Beyond Peak Hour Volume-to-Capacity: Developing Hours of Congestion Mike Mauch DKS Associates.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A PERSPECTIVE ON APPLICATION OF A PAIR OF PLANNING AND MICRO SIMULATION MODELS: EXPERIENCE FROM I-405 CORRIDOR STUDY PROGRAM Murli K. Adury Youssef Dehghani.
Advertisements

1 Innovative Tools October 27, 2011 Chi Mai. 2 Presentation Overview VISSIM Corridors VISSIM Protocol Hours of Congestion.
Metro DTA Workshop: August 15 th, 2012 Road Diet DTA Methodology PM 5-hr trip tables (2pm-7pm) were transposed to represent reverse directionality on network.
Abstract Travel time based performance measures are widely used for transportation systems and particularly freeways. However, it has become evident that.
Breaking the Static Barrier: Building Regional Support for Implementation of Dynamic Traffic Assignment in Long-Range Planning Processes TRB Planning Applications.
Moving Goods, Creating Jobs: Planning Portland Region Corridors for Economic Growth.
Dynamic Traffic Assignment: Integrating Dynameq into Long Range Planning Studies Model City 2011 – Portland, Oregon Richard Walker - Portland Metro Scott.
Applying DynusT to the I-10 Corridor Study, Tucson, AZ ITE Western District Meeting Santa Barbara June 26th, 2012 Jim Schoen, PE, Kittelson & Assoc. Khang.
SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Southern California Region Heavy Duty Truck Model.
Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2 June 25,
Multiple Regression Predicting a response with multiple explanatory variables.
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
June 16, 2004 Dr. Robert Bertini Michael Rose Evaluation of the “COMET” Incident Response Program Oregon Department of Transportation.
CE 578 Highway Traffic Operations Introduction to Freeway Facilities Analysis.
Peter Koonce TRB Annual Meeting January 9, 2005 Best Practices for Signal Operations Best Practices for Signal Operations – Lessons Learned from the Portland.
Can Multi-Resolution Dynamic Traffic Assignment live up to the Expectation of Reliable Analysis of Incident Management Strategies Lili (Leo) Luo, P.E.,
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 10 Traffic (Trip) Assignment Trip Generation Trip Distribution Transit Estimation & Mode.
Validate - A Nationwide Dynamic Travel Demand Model for Germany Peter Vortisch, Volker Waßmuth, PTV AG, Germany.
Interpreting Demand and Capacity for Street and Highway Design Lecture 5.1 CE Norman Garrick Norman W. Garrick.
©2009 Proprietary and Confidential DTA in practice: Modeling dynamic networks in the real world Michael Mahut, Ph.D. INRO Montreal, Canada.
Evaluating Robustness of Signal Timings for Conditions of Varying Traffic Flows 2013 Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium – August 16, 2013.
June 15, 2010 For the Missoula Metropolitan Planning Organization Travel Modeling
© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. COUNCIL BLUFFS INTERSTATE SYSTEM MODEL Jon Markt Source: FHWA.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Vamsee Modugula Cambridge Systematics, Inc. May.
Methodology for the Use of Regional Planning Models to Assess Impact of Various Congestion Pricing Strategies Sub-network Extraction A sub-network focusing.
How to Put “Best Practice” into Traffic Assignment Practice Ken Cervenka Federal Transit Administration TRB National Transportation.
Integration of Transportation System Analyses in Cube Wade L. White, AICP Citilabs Inc.
+ Creating an Operations-Based Travel Forecast Tool for Small Oregon Communities TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 20, 2009.
Interpreting Demand and Capacity for Street and Highway Design Lecture 6 CE 5720 Norman Garrick Norman W. Garrick.
Major Transportation Corridor Studies Using an EMME/2 Travel Demand Forecasting Model: The Trans-Lake Washington Study Carlos Espindola, Youssef Dehghani.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco DTA Model: Working Model Calibration Part 1: Process Greg Erhardt Dan Tischler Neema Nassir.
Dynamic Origin-Destination Trip Table Estimation for Transportation Planning Ramachandran Balakrishna Caliper Corporation 11 th TRB National Transportation.
Incorporating Traffic Operations into Demand Forecasting Model Daniel Ghile, Stephen Gardner 22 nd international EMME Users’ Conference, Portland September.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB 11 th Conference on Transportation Planning Applications presented by Dan Goldfarb, P.E. Cambridge.
FACTORS AFFECTING HOUSING PRICES IN SYRACUSE Sample collected from Zillow in January, 2015 Urban Policy Class Exercise - Lecy.
Integrated Travel Demand Model Challenges and Successes Tim Padgett, P.E., Kimley-Horn Scott Thomson, P.E., KYTC Saleem Salameh, Ph.D., P.E., KYOVA IPC.
Calibrating Model Speeds, Capacities, and Volume Delay Functions Using Local Data SE Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting February 6, 2009 Dean Lawrence.
Dowling Associates, Inc. 19 th International EMME/2 Users’ Conference – 21 October 2005 Derivation of Travel Demand Elasticities from a Tour-Based Microsimulation.
Enhancement and Validation of a Managed-Lane Subarea Network Tolling Forecast Model May 19, 2005 Stephen Tuttle (RSG), Jeff Frkonja (Portland Metro), Jack.
Presented to Time of Day Subcommittee May 9, 2011 Time of Day Modeling in FSUTMS.
Bharath Paladugu TRPC Clyde Scott Independent Consultant
DVRPC TMIP Peer Review Dynamic Traffic Assignment (DTA) Oct. 29 th, 2014.
Comparative Analysis of Traffic and Revenue Risks Associated with Priced Facilities 14 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Portland State University 11 By Maisha Mahmud Li Huan Evaluation Of SCATS Adaptive Traffic Signal Control System.
Review of the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) 2007 Urban Mobility Report By Ronald F. Kirby Daivamani Sivasailam TPB Technical Committee October 5,
Analysis of the IH 35 Corridor Through the Austin Metropolitan Area TRB Planning Applications Conference Jeff Shelton Karen Lorenzini Alex Valdez Tom Williams.
11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, Validation of Speeds and Volumes in a Large Regional Model Southeast.
1 Methods to Assess Land Use and Transportation Balance By Carlos A. Alba May 2007.
Jack is currently performing travel demand model forecasting for Florida’s Turnpike. Specifically he works on toll road project forecasting to produce.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Fairfax County Parkway Corridor Study Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee December 1,
SHRP2 Project C05: Final Report to TCC Understanding the Contribution of Operations, Technology, and Design to Meeting Highway Capacity Needs Wayne Kittelson.
Transportation Research Board Planning Applications Conference, May 2007 Given by: Ronald T. Milam, AICP Contributing Analysts: David Stanek, PE Chris.
I-680 Value Pricing: A HOT Lane Demonstration Project of “Smart Carpool Lanes” Sponsor: Alameda County Congestion Management Agency 2003 Sponsor: Alameda.
Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of a System-wide Adaptive Ramp Metering (SWARM) System Data Collection Plan / Experimental Design May.
Incorporating Time of Day Modeling into FSUTMS – Phase II Time of Day (Peak Spreading) Model Presentation to FDOT SPO 23 March 2011 Heinrich McBean.
Application of Accelerated User Equilibrium Traffic Assignments Howard Slavin Jonathan Brandon Andres Rabinowicz Srinivasan Sundaram Caliper Corporation.
1 Bottleneck Identification and Forecasting in Traveler Information Systems Robert L. Bertini, Rafael Fernández-Moctezuma, Huan Li, Jerzy Wieczorek, Portland.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Traffic Assignment CE331 Transportation Engineering.
NCHRP 7-22 Planning & Preliminary Engineering Applications Guide for the HCM Kittelson & Associates 01/12/15 1 Status Report.
ATDM Analytical Methods for Urban Streets Urban Streets Subcommittee Meeting January 10, 2016 David Hale.
METRO Dynamic Traffic Assignment in Action COST Presentation ODOT Region 4 April 1,
Evaluation of Hard Shoulder vs
Macro / Meso / Micro Framework on I-395 HOT Lane Conversion
Performance Measure Exploration Preparing for the 2018 RTP
Jim Henricksen, MnDOT Steve Ruegg, WSP
Macroscopic Speed Characteristics
Development of New Supply Models in Maryland Using Big Data
Ventura County Traffic Model (VCTM) VCTC Update
Problem 5: Network Simulation
Application of a Macro Based Capacity Constraint Assignment Technique
Presentation transcript:

Beyond Peak Hour Volume-to-Capacity: Developing Hours of Congestion Mike Mauch DKS Associates

Presentation Overview  Introduction to the Hours of Congestion (HOC) project  Data sources – PORTAL and tube counts  Observed trends in the count data  HOC model goodness of fit  Peak Spreading  Observed trends and forecasting “hours of congestion”  Concluding Remarks

How Can Transportation Decisions Be Made When Standards Are Not Meaningful?  What does it mean when peak hour volume to capacity (v/c) ratios far exceed 1.0?  What is the difference between a peak hour v/c ratio of 1.3 and 1.6? How much worse is congestion on the facility?  Evaluating only peak hour level-of- service (LOS) provides myopic understanding of congestion.  A performance measure of the “duration” of congestion is needed to evaluate networks in these conditions

Current Regional Travel Demand Models Are Not Built To Predict Congestion Duration & Peak-Spreading  Trips are developed for daily trip purposes  Peak period trip tables are built with fixed time-of-day factors  Portland Metro Model Time Periods  AM Peak (7AM - 9AM, 2 hours)  Midday Peak (Noon - 1PM, 1 hour)  PM Peak (4PM - 6PM, 2 hours)  Network congestion affects trip distribution, mode choice, and assignment, but excess demand is not forced into shoulder periods

Congestion Duration Analysis Can Provide Decision Makers Insight Into the Reality of Congestion  If financial constraints, land use forecasts, and policies on facility sizing = severe peak hour failure, how many hours of the day are congested? Hour Vehicles per Hour

Hours of Congestion (HOC) Approach: Data Mining to Build a Travel Demand Model Post-Processing Tool  Data Mining Sources  PORTAL Data (Database of Freeway Loop Detectors) – 4 yrs of data  ATR Data (Database of Permanent Count Recorders) – 4 yrs of data  Roadway Tube Counts (Sample Daily Hourly Profiles) – 100+ data points  Bus GPS Records (Database of Corridor Travel Speed) – 6 weeks of data

Data Mining Must Include Data Cleaning  Data Screening Process  Identify Locations of Interest  Filter to General Purpose Lanes  Remove weekends and holidays  Review data quality diagnostics and filter out “suspect” data 455 Valid Detectors Data Quality Filters Raw Data 665 Loop Detector Locations

Step #1: Can Daily Traffic Volume Be Predicted From Peak Period & Midday Data Points? ADT = 1.30 *Vols AM * Vols Midday *Vols PM-2

Step #1: Can Daily Traffic Volume Be Predicted From Peak Period & Midday Data Points? ADT = 1.30 *Vols AM * Vols Midday *Vols PM-2 > summary(lm(ADT~AM2+Midday1+PM2+(-1), data=ODOT)) Call: lm(formula = ADT ~ AM2 + Midday1 + PM2 + (-1), data = ODOT) Residuals: Min 1Q Median 3Q Max Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|) AM <2e-16 *** Midday <2e-16 *** PM <2e-16 *** --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 Residual standard error: 1544 on 579 degrees of freedom Multiple R-squared: , Adjusted R-squared: F-statistic: 1.465e+05 on 3 and 579 DF, p-value: < 2.2e-16

Step #2: Can Hourly Traffic Volume Be Predicted With Daily, Peak Period & Midday Data Points?

Time of Dayf(ADT)f(AM-2hr)f(MD-1hr)f(PM-2hr) Midnight - 1 AM AM Noon Noon - 1 PM PM Midnight

Result: A Tool That Can Estimate & Graphically Display Hourly Volume Profiles Southbound

Result: A Tool That Can Estimate & Graphically Display Hourly Volume Profiles Northbound

Step #3: Accounting For Peak “Spreading”

The Hours of Congestion Tool Helps Identify and Assess Locations for Operations Improvements Vehicles per Hour Hour Lower Boones Ferry Road (northbound), 2035

Project Team Review of HOC application (1/2)  The results of the Hours of Congestion sample corridor analysis reasonably match empirical data considering the accuracy of raw model data.  The network plots generated with the Hours of Congestion results are easy to graphically present and explain.  The Hours of Congestion application is flexible enough to be applied to more focused corridor studies with post-processed volume data used as inputs.

Project Team Review of HOC application (2/2)  The Hours of Congestion data and network plots should be viewed critically, as queue spillbacks and the corridor-wide impact on hours of congestion is not captured with this link specific application. This is similar to conducting traffic signal analysis using isolated HCM methodology instead of coordinated corridor analysis in Synchro, or looking at traditional model link v/c plots where congestion does not impact upstream or downstream results.  Overall, the link-based application is recognized as not being as robust as a trip-table based Dynamic Traffic Assignment (DTA) or activity based modeling tool, but it is reasonable as an interim analysis tool applied to four-step travel model volumes over the next few years as Metro develops a more robust travel model. Even though the results of the Hours of Congestion analysis does not adjust trip tables and/or reassign traffic, the resulting application is quite useful at a macroscopic level as a prioritization and general policy tool, providing valuable information on levels (hours) of congestion not otherwise available.

Introducing Hours of Congestion Into the Transportation Planning Process

Forecasting the Duration of Congestion Improves Regional Transportation Discussions  Hours of Congestion provides a duration measure for congested urban networks  Hours of Congestion adds a new dimension to understanding key regional bottlenecks  Hours of Congestion helps identify and assess locations for operations improvements  Hours of Congestion provides a comparison to known nationwide severely congested corridors

Hours of Congestion provides a duration measure for congested urban networks OR 43 (Macadam Avenue) northbound at Gaines Street, 2035 I-5 northbound ramp to Marquam Bridge, 2035 Vehicles per Hour Hour Vehicles per Hour Hour

Hours of Congestion adds a new dimension to understanding key regional bottlenecks

Hours of Congestion helps identify and assess locations for operations improvements

Hours of Congestion provides a comparison to known nationwide severely congested corridors Source 2009 Data: INRIX National Traffic Scorecard 2009 Annual Report

HOC – implemented as an embedded model script or post model run Excel-based application

HOC methodology successfully applied to other models – SACOG’s SACMET Model

Developing an Empirical Tool for Estimating Duration of Congestion Questions ?