Reportnet 3.0 Requirements Catalogue

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SEIS does matter! sa ɪ z d ə z mæt ə !sa ɪ z d ə z mæt ə ! Towards a Shared Environmental Information System.
Advertisements

National Environmental Research Institute, University of Aarhus, Denmark GIS Guidance update.
Serving society Stimulating innovation Supporting legislation INSPIRE compliance of future WFD and other water data EC/EEA INSPIRE.
WISE European System for Water Information WISE – part of Eionet (European Environment Information and Observation Network) http//
1 Introducing Reportnet Miruna Badescu. 2 A linear view of Reportnet process.
1 Joint Drafting Group on State of the Environment and Eionet Workshop — Overview task 4 and 5 — 13/14 November 2006 EEA Copenhagen.
Country Visit LT Towards a Shared Environmental Information System SEIS Bernt Röndell.
Update on INSPIRE CDDA/European protected areas technical meeting 2015 Darja Lihteneger Project manager - Data centres and INSPIRE implementation IDM -
NCP training session 30 October 2002 Integrated information system on RTD in Europe Gwenda Jeffreys-Jones, DG RTD European Commission.
Technology Needs Assessments under GEF Enabling Activities “Top Ups” UNFCCC/UNDP Expert Meeting on Methodologies for Technology Needs Assessments
1 Data management and QA/QC with priority data flows in EEA 8 th Joint TFEIP/EIONET meeting Dublin, October 2007 Sheila Cryan, EEA.
1 Integration of the LCP Reporting Into the E-PRTR Scope and Technical proposal November 3rd.
DG Enterprise and Industry European Commission Standardisation Aspects of ICT and e-Business Antonio Conte Unit D4 - ICT for Competitiveness and Innovation.
EEA - recent developments and national comparisons David Lee Environment Statistics and Indicators.
1 The EEA/EIONET Information System current applications and further developments relevant for EECCA countries Stefan Jensen.
ITEC 275 Computer Networks – Switching, Routing, and WANs
INSPIRE and the role of Spatial Data Interest Communities (SDIC)
List of priority spatial data sets
The FAIRMODE ways of communication
EEA/EIONET – Support to the Fitness Check Actions and Action Plan
PROMOTION OF BEST PRACTICES FOR NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION
Streamlining of Industrial Emissions Reporting
The ePhyto Solution A Guide to implement the ePhyto System
Introduction to the EEA and the EIONET
MIWP Action ”Priority List of E-Reporting Datasets”
List of priority spatial data sets
Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD
EU Reference Centres for Animal Welfare
INSPIRE registry Roles & procedures
5.c List of priority spatial data sets
MIWP Action ”Priority List of E-Reporting Datasets”
‘Basic approach: Reporting and data handling’
MIWP MIWP actions follow-up
MIG-T meeting, 19th April 2016, Ispra End-user applications
Status on eu actions from the kick-off meeting
Fitness Check of environmental reporting
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
5.1 Environmental Data Centre on Waste Progress report
RECARE set-up Rudi Hessel on behalf of coordination team
CDDA & INSPIRE work of EEA - preliminary lessons learnt
GUIDANCE ON (NEEI) AND NATURA 2000 ___________________________________________________________________ TERMS OF REFERENCE N2K GROUP.
INSPIRE-based e-reporting pilots
GISCO Working Party October 2001
Reportnet 2.0 & 3.0 An overview
Change and adapt the Eionet water data flow to meet WFD requirements
Executive Order No. 23 Update Air & Waste Management Association Conference November 16, 2018 Presentation will focus on the latest policy development.
The Biodiversity Information System for Europe (BISE)
Expert Group on Reporting under the Nature Directives
WISE - State of the art --- WISE - in the context of SEIS
Hans Dufourmont Eurostat Unit E4 – Structural Funds
Workshop on WFD Article 8 reporting tools and WISE GIS
CDDA & INSPIRE work of EEA - lessons from implementation so far
Implementation EU White Paper Climate Change Adaptation Specific actions DG Environment Feedback from Expert Group Climate change and water Jacques Delsalle.
Data collection and validation support for the management of the ESF
Reportnet An Introduction
Streamlining of monitoring and reporting under WFD, Nitrates Directive and EEA's SoE –concept paper DG Environment.
3rd WISE Implementation Plan ( ) Draft version
Meeting of Water Directors Progress on Reporting and WISE
Hans Dufourmont Eurostat Unit E4 – Structural Funds
Reportnet 3.0 Database Feasibility Study – Approach
4th Meeting of the MIG-P, Brussels, June 2016
5.b3 Monitoring & Reporting 2019
Reportnet 3.0 Business Vision
MIWP Action on « List of priority data sets »
Actions on streamlining environmental reporting
… Two-step approach Conceptual Framework Annex I Annex II Annex III
Large Combustion Plants dataflow management
GIS Guidance for WISE supporting reporting and application of data
INSPIRE MIG-T Meeting Paris, October
WISE and INSPIRE By Albrecht Wirthmann, GISCO, Eurostat
Presentation transcript:

Reportnet 3.0 Requirements Catalogue Presentation to NRC EIS Thursday 22nd November 2018 Reportnet 3.0 Requirements Catalogue Jon Maidens

Overview How study fits to overall process Goals Approach Evaluation example questions Workflow questions Timeline Current activities

Reportnet 3.0 2018 deliverables TRASYS EEA Interviews Business Vision Business process evaluation DGENV and DGCLIMA Interviews Requirements Catalogue V1 Requirements Catalogue V2 Architecture TO-BE Member state Interviews Reportnet Architecture AS-IS Requirements Catalogue - Final Business process analysis INSPIRE Feasibility study report EEA Wireframes Database Feasibility study report Comments from BIG Interviews Climate and Energy

Process for requirements gathering Interviews Business Process Evaluation AS-IS Architetcure analysis Database feasibility study INSPIRE feasibility study

Helping MS** to prepare their reports Reference model DG Environment 10 step guidance* Legislation "data collection" Step 5: Helping MS** to prepare their reports Step 1: Designing intervention logic and reporting products Step 4: Explaining the reporting obligations in practice "data acquisition" Step 6: Organising the data submission or harvesting Feedback loop: lessons learnt Step 2: Drafting reporting obligations in legislation Data management Feedback loop: update, corrections, re-submissions Step 10: Publishing the official report Step 7: Ensuring quality of the reported data Step 9: Presenting and disseminating results Step 3: Preparing implementing acts on reportings Step 8: Carrying out data processing and analysis "data acquisition" "data dissemination" "data processing" DG ENV With some EEA involvement Within EEA responsibility * Adapted DG ENV diagram 2018 ** MS means relevant national authority responsible for environmental reporting

These are the requirements that define business policies, standards and needs General requirements Language GDPR General Business constraints Legal Reporting hierarchy Confidentiality Business policies Re-use Standards Open

Delegated user management The functional requirements are those that set out the features that any solution should provide. Functional requirements Inline tools Notifications Communication Delegated user management Access management INSPIRE Functional Data management Data quality Workflows Test area Formats Flexible delivery Visualisation

Non-Functional requirements The non-functional requirements are concerned with how well the solution will operate Non-Functional requirements Scalability Performance Coding Availability Security Non-Functional Clarity Maintainability Usability Modular Dashboards Business continuity Pre-filling Fault tolerant

Technical requirements These are the requirements that state the technical policies and constraints to be adopted across the organisation. Technical requirements Third party Interoperability Re-use Validation Standardisation Data quality Technical Atom feeds support INSPIRE Efficient Manual fallback Velocity and volume Cyclic Up-to-date

Requirements v2.0 - map to reference model IDEA 2 Step 1, 2, 3 Legislation Step 4 Explaining the reporting obligations in practice Step 5 Helping MS to prepare their reports Step 6 Organising the data submission or harvesting Step 7 Ensuring quality of the reported data Step 8 Carrying out data processing and analysis Step 9 Presenting and disseminating results Total General 1 2 5 Functional 11 14 31 Non-Functional 8 9 18 Technical 3 23 33 Extracted from ”Vademecum for Streamlining Environmental Reporting”

Requirements Catalogue V.2 Stakeholder involvement   Requirements Catalogue V.2 15 October RSC Comments (invited) until 31 October BIG Comments (requested) until 31 October PCT NFP NFPs will be informed about this process and upon their choice, they can collect the comments from their national network NFP ICT UG NRC EIS ETC RSC: Reportnet 3.0 Steering Group; BIG: Business Implementation Group; PCT: Project Core Team (consists of thematic experts from the EEA and consultants on IT infrastructure.); NFP: National Focal Points; NFP ICT UG: NFP User Group on Eionet Information and Communication Technology Tools Developments; NRC EIS: National Reference Centres on Environmental Information System; ETC: European Topic Centres

Requirements catalogue v2 - Comments distribution

Overall comments for each category

Pain points – platform performance and availability Feedback More details Poor phrasing Examples in support Change of priority Pain points – platform performance and availability Integration e.g. to IMS INSPIRE

Next steps

Back-up slides