 Copyright Atomic Energy of Canada Limited IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 9-12 Feb, 2010 AECL Perspectives on newcomer NPP owners: lessons from the Cernavoda.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nuclear Power: Opportunities, Challenges and Solutions Black Sea Energy Conference - April 2006 Ron Cullen General Manager and Project Director Romania.
Advertisements

Canada’s Nuclear Future So What’s Going On Up there Anyway eh?? WNFC 2008 Miami Milton Caplan President, MZConsulting Inc.
Opportunities in Nuclear Durham Economic Prosperity Conference November 14, 2014 Ron Oberth President Organization of Canadian Nuclear Industries.
Advancing Alternative Energy Technologies Glenn MacDonell Director, Energy Industry Canada Workshop on Alternatives to Conventional Generation Technologies.
Presented by: Muhammad Ayub Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority Safety Enhancement at Nuclear Power Plants in Pakistan Prospects of Nuclear Energy in.
UNRESTRICTED Infrastructure Assessment as Viewed by Technology Holders IAEA Technical Meeting December 10-12, 2008 R. Godden.
CNS The Canadian Nuclear Society People supporting applied nuclear science & technology Communication on technical nuclear issues Independent – no corporate,
Safety and Security Aspects of the Management of High Level Waste and Spent Fuel Ramzi Jammal Executive Vice-President and Chief Regulatory Operations.
India’s nuclear technology export future 1 Panel on Emerging Nuclear Powers September Presenter: S L Rao.
Nuclear Infrastructure Development Evaluation: Perspectives from the United States Dr. Marc A. Humphrey Office of Nuclear Energy, Safety and Security U.S.
UNRESTRICTED Financing of Nuclear Power Ala Alizadeh Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Nuclear Infrastructure Milestones Workshop November 2007 IAEA - Vienna.
INSAG DEVELOPMENT OF A DOCUMENT ON HIGH LEVEL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NUCLEAR POWER Milestone Issues: Group C. Nuclear Safety. A. Alonso (INSAG Member)
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Human Resources Development for Nuclear Safety J. Bastos NSNI/RAS.
IAEA, Vienna November 2007 SOME PROSPECTS FOR IMPROVING FINANCING OF DEVELOPMENT OF NUCLEAR POWER INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNICAL WORKSHOP ON THE ISSUES FOR THE.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency How do you know how far you have got? How much you still have to do? Are we nearly there yet? What – Who – When.
CANDU and AECL Professional Engineers Ontario May 21 st, 2009 Joe Howieson Regional Vice-President Marketing and Business Development.
Thailand NUCLEAR POWER PROGRAM INFRASTRUCTURE AND STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION: Regulatory Body Prof. Dr. Chaivat TOSKULKAO Secretary General Office of Atoms.
Gustavo Caruso Section Head Regulatory Activities Section
CANDU Fuel Options: Practical Adaptability Jerry Hopwood Vice President, Marketing & Product Development World Nuclear Association, Annual Symposium September.
NUCLEAR POWER PLANT FINANCING IAEA - Infrastructure Technical Meeting Vienna, November 2007 Fanny Bazile Forecast Director Nuclear Energy Division.
Tom MAZOUR IAEA, Division of Nuclear Power
08 October 2015 M. Ammar Mehdi Introduction to Human Resource Management & SSG-16 Actions 4 th Steering Committee on Competence of Human.
Nuclear Insurance A Global Perspective on Risk Presented by Wendy Hayden, FCIP CRM Nuclear Insurance Association of Canada to Women in Nuclear Golden Horseshoe.
Session III Waste Management Policy - Perspectives Chairman: Piet Bredell (ZA) Rapporteur: Peter Lietava (CZ)
Energy Forum 2011, Changing the Energy Paradigm and Outlook for South-Eastern EU Energy Forum 2011 Nuclear Safety Regulation in Romania Recent Developments.
GROUP 3:Bangladesh, Croatia, Egypt, Jordan, Montenegro, Namibia, Senegal, Syria, Vietnam and Yemen Moderator: Dr. I. Rotaru, IAEA consultant Reporter:
Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry Experience and Future Activities for Introduction of Nuclear Power Masaomi KOYAMA Deputy Director Nuclear Energy.
International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA Nuclear Knowledge Management Programme Meeting of the IAEA Technical Working Group on Nuclear Power Plant Instrumentation.
WIPO Pilot Project - Assisting Member States to Create an Adequate Innovation Infrastructure to Support University – Industry Collaboration.
Human Resources Development TM/WS Infrastructure Development 9-12 February 2010 Breakout session – Group 1 Moderator: Mr. Biro Lucian (Romania) Reproter:
TM/WS 9-12 February GROUP 3: Bangladesh, Croatia, Egypt, Jordan, Montenegro, Namibia, Senegal, Syria, Vietnam and Yemen Moderator: Dr. I. Rotaru,
Thailand’s Preparation for Starting a Nuclear Power Program Mr. Pricha Karasuddhi Technical Advisor Nuclear Power Program Development Office(NPPDO) Ministry.
Current Status and Challenging Issues of Nuclear Energy in Korea Park, Yong Taek President & CEO Korea Power Engineering Company, Inc. 18th World Energy.
© 2012 Rolls-Royce plc The information in this document is the property of Rolls-Royce plc and may not be copied or communicated to a third party, or used.
ENERGY FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY the Potential for Nuclear Power Luis Echávarri Director-General, OECD Nuclear Energy Agency IAEA Scientific Forum at the General.
Algerian nuclear power programme Status, needs and perspectives T/M on development of nuclear infrastructure of NP programme February, ,Vienna.
1 st Workshop on issues and trends arising from the European IRRS missions Findings and Conclusions A.Munuera Brussels, 22 nd and 23 rd January 2014.
Personal reflections on implementing a new regulatory regime Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission Commission canadienne de sûreté nucléaire
ROMANIAN EXPERIENCE IN TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION OF THE NPP OWNER/OPERATOR FOR UNIT 1 OF CERNAVODA NPP Dr. Ioan Rotaru TM/WS on Topical Issues on Infrastructure.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development Technical Meeting/Workshop on: TOPICAL ISSUES ON INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT:
Nuclear Safety & Nuclear Security Synergy By Dr. Lucian BIRO Director General ROMANIA National Commission for Nuclear Activities Control International.
International Atomic Energy Agency Workshop feedback “ Roles & Responsibilities of Vendor Countries and Countries Embarking on Nuclear Power Programmes.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3© 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. 1 Graham Cable Vice President, New Plant Development.
1 Ottawa, ON Apr 7, 2015 CNS President’s Message Ottawa Branch Event.
4rd Meeting of the Steering Committee on Competence of Human Resources for Regulatory Bodies Vienna, 4-7 December 2012 Current Status of the Human Resources.
Dr. Jeremy Whitlock Canadian Nuclear Laboratories (Chalk River, Ontario) Canadian Nuclear Laboratories (Chalk River, Ontario)
RER/9/096 Regional Planning Meeting “Strengthening National Infrastructures for the Control of Radiation Sources” (TSA-1), (Phase II) Country: ROMANIA.
1 Nuclear Energy and Public Acceptance By Claudia Lemieux Director, Communications and Media Relations February 2004.
INDONESIA NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR NUCLEAR POWER PROGRAMME INFRASTRUCTURE AND STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION Dr. A. Sarwiyana Sastratenaya Director, Center for.
Current Status of the National Nuclear Infrastructure and Human Resources Development in the Republic of Belarus TM/WS on Topical Issues on Infrastructure.
JORDAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (JAEC) Building of National Safeguards Capabilities in Jordan IAEA’s Technical Meeting/Workshop on National Infrastructure.
Oil Sands & Nuclear Energy: Our Integrated Energy Vision Presentation for: Energy Roundtable, Calgary Presentation by Wayne Henuset, Director September.
Role of Self-Assessment V.C. Agarwal, Director (HR) NPCIL,INDIA.
DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NUCLEAR POWER IN VIETNAM DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NUCLEAR POWER IN VIETNAM Vuong Huu.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency TM/WS TOPICAL ISSUES ON INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT: MANAGING THE DEVELOPMENT OF NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NUCLEAR.
Comments on the Infrastructure Milestones Ala Alizadeh Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL) November 2007 IAECL Vienna.
1 MANAGEMENT OF TECHNICAL AND SCIENTIFIC COMPETENCE AND HUMAN RESOURCES STEVE COUPLAND CANADIAN NUCLEAR ASSOCIATION IAEA CONFERENCE APRIL 25,2007.
BCĐT-ĐHN-NT1 Institute of energy NUCLEAR POWER DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN VIETNAM OVERVIEW, PROSPECTS AND CONCERNS 12/2009.
DDG Nuclear Energy: Mr Zizamele Mbambo
IAEA PERSPECTIVE ON THE FUTURE OF NUCLEAR POWER
János Krutzler Hungarian Atomic Energy Authority
Personal reflections on implementing a new regulatory regime
Radiation & Nuclear Safety and Security Aspects in Lao PDR
Considerations on the Reference Plant Concept
Legal and Regulatory Framework for Nuclear Installations in IRAN
Mostafa El-Asiry Nuclear Power Plants Authority (NPPA), Cairo, Egypt
THE INTRODUCTION OF NUCLEAR POWER IN EGYPT AN OVERVIEW
Prepared and presented HEAD, RELIABILITY AND TESTING LABORATORY
A Canadian Perspective
Presentation transcript:

 Copyright Atomic Energy of Canada Limited IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 9-12 Feb, 2010 AECL Perspectives on newcomer NPP owners: lessons from the Cernavoda experience John Saroudis Regional Vice-President CANDU Reactor Division IAEA Technical Meeting/Workshop “Topical Issues on Infrastructure Development: Managing the Development of a National Infrastructure for Nuclear Power” 9-12 February 2010, Vienna, Austria

 Copyright Atomic Energy of Canada Limited IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 9-12 Feb, Outline AECL Profile Vendor Expectations of newcomers to nuclear Some key questions Legal, commercial and regulatory matters Training and Education Industrial and Localisation Aspects The Cernavoda Experience Longer Term Issues Conclusions

 Copyright Atomic Energy of Canada Limited IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 9-12 Feb, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Established in 1952 to lead the Canadian nuclear industry. 33 CANDU reactors in-service worldwide Over 5,000 employees CANDU recognized as one of the top 10 major engineering achievements of the past century in Canada. World records in construction and commissioning. Advanced R&D Facilities

 Copyright Atomic Energy of Canada Limited IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 9-12 Feb, AECL’s Power Reactor Products ACR-1000 TM (Advanced CANDU Reactor TM ) 1200 MWe class reactor Generation III+ technology Combines experience of CANDU 6 with new CANDU concepts Light water cooling & low enriched fuel Enhanced safety, economics, operability EC6 (Enhanced CANDU 6) 740 MWe class Heavy water moderated and cooled, natural uranium fueled Based on the Qinshan project Enhanced to meet current regulatory requirements in Canada and internationally, and the Gen III guidelines

 Copyright Atomic Energy of Canada Limited IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 9-12 Feb, CANDU – A Global Success Pickering, Canada Qinshan III, China Wolsong, S. Korea Romania Cernavoda 2 units + 2 units planned Ontario, Canada Darlington 4 units Pickering 6 units Bruce 8 units India 2 CANDU units 15 PHWR units, 3 units under construction China Qinshan 2 units Quebec, Canada Gentilly 2 1 unit N.Brunswick, Canada Point Lepreau1 unit Argentina Embalse1 unit Pakistan KANUPP1 unit South Korea Wolsong 4 units

 Copyright Atomic Energy of Canada Limited IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 9-12 Feb, 2010 Vendor Expectations of NPP newcomer countries Vendors want to deal with an intelligent customer; Realistic expectations and objectives from host country; Clear and practical (credible) process; Transparency and trust; Host country commitment to undertaking long process to develop the necessary infrastructure and human resources required for the successful implementation of an NPP program; 6

 Copyright Atomic Energy of Canada Limited IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 9-12 Feb, 2010 Vendor Expectations: some key questions What is the country's legal framework: does it adhere to international agreements? Does the country have the ability to develop the required human resources? Does it have a developed electricity sector from which to draw resources that can be further trained? What is the funding/financing model? 7

 Copyright Atomic Energy of Canada Limited IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 9-12 Feb, 2010 Why the subject is pertinent 43 countries have expressed interest in building a first NPP; 25 countries are actively considering nuclear power programs; Newcomer Country Perspective: Issues of economic effort, capability of industrial infrastructure, availability of human resources, cultural considerations Nuclear Vendor Perspective: Responding to new NPP acquisition process is a time-consuming and expensive process 8

 Copyright Atomic Energy of Canada Limited IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 9-12 Feb, 2010 What the vendor can do Help educate the buyer with help from the IAEA; Undertake joint pre-feasibility studies (reflect some vendor requirements into the process); Make their expectations and requirements known to the newcomer countries; Sell proven technology; this provides a reliable base on which to build in a newcomer country. 9

 Copyright Atomic Energy of Canada Limited IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 9-12 Feb, 2010 OFFICIAL USE ONLY CANDU Development: A Strong History Years Power (MWe) 900+ MWe Class Reactors 600+ MWe Class Reactors NRX NRU NPD NPD Douglas Point Pickering A Pickering B Bruce A Bruce B Darlington CANDU 9 Research & Prototype Reactors Today RAPPS 1,2 KANUPP ZEEP ACR ACR and beyond Gentilly 2 Wolsong 1 Pt Lepreau Embalse Cernavoda Wolsong2,3,4 Qinshan1&2 CANDU 6 Enhanced CANDU 6

 Copyright Atomic Energy of Canada Limited IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 9-12 Feb, 2010 Legal and Commercial Aspects Legal: Non-Proliferation legislation; Nuclear Liability legislation; Commercial: Well-established judicial system; Acceptance of 3 rd country legal system (if required); 11

 Copyright Atomic Energy of Canada Limited IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 9-12 Feb, 2010 Regulatory Aspects Independent regulatory capability needs to be built up early in the process; Close initial cooperation with vendor countries regulators; Train regulator staff in vendor country(s); Adopt a clear, well-structured licensing system; 12

 Copyright Atomic Energy of Canada Limited IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 9-12 Feb, 2010 Training and Education Training: Second regulator staff and future operations staff to vendor country institutions/utilities; Develop local labour capabilities in nuclear manufacturing and construction; Education: Existence of high level universities; Institute nuclear engineering courses including Masters level; Educate future pillars of nuclear program in vendor country universities 13

 Copyright Atomic Energy of Canada Limited IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 9-12 Feb,  Autonomy - self-reliance  ability to implement program without undue dependence on others  Economic development  local companies to benefit from economic activity  Scientific & Industrial Development  strengthens centres of excellence that support other industries  Shorten the supply chain  suppliers closer to customers  eliminate language barriers  Costs  reduce costs in a multi-unit new build program Industrial and Localisation Aspects

 Copyright Atomic Energy of Canada Limited IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 9-12 Feb,  AECL is committed to share technology  Four decades of experience  CANDU plants exported to six countries & operate in over six languages  High localization in most “CANDU” countries  AECL has no manufacturing facilities- therefore ready to partner with local companies AECL Localization Policy

 Copyright Atomic Energy of Canada Limited IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 9-12 Feb, Long history of collaboration starting in the late 1960’s Technology transfer contracts signed in 1978 for CANDU 6 technology; Initially program was too ambitious and not realistic (too much dependence on local capability; program too large in scale); From 1990’s and on the program was scaled back to one more manageable and has resulted in the completion of two very successful CANDU 6 units (Unit 1: in 1996 and Unit 2 in 2007) The Cernavoda Experience

 Copyright Atomic Energy of Canada Limited IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 9-12 Feb, 2010 Short history of Canada/Romania nuclear cooperation Preliminary Phase: Initial discussions started in late 1960’s; Bilateral agreement signed 1971; Joint AECL/ Ministry of Electrical Energy study; Common study AECL/ISPE on feasibility of CANDU in Romania ( ); –Meeting international safety standards; –Economic evaluation; –Localisation studies; localised D2O production; Visits to Canadian nuclear sites 17

 Copyright Atomic Energy of Canada Limited IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 9-12 Feb, 2010 Short history of Canada/Romania nuclear cooperation (con’t) 1 st Commercial Phase ( ): Commercial contracts signed in 1978: –Technology transfer to manufacturing sector; –Training in Canada (engineering training at AECL; operations training at Canadian utilities: Pickering and Pt. Lepreau NPPs) 2 nd commercial phase (1990’s to present): Greater involvement from vendor; Single unit pace (not 5 units at once); Successful completion of Unit 1 in 1996; Successful completion of Unit 2 in 2007 (greater local participation – local training of operations staff) 18

 Copyright Atomic Energy of Canada Limited IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 9-12 Feb, 2010 Cernavoda: Regulatory Cooperation Initially Romania adopted USNRC based licensing process; Then had to be adapted to CANDU approach in collaboration with the AECB (CNSC); CNCAN set up team of about 25 staff who were trained in Canada; In latter years of 2 nd commercial phase the CNSC had a full-time representative advising CNCAN during Unit 1 construction; Unit 2 licensed entirely by CNCAN ( ) 19

 Copyright Atomic Energy of Canada Limited IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 9-12 Feb, 2010 Cernavoda: Technology Transfer 1978 agreements had significant technology transfer from Canadian to Romanian nuclear manufacturing sector; Capability developed for an ambitious nuclear program during the 1980’s (e.g. for Cernavoda Unit 3 it was envisaged to manufacture calandria vessel in Romania); In reality fell somewhat short of requirements; Long delays in program and limited volume led to failure to fully develop domestic capability and eventually to further erosion (mainly in manufacturing). 20

 Copyright Atomic Energy of Canada Limited IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 9-12 Feb, 2010 Longer Term Issues: Effective nuclear programs need sustained efforts to maintain capabilities; Long interruption in program leads to loss of capability; Competition for trained human resources can seriously hamper domestic programs (manufacturing; construction; operation); Need to adapt objectives to realistic requirements (a single or 2 unit program has different requirements than a multi-unit long-term program) 21

 Copyright Atomic Energy of Canada Limited IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 9-12 Feb, 2010 Conclusions Vendors want to deal with an intelligent and well- prepared customer; The acquisition process is long and complex: newcomer countries must devote the necessary resources (human and monetary) to carry this out; Preparation for introduction of a first NPP is long and demands commitment from the buyer; But, it has been done successfully in several countries; You CANDU it also! 22

 Copyright Atomic Energy of Canada Limited IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 9-12 Feb, Thank you