SVT detector electronics

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FTK poster F. Crescioli Alberto Annovi
Advertisements

U N C L A S S I F I E D FVTX Detector Readout Concept S. Butsyk For LANL P-25 group.
M. Lo Vetere 1,2, S. Minutoli 1, E. Robutti 1 1 I.N.F.N Genova, via Dodecaneso, GENOVA (Italy); 2 University of GENOVA (Italy) The TOTEM T1.
1 Digital Active Pixel Array (DAPA) for Vertex and Tracking Silicon Systems PROJECT G.Bashindzhagyan 1, N.Korotkova 1, R.Roeder 2, Chr.Schmidt 3, N.Sinev.
High-resolution, fast and radiation-hard silicon tracking station CBM collaboration meeting March 2005 STS working group.
Joel Goldstein, RAL 4th ECFA/DESY LC Workshop, 1/4/ Vertex Readout Joel Goldstein PPd, RAL 4 th ECFA/DESY LC Workshop DAQ Session 1 st April 2003.
Valerio Re, Massimo Manghisoni Università di Bergamo and INFN, Pavia, Italy Jim Hoff, Abderrezak Mekkaoui, Raymond Yarema Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.
01/04/09A. Salamon – TDAQ WG - CERN1 LKr calorimeter L0 trigger V. Bonaiuto, L. Cesaroni, A. Fucci, A. Salamon, G. Salina, F. Sargeni.
CLAS12 Central Detector Meeting, Saclay, 3 Dec MVT Read-Out Architecture & MVT / SVT Integration Issues Irakli MANDJAVIDZE.
System Demonstrator: status & planning The system demonstrator starts as “vertical slice”: The vertical slice will grow to include all FTK functions, but.
SVT detector Electronics Status Overview: - SVT design status - F.E. chips - Electronic design - Hit rates and data volumes - Required ETD inputs Mauro.
Status of SVT front-end electronics M. Citterio on behalf of INFN and University of Milan XVII SuperB Workshop and Kick Off Meeting: ETD3 Parallel Session.
G. RizzoSVT Meeting – April, SVT Update SVT bi-weekly Meeting - April, Giuliana Rizzo Universita’ & INFN Pisa Group Organization & WBS.
Mu3e Data Acquisition Ideas Dirk Wiedner July /5/20121Dirk Wiedner Mu3e meeting Zurich.
Pixel detector/Readout for SuperB T.Kawasaki Niigata-U.
2 March 2012Mauro Citterio - SVT Phone meeting1 Peripheral Electronics Some updates Mauro Citterio INFN Milano.
29/05/09A. Salamon – TDAQ WG - CERN1 LKr calorimeter L0 trigger V. Bonaiuto, L. Cesaroni, A. Fucci, A. Salamon, G. Salina, F. Sargeni.
The LHCb Calorimeter Triggers LAL Orsay and INFN Bologna.
GGT-Electronics System design Alexander Kluge CERN-PH/ED April 3, 2006.
The SuperB Silicon Vertex Tracker Abstract : The SuperB project aims to build an asymmetric e+ - e- collider capable of reaching.
Some thoughs about trigger/DAQ … Dominique Breton (C.Beigbeder, G.Dubois-Felsmann, S.Luitz) SuperB meeting – La Biodola – June 2008.
G. RizzoSVT - SuperB Workshop – Paris 16 Feb SVT Plans for TDR Activities since Elba Meeting Plans for TDR preparation Giuliana Rizzo Universita’
Update on & SVT readout chip requirements
Work on Muon System TDR - in progress Word -> Latex ?
DAQ Requirements M. Villa 21/02/2011.
SVT – SuperB Workshop – Annecy March 2010
M. Bellato INFN Padova and U. Marconi INFN Bologna
Valerio Re Università di Bergamo and INFN, Pavia, Italy
Plans for pixel module integration electronics
Valerio Re INFN Pavia and University of Bergamo
ETD meeting Architecture and costing On behalf of PID group
 Silicon Vertex Detector Upgrade for the Belle II Experiment
SVT Parallel-SuperB Workshop Perugia, June
Update on SVT electronics
The Totem trigger architecture The LONEG firmware archtecture
SVT subchapters & editors
PID meeting SNATS to SCATS New front end design
Preliminary thoughts on SVT services
Milano Activities: an update Mauro Citterio On behalf of INFN Milano
APSEL6D Architecture, simulations and results
Electronics Trigger and DAQ CERN meeting summary.
INFN Pavia and University of Bergamo
Pending technical issues and plans to address and solve
SVT front-end electronics
PSD Front-End-Electronics A.Ivashkin, V.Marin (INR, Moscow)
DCH FEE 28 chs DCH prototype FEE &
TELL1 A common data acquisition board for LHCb
Electronics, Trigger and DAQ for SuperB
Discussion after electronics parallel session
Pixel Module Interfaces Mauro Citterio On behalf of INFN Milano
Trigger, DAQ, & Online: Perspectives on Electronics
CMS EMU TRIGGER ELECTRONICS
& pixel module interfaces On behalf of INFN Milano
Update on SVT activities
The SuperB Silicon Vertex Tracker
SVT Issues for the TDR What decisions must be taken before the TDR can be written? What is the mechanism for reaching those decisions How can missing information.
Read-out of High Speed S-LINK Data Via a Buffered PCI Card
Vertex 2005 November 7-11, 2005 Chuzenji Lake, Nikko, Japan
VELO readout On detector electronics Off detector electronics to DAQ
Pixel DAQ and Trigger for HL-LHC
SVT detector electronics
SVT detector electronics
Overview: - Front-end activities - DAQ activities - Test beam analysis
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
The CMS Tracking Readout and Front End Driver Testing
PID meeting Mechanical implementation Electronics architecture
SVT – SuperB Workshop – Frascati Sept. 2010
PHENIX forward trigger review
The LHCb Front-end Electronics System Status and Future Development
Perugia SuperB Workshop June 16-19, 2009
Presentation transcript:

SVT detector electronics Mauro Villa INFN & Università di Bologna Overview: - SuperB SVT - Front End chips - Layer 0 peculiarities - SVT channels and rates - Data transmission - SVT in trigger and DAQ schemas

SuperB SVT 40 cm 30 cm 20 cm Layer0 Layer Radius 0 1.5 cm 1 3.3 cm 2 4.0 cm 3 5.9 cm 4 9.1 to 12.7 cm 5 11.4 to 14.6 cm Baseline: use an SVT similar to the BaBar one adding a Layer 0 Layer 0 options: striplets or thin pixels (40x40 um^2). Each layer has several modules, mechanically independent units (52+8) Each module has 2 half-modules, electrically independent units: Sensor, front-end chips, HDI with power/signal input and data output link Pixel half-module Strip(lets) half-module Data Pixel sensor + front-end chips HDI Power/Signal HDI Si Wafers Data Power/Signal Front-end chips Paris, 16/02/09 M. Villa

Data driven vs triggered FE chips Data Driven chips FSSR2: only minor modifications needed for SuperB MAPS: no storage of data in local high radiation environment Could allow to use SVT data for LV1 trigger Need very fast link to send all data from HDI to DAQ (layer 0 critical! See next tables) Triggered chips Sending off chip only data from LV1 evt reduces by ~ 1/10 the load to the data transmission Need to investigate if there is a good match for striplets! MAPS readout: data out of high rad desiderable. Data stored outside vertex region in custom high rad memory chips. Pixel sensor + front-end chips Off Detector HDI Power/Signal DAQ Data HDI Power/Signal Very Fast link DAQ On Detector Paris, 16/02/09 M. Villa link Data

Layer0 peculiarities Rad hard environment Large machine background ( 15 mm from beam line) Fundamental the first point of a track for vertexing Option under study: strip or pixel sensors (40 um pitch) Apsel6D – or similar 320x216 pixels a 40 um pitch. Active Area = 110 mm2 Completely data driven architecture Space time coordinates Time granularity 0.2-5.0 us (1.0 us is the goal) External Time stamp clock. Hit rate expected: 110 Mhit/s/chip (with a safety factor>5). Paris, 16/02/09 M. Villa

SuperB Layer 0 Module Plan: 2009-2010 Production of a test module 6 Chips: 1.1 cm^2 Signal lines: 180 in 1 cm width Hit Rate: 110 MHz/chip (safety>5) Module Rates: 660 MHz Bandwidth: 20 Gbit/s (design parameters) Thin aluminium bus for power and signals Main technological challenge: Line spacing (<100 um) Frequency (> 100 MHz) Plan: 2009-2010 Production of a test module With 2-3 APSEL5D chips Electric and beam tests Paris, 16/02/09 M. Villa

SuperB SVT in numbers 6 layers: Layer0 + 5 layers like BaBar SVT Modules HDI ReadOut Section (ROS) chips/ROS chips channels 0- Striplets 8 16 32 6 192 2.46E+04 0- Pixels 12.59E+06 1 12 24 7 168 2.15E+04 2 3 10 240 3.07E+04 4 64 5 288 3.69E+04 18 36 72 324 4.15E+04 total 60 120   1316 12.97E+06 Track rate @ layer0: 5.3 GHz (safety factor 5 included) fully dominated by machine bkgd Paris, 16/02/09 M. Villa

Load to the data transmission Requirements on link speed reduced by 1/10 Assuming 1 us window and 100 KHz LV1 rate Simulated Background rate x20 (cluster multiplicity and safety factor) Layer flux (Hz/cm2) 1 us occupancy HDI Link speed Read all data Data driven ( bit/s/ROS) Read only LV1 evt (bit/s/ROS) hit/evt bit/evt (with 25 bit word) 0- Striplets 1.00E+08 9.00E-01 1.73E+10 1.73E+09 2.21E+04 5.53E+05 0- MAPS 2.50E-03 1.64E+10 1.64E+09 2.10E+04 5.24E+05 1 2.00E+05 2.00E-02 4.48E+08 4.48E+07 4.30E+02 1.08E+04 2 3 1.00E+05 6.40E+08 6.40E+07 6.14E+02 1.54E+04 4 noise occu 1.00E-02 1.60E+08 1.60E+07 3.69E+02 9.22E+03 5 4.15E+02 1.04E+04   evt size L1-5 7kByte evt size L0 66kByte Present BaBar data Similar in SuperB L1-L5 Paris, 16/02/09 M. Villa

Data transmission Option A: HDI with local rad-hard ram,optical links, L1 handled in the HDI Option B: HDI with line drivers, copper cables, L1 handled outside detector Memory buffers And L1 logic Buffers and line drivers optical/copper Link Optical Link 2.5 Gbit/s FEC ROM Off detector low rad area Counting room Std electronics On detector High rad area Pro B: fewer rad-hard elements few space required on HDI full event readout (trigger) commercial optical link only Pro A: data flux reduced asap shorter high load connections Paris, 16/02/09 M. Villa

EDRO Readout board Front End Card used in Slim5 beam test (SVT par. II): Main concept: flexibility at all levels Mezzanines to decouple input/processing/output Large FPGA Several triggering schema Slink To DAQ SuperB: 60 Mhz bus clocks 20 Gbit/s input rate 2.5 Gbit/s output rate To be addressed in the next versions foreseen in 2009/10 Performances: 40 Mhz bus clocks 8 Gbit/s input rate 1 Gbit/s output rate 2.5 ME/s evaluated for L1 40 kHz DAQ rate @slim5 Data from FE chips 4 Gbit/s EPMC Stratix EPMC TTCRQ Not too far from SuperB numbers Paris, 16/02/09 M. Villa

SVT in trigger and DAQ schemas Current best FE chip candidates are data driven with an intrinsic time resolution of 0.2-1.0 us Interface between FE chips and SuperB trigger and DAQ will be provided by a board equipped with large FPGA, memory and optical links (i.e. flexible) Consequences SVT will fit both the fixed and variable L1 latency schemas SVT readout time window of 1 us or larger will be handled in the HDI or off-detector electronics. Same for fixed or variable time window. SVT might have the possibility to provide information on events before L1 trigger (L1-L5 best, L0 maybe). SVT in trigger conceiveble. Paris, 16/02/09 M. Villa

Conclusions Main SVT challenge: layer 0 rates, chips, data busses and data transmission Current best FE chip candidates are data driven Front End Card and/or HDIs with enough logic to fit different DAQ and L1 schemas Trigger rate >150 kHz, time window >=1 us ✔ Data volume: L0: 66 kB with 1 us time window and >5 safety factor L1-L5: 7 kB with 1 us time window (Babar exp.) SVT in trigger conceivable SVT electronics R&D in 2009/10 Paris, 16/02/09 M. Villa