Future of Surveillance in the National Airspace System

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NextGen and Its Impact on Performance Worldwide Symposium on Performance of the Air Navigation System ICAO Montreal, Quebec, Canada March 26-30, 2007 Victoria.
Advertisements

Federal Aviation Administration International Flight Inspection Symposium June 24, 2008 James H. Washington Vice President, Acquisition and Business Services.
Air Traffic Management
Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) for Aviation United Nations International Committee on GNSS December, 2005 Ken Alexander United States.
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-40/PIA-4 Improved Safety and Efficiency through the initial application.
By: Steve Lang Date: September 2007 Federal Aviation Administration Wake Vortex R&D Status Briefing NBAA Convention.
NextGen GA Fund, LLC A Fund to Accelerate NextGen Equipage Benefits for the General Aviation Operator Community.
ACI-NA 2007 Environmental Affairs Conference Colorado Air Traffic Control Modernization Update Travis Vallin, Director Colorado Aeronautics Division.
Automatic Dependent Surveillance – Broadcast (ADS-B) What is it, and how can it help improve operations in Micronesia? Captain Rocky Stone Chief Surveillance.
Applications from packages I to III
The Next Generation Air Transportation System “The Near Term and Beyond” Presented by Charles Leader, Director Joint Planning and Development Office.
Presented to: MPAR Symposium By: William Benner, Aviation Weather Group, Operations Planning Date: 12 October 2007 Federal Aviation Administration Multi-function.
Federal Aviation Administration Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) Briefing to COMSTAC Kelvin Coleman May 16, 2008.
Federal Aviation Administration Navigation Services Overview Briefing to Air Traffic Management Bureau of the Civil Aviation Administration of China (CAAC)
Sense & Avoid for UAV Systems
Presented to: MPAR Symposium II By: James Williams – Director, Systems Engineering and Safety Date: 17 November 2009 Federal Aviation Administration Multifunction.
Delivering NextGen June 5, 2015 Maryland Airport Managers Association Presented by Carmine Gallo, Eastern Regional Administrator Federal Aviation Administration.
Presented to: MPAR Working Group By: William Benner, Weather Processors Team Manager (AJP-1820), FAA Technical Center Date: 19 March 2007 Federal Aviation.
MIT Lincoln Laboratory 2007 MPAR-1 JSH 5/2/2007 Session 2: Current State of Military Investment in PAR Panel Lead: Dr. Jeffrey Herd (MIT LL) Panelists:
1 Introduction of new electronic systems for aviation Thor Breien, Dr. Ing Park Air Systems AS Presented by Linda Lavik.
Federal Aviation Administration Surveillance and Broadcast Services By: Rick Castaldo Date: January 9, 2007 Surveillance and Broadcast Services Briefing.
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Alternative Positioning, Navigation, and Timing Initiative
Presented to: Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee By: Stan Pszczolkowski, Manager, System Analysis Division Date: March 1, 2006 Federal Aviation.
ATN2001 Rev New Kent Fisher, Program Manager Boeing Air Traffic Management Kent Fisher, Program Manager Boeing Air Traffic Management.
B.PRADHAN,IAS CVO,AAI. Structure of Presentation  Background  Why need Next Gen ATS  What is Next Gen ATS  Benefits of Next Gen Systems  Conclusion.
Presented to: PNT Advisory Board By: JC Johns, Director Navigation Services Date: May 14, 2009 Federal Aviation Administration GNSS Program Status WAAS,
Presented to: Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee By: Stan Pszczolkowski, Manager, System Analysis Team Date: October 11, 2006 Federal Aviation.
St Louis Flying Club I 2008 Annual Meeting 2008 Annual Meeting.
FAA NAS Enterprise Architecture – Informing Future Challenges in V&V for NextGen 2009 V&V Summit November, 2009.
October 5, 2007 By: Richard L. Day, Vice President En Route and Oceanic Services (ATO-E) Federal Aviation Administration Surveillance and Broadcast Services.
DHS Airspace Surveillance Requirements MPAR Symposium Randel Zeller Science and Technology Directorate Department of Homeland Security Director, Interagency.
GNSS Aviation Applications
Emerging Issues for Air Navigation Service Providers Rudy Kellar Vice President, Operations NAV CANADA September 2007.
FAA System-Wide Information Management Program Overview for SWIM-SUIT Public Lauch Donald Ward Program Manager FAA SWIM Program April 2007.
Federal Aviation Administration Alternative Positioning, Navigation & Timing (APNT) Study Update Leo Eldredge October 14, 2010.
NextGen Current System Primary Radar – Creates blip on Radar Screen Secondary Radar – Aircraft encodes identifier and telemetry data VHF Radio – Voice.
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-84 Initial Capability for Ground-based Cooperative Surveillance SIP/2012/ASBU/Nairobi.
Performance Based Navigation (PBN) Canadian Implementation Presentation to Air Transport Association of Canada 9 November 2010.
Federal Aviation Administration Data Communications Program Operational Trials in Domestic Airspace Presented to:Data Comm Implementation Team (DCIT) By:Jerry.
NextGen & ADS-B Presentation to Aviation Accreditation Board International (AABI) Industry/Educator Forum July 18, 2013 Kansas City, MO.
Update on Multifunction Phased Array Radar (MPAR)
What Is Multilateration Triangulation System Uses Aircraft Transponder Multiple Ground Receivers Central Computer Calculates & Displays Aircraft Position.
NextGen Next Generation Air Transportation System
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Multifunction Phased Array Radar PAR Work Group Magda Batista-Carver June 21, 2007 Radar Operations.
ADS-B Technology Overview
Joint Planning and Development Office (JPDO) Col Mark Weadon Air Force Weather Deputy for Federal Programs May 17 th,
By: R. Scott Stevens, ATO-P, Aviation Weather Office, Weather Policy & Requirements Group, WTIC Program Manager Date: October 9, 2008 Federal Aviation.
Federal Aviation Administration FPAW October Delivering NextGen Next Generation Air Transportation System Presented to: FPAW By: Alfred Moosakhanian,
F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N 1 FAA Satellite Navigation Program Update Dan Salvano.
Presented to: MPAR Working Group By: Jim Williams, Director of Systems Engineering, Operations Planning Date: 11 September 2007 Federal Aviation Administration.
ADS-B An Industry Perspective New Technologies Workshop Washington, DC January 10, 2007.
F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N 1 Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) Dan Hanlon.
Multifunction Phased Array Radar (MPAR) Update 1ICMSSR 12/16/11 ICMSSR Meeting December 2011 Doug Forsyth, Co-chair, WG/MPAR.
INTEGRATION OF UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS Into the New York Terminal Area Christopher Kennedy Anthony Peri.
William C. Withycombe March 14, 2012 Federal Aviation Administration Pacific Aviation Directors Workshop State of the FAA.
Worldwide Symposium on Performance of the Air Navigation System, Montreal, 29 March RNA and RNAV and RNP Strategy in Japan Yoshiki Imawaka Director.
Presented to:Nextor NAS-Wide Modeling Workshop By: Joseph Post, NextGen Systems Analysis Date: January Federal Aviation Administration NextGen.
Federal Aviation Administration Integrated Arrival/Departure Flow Service “ Big Airspace” Presented to: TFM Research Board Presented by: Cynthia Morris.
Larry Ley | Digital Aviation | Boeing Commercial Airplanes
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
FAA NAVAID Rationalization / Resiliency Overview
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
The Right Radar Backup for ADS-B
NextGen and Its Impact on Performance
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Bringing Large Commercial Airport Capabilities to Your Local Community
RNAV and RNP Strategy in Japan
The Air Traffic Organization: Building Today to Ensure Our Future
Presentation transcript:

Future of Surveillance in the National Airspace System

We’ve had a substantially volatile situation over the last 5 years We’ve had a substantially volatile situation over the last 5 years. Traffic is returning to levels seen in 2000. And by 2015, we project: A billion passengers on U.S. Flag Carriers. Domestic flights will increase by approximately 25% over 2005 levels Passenger traffic between the US and international destinations is expected to grow by 67 %

This chart compares the delays we experienced in 2004 … colored in green … with the delays we project for 2014 … colored in red. You can see the red spiking up, in some instances an average of over 50 minutes per flight. We expect that by 2014 … just seven years from now … without the introduction of new tools for managing the system … delays in the US could increase 62% over 2004 levels. Also, because aviation is vital to the national economy, increased delays put these economic benefits in jeopardy. The FAA is hard at work on a solution. It’s called the Next Generation Air Transportation System … [click next slide]

Today’s Air Transportation System Airport Landing, Weather, Lighting Radar Air/Ground Communications NAVAIDs Airport Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) Systems Today’s Air Transportation System Ground-based Human-centric and un-automated Single channel voice control Aging Infrastructure (youngest en-route facility – 43 years old) The current air transportation system is constrained in expanding to support the future economy and evolving security: Today's System – Ground centric – emphasis on the ground system less on aircraft capability. One sector, one controller, one frequency (glorified walkie-talkie system), a finite number of aircraft. One size fits all – no credit for equipage or communication, navigation capabilities. System focused on control rather than management

Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) Transformation and Modernization of the National Airspace System Goal is to: Triple the amount of air traffic capacity Further enhance safety Strengthen Homeland Security Protect the Environment NextGen is a system-wide transformation and modernization of our airspace system. It’s going to involve increased use of automation and the goals include: more ehanced safety Tripling the amount of air traffic capacity Building in post-9/11 security measures … and … Protecting the environment The Backbone of NextGen is going to be our surveillance system known as … [click]

Automatic Dependent Surveillance - Broadcast (ADS-B) Periodically transmits information with no pilot or operator input required Dependent Position and velocity vector are derived from the Global Positioning System (GPS) Surveillance - A method of determining position of aircraft, vehicles, or other asset Broadcast Transmitted information available to anyone with the appropriate receiving equipment Automatic Periodically transmits information with no pilot or operator input required Dependent Position and velocity vector are derived from the Global Positioning System (GPS) Surveillance - A method of determining position of aircraft, vehicles, or other asset Broadcast Transmitted information available to anyone with the appropriate receiving equipment ADS-B updates every second, in contrast to current radar technology.

ADS-B Milestones Final Invest- ment Decision Feb 07 RFO Equipage Mandate - 2020 Ground Infra- Structure Deployed 2013 Contract Award Aug 07 Backup Analysis Jan 07 NPRM* Sep 07 Final Rule Nov 09 In-Service Decision Nov 10 Separation Standards Pre-NPRM Activity: Lower Risk from High to Medium Aug 07 Separation Standards Approval Sep 09 Key Site IOC** Apr 10 FAA awarded the $1.8 billion automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast contract to a team led by ITT Corp. The ITT team, which includes AT&T, Thales North America, WSI and PriceWaterhouseCoopers, beat teams led by Raytheon and Lockheed Martin for the contract. FAA said yesterday in Washington during a briefing for reporters. ITT provided the "best value For the first three years of the contract, the ITT team will develop and deploy the system, gearing up to an eventual full deployment of ADS-B nationwide by 2013. If all options are exercised, the contract could be worth $1.8 billion, A factor in awarding the contract to ITT was AT&T's existing telecommunication infrastructure. ADS-B equipment will be installed on AT&T's cell phone towers and other installations, and the system will benefit from AT&T's existing telecommunications operations centers, he said. Deployment of the system will occur in two phases. ADS-B will be rolled out in the Gulf of Mexico region, Philadelphia, Louisville, Ky., and Juneau, Alaska. The second phase will see the system deployed nationwide. *Notice of Proposed Rulemaking ** Initial Operating Capability

Gulf of Mexico: Current Conditions The benefits of more efficient spacing can be seen in ADS-B’s use in the Gulf of Mexico. Gulf of Mexico: Current Conditions Currently in areas over the Gulf of Mexico there is no surveillance available. Without any surveillance services the separation standards are approximately 15 minutes between aircraft which equates to approximately 120NM.

Gulf of Mexico: ADS-B Enabled With ADS-B services (surveillance, communications and weather) in the Gulf of Mexico, FAA will be able to provide radar-like separation (currently 5NM separation). Deploying ADS-B over the Gulf will result in greater capacity, optimized routing and savings for the Airlines. We estimate the benefits of ADS-B Out to be: In 2017 this will allow 246,400 more flights over the Gulf 1.5B in savings due to reduced delays through 2035 With ADS-B applications in the terminal area, more efficient spacing on approach can save an additional 1.5B for commercial aviation through 2035

ADS-B Milestones Backup Analysis Jan 07 Final Invest- ment Decision Feb 07 RFO Equipage Mandate - 2020 Ground Infra- Structure Deployed 2013 Contract Award Aug 07 Backup Analysis Jan 07 NPRM* Sep 07 Final Rule Nov 09 In-Service Decision Nov 10 Separation Standards Pre-NPRM Activity: Lower Risk from High to Medium Aug 07 Separation Standards Approval Sep 09 Key Site IOC** Apr 10 FAA awarded the $1.8 billion automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast contract to a team led by ITT Corp. The ITT team, which includes AT&T, Thales North America, WSI and PriceWaterhouseCoopers, beat teams led by Raytheon and Lockheed Martin for the contract. FAA said yesterday in Washington during a briefing for reporters. ITT provided the "best value For the first three years of the contract, the ITT team will develop and deploy the system, gearing up to an eventual full deployment of ADS-B nationwide by 2013. If all options are exercised, the contract could be worth $1.8 billion, A factor in awarding the contract to ITT was AT&T's existing telecommunication infrastructure. ADS-B equipment will be installed on AT&T's cell phone towers and other installations, and the system will benefit from AT&T's existing telecommunications operations centers, he said. Deployment of the system will occur in two phases. ADS-B will be rolled out in the Gulf of Mexico region, Philadelphia, Louisville, Ky., and Juneau, Alaska. The second phase will see the system deployed nationwide.

Backup Analysis: Ground Rules - Minimum Requirements Strategy must support ATC surveillance application Basic en route and terminal area services Support for other applications desirable, but not required Continuity of services must be maintained Must maintain at least the same level of capacity during a GPS outage that we would have during a radar outage today 3 nm separations in top ~40 high density terminals 5 nm separations in medium density terminals and en route Coverage volume same as CENRAP coverage + top 40 terminals Safety of operations must be maintained Single-aircraft avionics failures must also be addressed Strategy must be able to be implemented and made operational on or before ADS-B rule compliance date

Backup Analysis: Potential Backup Technologies and Methods Surveillance Secondary radar Primary radar Passive multilateration Active multilateration Positioning/Navigation DME/DME/IRU DME/DME eLoran IRU only Satellite Navigation Only (SBAS/WAAS, L5, Galileo) VOR/DME, LOC/DME, MLS/RNAV Procedural Separation

Backup Analysis: Recommendation The FAA should adopt Backup Strategy 1, “Secondary Radar” Retain (reduced) secondary radar network to cover required airspace, and use primary radar to mitigate single-aircraft avionics failures Requires approximately 40 terminal Secondary Surveillance Radars (SSRs) and 150 en route SSRs be retained beyond 2020 (compared to a total of approximately 380 today) No additional equipage required for aircraft This strategy is assessed as having the highest performance ranking and lowest life cycle cost The FAA should revisit this assessment prior to committing to radar investments beyond 2020 Changes in evaluation assumptions could significantly affect results of this assessment Investment decision for Strategy 1 required no later than FY2014

Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B): Backup System The FAA adopted Radar as the preferred back up system. But current radar networks are: Aging (new ones are up to 40 years old) Nearing the end of their service life Expensive to maintain The FAA adopted Radar as the preferred back up system. Retain (reduced) secondary radar network to cover required airspace, and use primary radar to mitigate single-aircraft avionics failures Requires approximately 40 terminal Secondary Surveillance Radars (SSRs) and 150 en route SSRs be retained beyond 2020 (compared to a total of approximately 380 today) The FAA will revisit this assessment prior to committing to radar investments beyond 2020 Changes in evaluation assumptions could significantly affect results of this assessment Investment decision for Strategy 1 required no later than FY2014 But current radar networks are aging. New ones are up to 40 years old … nearing the end of their service life … and expensive to maintain

Potential Benefits of MPAR in Civil Aviation MPAR may prove to be a viable, cost-efficient backup to ADS-B. MPAR may assist in achieving key NextGen capabilities such as: Assimilating Weather into Decision-making Aircraft Trajectory-Based Operations Super Density Operations MPAR may prove to be a viable, cost-efficient backup to ADS-B. MPAR may assist in achieving key NextGen capabilities such as: Weather Assimilated into Decision-making Aircraft Trajectory-Based Operations Super Density Operations

ADS-B Complement to Support ATC MPAR Concept ADS-B Complement to Support ATC Non-Cooperative Targets Flexibility to Support New UAS Missions & Tasking High Quality Polarization Diverse Weather Data Efficient Multi-Beam Surveillance Non-Cooperative Targets Highlights Multi-function Capability (aircraft, weather and other threats and special objects of interest, e.g., UAV, bird flocks, volcanic ash, etc.) Adaptable beamsteering allows the system to expend radar resources where they’re needed, when they’re needed, and for how long they’re needed (e.g., stare). - Revisit time based on object characteristics (e.g., faster revisit on a non-cooperative track in the terminal area vs. a cooperative track in the en route air space) - Flexible dwell time (e.g., allows radar to “stare” target of concern or at a tornado vortex) - Track mode (vs. track-while-scan) facilitates faster track update rates Full Volume Weather Scan and Fast Scan Region (e.g., faster update rate for area of interest such as a gust front) Rapid Hazardous Weather Detection

MPAR Performance Benefits MPAR enables a 35% reduction in the number of radars. MPAR can save $1.8 billion savings in replacement acquisition costs. MPAR can save an additional $3 billion in life cycle costs over 30 years MPAR enables a 35% reduction in the number of radars. MPAR can save $1.8 billion savings in replacement acquisition costs. MPAR can save an additional $3 billion in life cycle costs over 30 years

MPAR Approach Today Future Concept 510 Radars, 7 Types ASR-9 ASR-11 ARSR-1/2 ARSR-3 ARSR-4 TDWR NEXRAD Seven System Types Single System Single Mission Multi-Mission Non-Scalable Scalable to Mission Needs Multiple Maintenance, Logistic and Training Prgms Consolidated Maintenance, Logistic and Training Prgms Mechanically Rotating Electronically Steered You can see that currently we have 7 types of radar: including the ASR series ... and NEXRAD. With MPAR: We can go from seven radar types … down to a single radar site for tracking and weather surveillance. (i.e., multi-mission) Design is scalable to mission need (e.g., terminal gap filler) Promote Common Air Picture between agencies Improve detection and forecasting of wind shear, microbursts and gust fonts Increase warning times for tornadoes, severe thunderstorms, and floods MPAR Cost Benefits Shared financial responsibility as a joint program with overlapping mission requirements Potential for reducing from current system of 510 radar, and seven different types, down to 334 radar, of a single type. Lower maintenance costs Economic cost benefit for NextGen weather MPAR 510 Radars, 7 Types 334 Radars, 1 Type 5000 ft AGL, Blue, weather only Future Concept