A Handbook That Outlines When traffic impact studies should be required What analyses should be included How the study should be reviewed and used Who.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transportation Impact Analysis Presented By Katy Flynn, P.E. Fehr & Peers February 19, 2008.
Advertisements

Lec 25: Ch2.(T&LD): Site planning
Traffic Impact Study “Study to evaluate the impact on a roadway network due to a proposed development”
Access Management in Indiana Transportation Planning and Traffic Calming Part II June 21, 2007.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT The Comprehensive Plan – Key to Concurrency Photo: Ragan Smith Inc.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Kirkland 2035 Plan Update Summary of EIS Alternatives Transportation Commission – September 25, 2014.
June 18, 2013 WINDSOR PARKWAY – ROSWELL ROAD INTERSECTION RELOCATION FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS.
New I-65 Interchange at Worthsville Road Welcome!.
Transportation’s Relation to Growth Management `.
TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRICT ROUTE 29.
Board of County Commissioners November 8, Recommendation Project Background and Location Traffic Analysis Comparison of Alternatives Public Meeting.
Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2 June 25,
Lec 24: Ch1.(T&LD): Urban transportation planning vs. Site planning Review the transportation-land use cycle (Read examples in Ch.1 & compare the development.
Lec 26: Ch3.(T&LD): Traffic Analysis – Trip generation
Access Management: Why And How? An Introduction To Access Management Problems, Principles and Treatments.
Talking Freight Seminars November 19, 2008 Caroline A. Mays, AICP Atlanta Regional Commission Integrating Freight and Land Use in the Atlanta Region.
Miller Road Feasibility Study & Reconstruction Project Information and Kick-off Meeting Presented by: The Corradino Group of Michigan, Inc. ROWE INC. Genesee.
Improving Your World. RS&H tradition began in 1941 Employee-owned company Six programs of client-focused services Multi-disciplined team of planners,
Northeast Ohio Areawide Coordinating Agency Kamm’s Corners Development Corporation.
Community Development Department DEVELOPMENTS OF REGIONAL IMPACT (DRIs) Summary.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
Community Development Department Neoga Lakes – Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Master Planned Development (MPD) Rezoning Application.
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT City Council June 3, 2014.
Navigating SB 375: CEQA Streamlining and SB 743 Transportation Analysis 2014 San Joaquin Valley Fall Policy Conference.
Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE). Outline  Background  ICE Process  Impacts  Current Status.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
SITE. Parcel will go from Medium Density Residential to medium high Density Residential Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Office/Business.
Capital Improvement Program. During the Annual Strategic Action Plan (SAP) evaluation, long-term needs and priorities are identified by City Council Capital.
Planning Processes/Permits “From Pre-application meeting to Board of Aldermen Approval.” “From Pre-application meeting to Board of Aldermen Approval.”
Community Development Department GRAHAM SWAMP AREA FUTURE LAND USE & ZONING MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION #2623 & 2624.
EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT MAJOR COMMUNITY ISSUES RELATED TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Board of County Commissioners/ Local Planning Agency Joint Meeting.
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
INDOT Access Management Study _________________________ Long Range Transportation Planning Section Division of Environment, Planning and Engineering INDIANA.
Public Hearing Modifications to the Gated Community Ordinance Board of County Commissioners Presented by the Orange County Public Works Department February.
New Brighton Planning Commission Meeting April 18, 2006 Public Hearing: Zoning Ordinance Amendment: Section Regarding Commercial/Industrial Park.
Access Management: South Carolina’s Experience Rick Werts Director of Traffic Engineering South Carolina Department of Transportation.
Development of A Traffic Monitoring Program Using Emme 3 Based on A San Joaquin COG Travel Demand Model Jia Hao Wu, Ph.D., Joy Bhattacharya, P.E. and Chris.
April 9, 2011 Mike Wieszchowski, P.E., PTOE Professional Traffic Operations Engineer Road Use Planning Guidelines to Protect Your Roadways.
Transportation and Transit Committee 4 December 2002 Albion Road Corridor Study.
Freeway Congestion In The Washington Region Presentation to National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board February 15, 2006 Item # 9.
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT Planning & Land Development Regulation Board May 21, 2014.
Incorporating Traffic Operations into Demand Forecasting Model Daniel Ghile, Stephen Gardner 22 nd international EMME Users’ Conference, Portland September.
Community Development Department FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT SMALL-SCALE LU-MIN & ZONING MAP AMENDMENT RZ-OTH
RR Farms, LLC Presented by James Stowers, Esq. Wright, Casey & Stowers, P.L. --- Pioneer Square --- Pioneer Square.
The Fargo/Moorhead Area Interstate Operations Study Opportunities and Planned Activities Presentation for the Mn/DOT Travel Demand Modeling Coordinating.
Growth Management Legislative Discussion: Transportation Concurrency April 24, 2012 Growth Management Legislative Discussion: Transportation Concurrency.
Using Planning and Zoning to Promote Healthy Living.
Analyzing the Mobility Impacts of TOD Level of Service in Transit Oriented Districts Service for Who?
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Fairfax County Parkway Corridor Study Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee December 1,
Work Zone Safety and Mobility Transportation Management Plans Jason Gutting, P.E. Michigan Department of Transportation.
September 15, 2011 Presented by: Clay Harris, PMP - City of Austin Federico Mendoza, PE, PTOE – Brown & Gay Engineers, Inc. Todd Lane Alternative Geometric.
“ Grand Landings North” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing March 3, 2015.
MED SR 18 Corridor Project MED PID October 13, 2015.
Connecting South Dakota and the Nation Access Management Training Brooke White, Access Management Engineer.
“State Road 100 MPC Lots” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing November 17, 2015.
Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 1: How to Determine Which Resources Should be Considered in a SCEA How to identify what.
Visit Our Website at: Click to edit Master title style.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
Public Hearings D10, E11, F12 March 26, Today’s Public Hearings D C-TRAN-2 Comprehensive Plan amendment adoption E C-TRAN-1 Comprehensive.
“Palm Coast 145, LLC” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning Planning and Land Development Regulation Board December 21, 2016.
Location Map Site is 6.2+/- acres, located on south side of Matanzas Woods Parkway, between old and new alignments of Belle Terre Parkway.
Draft Transportation Element September 6, 2017
Transportation Impact Fee Study
Palm Coast 145, LLC Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing September 5, 2017.
San Mateo Countywide Transportation Plan update
Growth Management & Multi-Family Housing
MPO School Transportation Working Group
New Hanover Comprehensive Plan
Presentation transcript:

A Handbook That Outlines When traffic impact studies should be required What analyses should be included How the study should be reviewed and used Who is qualified to prepare and review impact studies

Current Problems Communities do not adequately address traffic implications of zoning and land use decisions. A standard practice is needed. Site traffic impacts are often ignored, misunderstood or inappropriately used. Mitigation measures are not addressed.

What Can Traffic Impact Studies Do? Forecast traffic impacts. Assist in evaluation of rezonings and proposed land developments. Evaluate number/location of access points. Identify a basis to allocate costs of improvements. Help promote a coordinated review.

Elements of Handbook Why is a Traffic Study Needed? When is a Study Needed and What Type is Required? Impact Analyses Site Access and Circulation Review Mitigation Analysis Qualifications of Preparer and Reviewer Review Process and Coordination

Preliminary Considerations When traffic studies should be required. Require different types of traffic impact studies based on scale of development. Pre-application conference to discuss specific issues.

Types of Traffic Studies Rezonings: contrasting impacts of representative uses for current v. requested zoning. Traffic Impact Assessment: smaller projects, analyze site access points. Traffic Impact Statement: traditional traffic study, includes nearby signalized intersections. Regional Traffic Analysis: comprehensive study of a large area.

Trip Generation Sources Trip Generation, a nationally recognized manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Recent local data from at least three similar uses.

When Should Traffic Impact Studies be Required for Rezonings? Rezoning inconsistent with Master Plan if potential uses could generate 100+ more peak hour directional trips than uses under current zoning. Rezoning consistent with Master Plan but generate 1,000 daily trips or rezoning is considered premature because of traffic conditions. Rezoning along designated “congested,” “critical” or “safety management” corridors. Rezoning studies evaluate representative or worst case uses, not just a particular use.

When Should Traffic Impact Studies Be Required? Projects Which…Type of Study Required…. Generate > or 500 or < 750 trips daily Impact Statement Generate pk. hr. dir. trips or trips daily Impact Statement Are along identified corridorsVaries Involve “significant” change or expansion to PUD or use Varies Generate 500+ dir. pk. hr. Regional Analysis Other cases – Special Land Uses, etc. Varies

Peak Hours Traffic impacts should be evaluated for a typical week day : a.m. peak hour of adjacent streets p.m. peak hour of adjacent streets Saturday peak hour for certain commercial uses daily traffic figures useful for planning

Examples of Trip Generation to Meet Study Thresholds Use 50 Peak Hr. Dir. 100 Peak Hr. Dir. Single Family Units70150 Apartment units Shopping Centers (sq. ft.) 5,20015,500 Fast Food Restaurant (sq. ft.) 2,6005,200 Office (sq. ft.)22,00055,000 Light Industrial (sq. ft.)58,000115,000

Rezoning Traffic Study- Compare Uses Current Office Zoning – Municipal Offices – General Offices – Medical Offices – Funeral Homes Proposed Commercial Zoning – Offices – General Retail – Gas Stations – Restaurants – Motels – Shopping Centers

Preapplication Conference Who to involve…. Items to discuss  type of study needed  study area  availability of data  background traffic growth  other nearby projects to include  programmed roadway improvements  trip generation sources/trip reduction factors  horizon year  other issues

Traffic Impact Study Should Include 1.Recent traffic counts, especially peak hour(s) 2.Existing levels of service analysis 3.Background traffic growth 4.Trip generation of project 5.Trip distribution rationale

Traffic Impact Study Should Include 6.Future levels of service 7.Crash (accident) history, if appropriate 8.Site access and internal site circulation review 9.Mitigation alternatives and recommendations

Levels of Service (LoS) Analysis LoS mathematically measures traffic operations. Based on vehicle delays for various movements. Best measured for peak hours. Scale A-F A/B = no or little delay C/D = some delays, typical design standard E = volumes near or at capacity, congestion F = significant congestion/delays

Examples LoS Summary Signalized Intersection Approach A.M. Peak Hour Delay (sec.) LoS P.M. Peak Hour Delay (sec.) LoS Eastbound 34.1 D 46.9 E Westbound 26.7 D 41.1 A Northbound 18.2 C 17.7 C Southbound F 20.9 C Overall 52.9 E 32.1 D

Evaluation of Mitigation Alternatives Roadway improvements – bypass lane, deceleration lane, widening, construct new street, etc. Access management techniques – service drives, deceleration lanes, prohibit certain turns, median, etc. Operational improvements – install traffic signal(s) or change timing, demand management techniques, uses of public transit, etc. Responsibility, timing and funding.

Implementation Master planning and corridor planning Adopt or amend ordinances Staff training Agency coordination

Revise Ordinances Incorporate model ordinance as a General Provision Reference in the site plan review section List uses meeting the thresholds as special land uses Encourage mixed use developments and connections between developments Adopt access management standards Require submittal of a study for certain rezonings through “Ordinance Amendment” regulations

Qualifications 3+ years recent experience preparing traffic impact studies Impact studies comprise a major component of preparer’s work Familiarity with the Highway Capacity Manual Education or training in traffic impact analyses Member of ITE or TRB Registered PE/AICP/PCP or professional transportation planner Any signal or design work should be prepared by a PE trained in traffic engineering.

Summary of Michigan Cases and Constitutional Issues: Subdivision Control Act, Mobile Home Act and Zoning Enabling acts do not authorize requiring a developer to fund off-site improvements. Constitutionality of off-site improvements has been upheld under the driveway permit approval process.

Traffic Study Review: Training/Coordination Training staff and/or use consultants. Obtain reference materials. Establish a review system between the community and local road agency and/or MDOT. Coordinate with MPO, 3-C, Public Transit or Regional Planning Agencies.

Other Important Tools to Manage Traffic: State/MPO long range plans Master plans Corridor plans Thoroughfare plans Access management Right-of-way preservation Zoning/subdivision regulations Mixed use developments Public Transit Transportation demand management