MSDWT Teacher Evaluation Information. Primary Evaluators All teachers will be assigned one Administrator to be the Primary Evaluator. The primary evaluator.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
Advertisements

Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The FEAPs as a.
Dr. Jon Milleman, Assistant Superintendent Sabra Gage, WTEA President MSDWT Teacher Evaluation Information Review of Updates
Kansas Educator Evaluation Bill Bagshaw Asst. Director Kansas State Department of Education February 13, 2015.
Introduction and Overview.   PowerPoint  Civil Service chapter 10 rules  Planning and evaluation form  Performance notes  Request for review Handouts.
Teacher Evaluation Model
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
Performance Based Teacher Evaluation March 10, 2006.
Appraisal Process and Forms Probationary – first 3 years of employment Permanent – tenured On or before Oct. 1 – meet, In person, with appraiser to review.
Professional Development and Appraisal System
Professional Development and Appraisal System
Pause for Discussion Multiple pauses are included for discussion opportunities.
Teacher Evaluation Process Component 1: Training Before participating in the evaluation process, all teachers, principals and peer evaluators must complete.
Formal Observation 2 per year (due by February 7 th & May 6th) all teacher formals (write up only) in a zip file to Melissa Kaplan, Ron Bauer, and.
Full District Pilot EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS.
CHEA GENERAL MEETING August 31, 2011 STATE SALARY SCALE Professional Learning Community (PLC) NEGOTIATIONS DPAS II CHANGES STATE SALARY SCALE Professional.
TCS Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide the.
KEEP And Student Growth Measures for Building Leaders Lawrence School District, May 14, 2014 Bill Bagshaw, Assistant Director, TLA, KSDE Kayeri Akweks,
For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES/OPGES Does NOT Apply Certified Evaluation Orientation For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
Dr. Jon Milleman, Assistant Superintedent Jennifer Thomas, WTEA President MSDWT Teacher Evaluation Changes
Roles and Responsibilities for University Supervisors
State Board Mission, Goals, and Policies
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Department of Public Instruction Looking Ahead:
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 3 The DPAS II Process Training for Teachers.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Teacher Evaluations Swartz Creek Community Schools.
TAPCo. Full Staff Mtg March 17 th Agenda ● ADVANCE ● Regents.
From Mad River Schools Waiver Day Presentation May 15, 2013.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
MSDWT Teacher Evaluation Information.  The primary evaluator will assign the final rating  The primary evaluator will take the lead on any Performance.
OASYS Teacher Evaluation User Training – Part 2. Presentation Outline Pre-Conference Form review Overview of Formal Observation and Summative –Accepting/Declining.
Secaucus Reflect Live Observation Process Observer Guide.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
Evaluation School Year Review. Evaluation Intent  Collaborative process to support professional growth  Conversations and reflection should.
TEM 4.0 For School Librarians Laurie Butler, Library Services Advisor 2014.
Kansas Educator Evaluation Bill Bagshaw Asst. Director Kansas State Department of Education February 25, 2015.
STANDARD V AND WRAP-UP: NC TEACHER CANDIDATE EVALUATION TRAINING GWU TRAINING SESSION.
Teachscape Reflect User Guide Teacher Observation and Evaluation Howard County Public School System.
Holland Central School District Opening Day September 3, 2013.
Educator Effectiveness Updates April Updates Closing up Looking forward to
NCVPS TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS We believe this process will help us to determine the specific support and professional development you need to steer.
Certified Evaluation Orientation August 19, 2011.
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Teacher Appraisal and Development System Update Training HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.
For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES Does NOT Apply Certified Evaluation Orientation For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Process for Evaluating Teachers. Principal’s Responsibility ManageKnowIdentifyEnsureSupervise.
Iredell-Statesville Schools Orientation to the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Instrument & Process
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
MA-PAL Task 3 This task aligns with course assignments from EDC 5630 Supervision and Evaluation of Instruction.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Introduction to the Marzano Teacher Evaluation Model for USD 259
Teacher Evaluation Timeline
Teacher Evaluation Process
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
What component is the greatest barrier for you as an evaluator?
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
New Teacher Evaluation Process
Coordinator of Field Placements
Teacher Evaluation Process
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
TDES Think Tank September 25, 2018 Jill Cabe, Director of Performance Management Megan Scully, TDES Coordinator Time: 1 Minute.
Evaluation Information
Pike County Schools Certified Evaluation Annual Training
END-OF-YEAR EVALUATIONS
Presentation transcript:

MSDWT Teacher Evaluation Information

Primary Evaluators All teachers will be assigned one Administrator to be the Primary Evaluator. The primary evaluator will assign the final rating The primary evaluator will take the lead on any Performance Assistance Plan The primary evaluator will conduct the Summative Levels Conference 2

The teacher’s performance evaluation may include information provided by any administrator. The source of information shall be disclosed to the teacher. Name of Evaluator will be connected to informal observations through the technology tool Teachers will receive a secure login and access to the Standard for Success website When conducting Summative Levels Conference comments and formal/informal observation comments, Primary Evaluator should accurately attribute appropriate comments to the evaluator (either primary or secondary) 3

Representation A teacher may be afforded Association Representation if they so choose during the evaluation process 4

Right to a Reflection Anytime during the evaluation process, a teacher has the right to submit a written reflection to be attached to any written evaluation document The process for submitting a reflection/response will be covered in the Teacher Training FAQ provided by Standard for Success The default deadline for teacher response/reflection is 15 days following the date the observation/evaluation is submitted to the teacher 5

Formal Observation Preferably the length of an entire class period -At least 30 minutes in length Exceptions as discussed with teacher 6

Informal Observation At least 10 minutes - Preferably at least 15 minutes minutes (general rule) 7

Artifacts Opportunity for teachers to inform the evaluation Lesson Plans Pacing Guides Samples of Student Work PD Reflections/Logs/Evidence of Curriculum Work PLC Documentation Can be requested by evaluator Can be submitted by teacher at any time 8

1-2 Years MSDWT Experience: Minimum 2 Formal Observations Minimum 2 Informal Observations 1 Per Semester minimum First Formal Observation = announced within a one week window Opportunity to complete Pre-Observation form prior to Formal Observation – May be requested by evaluator or submitted voluntarily by teacher Recommend at least a Pre-Observation form before 1 st Formal Observation Evaluator to hold a meeting prior to Formal Observation – can be group meeting 9

3-5 Years MSDWT Experience: Minimum 1 Formal Observation (First Semester) - announced Minimum 2 Informal Observations Opportunity to complete Pre-Observation form prior to Formal Observation - May be requested by evaluator or submitted voluntarily by teacher 10

6+ Years MSDWT Experience: Minimum 1 Formal Observation – No restriction of timing - announced Minimum 2 Informal Observations Opportunity to complete Pre-Observation form prior to Formal Observation - May be requested by evaluator or submitted voluntarily by teacher 11

All Levels Meeting (group) prior to Formal Observation Inform all teachers of their primary evaluator Informal Observation feedback within a reasonable amount of time following Informal Observations – preferably within 48 hours, 1 week max 12

Performance Expectations Reflective Conference Required after each Formal Observation If, during a Performance Expectation Reflective Conference, a teacher receives an Improvement Necessary performance level in any domain, the teacher and evaluator will discuss and list teacher goals for improvement for any performance expectations. 13

Performance Expectations Reflective Conference If, during a Performance Expectations Reflective Conference, a teacher receives an Ineffective performance level in any domain, the evaluator and teacher will: 1. Review the specific performance expectation(s) not being met 2.Identify and add indicators in the teacher and student observation/evidence sections of the domain rubric that need to be addressed in order to improve the level of performance 14

Summative Levels Conference By May 15 Determination of Rating at Summative Evaluation Conference Primary Student Measure may not be available by the time of the Summative Evaluation Conference (grades 3-8 E/LA and Math) – If this is the case, the Summative Evaluation is designated as “In Progress” Place on Plan of Assistance with guidance from appropriate Director and Director of HR 15

Resources Teacher Evaluation Website Updated with New Documents Updated Rubrics – Containing Examples of Observable and Document Evidence New Test Item Construction and Rigor Analysis Resources available on Website and in Guidebook 16