1. © 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. COUNCIL BLUFFS INTERSTATE SYSTEM MODEL Jon Markt Source: FHWA

2.  CBIS Project Overview o Project challenges o Project solutions  CBIS Model o Applications Construction Phasing Construction Alternatives Traffic Impacts / User Costs o Innovations Large Sub-area Microsimulation Dynamic Traffic Assignment Perpetually refined PREVIEW

3.  By the numbers o 18 - miles of interstate system reconstructed o 32 – number of bridges reconstructed o 5 – number of lanes on existing I-80 / I-29 o 12 – number of lanes on future I-80 / I-29 o 50+ - number of years since the original construction of the CBIS o 130,000 – projected 2030 daily traffic volume on I-80 / I-29 CBIS PROGRAM

5. o Traffic simulation model of Council Bluffs o Applications Construction Phasing Analysis Construction Alternatives Analysis Traffic Impacts / User Cost o Innovative Features Dynamic Traffic Assignment Large Sub-area Microsimulation Perpetually refined CBIS MODEL

6. APPLICATIONS

7. o Goal: Reduce overall program costs o Strategy: Accelerate Construction o Baseline Schedule Final work in fiscal year 2023 Cumulative construction cost: $734 million o Accelerate Schedule Final work in fiscal year 2020 Cumulative construction cost: $706 million o User benefits of accelerated schedule? o User cost of concurrent work zones? CONSTRUCTION PHASING

9.  Daily Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)  Daily Vehicle Hours Traveled (VHT)  Primary road user costs for economic evaluation USER COST

10. INNOVATIVE FEATURES

11.  Limited to particular strategies  Small models, suited for localized impacts  Projects evaluated in isolation WORK ZONE ANALYSIS Source: Oregon DOT Source: FHWA

12. o Large Sub-area Microsimulation Addresses network impacts Inclusion of boundary effects Couples with DTA to show spatial impacts of congestion on traffic flow and user costs CBIS MODEL

13. o Dynamic Traffic Assignment (DTA) Time-sensitive routing tool Greater sensitivity to congestion than traditional assignment methods (permits queuing) CBIS MODEL

14. IDENTIFYING IMPACTS  Union Pacific Railroad Bridge Reconstruction o Single lane vs. full closures o Ramp closures o Extent of impacts?

15.  Dual calibration – before & “after” construction o Before AirSage origin-destination data INRIX speed data o After Iowa DOT sensor data and video INRIX speed data  Sub-area refinement and analysis o Refined input values incorporated in the regional model PERPETUALLY REFINED

16.  Key insights o DTA and larger microsimulation networks address gaps in traffic analysis and are becoming more practical for day-to-day use o Model calibration is changing due to innovative new forms of data, better data collection infrastructure, advances in traffic models o Model as an asset, rather than single use CBIS INNOVATIONS

17. INNOVATIVE FEATURES

18.  Dual calibration – before & “after” construction o Before AirSage origin-destination data INRIX speed data o After Iowa DOT sensor data and video INRIX speed data  Sub-area refinement and analysis o Refined input values incorporated in the regional model PERPETUALLY REFINED Source: FHWA

20. USER COSTS

21. © 2014 HDR Architecture, Inc., all rights reserved. © 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved.

23.  Project scale o 18 miles of corridor improvements o Impacts freeways to local roads  Scope of Improvements o Closures o Additional capacity  Driver Behavior o Route choice PROJECT CHALLENGES

24.  Operating conditions  Route decisions  User cost WORK ZONES

25. o Development – TransModeler Model MAPA Regional Travel Demand Model AirSage Data Aerial Photography Signal Timing Traffic Counts INRIX Speed Data CBIS MODEL

26. © 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved.

35. TIER 1 HEADER First Name Last Name Business Title TIER 2 HEADER First Name Last Name Business Title First Name Last Name Business Title First Name Last Name Business Title First Name Last Name Business Title First Name Last Name Business Title First Name Last Name Business Title CLIENT LOGO