Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

2013-2014 School Performance Profile and PVAAS.  Federal accountability and PA law dictate that school effectiveness must be measured looking at multiple.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "2013-2014 School Performance Profile and PVAAS.  Federal accountability and PA law dictate that school effectiveness must be measured looking at multiple."— Presentation transcript:

1 2013-2014 School Performance Profile and PVAAS

2  Federal accountability and PA law dictate that school effectiveness must be measured looking at multiple things – SPP assigns schools a score based on multiple factors  SPP allows us to: ◦ Set goals ◦ Plan ◦ Allocate resources ◦ Compare with other schools  These numbers go into teacher and principal evaluations

3 BHSHMSMESPESWES 2013-1488.267.892.488.794.9 2012-1383.381.887.983.289.5  A score of 70 or higher is considered ‘strong’ by the state  Scores close to the max score of 100 would be earned by ‘highly effective’ schools (can earn up to 7pts extra credit)

4 50% of the School Academic Performance Score is comprised of three areas:  40 % Indicators of Academic Achievement  5 % Indicators of ALL Students Closing the Achievement Gap  5 % Indicators of Closing the Achievement Gap - Historically Underperforming Students

5  40% of the School Academic Performance Score ◦ Indicators of Academic Growth/PVAAS - Measures the school’s impact on the academic progress of groups of students from year-to-year.  10% of the School Academic Performance Score ◦ Other Academic Indicators - Assesses factors that contribute to student achievement (e.g., graduation rate, promotion rate, attendance rate).

6  Measures a student's performance at one single point in time  Highly correlated with a student's demographics  Compares student performance to a standard  Critical to a student's post-secondary opportunities

7 EthnicityBHSHMSMESPESWES American Indian0.070.11000 Asian7.07 4.9512.284.58 Black or African American 6.055.026.196.415.16 Hispanic0.881.711.241.21 Multi-Racial2.243.885.886.014.01 White83.6182.2181.7373.9785.24 Native Hawaiian0.07000.130 Historically Underperforming Subgroups BHSHMSMESPESWES Econ. Disadvantaged32.1134.8928.1744.1931.39 ELL5.315.364.338.812.58 Special Education8.059.1210.228.2812.75

8 ACHIEVEMENT SCORES – How many of our kids are proficient in…  PSSAs, Keystones, NOCTI/NIMS (career schools)?  Grade 3 Reading?  SAT Scores?

9 ACHIEVEMENT SCORES ProficiencyBHSHMSMESPESWES Math (Algebra I) 71.0584.6693.7986.490.53 Reading (Literature) 81.2980.0783.4576.884.85 Science (Biology) 59.0656.27 NA 91.7394.01 Writing NA61.57 87.6979.56 Industry (NOCTI)76 NA Grade 3 Reading NA 76.1188.14 SAT/ACT 100 NA

10 SAT/ACT College Ready Benchmark Number of 12 th grade students with Record of Scoring 1550 or higher on the SAT 110 Number of 12 th grade students with Record of Scoring 22 or higher on the CT 61 Grade 12 Enrollment387 Number of 12 th grade students with 1550 (SAT) or 22 (ACT) or higher divided by 12 th grade enrollment 44.19 College Ready Benchmark Performance 100 Percentage of 12 th grade students with 1550 (SAT) or 22 (ACT) or higher Performance Measure Greater than 40100 30.00 - 40.0075.00 -100 20.00 - 30.0050.00 – 75.00 10.00 – 20.0025.00 – 50.00 0 – 10.00

11 CLOSING THE GAP – The state wants us to have half as many non-proficient kids in six years than we have now. Are we on track? (ex: if we are 40% proficient now, we need to be 70% proficient six years from now, growing 5% a year to reach that goal)  SPP looks at all students  SPP looks at Historically Underperforming – group made of economically disadvantaged, special education, and ESL

12 CLOSING THE GAP (ALL Students) Closing Gap BHSHMSMESPESWES Math NA Reading NA Science 1000 NA 100 Writing NA Industry Standard NA

13 The objective is to close 50% of the gap between performance in the baseline year and 100% proficiency of students in this group over a six (6) year period. Percent Proficient or Advanced in Baseline Year48.64 Percent Proficient or Advanced in Reported Year59.06 Baseline Year2013 Reported Year2014 Year in the 6 Year Cycle1 Achievement Gap Between Baseline Year and 100 % Proficient or Advanced 51.36 50% of Achievement Gap (to be closed in 6 years)25.68 Average Gap Closure Required Each Year (over the 6 years) 4.28

14 CLOSING THE GAP(Historically Underperforming Students) Closing Gap BHSHMSMESPESWES MathNA ReadingNA Science 1000 NA 100 WritingNA Industry Standard NA

15 The objective is to close 50% of the gap between performance in the baseline year and 100% proficiency of students in this group over a six (6) year period. Percent Proficient or Advanced in Baseline Year22.73 Percent Proficient or Advanced in Reported Year35.71 Baseline Year2013 Reported Year2014 Year in the 6 Year Cycle1 Achievement Gap Between Baseline Year and 100 % Proficient or Advanced 77.27 50% of Achievement Gap (to be closed in 6 years)38.64 Average Gap Closure Required Each Year (over the 6 years) 6.44

16  Measures a student's growth across time; i.e., across years  Not related to a student's demographics  Compares student performance to his/her own prior performance  Critical to ensuring a student's future academic success  By measuring students' academic achievement AND growth, schools and districts have a more comprehensive picture of their own effectiveness in raising student achievement.

17 GROWTH – Did our kids make growth as expected by the state statistical models? PVAASBHSHMSMESPESWES Math 7962.5 NA 72100 Reading 10070 NA 10098 Science 10054 NA 7892 Writing NA 50 NA 100

18 PVAAS Growth BHSHMSMESPESWES Algebra I 0.944.55 NA Math NA-6.68 -0.558.93 Reading 3.89 -0.88 NA 3.112.82 Science 3.92 -2.55 NA 0.772.24 Writing NA -9.57 NA 9.055.06

19

20 Inconsistent Growth This is what we want to see with all students

21 OTHER  What percentage of our kids graduated?  What was our attendance rate?  Does our school offer AP/IB/College courses?  How many of our kids took the PSAT/PLAN test?

22 OtherBHSHMSMESPESWES Graduation 94.92 NA Attendance 93.9894.994.9495.7895.42 Promotion NA 98.9799.6999.86100 AP/IB Courses 100 NA PSAT Participation 99.93 NA

23 Extra CreditBHSHMSMESPESWES Math 20.7655.27 NA 61.8763.07 Reading 7.3148.89 NA 34.6741.86 Science 7.8816.35 NA 51.1355.69 Writing NA 3.53 NA 10.776.63 Industry 40 NA AP/IB Adv. 3 or higher 53.62 NA

24  Have many kids proficient  Continue to move non-proficient kids to proficient each year  ‘Grow’ kids beyond the expectations of the state data model  Have high graduation/promotion rate (kids aren’t failing)  Have high attendance rate  Offer advanced courses  Provide opportunity to take PSAT/PLAN test

25  Focus on growth – we have to move our kids beyond what is expected of them – this growth will raise our growth score on the SPP and lead to higher achievement scores, which will raise our achievement scores  Close the gap – continue to focus on moving kids to proficient, taking small steps each year  Increase our graduation/promotion/attendance rates  Offer more advanced courses

26 2012-2013 and 2013-2014 School Years

27 2012-20132013-2014 Building Level Academic Score 83.388.2 PSSA Proficiency Algebra I 70.771.05 Literature 80.4381.29 Biology 48.6459.06 Industry Standard 79.3176 SAT 100 PVAAS Algebra I 8279 Literature 100 Biology 73100

28 2012-20132013-2014 Other Indicators Industry StandardNA Graduation Rate 94.9394.92 Attendance 94.4993.98 AP Offerings 100 PSAT 95.7199.93 Extra Credit for Advanced Algebra I 28.2320.76 Literature 19.027.31 Biology 8.427.88 Industry Standard 58.6240 AP 3 or higher 37.0653.62

29 2012-20132013-2014 Building Level Academic Score 81.867.8 PSSA Proficiency Mathematics 83.8884.66 Reading 77.5280.07 Science 67.1356.27 Writing 75.7961.57 PVAAS Mathematics 62.7562.5 Reading 10070 Science 10054 Writing 7150

30 2012-20132013-2014 Other Indicators Attendance 94.2994.49 Promotion NA 98.97 Extra Credit for Advanced Mathematics 54.1855.27 Reading 46.948.89 Science 21.1116.35 Writing 5.963.53

31 2012-20132013-2014 Building Level Academic Score 87.992.4 PSSA Proficiency Mathematics 88.5693.79 Reading 82.0383.45 Other Indicators Promotion NA99.69 Attendance 95.394.94

32 2012-20132013-2014 Building Level Academic Score 83.288.7 PSSA Proficiency Mathematics 86.0686.4 Reading 75.2776.8 Science 83.7491.73 Writing 86.5587.69 Grade 3Rdg 77.7876.11 PVAAS Mathematics 8072 Reading 79100 Science 6478 Writing 100

33 2012-20132013-2014 Other Indicators Promotion NA 99.86 Attendance 96.1895.78 Extra Credit for Advanced Mathematics 53.0861.87 Reading 24.4634.67 Science 45.5351.13 Writing 010.77

34 2012-20132013-2014 Building Level Academic Score 89.594.9 PSSA Proficiency Mathematics 85.890.53 Reading 81.584.85 Science 86.194.01 Writing 84.0279.56 Grade 3Rdg 85.8888.14 PVAAS Mathematics 100 Reading 10098 Science 6392 Writing 100

35 2012-20132013-2014 Other Indicators Promotion NA 100 Attendance 95.6195.42 Extra Credit for Advanced Mathematics 49.2563.07 Reading 36.6341.86 Science 42.7855.69 Writing 3.556.63

36 More information can be found on the BWSD website at www.bwschools.net under the tab School Performance Profile


Download ppt "2013-2014 School Performance Profile and PVAAS.  Federal accountability and PA law dictate that school effectiveness must be measured looking at multiple."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google