Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2012 ReCAP Columbia University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2013 ReCAP Columbia University.
Advertisements

Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 19, 2012 ReCAP Columbia University.
Business Library and ReCAP: Update and Statistics
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2013 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2013 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2013 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2013 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator August 30, 2011 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2013 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2013 ReCAP Columbia University.
Barcode Tracking At ReCAP ReCAP LAS CUL “Big File” + - Pending Directory SubmitTracking Database Request Directory + Columbia University 2/6/09 Zack Lane.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator September 2012 ReCAP Columbia University.
Impact Theories: Trends in Off-site Shelving Facility Use Zack Lane, ReCAP Coordinator, Columbia University Libraries | Colleen Major, Networked E-Resources.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2013 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2012 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2012 ReCAP Columbia University.
ReCAP Summary: East Asian Library Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator 7/12/2010.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2012 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2013 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator August 10, 2012 ReCAP Columbia University.
Outline of ReCAP Accession Zack Lane Recap Coordinator 9/12/08 rev. 12/6/2010.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator February 2012 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2013 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator August 5, 2011 ReCAP Columbia University.
System-wide Circulation Data: Initial Analysis Stephen Zweibel CCMSCC 7/14/2010.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator May 2011 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator January 24, 2012 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2013 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2013 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2013 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2012 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator September, 2012 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator April 2011 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 31, 2012 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator November 21, 2011 ReCAP Columbia University.
ReCAP Topics: Access and Request Columbia University Libraries 10/27/2009 Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator.
Columbia University and ReCAP July 24, 2008 Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator (212)
RBML and ReCAP: Summary of Progress Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator 4/12/2010.
Impact Theories: Trends in Off-site Shelving Facility Use Zack Lane and Colleen Major Columbia University 12/5/2008.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator August 13, 2012 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2013 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator August 5, 2011 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2012 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator April 5, 2011 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2013 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator February 16, 2011 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator September 16, 2013 ReCAP Columbia University.
Business Library and ReCAP: Update and Statistics
11/5/2008 Updated 1/12/2009 Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator February 2012
Circulation Data: East Asian Library
Current ReCAP Projects: A Review
ReCAP Data Part 4: EDD (Electronic Document Delivery)
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator June 21, 2010 rev. May 2, 2011
ReCAP Collections Analysis: Music Library
Circulation Data: Barnard Library FY13
Social Work Library and ReCAP: FY13 Update and Statistics
Circulation Data: Business Library FY13
Circulation Data: The Burke Library
ReCAP Data Part 2: Requests
Butler Media Center: ReCAP Statistics
Circulation Data: Geology Library FY13
ReCAP Data Part 5: Request Rate
ReCAP Collections Analysis: East Asian Library
The Off-site Request Button: How it works and when it appears
ReCAP Data Part 2: Requests
Geology Library and ReCAP: FY13 Update and Statistics
ReCAP Data Part 6: High-Use Titles
11/5/2008 Updated 1/12/2009 Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator
Presentation transcript:

Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2012 ReCAP Columbia University

 An item is accessioned when it is processed by ReCAP staff and shelved at the facility  Books must have a unique barcode and be in good condition  Accession totals are tracked by both ReCAP and CUL  Each institution tracks parameters about accessions  Granular, bibliographic data is available only from CUL ReCAP Columbia University

 ReCAP accessioned it’s first book in January 2002  Currently holds 9.47 million volumes  Modules 8 & 9 scheduled for completion by Summer 2013  Larger scale transfers from CUL will resume in Fall 2013 ReCAP Columbia University

ReCAP Columbia University  Barcode  Customer code  Date  Patron group  BIBL/HLDG/ITEM ID  CLIO location  Fiscal year  Format  Publishing date  Language  Place of publication  Title  Call number  Enumeration/Chron ology  Digitization status  Copyright status

ReCAP Columbia University The history of CUL accessions at ReCAP can be divided into three periods:  FY02-FY04, Load In Phase. Large-scale transfer to clear onsite backlog and at obsolete off-site facilities; 500k per year  FY05-FY09, Middle Phase. Continued effort to clear backlog, re-purpose library space and offset collection growth; 300k per year  FY10-13, Restrained Phase. Slow-down a result of budget, delaying planned construction of new module; 150k per year

ReCAP Columbia University  3,726,036 accessions since ReCAP opened in January 2002 ◦ FY10 : 209,630 ◦ FY11 : 183,324 ◦ FY12 : 173,299  Does not includes Columbia Law Library ◦ 283,626 total accessions  9,659,753 total accessions at ReCAP

 CUL continually transfers collections to ReCAP  Accession total only grows  Administration assigns informal quotas to each department libraryquotas  Quotas are based on both acquisition rate and space demands  Transfer projects vary from year to year  Each truckload carries approximately 5,000 books  Transfer schedule is maintained online Transfer schedule ReCAP Columbia University

ReCAP Columbia University

 Customer code is used by ReCAP to control access and delivery permissions Customer code  Following chart visualizes the distribution of customer codes within the yearly accession totals  Transfers occur in phases, out of department libraries  Easier to view as pie chart, see following slides ReCAP Columbia University

ReCAP Columbia University

ReCAP Columbia University  Pie chart illustrates the distribution of customer codes at ReCAP  The four largest codes are: ◦ CU: 69.6% general circulating ◦ EV: 9.0% general circulating CJK ◦ AR: 5.8% non-circ Avery Library ◦ RS: 3.5% restricted RBML/University Archives

ReCAP Columbia University

 CLIO location is the encoding used by CUL to manage offsite collections CLIO location  Departments may have several offsite CLIO locations  Often several CLIO locations correspond to the same customer codecustomer code ReCAP Columbia University

ReCAP Columbia University

ReCAP Columbia University  Granular, bibliographic data from Voyager is available for all Offsite collections  In general, better data since bibliographic control is so high compared to on campus collections  It allows analysis based on single or multiple parameters  E.g. distribution of publication dates, format and languages

ReCAP Columbia University  Format is a combination of two elements of the Leader field: Type and BLvl  OCLC definitions: ◦ Type “a” is “Language material” ◦ BLvl “m” is “Monograph/item”; “s” is “Serial”  Monographs and Serials are identified by formats “am” and “as”  All other formats fall under the heading of “Everything Else”

ReCAP Columbia University

ReCAP Columbia University  Monographs : all records with format “am”  Only include complete dates  Substantial holdings of monographs published between 1950 and 1990  Post-2003 materials were transferred directly to ReCAP at the time of acquisition  Approximately 30,000 new acquisitions per year are sent directly to ReCAP  Recent publications have a high request rate

ReCAP Columbia University

ReCAP Columbia University

ReCAP Columbia University  Distribution by language includes all items  424 total languages  Top ten language in ReCAP collections ◦ English : 49.9% ◦ German : 7.8% ◦ Japanese : 5.5% ◦ Chinese : 5.4% ◦ French : 5.2% ◦ Spanish : 3.9% ◦ Russian : 3.8% ◦ [none] : 2.4% ◦ Italian : 2.1% ◦ Korean : 1.4%

ReCAP Columbia University

 More information and data can be found on the ReCAP Data CenterReCAP Data Center  Website includes more information about system-wide data and special projects  Tailored data sets and analysis will be provided to staff via the ReCAP Coordinator  Please see the main ReCAP website for general information about CUL procedures and systemsReCAP website ReCAP Columbia University