1 Context Sensitive Design CE 453 Highway Design Iowa State University Howard R. Green Company.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ODOT Pedestrian and Bicycle Program Sheila Lyons, PE Local Area Government Conference 2011.
Advertisements

Corridor Management Planning for Scenic Byways Transportation Conference 2006 Presentation Deborah Divine Kansas Scenic Byways Program Manager.
BI-NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP STUDY Canada-U.S.-Ontario-Michigan Partnership Border Study.
Public Workshop Welcome -to the -. What is the ?
London Streets...The Way Ahead Garrett Emmerson Chief Operating Officer: London Streets.
CALTRANS’ TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT & OPERATIONS CTP 2040 PAC 1 Kris Kuhl Assistant Division Chief, Division of Traffic Operations 4/15/2014 CREATING.
Route 17 Corridor Study Public Workshop II – November 29, 2012 Orange / Sullivan County 1.
The US 101 Mobility Study will -  Examine current and future conditions, identify key deficiency areas and propose multi-modal improvement packages along.
1 How to Succeed in Statewide and MPO Transportation Planning.
Freight-Supportive Guidelines ACT Canada – Sustainable Mobility Summit 2012 November 7, 2012 Ontario Ministry of Transportation.
Sustaining your Community Strategies & Structures Fran Butterfoss Coalitions Work Tim LaPier CDC’s Healthy Communities Program.
Chapter 5 1 Chapter 5. The Transportation- Planning Process 1.Explain how travel demand modeling fits into the transportation-planning process 2.Explain.
Consulting Trends and the Design Process. Fundamental activities conducted by consulting firms Winning work Doing work Managing work Managing business.
I n t e g r a t I n g C S S Practitioner Module 1 1 Module 1: Context Sensitive Solutions and Livability Overview.
I n t e g r a t I n g C S S Practitioner Module 2 1 Module 2: Building the Case for Change.
1 ACCESS to QUALITY CULTURAL, RECREATIONAL, EDUCATIONAL and LEISURE OPPORTUNITIES Collaboratively encourages and supports opportunities to focus on the.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Sustainable Tourism development
Linda K. McCarthy, Executive Director Missoula Downtown Association Missoula, Montana
July 15, 2011 NEW YORK & CONNECTICUT SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES.
2013 Annual Strategic Action Plan Evaluation. Overview Background Role of SAP Implementation Evaluation process Council feedback Enhancement of SAP.
BC Injury Prevention Strategy Working Paper for Discussion.
Intersection & Interchange Geometrics (IIG) Innovative Design Considerations for All Users Module 8 Intersection- Interchange Evaluation Process.
Barrington Road at Jane Addams Memorial Tollway (Interstate 90) Interchange Improvement Study Hoffman Estates Village Hall June 27, 2012.
North Central Texas Council of Governments Southern Dallas County Strategic Development Planning Project Capture the Value.
Meeting Agenda Stakeholder Participation Panel July 14, 2003 Welcome/Introductions Study Overview Tasks/Products/Schedule Traffic Patterns Break Key Project.
Practical Design in ODOT Roadway Conference April 13, 2010 Cathy Nelson, PE Technical Services Manager/ Chief Engineer.
Mid Wales LTP Stakeholder Workshop 3 rd October Presentation by Ann Elias and Janice Hughes.
Palm Coast City Council STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN 2012.
Designing the Future of NMDOT NM Section ITE September 3, 2015 Tamara P. Haas, P.E. Asset Management & Planning Division Director
AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 – 8:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback on purpose, needs, and alternatives  Sign up for list  Fill.
1 Context Sensitive Solutions For Designing Urban Thoroughfares Brian Bochner Senior Research Engineer Texas Transportation Institute Brian Bochner Senior.
Envisioning the Future of Minnesota Transportation Finance Advisory Committee April 20, 2012.
Integrated Regional Watershed Management Plan Presentation – March 12, 2013 HLVRCD.
OPEN HOUSE #4 JUNE AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment.
Highway Location Study CE 453 Lecture 4 See also lab 2 and lab 4 instructions, and EIS lecture notes See also 04 DOT development process.doc Refs:
At the last Steering Team meeting… Goals (Rule-level) EPS (Measurable and Reportable) Natural Resources Human/Cultural Environment Administrative Avoid,
NCHRP Study (30) Performance Measures for Context Sensitive Solutions – A Guidebook for State DOTs As presented by Sally Oldham at the 2005 Midwest.
Transportation Planning Process Freight Transportation Planning Workshop July 11, 2001.
Comprehensive Plan Update Kevin O’Neill Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015.
Chapter 5 1 Chapter 5. The Transportation- Planning Process 1.Explain how travel demand modeling fits into the transportation-planning process 2.Explain.
The SSMP Process 1. The Servicing and Settlement Master Plan A plan to encompass the community’s visions and ideas, while approaching planning and servicing.
MIT - October 1, 2004Jeffrey D. Ensor 1 RSTP Planning for Operations Jeffrey D. Ensor Malaysia Transport Group M.I.T. October 1, 2004.
Steps to Creating a Comprehensive Plan  PHASE 1: Where are we? Research & Analysis of Existing Conditions  PHASE 2: Where do we want to be? Creating.
Village of Villa Park Comprehensive Plan Update CPAC Meeting December 2 nd, 2008.
Center for Environmental Excellence by AASHTO September 29, 2007 AASHTO Standing Committee on Highways.
Ames Area Long Range Transportation Plan Issues / Visioning Workshop Originally helpd …November 3, 2009 Welcome!
200/768_K 0 Sustainable Growth & Development Subcommittee Report Committee for a Sustainable Emerald Coast May 17, 2007.
National Forum on Performance Based Planning and Programming Michael King North Country Council Bethlehem, NH September 13, 2010.
Comprehensive Plan Update. General, far-reaching vision to benefit the whole community Takes a long term view of issues Focuses on physical development.
San Diego Regional Comprehensive Plan Presentation to Senate Transportation and Housing Committee February 8, 2005.
Context Sensitive Solutions Focus Group Session Lynn Purnell Parsons Brinckerhoff Prosperity Church Road Corridor December 8, 2005.
Chapter 7 Planning and Decision Making. Planning Planning is the process of creating a direction for one or more parts of the organization. The purposes.
The Importance of Public Participation and Outreach in Project Development Gary Flunoy – Business Outreach/Public Involvement Coordinator August 27, 2009.
Sustainability Principles for Land Use and Mobility Approved by City Council – January 2007.
Minnesota State Planning Conference September 28, 2011.
Office of Major Project Development (OMPD) Overview November 2015.
Planning Commission Study Session: Preferred Plan July 23, 2015.
Unit 2 DEVELOPMENT OF THE LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (LRTP) LCTCC Educational Program.
STAMFORD CAPACITY AND LIMITS TO GROWTH STUDY SOUTH KESTEVEN DISTRICT COUNCIL FINAL REPORT PRESENTATION PRESENTERS: UNA McGAUGHRIN JESSE HONEY 14 TH DECEMBER.
CONTEXT-SENSITIVE DESIGN 2002 Texas Department of Transportation Design Conference.
Oregon State Rail Plan Update
Technical and Public Advisory Committee Meeting #3
Draft Transportation Element September 6, 2017
Loddon Campaspe Integrated Transport Strategy
TSMO Program Plan Development
Chapter 5. The Transportation-Planning Process
Don Arkle, AL DOT - moderator Tom Warne, Warn & Associates
Loddon Campaspe Integrated Transport Strategy
MODULE 11: Creating a TSMO Program Plan
Presentation transcript:

1 Context Sensitive Design CE 453 Highway Design Iowa State University Howard R. Green Company

2 Where do we want to end up? Understand the concepts of CSD Apply CSD to a real project process See where the theory of CSD has been successful

3 Background 1991 ISTEA Balanced transportation projects with community and environmental values. 1997FHWA/AASHTO, Flexibility in Highway Design Identifies flexible highway design tools available to help sustain important community interests without compromising safety. 1998FHWA/AASHTO/Maryland DOT, “Thinking Beyond the Pavement” National Workshop Encouraged the best ways of integrating highways with their communities and the environment while maintaining safety and mobility.

4 Context Sensitive Design …is a collaborative approach, which involves all stakeholders to develop a transportation facility that fits its physical setting and preserves scenic, aesthetic, historic, and environmental resources, while maintaining safety and mobility.

5 Principles Qualities Project satisfies purpose and need Safe facility for user and community In harmony with the community while preserving environmental values Efficient and effective use of resources Minimal disruption to the community Adds lasting value to the community Achieves excellence in people’s minds

6 Principles Characteristics Establish multi-disciplinary team early Understand the community and valued resources before designing Involve a full range of stakeholders, purpose clear Process examines multiple alternatives Commitment to the process from top officials and leaders Open, continuous communication with stakeholders Public involvement process is tailored to the project

7 Why is CSD Important? Promotes active citizen participation Balances community needs with transportation goals Provides an integrated development framework Seeks stakeholder and community values Puts the customer first Enhances community acceptance Encourages a lasting public works legacy

8 Benefits Making development decisions for the right reasons Better protection for the environment and other community assets Projects look and fit better into their physical setting Enhances community livability and sustainability Can save time and money by reducing “rework” cycle Creates opportunities for design excellence

9 What is Context? Context is everything related to the environment, places, and people where a project is located.

10 Every Project has Context!

11 Understanding Context Natural Resources Community Resources Cultural Resources People

12 Natural Resources

13 Natural Resources

14 Community Resources

15 Community Resources

16 Cultural Resources

17 Cultural Resources

18 Context Sensitive Design TH 61 Corridor Study

20 We are Here Public Open House Advisory Committee Meeting Time to Complete Task MayJuneJulyAug.Sept.Oct.Nov.Dec.Jan.Feb.Mar.Apr.MayJuneJulyAug.Sept.Oct.Nov.Dec.Jan.Feb. Project Management Data Collection Needs and Issues Assessment Develop and Evaluate Alternative Solutions Draft and Final TH 61 Corridor Transportation and Access Mgmt. Plan Early and Continuing Public and Agency Involvement Partnership Among: Mn/DOT – Counties – Cities – Townships – State & Local Agencies – Corridor Stakeholders

21 DOT/Municipality/etc. Advisory Committee -Provide Input -Provide Business Perspective -Identify Deficiencies -Suggest Mitigation Strategies -Provide two-way communication between Advisory Committee and organization Context Sensitive Design Workshop -Identify Community Values and Issues -Identify Opportunities and Constraints -Consider Roadway Safety -Develop Corridor Vision Residents -Identify Issues -Review and Comment on Mitigation Strategies Design Consultant -Provide Technical Support & Analysis

22 Why are we going through the process? Create a suitable corridor Identify community values & issues Guarantee the opportunity to participate Share stakeholder viewpoints, visions, and goals Understand the transportation constraints

23 What won’t this workshop do? Determine corridor alignment Guarantee everything will happen Accuse or be confrontational Win or Lose Compromise safety

24 Goal To BALANCE: Community values Environmental considerations Safety and capacity Economic realities

28

29

34 Stakeholder Input An opportunity to bring YOU, the community stakeholders, into the project study process early: –to provide input as individuals and community representatives –to identify community issues –to share values –to determine important elements related to the project –to consider what the BALANCE between safety, capacity, community, and environment is fair and practical

35 Traffic & Transportation Issues Truck vs. car traffic Destination vs. thru traffic Pedestrian Circulation: safe crossings, bikeways

36 Business & Commerce Values Maintain small town image vs. the strip Maintaining good commerce flow- goods, services, people Maintaining appropriate land use – residential, business, industry

37 Environmental Values Visual & scenic preservation Cultural – architecture, archeological, historical features Natural resources – wetlands, lake, bluffs

38 Tourism & Recreation Values Should this be a destination community corridor? What is the emphasis on local & regional tourism? What is the importance & value of recreation in the corridor?

39 The BIG question is… What is the BALANCE between community/corridor and transportation needs?

40 Analyze and Evaluate Input from CSD Workshop Develop Alternatives to Balance: –Safety –Mobility –Environment –Economic Investment Present Alternatives to Advisory Committee for Review and Comment Revise Alternatives Public Information Open House – Present Feasible Alternatives for Review and Comment 40 TH 61 Corridor Study

41 Successful Projects using Context Sensitive Design

42 What Defines a Successful Project? Community Acceptance Environmental compatibility Engineering and technical credibility Financial feasibility Timely delivery

Lake Place, Duluth

Silver Creek Cliff Tunnel TH 61

Edge of the Wilderness Scenic Byway TH 38

Gooseberry Falls, TH 61

Alternatives and Design Flexibility Studies

Desired Outcome: Design Excellence