Include similar type of data for every window that has a DOE Logo on the bottom right corner A => 6 or more HS also Grad. Info. AA => At Least 1 B => At Lease 1 C = > At Least 1 1 A Achievement Data ttendance Behavior Course Marks Accountability D Demographic Data

2

Link to Various Reports – Recommend Print a Copy of each (# 9, selected reports) for your records. 1. HSSRA Report - Early Childhood = Pick school > Hawaii State School Readiness AssessmentEarly Childhood = Pick school > Hawaii State School Readiness Assessment 2. KMR Enrollment Counts by Grade.doc KMR Enrollment Counts by Grade.doc 3. MySchool = Enrollment Count for Subgroups > Go to your school > School Status Report (individual school’s My School Page) MySchool = Enrollment Count for Subgroups 4. School Quality Survey (SQS) School Quality Survey 5. Trends Report: School Accountability Trends Reports Trends Report: School Accountability Trends Reports 6. NCLB Report – No Child Left Behind NCLB Report – No Child Left Behind 7. Hawaii P20 > College and Career Indicators Report Hawaii P20 > College and Career Indicators Report 8. SSIR – School Status and Improvement Report SSIR – School Status and Improvement Report 9. LDS – Longitudinal Data System LDS – Longitudinal Data System 3

Sample Subgroup – Disadvantaged Trend Profile Against State, School Example of file with both Chart and Table 1. Right CLICK on any chart 2. Select OBJECT > Open 3. Chart will open editable 4. spreadsheet 5. Change data to reflect your schools information 6. Copy into your Dashboard Powerpoint 4 A Achievement Data

___ School Performance Dashboard Quarter ____ Principal: ___ Data Coordinator: ___ School Name Here 5

Annual Yearly Progress Report 6 Accountability Resource Center >AYP & NCLB Status > NCLB Ind. TrackingNCLB Ind. Tracking Fn+Print Scrn > control + V (paste) Accountability Complete once a year in first Quarter

% HSA Math HSA Reading The Way Forward – RTTT Targets Know your Targets (Race to the Top) Graduation Rate

___ School’s Vision & Mission Vision: 8 Accountability Mission:

Sample RHS Profile SY Enrollment: 1426 (Official Enrollment Count) Students Receiving Free/Reduced-cost lunch: 580(40.67%) Students in Special Education programs: 123 (8.63%) Students with limited English proficiency: 118 (8.27%) LDS – Longitudinal Data System or SSIR – School Status and Improvement ReportSSIR – School Status and Improvement Report 9 D Demographic Data

School Profile SY Enrollment: __ Students Receiving Free/Reduced-cost lunch: __(__%) Students in Special Education programs: __(__%) Students with limited English proficiency: __(__%) Trends Report: School Accountability Trends Reports 10 D Demographic Data

Multi-year School Demographic Comparison SY 09-10SY 10-11SY 11-12% Change from last year Enrollment__ -_ (-0.__%) Students Receiving Free/Reduced-cost lunch __ (_%) Students in Special Education programs __ (_%) -__ (-__%) Students with limited English proficiency __ (_%) -__ (-__%) Retrieved(SSIR 2010, Retrieved 12/10/10) (LDS, Retrieved 12/14/10) (LDS, Retrieved 9/2011) % change = [(SY11- 12) –(SY10-11)] / (SY10-11) D Demographic Data School Accountability Trend Report 11

Sample RH School Multiyear Demographic Comparison SY 09-10SY 10-11SY 11-12% Change from last year Enrollment (-0.49%) Students Receiving Free/Reduced-cost lunch 436(31.5%)544 (38.2%)609 (42.98%)65 (11.9%) Students in Special Education programs 135 (9.7%)126 (8.8%)121 (8.54%)-5 (-4%) Students with limited English proficiency 99 (7.1%)130 (9.1%)118 (8.33%)-12 (-9.23%) Retrieved(SSIR 2010, Retrieved 12/10/10) (LDS, Retrieved 12/14/10) (LDS, Retrieved 9/2011) % change = [(SY11- 12) –(SY10-11)] / (SY10-11) School Accountability Trend Report 12 D Demographic Data

3 Year Enrollment By Grade KMR Enrollment Counts by Grade 13 D Demographic Data

School Subgroup Profile Trends 14 A Achievement Data

ARCH >Proficiency Math and Reading > By Grade & Year 15 Accountability Resource Center >Proficiency> By Grade and YearBy Grade and Year Fn+Print Scrn > control + V (paste) A Achievement Data

ARCH >Proficiency> Data Grid> By Grade – Proficiency Level 16 A Achievement Data Accountability Resource Center >Proficiency> By Grade – Prof. LevelBy Grade – Prof. Level Data Grid button > Fn+Print Scrn > control + V (paste)

ARCH >Proficiency> By Subgroup & Year Gap Analysis 17 Accountability Resource Center >Proficiency> By subgroup and YearBy subgroup and Year Fn+Print Scrn > control + V (paste) A Achievement Data

18 ARCH >Proficiency> Data Grid>By Subgroup & Year A Achievement Data Accountability Resource Center >Proficiency> By subgroup – Prof. LevelBy subgroup – Prof. Level Data Grid button > Fn+Print Scrn > control + V (paste)

LDS – Math Proficiency of All Students by Quarter 19 A Achievement Data DS – Longitudinal Data System Monitoring changes in targeted subject (Math). Indicating proficiency by Quarters. This example is showing that the MP is increasing and the DP is decreasing with each quarter

HSA % Proficient by Year & Content Reading: SY 07-10: 58% TargetsSY 10-12: 72% Math Targets: SY 07-10: 46% SY 10-12: 64% School Accountability Trends Reports 20 A Achievement Data

HSA Trends for (Disadvantaged) Subgroup by Year Data Reading SY : 65% SY : 72% SY : 79% SY : 75% (NCLB School Report, retrieved 12/10/10) Proficiency Objectives: SY 07-10: 58% SY 10-11: 72% (Current) Math SY : 42% SY : 46% SY : 43% SY : 41% (NCLB School Report, retrieved 12/10/10) Proficiency Objectives: SY 07-10: 46% SY 10-11: 64% (Current) (DOE memo “Hawaii State Assessment/Adequate Yearly Progress FACT SHEET - dated July 15, 2010) Trends Report: School Accountability Trends Reports 21 A Achievement Data

HSA Trends for (Disadvantaged) Subgroup by Year ReadingMath Trends Report: School Accountability Trends Reports 22 A Achievement Data

LDS - DIBELS Nonsense Word Fluency – K-2 indicator 23 A Achievement Data Dashboard:CPS Dashboard W1 View:DIBELS - Nonsense Word Fluency Date:10/4/2011 Organizatio n: All Schools Current Grade: All Race:All IEP:All F/R L:All Gender:All ELL Classificatio n: All LDS – Longitudinal Data System > DIBELS (old verision)

HSA Support New HSA format – electronically tested so scores are instant HSA data – New database allows teachers (planned in future rollout) / coordinators to pull data ◦ students exceed, meets, approaching, not proficient ◦ Standards strands breakdown 3 Tests allow students to show progression over time Teachers are practicing and aligning curriculum to match HSA blueprint. 24 A Achievement Data

Student Level Supports AVID – Supports Gap Group (C-students) with academic/study skills/tutoring/peer support Summer Bridge – Supports incoming Freshmen Approaching group in Reading/Math Ignition – Peer mentoring Freshmen Cisco Phone System – Automatically calls guardians to inform them about child’s daily attendance Home Visits– Counselors visit child’s home regarding truancy IMUA – Supports struggling students to recover credits (~SMP) NovaNet – Supports during/after-school credit recover LDS – Provides background data (academic, behavioral, attendance) on students from when they entered DOE system 25

College Enrollment Support Navigation 101–College exploration/readiness. College profiling against your criterions. CRASH (College Readiness and Success Hawaii) – Activities promoting a college going culture. AP Program– Supports high-achievement students to academically challenge themselves. IB Program – Starting process to become an IB school to offer a rigorous college-prep program to our students similar to AP Program. AVID – Supports Gap Group (C-students) with academic/study skills/tutoring/peer support to attend college. Running Start – Supports students that wish to take courses at the University. (dual credit program) Step-Up Program – Students pledge to do the BOE recognition diploma for more rigorous high school graduation standards. 26

College Remediation in UH System English SY : 34 (215) SY : 46 (267) SY : 56 (251) (P20 Hawaii Report, retrieved 9/2011) Percent of Students enrolled in UH System SY : 19% SY : 20% SY : 49% Math SY : 46 SY : 79 SY : 63 (P20 Hawaii Report, retrieved 9/2011) Percent of Students enrolled in UH System SY : 26% SY : 35% SY : 55% KMR Complex Benchmark: 5% decrease 27

College Remediation Support Compass Test – Running test at school for placement exams. Students can see what areas they are proficient in. ◦ Teachers took exam to see what is expected of students. 28

HSA Disaggregated Profiles RHS Subgroups ◦ Male / Female ◦ Disadvantaged / Not Disadvantaged ◦ Native Hawaiian / Non-Native Hawaiian State Subgroups ◦ Male / Female ◦ Disadvantaged / Not Disadvantaged ◦ Native Hawaiian / Non-Native Hawaiian 29

Roosevelt High Reading All Students: 72.2% Native Hawaiian: 68.1% Non-Native Hawaiian: 73.4% Reading Achievement Native Hawaiian Gap = 5.3% Female: 75% Male: 69.2% Reading Gender Gap =-5.7% Not Disadvantaged: 54.3% Disadvantaged: 86.2% Reading Achievement Economic Gap =31.9% Math All Students: 47% Native Hawaiian: 24.6% Non-Native Hawaiian: 54.2% Reading Achievement Native Hawaiian Gap =29.6% Female: 47.7% Male: 46.9% Reading Gender Gap =-.8% Not Disadvantaged: 40.2% Disadvantaged: 53% Reading Achievement Economic Gap =12.9% 30 A Achievement Data

All Schools (gr. 10) Reading All Students: 66.3% Female: 54.3% Male: 62.1% Reading Achievement Gender Gap =7.8% Not Disadvantaged: 55% Disadvantaged: 76.1% Reading Achievement Economic Gap =21.1% Native Hawaiian: 54% Non-Native Hawaiian: 70.8% Reading Achievement Native Hawaiian Gap = 16.8% Math All Students: 39.7% Female: 42% Male: 37.5% Math Achievement Gender Gap =-4.5% Not Disadvantaged: 31% Disadvantaged: 47.4% Math Achievement Economic Gap =16.4% Native Hawaiian: 24.6% Non-Native Hawaiian: 45.2% Reading Achievement Native Hawaiian Gap = 20.6% (LDS, 9/2011) 31 A Achievement Data

Sample Subgroup – Disadvantaged Trend Profile Against State, School School Profile Indicators 32 A Achievement Data

Sample School Trends – Subgroup Gender School Profile Indicators (Gender) 33 A Achievement Data

Sample Subgroup – Gender Trend Profile Against State, School School Profile Indicators (Gender) 34 A Achievement Data

Middle or High School K M R Success Indicators 5% annual decrease in 9th grade retention Middle or High School K M R Success Indicators 5% annual decrease in 9th grade retention 35 Trends Report: School Accountability Trends Reports> Trends Report: School Accountability Trends Reports> Academic Achievement Looking to decrease the 9ty grade retention rate by 5% each year. A Achievement Data

Average Daily Attendance SY : 95.4% (LDS, 9/2011) SY : 94.1% SY : 92.5% SY : 94.5% (Trend Report, Retrieved 12/10/10) State Benchmark: 95% 36 LDS – Longitudinal Data System ttendance

Average Daily Attendance SY : 95.4% (LDS, 9/2011) SY : 94.1% SY : 92.5% SY : 94.5% (Trend Report, Retrieved 12/10/10) State Benchmark: 95% 37 LDS – Longitudinal Data System ttendance

LDS - Behavior Offenses for 3 Years Chart LDS – Longitudinal Data System 38 Discipline Offenses Attributes Offense Type Behavior

LDS - Behavior Offenses for 3 Years LDS – Longitudinal Data System 39 Dashboard:cCPS Dashboard W1 View:Discipline Offense Trend by Class Date:10/4/2011 Time: , , Race:All F/R L:All IEP:All Gender:All Current Grade:All Organization: Honolulu\Kaimuki-McKinley- Roosevelt ELL Classification:All Discipline Offense Attributes Offense Type, Discipline Offense Attributes Offense Group State, MeasuresActive All Class A Offense Count Class B Offense Count Class C Offense Count Class D Offense Count Discipline Offenses Attributes Offense Type Behavior

Dashboard:CPS Dashboard W1 View:GLO 1: Self-Directed Learner Date:10/4/2011 Organization:All Schools Current Grade:All Race:All IEP:All Gender:All F/R L:All Mark Year: ELL Classification:All LDS – Longitudinal Data System LDS > GLO Behavior

Dashboard:CPS Dashboard W1 View:GLO 1: Self-Directed Learner Date:10/4/2011 Organization:All Schools Current Grade:All Race:All IEP:All Gender:All F/R L:All Mark Year: ELL Classification:All LDS – Longitudinal Data System LDS > GLO Behavior

LDS - Course Marks by Content and Subgroup Elem = % of St. receiving MP or ME in Math and/or LA, Mid. = % of St. receiving C or Better in Math and/or LA High = % of St. receiving C or Better in Math and/or LA 42 Course Marks LDS – Longitudinal Data System

Teacher Quality - Teacher Qualifications - if HQ issue at your school Percent of Highly Qualified Teachers Percent of New Teachers Assigned a Mentor 43 NCLB Report – No Child Left Behind

Percent of Teachers (HQT) Teaching in Assignments they are Qualified For 44 NCLB Report – No Child Left Behind

HIGH SCHOOL & BEYOND Data Points (Indicators) Graduation Rate Attendance HSA (Hawaii State Assessment) gr. 10 ◦ Total School ◦ Subgroup – Disadvantaged Dropout Rate Retention Rate College Enrollment Rate College Remediation Rate 45

K M R Task -- Success Indicators 5% annual increase in graduation rate 5% annual decrease in 9th grade retention K M R Task -- Success Indicators 5% annual increase in graduation rate 5% annual decrease in 9th grade retention 46 Trends Report: School Accountability Trends Reports> Trends Report: School Accountability Trends Reports> Academic Achievement

K M R Task -- Success Indicators 5% annual increase in college-going rate 5% annual decrease in % of students enrolling in remedial courses in college 47 Hawaii P20 > College and Career Indicators Report

College Enrollment Rate SY : 69% (215/312) SY : 73% (267/366) SY : 69% (251/365) (P20 Hawaii Report, retrieved 12/14/10) KMR Complex Benchmark: 5% increase 48 Hawaii P20 > College and Career Indicators Report

HS ONLY --ARCH>AYP> Graduation Rate Results 49 Accountability Resource Center >AYP & NCLB Status > Grad/RetGrad/Ret Fn+Print Scrn > control + V (paste)

HS ONLY - Graduation Retention Rate SY : 87% SY : 86% SY : 89% SY : 87% (NCLB School Reports, Retrieved 12/10/10) State Benchmark: 80% State Avg: 80% Note: Grad rate is for previous school year’s. Ex: is for Class of ARCH > NCLB

HS ONLY - Graduation Rate SY : 87% SY : 86% SY : 89% SY : 87% (NCLB School Reports, Retrieved 12/10/10) State Benchmark: 80% State Avg: 80% Note: Grad rate is for previous school year’s. Ex: is for Class of NCLB Report – No Child Left Behind

HS ONLY - School Dropout Rate SY : 10.3% SY : 10.4% SY : 8.8% (SSIR, retrieved 12/10/10) SSIR SY will be released in Nov No way to calculate at school. 52 S SSIR – School Status and Improvement Report

HS ONLY - Grade Retention Rate SY : 15.6% (State Retention List via School Registrar, 9/2011) SY : 13.3% SY : 14.7% SY : 18.5% (Trend Report, retrieved 12/10/10) KMR Complex Benchmark: 10% decrease Trends Report: School Accountability Trends Reports> 53