Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2012 ReCAP Columbia University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2013 ReCAP Columbia University.
Advertisements

Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 19, 2012 ReCAP Columbia University.
Business Library and ReCAP: Update and Statistics
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2013 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2013 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2013 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2013 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator August 30, 2011 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2013 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2013 ReCAP Columbia University.
Impact Theories: Trends in Off-site Shelving Facility Use Zack Lane, ReCAP Coordinator, Columbia University Libraries | Colleen Major, Networked E-Resources.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2013 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2012 ReCAP Columbia University.
ReCAP Summary: East Asian Library Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator 7/12/2010.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2012 ReCAP Columbia University.
Circulation Data: Initial Analysis Steve Zweibel CCMSCC 6/14/2010.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2013 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator August 10, 2012 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2012 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator February 2012 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2013 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator August 5, 2011 ReCAP Columbia University.
System-wide Circulation Data: Initial Analysis Stephen Zweibel CCMSCC 7/14/2010.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator May 2011 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator January 24, 2012 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2013 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2013 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2013 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2012 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator September, 2012 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator April 2011 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 31, 2012 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator November 21, 2011 ReCAP Columbia University.
Columbia University and ReCAP July 24, 2008 Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator (212)
RBML and ReCAP: Summary of Progress Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator 4/12/2010.
Impact Theories: Trends in Off-site Shelving Facility Use Zack Lane and Colleen Major Columbia University 12/5/2008.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator August 13, 2012 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2013 ReCAP Columbia University.
ReCAP Shelving Facility Research Collections and Preservation Consortium.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator August 5, 2011 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2012 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator April 5, 2011 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2013 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator February 16, 2011 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator September 16, 2013 ReCAP Columbia University.
Business Library and ReCAP: Update and Statistics
ReCAP Collections Analysis: Geology and Geoscience
11/5/2008 Updated 1/12/2009 Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator
7/18/2008 Updated 1/16/09 Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator February 2012
Circulation Data: East Asian Library
Current ReCAP Projects: A Review
ASCC: Answers to ReCAP-related Questions
ReCAP Data Part 4: EDD (Electronic Document Delivery)
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator June 21, 2010 rev. May 2, 2011
ReCAP Collections Analysis: Music Library
Circulation Data: Health Sciences Library FY13
Circulation Data: Barnard Library FY13
Social Work Library and ReCAP: FY13 Update and Statistics
Circulation Data: Business Library FY13
Circulation Data: The Burke Library
ReCAP Data Part 2: Requests
Butler Media Center: ReCAP Statistics
Circulation Data: Geology Library FY13
ReCAP Data Part 5: Request Rate
ReCAP Collections Analysis: East Asian Library
ReCAP Data Part 2: Requests
Geology Library and ReCAP: FY13 Update and Statistics
ReCAP Data Part 6: High-Use Titles
11/5/2008 Updated 1/12/2009 Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator
Presentation transcript:

Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2012 ReCAP Columbia University

 Looks at Social Work Library circulation activity  Is only one measure of collection usage  Presents data both SW specific and system- wide  ?Circ Desk uses several happening locations: Social Work, Butler, BorrowDirect, HSL  No circulation data for non-circulating collections ReCAP Columbia University

ReCAP Columbia University  ?Social Work Library became independent entity in August 2004  ?Opening of new Social Work building  ?Print collection was previously part of Lehman Library in SIPA  ?Transition period between August 2004 and May 2005  ?Two happening locations: ◦ Social Work Circ. Deck ◦ SW Circulation Desk

ReCAP Columbia University  Data collated by happening location  Social Work Library became independent entity in August 2004  Five primary types of circulation activity: charge, discharge, renewal, recall and hold  Most renewals and recalls are done in the OPAC happening location, dynamically by patrons themselves  Note: circulation data includes primarily “on campus” collections

ReCAP Columbia University

ReCAP Columbia University

ReCAP Columbia University  Total volume of charges has fluctuated  System-wide there has been a 27.4% decline  Volume of discharge predictably mirrors charges  Other types of circulation activity happen in much lower volume  Majority of renewals occur in the OPAC happening location

ReCAP Columbia University  Almost 3/4 of all charges are to graduate students  Patron Group definitions have changed: ◦ Adjunct faculty, in 2008 grad students were given primary group OFF instead of GRD  Pie charts break down data for FY12 only  Bar chart compares patron group charges for each fiscal year

ReCAP Columbia University

ReCAP Columbia University

ReCAP Columbia University

ReCAP Columbia University

ReCAP Columbia University  Over the life of SW, charge activity is split evenly between stacks and reserves collections  In FY12, activity was heavier with Reserves  Charges to SW Stacks has declined steadily each fiscal year  Offsite charges should be placed in the Butler Happening Location  Data unavailable for non-circulating collections

ReCAP Columbia University

ReCAP Columbia University

ReCAP Columbia University

ReCAP Columbia University  Data for all transactions in the SW Happening Location  Nearly 80% is for the LC Stacks collection alone  Offsite charges are placed in the Butler Happening Location  Data unavailable for non-circulating collections

ReCAP Columbia University

ReCAP Columbia University

ReCAP Columbia University

 System-wide circulation statistics are available for both on campus and offsite collections  Circulation data are accessible to all staff Circulation data are accessible  Offsite collections can be identified by CLIO location format off,xxx.  System-wide data is available from July 2003, the date of Ex Libris Voyager implementation ReCAP Columbia University

 Comparison of on campus and offsite collection charges by volume  On campus charge volume declined by 27.4% between FY04 and FY12  On campus charges have declined every year since FY04  Offsite charge volume increased 121.3% between FY04 and FY12  N.B. On campus collection size declines each year; offsite collections grow each year ReCAP Columbia University

ReCAP Columbia University

 Monthly charges of both onsite and off-site collections are in phase with the academic calendar  Peaks in the middle of Fall and Spring terms  The pattern of offsite charges is more apparent when viewed alone ReCAP Columbia University

ReCAP Columbia University

ReCAP Columbia University

 On campu and offsite charges can be compared using a ratio  The ratio of offsite to on campus increased from FY04 to FY012  Offsite collections are accounting for proportionally more activity ReCAP Columbia University

ReCAP Columbia University

 Chart compares total volume of charges to renewals for Offsite collections  Graduate students and Faculty request more Offsite collections than Undergraduates  Graduate students and especially Faculty have higher renewal/charge ratios  Over time, these two patron groups tend to renew more than charge  CUL may expect to see steady or decreasing request volume as a result ReCAP Columbia University

ReCAP Columbia University

ReCAP Columbia University

 More information about data sets can be found on the ReCAP Data Center websiteReCAP Data Center website  Primary data categories include: accession, retrieval, delivery and circulation  Tailored data sets and analysis will be provided to staff via the ReCAP Coordinator  Please see the main ReCAP website for general information about CUL procedures and systemsReCAP website ReCAP Columbia University