Grey Owl Municipal Water feasibility study

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Contractor Management. Struggling with Contractor Management ? ? ? Getting purchasing on board? Specifically stating environmental compliance in contracts?
Advertisements

Cara - Waste Management That Doesn't Cost The Earth WASTE MANAGEMENT - INDUSTRY BEST PRACTICE Dr. Peter Coulahan Cara Group Safety Manager A PRESENTATION.
Presented by Nicole Kohnert, P.Eng., FEC Manager of Regional Engineering Services October 2010 Reports Produced by CH2M Hill PHASE 2 Technical Memorandum.
Finally! – A Process that Looks at Environmental Risk Early J. S. Irving Environmental Compliance Idaho National Laboratory.
Stanlick Sewer Treatment Plant Upgrade Implementation Date: September 1, 2008.
Water Programming One of our programs major concern was the loss of our major computers (Programming Logic Controls) due to age. The equipment was replaced.
Town of Plattsburgh Cumberland Head Sewer District Welcome To CUMBERLAND HEAD SEWER DISTRICT INFORMATIONAL MEETING JULY 2009.
2009 ENVIRONMENTAL SEMINAR Boat Bottom Pressure Washing Requirements & General Permit for the Discharge of Stormwater Associated with Industrial Activity.
City of Farmersville, Texas Water and Wastewater Rate Study February 2011.
Charlie Lake Sewer Collection System & Lagoon Upgrades Thursday June 20 th, 2013.
Cuba’s Future Development Needs, Funding Models, and Alternatives. A Perspective of the Operation of a Cuban Water & Sewer Utility. Eduardo Vega-Llort,
Promoting Smart Growth with Wastewater Management Optimizing Conservation and Growth with Wastewater Management Strategies.
Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection.
SPWSTAC 2006 From POU to Centralized Arsenic Treatment: A Small Water System Case Study 2006 NGWA Naturally Occurring Contaminants Conference J. Mitchell.
Water & Waste Disposal Loans and Grants The funding purpose is to construct, enlarge, extend or improve water, wastewater and solid waste systems in rural.
Agenda August 5, Introduction – Natalie Robottom 2.Background and History – Rob Delaune 3.Present Conceptual Engineering Design Proposed Tasks -
Pelican Group of Lakes Improvement District Public Hearing on Facilities Plan Agenda Introduction of PGOLID Board of DirectorsDale Haakenstad Introduction.
Utilities Department Solid Waste System Tipping Fees November 11, 2008.
1 st Quarter 2015 Financial Report City Council Meeting June 11, 2015.
Transmission Outage Process April Purpose In compliance with the Protocols and the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) Operating Guides,
Hospital Albert Schweitzer Case Study. CASE STUDY 1- HOSPITAL ALBERT SCWEITZER, ARTIBONITE VALLEY, HAITI ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS REHABILITATION PROJECT.
Indian & Northern Affairs Canada March 10, 2010 On-Site Water and Wastewater Systems - First Nations Water Symposium Matthew Hough, P.Eng. Infrastructure.
Work Session Water Issues and Water Rate Study Topics: Fundamental Assumption Key Issues Areas of Concern / Focus Water Audit Water Meter Audit Water Rate.
Sanitary Sewer Fee Study March 4, Summary Sausalito’s 75-year-old sewer system is old and deteriorated. While the current rates have allowed the.
Desalination for Drinking Water Purposes TCEQ Trade Fair David A. Williams, P.E Robert W. Sims, P.E. Austin, Texas May, 2016.
Phase II and Compost Facility Upgrade Projects February 16, 2012.
PUBLIC WORKS FY 2012 Proposed Budget May 24, 2012.
Mandatory Connection 2 nd Information Meeting November 17, 2015.
UTILITY PARTNERSHIP CITY OF STOCKTON & OMI / THAMES WATER SERVICE CONTRACT.
CSA 7 – Boulder Creek. YOUR SANITATION FACILITY Facility Includes the Following Five Pump Stations –Total of 10 pumps 16,553 feet of collection lines.
STOCKTON DELTA WATER SUPPLY PROJECT (DWSP) Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Certification Hearing November 8, 2005 Mark J. Madison, Director Municipal.
Internal/External Sales Rate Development Level III
U.S. Air Force Cooperative Agreement for Perfluorinated Compounds Response Activities Jayne Joy, P.E. February 9, 2017.
Limited Service Agreements
Proposed Draft Financial Plan April 10, 2017
EDENTON-CHOWAN SCHOOLS
RUSSELL - ROSSBURN WATER SUPPLY
Chromium 6 Regulation Corrective Action Plan October 6, 2015
Mangawhai Wastewater Strategy and Options 7 August 2017.
The Solid Waste Disposal Act and the Superfund Act
Perris Water Filtration Plant Membrane Upgrade – Phase I
CFI Requirements – Institutional Commitment and Sustainability
Wastewater Surcharge Reduction for Manufacturing Processes
Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada Leveraging Infrastructure Funds
Financing Land Development Projects
Springbrook Estates Sewer Improvement Area Informational Meeting
CITY OF MARSHALL CHLORIDE ISSUES September 26, 2017
Victor Valley Water Reclamation Authority Biogas to Energy Project with Omnivore™ Digester Demonstration May 30th, 2013.
HARPURSVILLE CENTRAL SCHOOL
U.S. EPA e-Manifest Program
Joshua Basin Water District Revised Rate Recommendations
Georgetown county water and sewer district
Distributed water recycling
MTA 2019 Final Proposed Budget November Financial Plan
Removes Some of the Regulatory Restrictions
CITY OF MARSHALL CHLORIDE ISSUES NOVEMBER 22, 2016
Treatment –Reverse Osmosis (Desalination)
WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT 19 September 2018
CP-TXT Amendment to the Capital Improvements Element & Public School Facilities Element (Annual Update) October 2008.
Controlling Project Cost and Schedule
FEE INCREASES Public Work Shop June 2, 2018.
COUNTRY CLUB TOWNHOMES HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION
Delta Water Supply Project
Linking AMPs to Short-Term and Long-Term Investment Plans
Construction Contract Administration
City of Sunrise Wastewater Reuse Program
Director of Water Engineering
EDENTON-CHOWAN SCHOOLS
Fiscal Years 2019/20 and 2020/21 Biennial Budget Adoption
Dollars and Cents: Ways to Save and be More Resourceful
Presentation transcript:

Grey Owl Municipal Water feasibility study Grey Owl Board of Directors Presented August 27th, 2017 Fall AGM

Current situation Grey owl Estates is currently non compliant in two areas. Arsenic levels exceeds acceptable levels in two wells. Inadequate contact time for the sodium hypochlorite to mix with the well water. Manganese levels currently exceeds the proposed maximum acceptable levels for manganese in drinking water. Grey owl Estates is required to complete a compliance plan to become compliant in all of these issues in the future. The Compliance plan has been submitted and accepted by the government but it is still a working document that will continue to be improved.

Current situation Burns Maendel consulting engineers (BMCE) were retained by Grey Owl estates in the spring of 2017 to conduct a feasibility study. In august, 2017 a draft version of this study was shared with the board of grey owl estates. The draft feasibility study provided grey owl estates with two options to become compliant.

OPTION #1 Water treatment plant: A water treatment plant would be constructed to treat the water from grey owl estates 5 existing wells. This option would also include some upgrades to Grey Owl estates existing infrastructure to provide proper water pressure and operation. INCLUDES: 30X50FT Building. Equipment to filter, treat and discharge waste water.

Option #1 PRos Will not have to purchase water. Can continue to use existing wells.

Option #1 Cons High Capital costs. Have to maintain a trained operator with training on Grey Owl Estates new water treatment plant. Operational costs for power, chemicals, membrane replacement and equipment replacement, will be much larger than our current system. Likely the water treatment plant will need to be heated year round, even though it will be used seasonally.

Option #1 Cons The water treatment plant will need to be serviced by a sewer system to handle the rejected concentrate produced during the treatment process. Grey owl estates would be required to pay the municipality for the for the disposal of waste created during the water treatment process. Grey owl estates would need to pay taxes on the water treatment plant building. Need to find a suitable location for a water treatment plant.

Option #1 Cons Future changes to drinking water guidelines may result in upgrades being required for the water treatment plant. Rreplacement costs will need to be included in reserve fund.

Costs of option #1 A high level cost estimate was completed for option #1, water treatment plant. The cost for option #1 was $904,860.00

Option #2 Municipal Connection: installation of water main to existing grey owl estates water system from the existing municipal water system. This option would also include upgrades to the distribution system in grey owl estates to ensure proper pressure distribution. Run new main lines along victor avenue Install manhole with metering equipment Tie in to grey owl water mains

Option #2 pros Requires significantly less capital than the water treatment plant option. Reduces the overall infrastructure owned and managed by Grey owl estates. Fully treated water meeting cdw guidelines will always be supplied by the system. Future upgrades to meet new drinking water requirements are the responsibility of the municipality.

Options #2 pros Some liabilities associated with the operation of a public water system will be passed on to the municipality. Less demands for our maintenance person, possibly resulting in an easier hiring process in the future. Much less water testing required for grey owl estates to complete. Allows for usage of the main waterline that grey owl unit holders have already paid for in the form of the $2000.00 fee from the RM.

Options #2 Cons Will have to purchase water based on a metered volume. Requires installation of additional infrastructure in the municipality’s right of way in order to service the grey owl site resulting in additional upfront capital costs which may or may not be recoverable over time. Existing wells will be obsolete and will need to be decommissioned.

Engineer recommendation Based on the high cost and complexity of the stand alone treatment plant; engineers recommended the municipal options as the likely best alternative. Based on this, a more detailed class d estimate (+/- 30%) was completed for the municipal water option. As the municipal water hook up is recommended by the engineers a class d estimate was completed for the municipal water option. This estimate is more detailed and reliable than a high level estimate. The estimate for option #2 was $285,248.00

More detailed costs Description Cost Off site watermain installation $107,950.00 On site watermain installation $90,000.00 Sub total $197,950.00 Engineering Fees (approx. 10%) $19,795.00 Construction Management Fees (approx. 10%) Sub Total $237,540.00 Project Contingency fees (20%) $47,508.00 $285,048.00 Plus 30% $370,562.00

Costs At this time, we project a cost between $285,048.00 to $370,562.40 based on these estimates the cost per unit would range from $1325.80 to $1723.55 per unit. Does not include water usage cost. Method of charging unit holders has not yet been determined.

Potential impact to cost estimate Potential changes to final design Potential escalating construction costs Potential cost share to tie-in to existing line running partially along victor to minty rental unit Potential cost for hydrants along victor and cost recovery from others hooking onto or extending grey owl line.

Next steps Obtain a finalized engineering feasibility study from BMEC. Secure Secure a proposal from BMEC to provide a detailed design and specification package for tendering. Meet Meet with RM to see if there is any financial assistance available for the project. Hold Submit our engineering plans to the RM and water drinking office for approval and to obtain permits. * not necessarily in this order. * Provide update on final design and tendering to unit holders at spring AGM. Submit Hold a special meeting this fall or winter for unit holders to vote on a motion to accept the engineer report recommendations and proceed with the hookup to the municipal water system and move ahead with detailed design and tendering. Next steps

Questions