Team Icarus Flight Readiness Review Nick Barnes, Ethan Kapler, Henry McCabe, and Sean Grogan AEM 1905 11-21-11

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Team K^3 + C Final Team Presentation Khin Oo, Kim Gleffe, Carlie Bolin, Katelyn Harder AEM /16/11.
Advertisements

Matt Breihan, Jay Davis, Jack Gregory, Ashton Schrage, Sara Schuette, and Lydia Whitney October 14, 2008.
#4908.If, while in level flight, it becomes necessary to use an alternate source of static pressure vented inside the airplane, which of the following.
Space Debris Conceptual Design Review Cole Bostrom Corey Godwin Jonathan Kirchmaier Emily Logan Sean Murphy Seanna Renworth
Colorado Space Grant Consortium DemoSat-B Colorado State University Matthew Jui, Ian Patterson, Mark Spowart, Todd Wallis June Colorado Space Grant.
Team Space Jam Launch Readiness Review Paul Guerrie, Ben Azlein, Megan Scheele, Bridget Chase, Shane Meikle, Taylor King, & Jamie Usherwood November 2,
Team Lightning Rod Launch Readiness Review Fall 2010 Rev C 11/2/2010 Trevor Luke Chris Bennett Matt Holmes Sushia Rahimizadeh Alex Shelanski Matthew Dickinson.
Team 7, Final Presentation December 1, Mission Overview Send up petri dishes containing bacteria Analyze the effects of temperature, pressure, and.
Brynn Larson Trey Karsten Terek Campbell Marcus Flores Marcell Smalley Shunsuke Miyazaki 2015/6/10 Team Ochocinco.
Team Delta Special Recon Ops Launch Readiness Review Taylor Boe Andrew Gilbert Bobby Stillwell Emily Howard Grace Harsha Andrew Buckner November 11, 2008.
BalloonSat “Optimism Prime” Team “Thumbs Up” Conceptual Design Review Nick Lenk, Greg Nelson, Eddie Cyrus, Jake Varey, Chase Pritchett, Brian Inglis 9/23/08.
Team icarus Final Project Presentation AJ Knapp, Kyle Marek-Spartz, Lucas Chowen, Max Sjöberg, Mike Hill AEM 1905 – Nov. 24 th 2009.
Paul “Trey” Karsten Marcell Smalley Shunsuke Miyazaki Brynn Larson Terek Campbell Marcus Flores 11/25/09 Final Revision.
Team Name Final Presentation Team Members Date Fall 2010 Rev A
Team Cutthroat Critical Design Review Chris Alley Annie Frederick Josh Marshman Julie Price Lance Tokmakian Kent Welborn October 17, 2006.
Team R3D3 Final Presentation Devon Campbell Greg McQuie Kate Kennedy Henk Wolda Marisa Antuna Nicole Ela Tyler Smith 12/1/11.
Teamo Supremo Critical Design Review Ahna Issak Wes Roos Kristen Brenner Kimberley Fornall Barton Tofany Nick Martinez Ahna Issak Wes Roos Kristen Brenner.
Team T.E.N Final Presentation Nate Bolt Greg Frank David Maier Luke Pederson David Stagg Matthew Stephenson 12/05/2006.
Teamo Supremo Final Presentation Kristen Brenner Kim Fornall Ahna Isaak Nick Martinez Wes Roos Bart Tofany RevD
Team Cutthroat Critical Design Review Chris Alley Annie Frederick Josh Marshman Julie Price Lance Tokmakian Kent Welborn December 7, 2006.
Final Presentation Nick Hoffmann Miranda Rohlfing Geoff Morgan Miles Buckman Lauren Wenner Rahul Devnani December 5, 2006.
GONS Final Presentation Steven Benedict Jake Danser Josh Hecht Brock Kowalchuk Erik Shuttlesworth Matthew Zemel December 4, 2007 Steven Benedict Jake Danser.
1 Student Hands On Training I (2009) Additional AVR Modifications For BalloonSat Flight Additional AVR Modifications For BalloonSat Flight.
Team Name Final Presentation Team Members Date Rev
Cydonia Final Review Presentation 6 December 2007 Greg Rancourt, Sarah Flinn, Dominic Boiko, Kevin Stuth, Derek Houtz, Max LaFon.
Critical Design Review Nick Hoffmann Miranda Rohlfing Geoff Morgan Miles Buckman Lauren Wenner Rahul Devnani October 17, 2006.
Team DSRO Critical Design Review Taylor Boe Andrew Buckner Andrew Gilbert Emily Howard Grace Harsha Bobby Stillwell October 14, 2008.
Team Hubble Jr. Final Presentation Rachel Small, Holly Zaepfel, Ryan Del Gizzi, Kyle Norman, and Evan Levy December 5, 2006.
Launch Readiness Review 11 Nov Brady Phillips, Elliot Guber, Brandon Campbell, Dushyant Dhundra, Joel Mendez, Cameron Trussell.
Conceptual Design Review Nick Hoffmann Miranda Rohlfing Geoff Morgan Miles Buckman Lauren Wenner Rahul Devnani September 21, 2006.
Echo  Final Presentation Andrew Berg, Shawn Carroll, Cody Humbargar, Jade Nelson, Jared Russell, Austin Williamson
JAKE BINNEY JAMEY GRAHAM LOUISE MARTINEZ JACK OAKES MARCUS RAHIMPOUR ERIN TUCKER JAKE BINNEY JAMEY GRAHAM LOUISE MARTINEZ JACK OAKES MARCUS RAHIMPOUR ERIN.
Space Debris Launch Readiness Review Seanna Renworth, Emily Logan, Corey Godwin, Sean Murphy, Cole Bostrom, Jonathan Kirchmaier November 11 th, 2008.
Full Mission Simulation Report New Jersey Space Grant Consortium at Stevens Institute of Technology and Rutgers University Ethan Hayon, Mark Siembab, Mike.
Air Pressure By: The Furry Ewoks Orcutt Academy Ty Fredriks.
Team Andromeda Lucas Ibarra Alexis Sutker Evan Long Jack Oblack Jaevyn Faulk Dylan Anderson Devon Connor Eric Hardwick 2 October 2012.
Miscellaneous Notes: This is a bare-bones template – make it fancier if you wish, but be sure to address at least the items listed here. Basically this.
PHAT-TACO Experiment Pressure Humidity And Temperature Tests And Camera Observations Hannah Gardiner, Bill Freeman, Randy Dupuis, Corey Myers, Andrea Spring.
Hang Seven Launch Readiness Review Lucas Migliorini, Becca Lidvall, Paul Smith Chase Goodman, Ethan Hollenbach, Nikhil Desai, Abby Caballero, Sierra Williams.
Alex Ngure, Casey Sutherland, Nate Warner, Tad Nielsen AEM November 23, 2010.
Team Hang 7 Final Presentation Lucas Migliorini, Sierra Williams, Chase Goodman, Ethan Hollenbach, Becca Lidvall, Abby Caballero, Paul Smith, Nikhil Desai.
Team Name Flight Readiness Review (this is a bare-bones template – make it fancier if you wish, but be sure to address at least the items listed here)
Hang Seven Critical Design Review Sierra Williams, Lucas Migliorini, Abby Caballero, Chase Goodman, Paul Smith, Becca Lidvall, Ethan Hollenbach, Nikhil.
Ryan Olin, Austin Granger, R.J. Kakach, Seth Frick, Joey Senkyr AEM /24/09.
High Altitude Imaging and Atmospheric Data Collection Experiment by SABRE (Scientific Aerospace and Balloon Research Engineers) Team Advisor:Atin Sinha.
Space Monkeys Launch Readiness Review Project Curious George November 11, 2008 Project Curious George November 11, 2008.
The Poorman’s Space Program Near Space. Public Access To Space Is public access about to begin? Why wait when we have something nearly as good and more.
Team NASA Final Team Presentation Zach Fadness, Travis Bridell, Dan Bakke, Nate Randall AEM 1905 Spaceflight with ballooning 11/22/11.
Hybrid panel heated plate study Currently the curing of the ASIC glue for the hybrid panels are done at room temperature. This is a study to determine.
Team SSCSC Critical Design Review Nick Brennan, Kier Fortier, Tom Johnson, Shannon Martin, Dylan Stewart, and Adam Wright October 05, 2010 Fall 2010 Rev.
Rockettes Final Flight Presentation Amanda Marcott, Cait Mantych, Amy Paul and Jessie Pohl Spaceflight and Ballooning AEM 1905 November 20, 2008.
Junk in a Box Final Presentation Frank Becky, Kyle Cummings, Jordan Haines, Villiam Klein, Matt Peoples, Ryan Scott and Aaron Young 4 December 2007.
Team Hubble Jr. Critical Design Review Ryan Del Gizzi, Evan Levy, Kyle Norman, Chris Everhart, Holly Zaepfel, Rachel Small October 17, 2006.
S.H.I.E.L.D. CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW Addison, Travis, Jared, Evan, Aaron, Matt 10/14/08.
Scott Luisi, Abe Fark, Trent Quick, Jack Szmanda, Tom Valkenberg AEM 1905, 11/20/2008.
Junk in a Box Critical Design Review
Balloon Payload Launch
High Altitude Balloon Research at the University of Kentucky
Team S.H.I.E.L.D. Final Presentation
Team Go Go Gadgets Launch Readiness Review
Team Thumbs Up Final Presentation
Launch Readiness Review
Space Proximity Atmospheric Research above Tropospheric Altitudes
James Flaten, MN Space Grant U of MN – Aerospace Engineering Dept.
Pima Community College ASCEND Flight: Spring 2010 A post-mortem!!!
Team TWSS Launch Readiness Review
Team SCREAM Launch Readiness Review
Proposal Team 8: Grant Fritz, Jessica Brown, Stephanie Jalovec, Jennifer McGraw, Brian Roth, Evan Townsend.
Ballooning Payload Components for Teacher Workshop Summer 2010
Panoramic Rays Critical Design Review
Presentation transcript:

Team Icarus Flight Readiness Review Nick Barnes, Ethan Kapler, Henry McCabe, and Sean Grogan AEM

Mission Overview Weather station Logged pressure, humidity, and inside/outside temperature. Compared data to time, as well as altitude Will compare this to expected results and see how they differ

Mission Overview To take pictures of the sun’s corona. Procedure: used a camera mounted on a turntable with photo sensors, use servos to keep the camera pointed at the sun. We used a strip instead of a dot to block out the sun so that the stabilizing was in only one direction.

Mission Overview A secondary experiment to the mounted camera Used a mounted video camera at an angle of 30 degrees to attempt to catch the sun’s corona in a single frame of video We blocked half of the lens so as to create a greater chance of (partial) coronal view.

Management/Org Chart Team Leader: Nick EthanHenrySean Mission Overview Project Manage- ment Expected Science Results Introduc tion Conclusi on Payload Design Test Plan and Results Launch and Recovery Project Budgets Payload Photogra phs Results and Analysis CDR FRR Photogra pher Camera and Camera Experiment Payload Box Build Weather Station

Org Chart cont. Flight Computer Program mer HOBO Other Payload Handling Predicti on Balloon filling Photog rapher Recove ry (Ethan)(Kieran)(Sean)(Nick)

Schedule (In-Class) -Sept 27: CDR proposal Due -Oct 4: Build Session -Oct 5: Essay A1 due -Oct 6: Essay A1 peer review due -Oct 11: Check out of various systems -Oct 12: A1 final draft due -Oct 14: Rev A due -Oct 18: Flight Readiness review -Oct 25: Flight Predictions -Oct 27: Payload due -Oct 29: Payload Launch Day -Nov 1- Dec 13: Analysis of data and continue on essay and revisions

Schedule (Out-of-Class) Oct 4: Build session Weeks of Oct 3- Oct 17: build sessions according to individual availability. Weeks of Oct 3- Oct 17: weekly group check- ins to discuss progress, difficulties and what needs to be done/ improved on.

Cost Budgeting Ball Joint Rod End- $8 Washers/Nuts- $4 Heater- $5 Heater Battery- $6 Weather Station- $50 BalloonSat Easy Flight Computer- $50 BSE Battery- $2 FLIP Camera- $140 HOBO Data Logger-$130 Geiger Counter- $150 Zigbee- $300 Hobo Accelerometer- $75 Total-- $920

Cost Budgeting (revised) Heater- $5 Heater Battery- $6 BalloonSat Easy Flight Computer- $50 BSE Battery- $2 FLIP Camera- $140 HOBO Data Logger-$130 Servo-$18 Acrylic Dome-$12 Turntable-$4 Vivatar camera-$50 Total:$420 Difference between both prices: $500

Mass Budgeting Ball Joint Rod End:.25lb Servos:.04lb Adapter: >.04lb Camera:.386lb Nuts/Washers: >.06lb Hobo Logger:.11lb Heater:.05lb Heater Battery:.33lb Accelerometer:.037lb BSE Flight Computer:.072lb BSE Battery:.10lb Zigbee:.28lb Geiger counter:.41lb Structure: >.32 Total:2.485

Mass Budgeting (revised) Heater:.05lb Heater Battery:.33lb BSE Flight Computer:.072lb BSE Battery:.10lb Structure: >.32 Servos:.04lb Flip Camera:.386lb Hobo Logger:.11lb Servos:.04lb Acrylic Dome:.38lbs Turntable:.28lbs Vivatar camera:.61lbs Total:2.718 lbs Difference between both prices: Heavier by.233 lbs

Design

Design (Final)

Test Results Our BSE Flight computer was tested and hooked up to a camera, weather station, and servo. The BSE was also connected to a pc and a diagnostic test was ran on the computer and all systems were nominal. The Weather station was able to collect data, The servo went through a diagnostic test Our structure was tested in a cold chamber

Test Results Payload changed so a second drop may be necessary The only thing(s) remaining to be tested: the whole assembly works with all its components when everything is put together and put in the box. This is our final test to do once everything has been assembled. This will hopefully be tested sometime late Tuesday, or on Thursday.

Test Results Drop test- passed Heater has been difficult to get to run consistently, but it passed the cold test We may want to run another cold test or do more testing of the heater Concerns are in the camera mounting and motion system, would be optimal to do a flight test, but we can’t do one, and have to rely on mentor input.

BSE Test

HOBO/Heater Test

Expected Science Results Corona experiment Expected results: We hope to see more clarity of pictures as we get higher in the atmosphere. Very difficult experiment, but interesting results.

Expected results Geiger counter We expect to see the radiation levels increase significantly with altitude. We will compare with other group to see the difference made by tin foil shielding.

Expected science results Ref. Paul Verhage Feb 2004 We expect to see temperature drop until around 50,000 feet of altitude (stratosphere), then level off for around 5,000-10,000 feet, and then steadily increase with altitude.

Expected Science Results We expect the pressure to steadily and linearly decrease until around 45,000 feet, and then asymptotically approach 0 millibars after that.

Flight day. The launch occurred on October 29, it was launched out of Gustavus Adolphus College in St. Peter Minnesota, and was recovered two miles south of Hollandale Minnesota. The Icarus Payload was flown twice because of camera problems. The second flight was launched out of Northfield Minnesota and recovered south east of Menomonie Wisconsin. Both launches went relatively smoothly, hardly any problems arose during the launches. Tracking of the second launch was quite smooth as well, a strong signal was maintained during the entire chase, the first launch however lost communication during flight, and tracking was made much harder.

Flight Day The payload for both launches was nearly pristine in each case. The payload was unharmed in both cases (pictures of before and after are in the proceeding slides). On both flights the cameras and in particular the servos were running, this is known because the servos make a distinct sound when they are rotating. Unfortunately, just before the first flight, the Vivatar camera ceased to take any pictures, but during the second flight of the payload, the camera captured over 5 thousand pictures. We believe that something may have been bumped before the first flight, the problem was resolved though.

Flight Day Pictures Below: Balloon inflated and ready for the payloads to be attached Right: Balloon being launched with all of its payloads, and tracking devices.

Flight Day Pictures Below: Icarus payload, all ready to be taped up, this is just before launch. Right: the order in which the payload landed, and the untouched state of the payloads

Flight Day Pictures Below: Team Icarus’s payload before being retrieved to be turned off. Above: Dr. Flaten with the recovered payloads.

Flight Day Pictures (from Launch 2) Below: Day 2 payload launch. Right: Location of second balloon upon arriving at the retrieval site.

Science Results (HOBO Data) The internal temperature decreases until the balloon reaches chaos(besides the dip in the graph showing where the stratosphere began.) Once the balloon pops, the internal temperature increases until it reaches the ground and then settle around 70°F. The lowest temp. that the inside of our payload got to was about -8°F. Our heater worked but not the best it could have. The relative humidity seemed to people kind of sporadic. From T=0, the humidity decreased to about 5% but then jumped up to 22% and back down to 0%. This is when the balloon popped. Once the balloon popped, the humidity started to increase until almost 100%. After the peak, the humidity decreased drastically and settled at around 10%.

HOBO Data cont. The external temperature followed the same trend as the internal temperature just more colder. The external temperature decreased until it reached the stratosphere, and reached about -70°F. Once the stratosphere was reached, the temperature began to increase and then decrease to -70°F again. During descent, the temperature rose until it settled at 50°F. The reason this is lower than the internal temperature even though it was on the ground is because the heater was on. This shows that our heater did work.

Flight Analysis Launch was approximated at 7.25 minutes into data. We can estimate that landing was around 92 minutes into flight from data.

Flight Analysis Cont. (On the left): Another graph showing temperature. Similar to graphs previously shown. (On the right): This graph shows that as the balloon traveled through the troposphere the temperature decreased steadily. As the balloon reached the stratosphere and got closer and closer to chaos, the temperature began to rise again.

Flight Analysis Cont. (On the left): This graph is very similar to the graph shown earlier. The humidity increased and then decreased during the ascent. Right before the balloon popped, humidity was increased to a peak. After chaos the humidity continuously decreased until it reached the ground. (On the right): As seen, the humidity decreased until the balloon was about 20000ft above sea level. The humidity then increased until about 40000ft and then started to decrease until the balloon reached its maximum altitude.

Flight Analysis Cont. (On the left): The pressure decreased until chaos and then increased until the balloon reached the ground. (On the right) This is the most simple graph collected. As the altitude increases, the pressure decreases.

Possibly Successful Photo’s These are possibly successful photos catching the edges of the suns corona, they could be glitches or misinterpretations.

Sun’s Corona Experiment: This one failed our first flight since the camera got disconnected and stopped taking pictures before it left the ground. We then re-flew the same setup on the second flight and it took numerous promising pictures. Sun Tracking System: This experiment worked on both flights and, as far as we could tell, correctly pointed the camera towards the sun. However, the servo we used could not quite keep up with the rotation of the payload, and so it was not perfect. If we could fly it again we would get a faster motor that continuously ran to correct for rotation in the stack. Flip Video Camera: This was a backup for the still camera in case it did not work. The first flight it took video from launch until after landing and did have some good pictures of the sun, but it was not needed after our primary experiment worked on the second flight. Hobo Data: The Hobo correctly logged data throughout the entire flight. The data also matched up with the expected results. Conclusion

Words of Wisdom Pick an experiment that you will enjoy. Do not go too complex. Try to keep it simple yet interesting and meaningful. Even out the workload. Don’t cram the week before the flight.

Special Thanks Philip Hansen Vishnu Mallik Joey Senykr Alex Ngure Dr. Flaten

Post Script: What SOHO saw.