Associate Professor P&T Workshop Associate to Full Professor WELCOME Associate Professor P&T Workshop   Transitioning from Associate to Full Professor April 30, 2019

Expectations

PowerPoints will be available on CALS webpage About Faculty/Staff Promotion and Tenure

Faculty Handbook Section 5.2.3.3 Qualifications for Academic Rank: Professor recognized by his/her professional peers within the university, as well as nationally and/or internationally, for the quality of the contribution to his /her discipline.

Faculty Handbook Section 5.2.3.3 Candidate must demonstrate: National distinction in scholarship, as evident in candidate's wide recognition and outstanding contributions to the field or profession Effectiveness in areas of position responsibilities Significant institutional service Contributions of appropriate magnitude and quality and likelihood of sustained contributions to field, profession, university

Faculty Handbook Section 5.2.3.3 No set time-line The faculty member’s entire academic career must be considered in the evaluation. A recommendation for promotion to professor also must be based upon an assessment of the record, since the last promotion, regardless of the institution that granted the promotion.

Time in Rank? The average length of time spent in rank as an Associate Professor in CALS: 6.5 years (range 3 – 26 years)

Number of refereed publications? Number of refereed journal publications completed by candidates for Full Professor range: 10 – 35

Portion of PRS devoted to research? range: 25% to 90% Faculty with higher levels of teaching and/or extension responsibility are promoted as frequently as those with higher levels of research responsibility

Evaluation Product Digital Dossier uploaded to CyBox Tab 1: Factual Summary, PRS and CV Tab 2: Portfolio Summary (25 pages) Tab 3: Department Evaluations Tab 4: College Evaluations Tab 5: External Evaluations

P&T Vita (Tab 1) Annotated Listing of activities, accomplishments (and your role in each) teaching and learning research and discovery extension and outreach service (professional and institutional)

Portfolio – 25 pages (Tab 2) Evidence of quality, reputation and impact Faculty Handbook: Faculty Portfolio should… provide a clear understanding of the candidate’s accomplishments within scholarship and his or her areas of faculty activities include “an overall statement of the candidate’s accomplishments in scholarship as they relate to teaching, research/creative activities, and extension/professional practice.”

Portfolio Tab 2 Template for CALS Available on the Provost’s P&T Site Copy available in your handouts

The following slides can be used to show examples of good practices in presenting scholarship

One, Thing and Thing Two. (2019) One, Thing and Thing Two. (2019). The long-term impact of the Cat in the Hat on Iowans. Journal of Dr. Seuss, Vol 14, 17-24. This is a standard citation as it would appear in your vita. For you promotion vita…

One, Thing. and Thing Two. (2019) One, Thing* and Thing Two. (2019). The long-term impact of the Cat in the Hat on Iowans. Journal of Dr. Seuss, Vol 14, 17-24. Role: Thing Two [the candidate] supervised Thing One’s PhD research, provided concept, analysis and interpretation of results, and editing of manuscript. [contribution: 25% concept; 30% analysis; 30% writing and editing] Significance: This is the first paper to address feline hat wearing. . . * MS, Ph.D. Post Doc or Research Associate supervised by T. Two.

Teaching Responsibility Table: Courses Taught (List them all) Sem. & Yr. Course # Course Title Enrollment Percent of course for which responsible Fall 2017 ABC 218 Intermediate XYZ 72 100% Spring 2018 ABC 420 Advanced XYZ 16 50% Fall 2018 81 Spring 2019 14

Assessment of Teaching Effectiveness: Student Evaluation of Teaching Sem. & Yr. Course # Course enrollment % responding Overall rating of instructor Dept mean for comparable courses Overall rating of course Fall 2018 ABC 218 70 94% responded 4.5 4.0 4.3 Spring 2019 ABC 540 20 95% 4.6 4.2 4.4 4.1 Scale: 1 = Very Poor, 5 = Very Good NOTE: This scale is required by the Provost for all reporting on Student Evaluation of Teaching

Portfolio: Illustrating Sponsored Funding Cumulative Funding 000$ Figure 4. Cumulative funding as principal investigator and co-investigator

Portfolio: Summarizing Research Output & Impact TABLE 6. SUMMARY OF RESEARCH GRANTS BY AREA, GRANT AMOUNTS AND WORK PRODUCTS. Program No. of Amount Graduate Refereed Abstracts & Reports & Area Projects $ Mil. Students Journal Articles Proceeding Book Chpts Hats 6 $4.5 8 6 10 2 Feline Management 3 $1.8 5 5 8 1

Portfolio: Summarizing Output & Impact Table 5. Summary of journal characteristics for candidate’s refereed publications (on Agronomy and plant biotechnology) from 20011 to present. Total: 18.   Journal Acceptance Rate Articles Published Impact Factor* Cited Half-Life* Agronomy 50% 7 1.5 >10 Premier journal in agronomy Plant Biotechnology 60% 3 3.6 9.5 Premier journal in plant science * Impact Factors & Cited Half-Life from ISI Web of Knowledge (Thomas Reuters) as of 4-15-2019

NEXT: Advice from Chairs Kendall Lamkey Ruth MacDonald