Principle of coversation

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Conversational Theory Ben Franks. Accommodation Theory Part One.

Advertisements

Politeness Theory and Discourse Lecture 7. Objectives After this lecture, students should be able to: 1.Explain the notions of politeness and face 2.Explain.

Research Methods for T&I Studies I Politeness Phenomena.

POLITENESS AND INTERACTION

Non-Verbal Communication

1 MODULE 2 Meaning and discourse in English COOPERATION, POLITENESS AND FACE Lecture 14.

Talk in Life and Literature LO: to understand the basis of the question and the differences between crafted and ‘real’ talk.

AS English Language Unit 3 Spoken Interaction Conversation Analysis Conversation Theory.

Yule, Politeness and interaction Pertemuan 9 Matakuliah: G1042/Pragmatics Tahun: 2006.

Politeness Starter – How might Politeness be connected to English Language and Literature? Learning Objective – to explore Brown and Levinson’s politeness.

Politness and Face theory

Linguistic interaction = social interaction  Social distance and closeness (age, social status, power, etc)

POLITENESS Hanifa Rahmawati Bella Stita R. Firnantia Lara L. Weni Agustiningrum Dwi Esti J.N.

PRAGMATICS AND SOCIOCUTURAL NORMS. Sociocultural norms, such as how to express politeness in a given context, guide pragmatic expression. For example,

Obj.1.03 Practice interpersonal skills Ms. Jessica Edwards, M.A.Ed.

Introduction to linguistics II

 We have been considering ways in which we interpret the meaning of an utterance in terms of what the speaker intended to convey.  However, we have.

Nonverbal Communication

RELATIONSHIPS. What is important in a relationship?  Communication – the process of sharing information, thoughts, or feelings.  How do we communicate?

Yule, Speech Acts Pertemuan 8 Matakuliah: G1042/Pragmatics Tahun: 2006.

CiSELT Module 5.2: Classroom Dynamics. Assemble the contents of your envelope How does the puzzle represent a metaphor for teamwork? Each piece is a different.

Lipreading: how it works. Learning objectives Recognise the different processes and skills involved in lipreading Revise factors that help or hinder lipreading.

Module Nine: Emotional Communication (Conversation) 8- 1.

Politeness & Speaking Style Discourse & Dialogue CS 359 November 15, 2001.

ADRESS FORMS AND POLITENESS Second person- used when the subject of the verb in a sentence is the same as the individual to.

Lesson 2 People use many different ways to communicate their feelings. Writing a note Facial expressions Communication is critical to healthy relationships.

GEB 3213 Lecture 11 Outline Working in Teams. Why form groups and teams? 1._________________ 2.Faster response 3. _________________ 4. Greater “buy-in”

FACE. Goffman’s Face Erving Goffman was intrigued by what lay behind everyday expressions such as ‘losing face’, ‘saving face’ and ‘being shamefaced’.

Lecturer: Ms. Abrar A. Mujaddidi P RAGMATICS. W HAT IS PRAGMATICS ?  Try to figure out the meaning of the following dialogue:  A: I have a fourteen.

PRAGMATICS 3. CH 7: POLITENESS AND INTERACTION Arrange these in order of politeness: (least polite first) Set the table! Could you please set the table?

Principles of conversation

Natural conversation “When we investigate how dialogues actually work, as found in recordings of natural speech, we are often in for a surprise. We are.

Speech Acts: What is a Speech Act?

Chapter 8 Spoken Discourse. Linguistic Competence communicative competence: the knowledge we bring to using language as a communicative tool in conversation.

COMMUNICATION SKILLS. A process through which two or more people exchange information.

To Linguistics Introduction Department of English Level Four

COMMUNICATE FACE-TO-FACE

Peers Fostering Hope Supported by the Dr

MODULE 2 Meaning and discourse in English

Types of Communication

POLITENESS PRINCIPLE:

Advice for Unit 7, P2 Part 2 and 3

POLITENESS AND INTERACTION

Instead of Half Listening…

National 4 English – Listening

Types of Communication

‘The most natural way to communicate is simply to speak

Chapter ten Pragmatics

Outcome 2 At the end of this session you will:

Communicating Effectively

K-3 Student Reflection and Self-Assessment

AGREE AND DISAGREE 11/12/2018.

Suicide Prevention Chapter 5: Lesson 3.

Communicative competence

Spoken English Ms El-Hendi.

ONLINE STRESS Learning objectives Learning outcomes

PRESENTATION ON LISTENING SKILLS.

Unit 1 Lesson 11 Practice: Listening and Responding to the Emotions of Others.

Habit 1 Be Proactive.

The Importance of Credibility in Relationship Building

Healthy Relationships

Principle of coversation

Unit 1 Lesson 11 Practice: Listening and Responding to the Emotions of Others.

ONLINE STRESS Learning objectives Learning outcomes

Social-Emotional Learning

Chapter 9: Communicating Effectively

Presentation transcript:

Principle of coversation Agreement and Politeness

Agreement Principle When we are happy for someone to take the lead in a conversation, we do not wish to impose our ego or our point of view, tacit agreement is the norm – normally signalled by murmurs of assent , short grunts or, at the level of kinesics by nods of approval (feedback). The Agreement Principle does not necessarily mean that the listener agrees with what the first Speaker says, it merely signals that the respondent is supporting the first speaker.

Politeness Principle Robin Lakoff (1973) Language and Woman’s Place pointed out three maxims that are conventionally followed. Together they make up the politeness principle: 1 Don’t impose, 2 Give options 3 Make your receiver feel good. These maxims can explain and describe how many utterances carry no information but have the function of facilitating social interaction:

Face Linguistic politeness also involves the concept of ‘face’. ‘Face’ is your public self-image. it is ‘the emotional and social sense of self that every person has and expects everyone else to recognize.’ (George Yule, The Study of Language, 1985, 1996)

Face Threatening Acts Speech that represents a threat to another persons face is called a face-threatening act; e.g., using a direct speech act to make someone do something. In such circumstances you are acting as though you have more social power than the other person. If you do not actually have that power, it makes your speech act an FTA.

Face-Saving Acts An indirect speech act is an example of a face-saving act. These are meant to reduce potential threats to the other person’s face. e.g., if I formulate a direct speech act as a question, I remove the assumption of social power. I appear to be enquiring about ability and not issuing an order.

Negative Face Face-saving acts can emphasise a person’s negative face or positive face. Negative face is the need to be free from imposition. Many face saving acts in everyday conversation preserve the other person’s negative face, because the speaker signals the wish not to impose on the other person; e.g. ‘I’m sorry to bother you…, ‘if I could just trouble you for a second…’, If I could just steal a minute of your time...’

Positive Face Positive face expresses the need to be connected and belong to the same group. A face-saving act that emphasises a person’s positive face will show solidarity and draw attention to a shared goal or view: e.g., ‘I couldn’t agree with you more.’ ‘ Let’s do this.’ ‘you and I have the same problem.’