Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2013 ReCAP Columbia University.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2013 ReCAP Columbia University."— Presentation transcript:

1 Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2013 ReCAP Columbia University

2  Four basic categories of data ◦ Accessions ◦ Requests ◦ Delivery ◦ Circulation  Detailed information can be found at the ReCAP Data Center website ReCAP Data Center website  Website now includes introductory presentations for all basic categories AND analysis ReCAP Columbia University

3  TOTAL : 203,916 / 21,282 (Request Rate 2.14%)  off,hsl : 68,647 / 3,531 (2.05%)  off,hsr : 120,096 / 17,448 (2.45%)  off,hssc : 15,173 / 303 (0.13%) ReCAP Columbia University

4  Chart of Health Sciences Library accessions by fiscal year  Transfer began several years after ReCAP  Large load-out began in FY08 to clear stacks  Ongoing transfers from Brewster to ReCAP  Detailed information on project may be found on HSL/ReCAP websiteHSL/ReCAP website ReCAP Columbia University

5 ReCAP Columbia University

6 ReCAP Columbia University

7 ReCAP Columbia University

8 ReCAP Columbia University  Requests begin immediately after transfer  Monthly request volumes in phase with academic calendar  50% more requests in Fall and Spring than Summer system-wide

9 ReCAP Columbia University

10 ReCAP Columbia University

11 ReCAP Columbia University

12 ReCAP Columbia University  HSL has received deliveries of ReCAP collections since the facility opened in 2002  Books from other department libraries are deliverable to HSL  Top Collections ◦ HSL: 63.3% ◦ Butler: 13.9% ◦ Other Science Libraries: 8.8%

13 ReCAP Columbia University

14 ReCAP Columbia University

15 ReCAP Columbia University

16 ReCAP Columbia University  Large increase in EDD requests in FY09, decline began in FY11  EDDs for HSL ILL are now physically delivered to HSL for on-campus scanning because quality is inconsistent and often poor  Staff in interested in breakdown between EDDs requested by patrons and those sent via DOCLINE

17 ReCAP Columbia University

18 ReCAP Columbia University

19 ReCAP Columbia University  In FY13 54.0% of all EDD requests are from HSL Collections  Most ILLs (DOCLINE) requests are now physically delivered for in-house scanning  Quality is inconsistent and often poorly performed at ReCAP  Need for consistent success with good quality

20 ReCAP Columbia University

21 ReCAP Columbia University

22 ReCAP Columbia University

23 ReCAP Columbia University

24 ReCAP Columbia University  Request rate is a measure of collection usage  It is the percentage of ReCAP collections requested during a twelve-month period  Provides staff one way to gauge overall use of offsite collections  Request rate is one factor used to structure ReCAP facility staffing model  Patron access to offsite collections is excellent: dynamic with few failures  Measured two ways: ◦ Annual ◦ Lifespan

25 ReCAP Columbia University

26 ReCAP Columbia University

27  More information and data can be found on the HSL/ReCAP websiteHSL/ReCAP website  ReCAP Data Center includes more information about system-wide data and special projects ReCAP Data Center  Tailored data sets and analysis will be provided to staff via the ReCAP Coordinator  Please see the main ReCAP website for general information about CUL procedures and systemsReCAP website ReCAP Columbia University


Download ppt "Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2013 ReCAP Columbia University."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google