International Political Economy-- Alternative Perspective on IPE Professor Yu Xunda 2013. 05

Suggested Readings Barnara Ehrenreich and Arlie Russell Hochschild. Global Woman: Nannies, Minds and Sex Workers in the New Economy. New York: Henry Holt, 2002 Cynthia Enloe. Globalization and Militarism: Feminists Make the Link, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2007. Garnet. “Bibliography—Gender in International Political Economy.” Gender Action. http://www.genderaction.org/ Margaret Keck and Kathryn Sikkink. Activist without Borders: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1998. Nina Tannenward. The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Non-Use of Nuclear Weapons since 1945.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. Alexander Wendt. “Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Constitution of Power Politics,” International Organization, 46(Spring 1992), pp. 391-425. WIDE.Globalising Gender Equality and Social Justice.

Content 5.1 Views of Conflict and Cooperation 5.2 Actors Spread New Norms and ‘Socialize’ States 5.3 Tools and Concepts of Analysis 5.4 Women Matter; Gender matters 5.5 Liberal Feminisms 5.6 Feminist Critiques of Mercantilist Perspectives 5.7 Structuralist Feminism

Two alternative Perspectives Two alternatives or complements to the 3 mainstream IPE theories: Constructivism Feminist theory

Constructivism Focuses: the role of ideas, norms, and discourse in shaping outcomes

5.1 Constructivism-- Views of Conflict and Cooperation The state of international society: Anarchy is what state make of it. Conflict or cooperation is a product of actors’ different values, beliefs, and interests. A. States’ behaviors do not simply reflect the material distribution of power. 　E.g. The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) B. States, sometimes, do not seem to reflect a cost-benefit calculation or some other kind of rational self-interest. 　E.g. Powerful states in Somalia./ Nuclear taboo

5.2 Constructivism-- Actors Spread New Norms and ‘Socialize’ States Social forces: TANs, epistemic communities, and IOs. Function: can generate and spread values, norms, and ideas that change the way the world work. TANs Definition: ”those actors working internationally on an issue, who are bound together by shared values, a common discourse, and dense exchanges of information and services.” Function: using testimonies, symbolism, and name-and -shame campaigns to create a shared belief among political elites and social actors. E.g : the International Campaign to Ban Landmines

5.2 Constructivism-- Actors Spread New Norms and ‘Socialize’ States Epistemic Communities Definition: ”professional with recognized expertise and competence in a particular domain and authoritative claim to policy-relevant knowledge within that domain or issue area.” Function: providing political elites with advice, technical explanations and policy options. E.g : Peter Haas and the ban of CFCs, Chicago Boys IOs Function: they have a role in shaping what a state is (its identity), wants (its interests), and does (its policies). E,g: ICRC, WB, UN

5.3 Constructivism--Tools and Concepts of Analysis 4 basic assumptions of constructivism applied to IPE: 　　1. Ideas, values, norms, and identities of individuals, groups, and states are socially constructed. 　　2. Ideas and values are social forces that are as important as military or economic factors. 　　3. Conflict and cooperation are products of values and beliefs. 4. Change can be explained by examining changes in the values and beliefs of actors over time.

5.3 Constructivism--Tools and Concepts of Analysis 4 concepts/tools of constructivism to explain outcomes in IPE: 　Framing -- E.g. Blood Diamond Problematization --E.g. the money-laundering problem talked by OECD Discourse analysis --E.g. the clash of civilization Tracing the life cycle of ideas --E.g. the life cycle of ideas about preservation of the environment and natural resources.

Feminist Contributions to IPE Feminists argue that every area of IPE—from the structure of state power to the allocation of political and economic resources —is impacted by gendered processes.

5.4 Women Matter, Gender matters Gender analysis takes into account not just sex but gender as the socially constructed norms. The neglect to women in policy design, not only has a negative impact on women, but also always works to the detriment of the policy’s overall objectives as well. Gender-influenced things, including the roles assigned to men and women, our gendered resources and obligations, the thing we buy, where we work......shape markets and affect the distribution of power and resources in society.

5.5 Liberal Feminisms Classical liberal feminists (libertarian feminists) most concerned with individual freedoms, freedom from coercion, and “self-ownership”for men and women, especially, the de jure inequality. Other liberal feminists tend to support individual rights and free markets, but argue that men hold a disproportionate share of power in society. ----liberal feminists stress than the level of political rights that women enjoy in a country, along with their overall treatment, have important impacts on a country’s overall economic health.

5.6 Feminist Critiques of Mercantilist Perspectives Questioning the assumptions in the mercantilist and realist traditions. Traditionally, the study of IPE has privileged macro-level structures. Feminism begin their analysis at household or community level. Economically, they pointed out that state-centric IPE scholars have over-looked the informal and non-wage-based economy in which women work. Politically, they have redefined the concept of security, showing the way in which the international relations are gendered and making women’s often invisible roles more apparent.

5.7 Structuralist Feminism Marxist feminists challenge the idea that capitalism benefits women in almost any instance. Gender is a source of oppression that is facilitated by the capitalist system. There is a link between the power mechanisms that determine international relations and those that determine race, class, and gender relations. The fact that women and people of color make up a disproportionate number of the poor in most countries, is a result of systematic exploitation in capitalist economy.

Conclusion The two alternative perspectives direct our focus to actors and forces that have been overlooked in the liberal, mercantilist, and structuralist perspectives. They suggest that states and markets are not the only shapers in the world; other actors like individuals, women, and social movements profoundly influence global policies and struggles. They also remind us that the study of IPE cannot be divorced from moral and ethical questions.

Discussion Questions Do you think constructivism should get more attention as a social science theory? Why or Why not.? How might structuralists feminists respond to companies that outsource labor to sweatshops in poor countries. Why do feminists argue that the debates about national security need to consider gender? Do you see? What criticisms can made of constructivist? Do constructivists underestimate the importance of material power in affecting global issue? What tools do we have to measure the briefs of norms actually an actors outlook and actions.

Thank You !