TEACHING INFANTS PRIMARY COLORS BY: ASHLEY S. HUSER EDU 671:FUNDAMENTALS OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH INSTRUCTOR NEWTON MILLER JANUARY 20, 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Action Research Proposal
Advertisements

Individualized Family Service Plan-IFSP The Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP) is a process of looking at the strengths of the Part C eligible child.
Lesson Plan Design By: Andrea Perez EDU 3460.
Kyrene Professional Growth Plan
Autism and iPads Shauna Huber EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Instructor: Dennis Lawrence May 5, 2014.
School’s Cool in Childcare Settings
 Early childhood curriculum that promotes active participatory learning.  It offers: › Infant Toddler Educational care › Preschool Education › Early.
School’s Cool in Kindergarten for the Kindergarten Teacher School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
1 Enhancing Services in Natural Environments Presenter: Mary Beth Bruder March 3, :00- 2:30 EST Part of a Web-based Conference Call Series Sponsored.
Early Childhood Inclusion at the Frank Porter Graham Child Care Program: A Collaborative and Routines-Based Approach.
INDIVIDUALIZED FAMILY SERVICE PLAN-IFSP. IFSP The Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP) is a process of looking at the strengths of the Part C eligible.
Teaching Young Children, 4 th Edition © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 17 Using Technology to Support Development and Learning.
Rivera Elementary Mr. Trujillo’s Kindergarten class.
Tweet us! Making The Most of Web Reports.
Special Needs Program Stacey Warren. IEP The IEP is a: legal document teaching instrument road map for students The IEP must be: developed within 30 days.
Sharon Ostendorf EDU 671 Fundamentals of Education Research Instructor: Aaron Deris.
Mock Action Research Proposal Presentation Nena Williams Ashford University May 14, 2015.
Action Research Proposal EDU 671 KATHLEEN WALTERS 1.
Action Research Proposal Starla Stansbury EDU 671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Dr. Casey Reason April 26, 2014.
Action Research Proposal Presentation Krista Hill EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Dr. Casey Reason April 16,
Final Action Research Proposal Presentation Jasmine Crowder EDU 671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Dr. Tony Valley January 9, 2014.
ACTION RESEARCH PROPOSAL SAMARA DEESE EDU 671: FUNDAMENTALS OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH INSTRUCTOR: NEWTON MILLER JANUARY 18, 2016.
Technology Help or Hinderance? DOMINIQUE JOHNSON EDU671: FUNDAMENTALS OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH INSTRUCTOR: FREDERICK ANSOFF 2 JUNE 2014.
Ally Clark EDU 671 Dr. Kirgan EFFECTIVENESS OF ABILITY GROUPING.
Reading Literacy. The purpose of my study will be to describe why young children need to focus on reading in kindergarten and how to improve reaching.
Mock Action Research Proposal Presentation Tara S. Burch EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Professor Kathy Hoover September 3, 2015.
ACTION RESEARCH PROPOSAL PRESENTATION USING PUPPETS AS “PROPS” TO TEACH CHILDREN SOCIAL/EMOTIONAL SKILLS DAWN EYANSON EDU:671 FUNDAMENTALS OF EDUCATIONAL.
Action Plan Amanda Foster aaa. Area of focus Variables:
EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research ( MRD1423A ) Instructor: Frederick Ansoff Andrea Chisholm.
EDU 671 Fundamentals of Educational Research Instructor: Susan Hughes by T. Lee February 7, 2014.
Students Learning Effectively through Creative Resource Classes and Creativity in the Classroom Ashanti Banks Ashford University Professor Miller EDU.
Mock Action Research Presentation Marie Baker EDU 671 Fundamentals of Educational Research Instructor: Kathy Hoover October 15, 2015.
Action Research Proposal: Controlling Obesity through Nutrition and Exercise Michale D. Medina EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Dr. Kathleen.
Mock Action Research Proposal Presentation EDU 671 Fundamentals Of Educational Research By Valerie L. Brown.
Action Research Proposal: Improving Confidence in the Workplace Rebecca Jackson EDU 671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Dr. Miller January 21, 2016.
Action Research Patricia Smith EDU671 Fundamentals of Educational Research Newton Miller August 20, 2015.
Mock Action Research Proposal Presentation Deloris West EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research (NMJ 1610B) Instructor: Kathy Hoover March 31, 2016.
Action Research Proposal Presentation Veronica Bailey EDU 671 Lisa Reason 07/28/14-
CYNTHIA SPENCER THE BIG INTERVIEW. DESCRIBE YOUR PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION. Becoming a teacher is satisfying to many people for different reasons, but the.
Jamillah Gleason EDU 671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Instructor: Dennis Lawrence Reading Literacy Action Research Proposal.
Amanda M Surmann May 5 th 2014 EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research (MRD1413A) Instructor: Dennis Lawrence.
Technology Awareness Role: DISTRICT EDUCATOR Yovanka Kelly EDU620 Professor Deborah Naughton 3/28/16.
Action Research Proposal Presentation Shantel L. Pugh Dr. Jessica Bogunovich – Instructor EDU671 Ashford University.
Mock Action Research Proposal Presentation Claudia S. Herrera EDU671: Fundamentals of Education Research Dr. Newton Miller May 8, 2014.
JUDY CALLOWAY EDU 671 MOCK ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT PRESENTATION MARCH 27, 2014 NEWTON, MILLER.
DIANA G. FIELDING EDU-671 FUNDAMENTALS OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASHFORD UNIVERSITY DR. A. VALLEY DECEMBER 13, 2013.
EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research (MRD1414A) Ashford University Instructor: Dr. Kathleen Lunsford May 11th, 2014.
ACTION RESEARCH PLAN PROPOSAL PRESENTATION Tracie Shehan EDU671 Instructor: Holley Prescott May 28, 2015.
The Head Start Program Health Screenings By: Lillian Henderson.
LEARNING TECHNOLOGY TOOLS Dininne Grady Ashford University EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Instructor: Kathleen Pierce-Freedman July 3, 2015.
Dena D. Johnson Ashford University EDU 671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Instructor: Kathy Hoover September 3, 2015.
Mock Action Research Proposal Presentation. How can children get the most out of play in my classroom. Play is essential for a child’s development Socially,
Action Research Proposal By: B’Nekia Curtis EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Instructor: Newton Miller.
MOCK ACTION RESEARCH PROPOSAL PRESENTATION Beverly Houston-Stoute Week 5 Discussion 1 ASHFORD UNIVERSITY EDU 671 Dr. Ansoff.
Action Research Proposal LaTrisha Pennington Edu 671: Fundamentals of Education Research Dr. Newton Miller March 14, 2016.
 The area of focus consists of teachers creating an environment to help express how children learn through play.  The purpose of this study is to.
MOCK RESEARCH PROPOSAL Sharon Gray Ashford University EDU671.
TECHNOLOGY IN THE CLASSROOM Presented by Kerrie N. Berry EDU 671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Instructor N. Miller.
Chorcelle Taylor EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Instructor: Newton Miller August 20, 2015.
Importance of the Technologies for the E-learning Leslie Polk EDU 671: Fundamentals of Education Research Instructor: Kathleen Lunsford September 4, 2014.
ACTION RESEARCH PROPOSAL Erik Carroll. AREA-OF-FOCUS STATEMENT The purpose of this study is to get kids moving!
 The purpose of this study is to determine the best way to deliver instruction to students. I want to find out if whole group instruction or small group.
Derryn Beasley EDU 671: Fundamentals of Education Research Instructor: Frederick Ansoff May 22 nd, 2014.
EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research (MRD1414A) Ashford University Instructor: Dr. Kathleen Lunsford May 1, 2014.
Justin Allegra EDU 671 – Fundamentals of Educational Research Dr. Newton Miller Ashford University March 12, 2016 Action Research Proposal Final Project.
Keep the F-U-N In Education. An Action Research Plan On Play Based Education. Tressa Morris EDU 671 Dr. Miller September 8,2016.
The effects of physical activity on third grade math scores
Designing & Implementing Instructional Plans
The effects of physical activity on third grade math scores
ETHICS 4 Consent and Assent @ewc_cga.
Presentation transcript:

TEACHING INFANTS PRIMARY COLORS BY: ASHLEY S. HUSER EDU 671:FUNDAMENTALS OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH INSTRUCTOR NEWTON MILLER JANUARY 20, 2016

AREA OF FOCUS The purpose of this study is to use effective strategies to show how to help infants identify primary colors. child’s growth and development increasing their verbal and environmental stimulation distinguish and categorize (i.e., green trees, blue skies and red shirt)

PROBLEM middle class= both parents need to work  child put in daycare facilities First topics that teachers go over early in the year less we interact and teach them  the slower their developmental stimulation Introducing new topics will benefit them when they encounter it later on in school. “action research can serve as a chance to really take a look at one’s own teaching in a structured manner” (Ferrance, 2000, p. 15).

VARIABLES Independent variables: technology tool games, activities, toys, and books Dependent variable: rate at which the child learns Experimental group: the participant Control group: none

RESEARCH QUESTIONS 1.Will using technology integrated games help infants learn the primary colors? 2.How long can you teach an 18 month old before they get distracted? 3.Will these strategies effectively assist infants in learning the primary colors?

LOCUS OF CONTROL Finding out strategies to show infants how to learn primary colors Materials needed to conduct my research are available Store bought or homemade Ex. Technology games Track progress, data and results Setting is at home Tools used to track progress

INTERVENTION 1.I need to know what my intended goals and my action research proposal will be. 2.Review my sources and choose which will benefit my participant and as well as support my ideas. I will also ensure that these strategies will be no harm to the population of choice. 3.Take any ethical considerations that need to be implemented into this research. 4.I will focus on each color for three weeks and then move on to the next. 5.I will first start off by choosing one of the three primary colors (blue, yellow or red). In this case I will choose the color red. 6.First (week 1), I will begin by reading a book about colors to her and make sure to point out the color red. Throughout the day I will point out the color red when the chance arises. 7.Throughout that week I will implement a new toy, game and activity everyday (Sunday – Saturday). Again I will point out the red color when the chance arises in her daily routines and play time. 8.The following week (week 2) I will show her everyday a new technology game. For example, I will show her YouTube videos. And point out the color red during the day. 9.The last week (week 3) I will have a mix of toys, books, games, activities and technology into the learning strategy. Following will be an assessment to track her progress. 10.Steps 6-9 will be followed when teaching her the other two colors (blue and yellow). 11.At the end there will be a summative assessment and I will be able to understand what changes should be made or if I achieved my goals.

LITERATURE REVIEW Embedded teaching involves incorporating teaching strategies into everyday activities (e.g., play) or routines (e.g., diapering)” (Tate et al, 2005, p. 206). As stated by Guyton (2011) play is the mechanism by which children learn. “Furthermore, it can be hypothesized that, by helping parents recognize an infant’s early potential for interaction and by providing them with techniques for generating and responding to subtle early interactions, they become responsive to the mutual transmission of messages” (Metzl, 1980, p. 585).

GROUP MEMBERSHIP The population will be for infants between months old. They have or are attending a childcare facility. My choice is one 18-month old female infant Developmental growth is normal No early signs of learning disabilities Opportunity to learn a lot more

ETHICS Informed consent by both parents Make sure all activities bring no harm to the participant Ex. books, plush toys Biased standards and anonymity are not an issue Why? One participant - daughter

TIMELINE Each color (blue, red and yellow) is taught within three weeks How and when data will be collected 1.Will using technology integrated games help infants learn the primary colors? a)One week of technology games and data collected at the end of that week. 2.How long can you teach an 18 month old before they get distracted? a)Everyday for the first week and data will be collected at the same time. 3.Will these strategies effectively assist infants in learning the primary colors? a)Every end of the lesson for each primary color (every 3 weeks) and then at the end of the action research (summative assessment).

STATEMENT OF RESOURCES Identifying the primary colors Red, yellow and blue Choosing certain technology games i.e., Tablet, computer or phone Color books Toys i.e. puzzles Activities i.e., finger painting

DATA COLLECTIONResearchQuestions Data Collection Tool Why this tool? Justify its use in your study. How does it match to what you are attempting to find and to measure? Will using technology integrated games help infants learn the primary colors? Will using technology integrated games help infants learn the primary colors? Guided learning Assessments My daughter will use technology games, she will be assessed, through me or the game itself; keeping track of her progress. How long can you teach an 18 month old before they get distracted? Observation So the only way I will be able to know and use my time wisely when teaching the colors to her is through observation. Will these strategies effectively assist infants in learning the primary colors? Assessments Video Recording I will be video recording, while I test her on the colors This will help me understand if the strategies were successful and changes needed to achieve my goals. Also, it may arise other important questions to help infants learn.

REFERENCES Tate, T. L., Thompson, R. H., McKerchar, P. M., (2005). Training Teachers in an Infant Classroom to Use Embedded Teaching Strategies. EDUCATION AND TREATMENT OF CHILDREN 28(3), Guyton, G. (2011). Using Toys to Support Infant-Toddler Learning and Development. Young Children, Retrieved from Toys_Guyton_Online_0911.pdf Ferrance, E. (2000). Themes in education: Action research. Providence, RI: LAB at Brown University. Retrieved from alliance/sites/brown.edu.academics.education-alliance/files/publications/act_research.pdf Metzl, M. N. (1980). Teaching Parents a Strategy for Enhancing Infant Development. Child Development, (2) Mills, G. (2014). Action Research A Guide for the Teacher Researcher (5th ed.). Boston, MA:Pearson Education.