Training of Trainers Workshop Reference Centres and Regional Partners in the Performance Review and Assessment of Implementation of the Strategy (PRAIS)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Appraisal Module 5 Session 6.
Advertisements

Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Presentation to Geneva Group - Paris Hans d’Orville Director, Bureau of Strategic.
Training for Participants Date, Location, Venue 1 Welcome! Welcome to PEM 2 Module!
2014 AmeriCorps External Reviewer Training Assessing Need, Theory of Change, and Logic Model.
Training of Trainers Workshop Reference Centres and Regional Partners in the Performance Review and Assessment of Implementation of the Strategy (PRAIS)
Capitalising the full potential of online-collaboration for SME innovation support Horizon 2020 call Innosup (Participant Portal code: H2020-INNOSUP )
ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP: SESSION 1 ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES ACADEMIC AND STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES PRESENTED BY THE DIVISION OF INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY RENEWAL PROCESS: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS January29, 2015.
© 2014 Public Health Institute PROPOSAL WRITING.
Training of Trainers Workshop Reference Centres and Regional Partners in the Performance Review and Assessment of Implementation of the Strategy (PRAIS)
Project idea SUSCHEM BROKERAGE EVENT 2012 PROJECT TITLE CONTACT [note: fill in this template if you intend to be a project partner. If you intend to be.
1 Analytical Tools, Data & Scenarios Workshop July 29, 2004 California Water Plan Update 2004.
ESPON 2013 Programme Info Day on Calls and Partner Café Brussels, 10 May 2012 How to apply: Application Form and Eligibility A Decade of Territorial.
Introduction to the Training of Trainers Workshop Performance Review and Assessment of Implementation of the Strategy (PRAIS) Project 31 May – 4 June 2010,
Training of Trainers Workshop Reference Centres and Regional Partners in the Performance Review and Assessment of Implementation of the Strategy (PRAIS)
Training of Trainers Workshop Reference Centres and Regional Partners in the Performance Review and Assessment of Implementation of the Strategy (PRAIS)
Training of Trainers Workshop Reference Centres and Regional Partners in the Performance Review and Assessment of Implementation of the Strategy (PRAIS)
Training of Trainers Workshop Reference Centres and Regional Partners in the Performance Review and Assessment of Implementation of the Strategy (PRAIS)
Don Dodson, Senior Vice Provost Diane Jonte-Pace, Vice Provost for Undergraduate Studies Carol Ann Gittens, Director, Office of Assessment Learning Assessment.
MAP-IT! Review Meeting 5 March Brussels MAP IT Questionnaire INNOVA/ITIDA.
Presented by Madhuriya Kumar Dutta Trade and Investment Facilitation Department Mekong Institute, Thailand 16 May 2012.
Nuts and Bolts of the Title II, Part A Application Virginia Department of Education Coordinators’ Academy July 22 – July 24, Coordinators' Academy.
UK Aid Direct Introduction to Logframes (only required at proposal stage)
Introduction to the UNCCD Strategy, new monitoring and assessment system and relevant COP decisions Training of Trainers Rome, 31 May – 4 June 2010.
Activity Reporting Lead Partner Seminar 20 th January 2011, Friars Carse Hotel, Dumfries, Scotland Rachel Burn.
SC. Asia Project Training on Developing National Action Plans on Sustainable Consumption Adriana Zacarias & Fu Lu UNEP SC. Asia Project 17 March 2005 Manila.
International Federation of Accountants April 28, 2009 Impact Assessment Process for IFAC Linda Lach and Alta Prinsloo.
CCCB Evaluation Toolkit: Overview and Update on Progress Angela Moore, MPH 2009 NCCCP & NPCR Collaborative Meeting April 16, 2009.
Budget Formulation 2017/2018 A review of the 2017 process and the 2018 process. Office of Budget and Performance Management November 2015.
Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.
Proposal Development Guidelines for Signature Grantee Semi-Finalists The Covenant Foundation.
The FDES revision process: progress so far, state of the art, the way forward United Nations Statistics Division.
UNECE TIMBER COMMITTEE Fifty-ninth session 2-5 October 2001 STRATEGIC REVIEW OF INTEGRATED PROGRAMME Kit Prins Chief, Timber Section.
Developing a Project Proposal ACTRAV-Turin. Contents Concept of “Logical Framework Approach” SPROUT – model project proposal Individual activity Presentation.
CREATING A QUALITY PATHWAY IMPROVEMENT PLAN. The importance of planning……..
Terms of Reference for RCs Training of Trainers Rome, 31 May – 4 June 2010.
NPA eMS application – Budget Joint Secretariat & Managing Authority 1st June 2016 – Cork, Ireland.
CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME WORKSHOP A: Preparing an application – focus on activities and partnership Project development seminar Prague, 1-2 February.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
REPORTING RRP6 Technical Planning Meeting Amman, Sep
31 May – 4 June 2010, FAO Rome.
MODULE 15 – ORGANISATIONAL COMMUNICATION
Lesson Plan Creating a lesson plan week5.
Rebecca McQuaid Evaluation 101 …a focus on Programs Rebecca McQuaid
Template Contents of the Low Carbon Development Strategy (LCDS)
Scrutiny of RIAs Problem Definition and Objectives
Introduction to the UNCCD Strategy, new monitoring and assessment system and relevant COP decisions Training of Trainers Rome, 31 May – 4 June 2010.
Workshop to develop theories of change
REPORTING THROUGH THE EMS
Specific objectives Structured approach for design and assessment
Approval of Assessments
The revised Periodic Reporting Questionnaires: general features Alessandra Borchi Policy and Statutory Meetings Section UNESCO World Heritage Centre.
Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Presentation to Geneva Group - Paris Hans d’Orville Director, Bureau of Strategic.
NPA eMS application – Budget Christopher Parker
NPA eMS application – Budget Christopher Parker
Jane Ashdown, Adelphi University 2/14/2013 & 2/26/2013
GRANTS – WORKPLAN AND MONITORING AND EVALUATION (M&E) INSTRUCTIONS
Reporting 25 April 2018.
Communication plan.
Download the document from the website of our Programme :
School of Dentistry Education Research Fund (SDERF)
Information session SCIENTIFIC NEGOTIATIONS Call FP7-ENV-2013-two-stage "Environment (including climate change)" Brussels 22/05/2013 José M. Jiménez.
NPA eMS application – Budget Christopher Parker
Approval of Assessments
Monitoring & Evaluation
Quality Management Anita Téringer– ITS Hungary
STEPS Site Report.
Health Capital Technical Topics
DG Justice and Consumers
Institutional Self Evaluation Report Team Training
Presentation transcript:

Training of Trainers Workshop Reference Centres and Regional Partners in the Performance Review and Assessment of Implementation of the Strategy (PRAIS) Project 31 May – 4 June 2010, FAO Rome

Training of Trainers Workshop 31 May – 4 June 2010, FAO Rome Day 4 - Session 2 – Practical session on the use of the ‘additional information’ template This practical section provides: - general remarks on the structure of the template and on the type of data and information needed - on-screen overview of the template on the PRAIS portal - instructions for the calculation of the quantitative data to be inputted into the template - information on how to implement the iterative process on indicators

Training of Trainers Workshop 31 May – 4 June 2010, FAO Rome Practical session on the use of the ‘additional information’ template > General remarks Active (white) and not active (shaded) areas Shaded areas contain information and explanatory texts; they are not active on the PRAIS portal. White areas are for reporting purposes and need to be filled in by Parties with relevant quantitative data, selection of multiple choice boxes, or narrative information; they are active on the PRAIS portal. Types of data and information inputting - multiple choice (selection of standardized replies) - free text - quantitative data

Training of Trainers Workshop 31 May – 4 June 2010, FAO Rome Practical session on the use of the ‘additional information’ template > instructions to fill section 1 on reporting process-related issues How to quantify the financial resources contributed to the reporting process? Add the amounts invested from the national budget in terms of cost of: staff, external advisory services (if any), data gathering and processing, coordination, participation, consultation and validation, etc. Specify the currency. How to quantify the human resources contributed to the reporting process? Specify the total number of people contributing to the reporting process at its different stages, from the familiarization with the reporting tools, to data source mapping, data gathering, data processing, coordination, participation, consultation, validation, data inputting, etc. Quantify for each of the people identified above their actual input in terms of person/day and give the total.

Training of Trainers Workshop 31 May – 4 June 2010, FAO Rome Practical session on the use of the ‘additional information’ template > instructions to fill section 1 on reporting process-related issues What about the other questions in section 1? All the other questions in section 1 require the selection of a ‘yes/no’ answer or of a multiple choice. Where a multiple choice is proposed, the ‘other’ option is given. The ‘other’ option implies the insertion of free text whose lenght is limited (size limit is specified in the template and the insertion will be automatically truncked when the limit is reached).

Training of Trainers Workshop 31 May – 4 June 2010, FAO Rome Practical session on the use of the ‘additional information’ template > instructions to fill section 2 on specific requests within COP decisions How to highlight the difficulties experienced in reporting on performance indicators (iterative process)? 1. Identify the performance indicators for which difficulties were experienced while reporting. 2. Consult document ICCD/CRIC(8)/5/Add.2 and read the e-SMART criteria compliance analysis for the concerned indicator(s). 3. Get familiar with the meaning of the e-SMART criteria, by reading their definition in the glossary and document ICCD/CRIC(8)/5/Add.1 for additional background information. 4. If the difficulties faced in reporting are not reflected in the e- SMART criteria compliance analysis, tick the corresponding e- SMART criteria box in the template. A concrete example follows.

Training of Trainers Workshop 31 May – 4 June 2010, FAO Rome Practical session on the use of the ‘additional information’ template > instructions to fill section 2 on specific requests within COP decisions: example on difficulties experienced in reporting on performance indicators Example - Difficulties were experienced in reporting on CONS-O-1, in particular on the estimate of persons reached by media, either because the media producers could not be contacted or because they could not quantify the reach out (audience) of their products. - The compliance analysis of the e-SMART criteria of CONS-O-1 highlights that difficulties may be experienced in gathering estimates of audience (ICCD/CRIC(8)/5/Add.2, under the ‘achievable’ criteria, see following slide). The difficulty level is indicated as a medium one (+/-). - If you think that the difficulty level was, in fact, much higher and that the indicator needs to be improved in terms of ‘being achievable’, then tick the ‘achievable’ cell for CONS-O-1 in the template.

Training of Trainers Workshop 31 May – 4 June 2010, FAO Rome Practical session on the use of the ‘additional information’ template > instructions to fill section 2: extract from ICCD/CRIC(8)/5/Add.2

Training of Trainers Workshop 31 May – 4 June 2010, FAO Rome Practical session on the use of the ‘additional information’ template > instructions to fill section 3 on reporting on the implementation of the NAP How to quantify the portion of the NAP which is under implementation? Each National Action Programme has a unique structure and activities foreseen for implementation may be more or less clearly outlined. Where activities’ outlining is clear the identification of those activities under implementation is evident. By divinding the number of activities under implementation by the total number of activities, the percentage class to be selected in the template is derived. Example: 30 activities under implemntation/123 activities foreseen in total = 24 % (i.e. class % in the template) Where outlining of activities in the NAP is unclear, Parties are requested to provide an estimate of the implementation level of their NAP by selecting one of the five broad classes reported in the template. What about the other questions in section 3? They require narrative descriptions (free text).

Training of Trainers Workshop 31 May – 4 June 2010, FAO Rome Practical session on the use of the ‘additional information’ template > instructions to fill section 4 on other country-specific issues What about the questions in section 4? Section 4 encompasses one ‘yes/no’ answer, one multiple choice and narrative description (free text with limited length). If Parties wish to raise to the attention of the COP an issue (the ‘yes’ option is selected), they are asked to categorise this issue and to describe it.