defining & control Intervention logic: rationale Indicators (ref. year) Baseline (ref. date Current value Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objectives: Outcomes Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Indicator is verifiable statement describing objective or output in terms of quality (nature) - LFM column 2, quantity (including segregation by sex), place and time of performance with regards to the specific target group(s)

LFM: impact indicators Intervention logic: rationale Indicators (ref. year) Baseline (ref. date Current value Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objectives: Outcomes Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Impact indicators measure long term effects: how the project contributes to the strategic goals Ideally, to be drawn from the partner's strategy Example: a share of citizens who use bicycles for daily trips within the inner city (in comparison with those who use public transport and personal cars)

LFM: outcome indicators Intervention logic: rationale Indicators (ref. year) Baseline (ref. date Current value Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objectives: outcomes Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Measure specific objectives (outcomes) in terms of target group benefits (changes) Examples: Actual number of citizens and guests who use new cycling facilities in the inner city (daily) Carrying capacity of the new cycling facilities in the inner city (opportunity for users)

LFM: output indicators Intervention logic: rationale Indicators (ref. year) Baseline (ref. date Current value Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objectives: outcomes Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Output indicators measure the immediate and concrete consequences (products or services) of the activities implemented and resources used Examples: Length of newly built/ marked/ equipped cycling routes Number of citizens reached by the informational campaign on new cycling opportunities

LFM: value of indicators Intervention logic: rationale Indicators (ref. year) Baseline (ref. date Current value Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objectives: outcomes Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Baseline: the starting value of indicators the project intends to build over Current: the value of the indicator at the specific date within the timeline of the project implementation process Targets: planned level to be achieved due to the project implementation

LFM: verification of indicators Intervention logic: rationale Indicators (ref. year) Baseline (ref. date Current value Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objectives: outcomes Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Indicate where and in what form information on achievement of the overall objective, specific objective and outputs can be found internal project documentation e.g. reports or specific research external data (official statistics or external research Main function: allow the management of the project and the monitors to verify whether the project achieves the planned level of indicators

LFM: means Sources and means of verification Intervention logic: rationale Indicators (ref. year) Baseline (ref. date Current value Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objectives: outcomes Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Physical and non-physical resources (often referred to as ‘inputs’) that are necessary to carry out the planned activities and manage the project, e.g.: personnel/staff resources, supplies/equipment, services (trainings required), studies, operational facilities etc.

LFM: costs Sources and means of verification Intervention logic: rationale Indicators (ref. year) Baseline (ref. date Current value Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objectives: outcomes Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Translation of all the identified resources (“means”) into financial terms: what costs will be required to implement activities by the means as defined? classification of the costs required for implementation of all activities according to the budget lines

LFM: project implementation logic Intervention logic: rationale Indicators Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs: impact Intervention logic: rationale Indicators Sources and means of verification Assumptions Intervention logic: rationale Indicators Sources and means of verification Assumptions Activities Intervention logic: rationale Indicators Sources and means of verification Assumptions Outputs Activities Intervention logic: rationale Indicators Sources and means of verification Assumptions Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Intervention logic: rationale Indicators Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objectives: outcomes Outputs Activities Intervention logic: rationale Indicators Sources and means of verification Assumptions Project outcomes outputs activities inputs

Developing LFM Intervention logic: rationale Indicators Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objectives: Outcomes Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Means Ends Effects Impact OO Outputs Outcomes SOs Key problem Needs Causes of the key problem Stakeholders Activities Final beneficiaries Target groups Causes Means Ends Effects Impact OO Outputs Outcomes SOs Key problem Needs Causes of the key problem Stakeholders Activities Final beneficiaries Target groups Causes Intervention logic: rationale Indicators Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Intervention logic: rationale Indicators Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Intervention logic: rationale Indicators Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Intervention logic: rationale Indicators Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Intervention logic: rationale Indicators Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Key problem Overall objective Objectives-impacts Final beneficiaries Stakeholders Causes of the key problem Objectives-outcomes Specific objectives Target groups Needs Objectives-outputs Outputs Activities

LFM development: methodologies Methodology Output Problem analysis Stakeholder analysis Objective analysis Strategy analysis and identification of target groups and final beneficiaries Feasibility analysis Identification of indicators Problem tree List of shareholders and identification how they are affected by problems Objective tree Project intervention (implementation) logic Risks & assumptions and related activities System of monitoring and control

LFM and project description Contents of the LFM should be carefully coordinated with other components of the project application Pay attention to definitions and references used in all sections in the Application Form and annexes Annex 4. Logical Framework of the Project Intervention logic: rationale Indicators Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objectives: outcomes Outputs Activities Means: Costs:

LFM and Action Plan Action Plan / Timetable of the Project Annex 4. Logical Framework of the Project Intervention logic: rationale Indicators Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objectives: outcomes Outputs Activities Means: Costs:

LFM and Budget (1) Budget, sheet 1 Annex 4. Logical Framework of the Project Intervention logic: rationale Indicators Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objectives: outcomes Outputs Activities Means: Costs:

LFM and Budget (2) Budget, sheet 2 Annex 4. Logical Framework of the Project Intervention logic: rationale Indicators Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objectives: outcomes Outputs Activities Means: Costs:

LFM and detailed activity planning Intervention logic: rationale Indicators Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objectives: outcome() Outputs Activities Means: Costs:

LFM and project reporting Final Report Progress Report Intervention logic: rationale Indicators Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs:

LFM as universal tool Developing LFM please keep in mind that you will need it for detailed activity planning project management, including internal monitoring & control and project reporting LFM will be also used for evaluation of your Application external monitoring, control and assessment

Thank you for attention !