Janet Corbin Education and Technology Summer 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PLP Circle of Support: A prevention/intervention model December 12, 2003 Rhode Island Department of Education.
Advertisements

Title I Directors Conference October 23-25, 2007 Waterfront Place Morgantown, WV Reading the Fine Print Monitoring K-3 Reading Programs Presenter: Pat.
Mission: School Improvement West Virginia Department of Education Division of Educator Quality and System Support August 18, 2010.
Elementary. The District Heard Your Concerns In teachers requested that the following three documents be merged into one. Instructional Focus.
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
Blended Learning Rubric BMS Faculty Meeting – September 10.
Using Core, Supplemental, and Intervention Reading Programs to Meet the Needs of All Learners Carrie Thomas Beck, Ph.D. Oregon Reading First Center COSA.
Getting Started with RTI School-wide Assessment Tool for an RTI Model.
School District of University City Jackson Park Elementary School SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Joylynn Wilson, Superintendent Monica Hudson, Principal.
No Child Left Behind The Basics Of Title 1 Every Child - Now! Focus on the critical nature of doing what’s right and what’s needed – today - to help every.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Common Core Implementation Plan Whittier City School District Board of Education Meeting April 7, 2014.
Presented By: Nora Jaramillo, MJ Boyter, Kristin Carter. Reem Kievit, Crystal Rivera, Matt Craft, Robert Garcia.
Technology and Achievement Gaps: Computers in the Biology Classrooms Jennifer Sills Towson University, Summer 2010 Educational Leadership and Technology.
Eugene Field Elementary School “Inspiring and empowering each other to positively impact our community and our world.” Our Journey to Responsive Intervention.
Educational Technology Plan Del Mar Union School District.
ITEC 7445: EMERGING TECHNOLOGY EMILY TOMS NOVEMBER 12, 2012
IIT: Supporting Staff and Students at PVMS.
A product of Project CENTRAL, 2004 The Action Research Process Sponsored by Project CENTRAL A Project of the Florida Department of Education In Collaboration.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Silas Deane Middle School Steven J. Cook, Principal Cynthia Fries, Assistant Principal October 22, 2013 Wethersfield Board of Education.
Thank you for joining us for Small Group Instruction The presentation will begin momentarily. RIGHT REASON TECHNOLOGIES YOUR SOLUTION FOR STUDENT SUCCESS.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
DEPARTMENT OF STUDENT, FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES Leadership I and II February, 2011 Providing Services to Students, Families and Community through.
PAULDING COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT AdvancED EXTERNAL REVIEW REPORT.
Principal’s Forecast Tangipahoa Parish School System Leadership Focus Strategy June 2015 Gary T. Porter.
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
Building A Tier Two System In An Elementary School: Lessons Learned Tina Windett & Julie Arment Columbia Public Schools, Missouri Tim Lewis & Linda Bradley.
School Improvement Planning Today’s Session Review the purpose of SI planning Review the components of SI plans Discuss changes to SI planning.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
DLP Assignments October 23, 2013 Karen Lea Branch NCSU NELA Cohort III.
By Tracy Papinchock ISTC 702 Summer 2010 Mod 8 Strategic Planning, Technology, & Leadership Presentation.
The Administrator: Key Factor in Student Achievement Dr. Rita L. Robinson The Mid-Atlantic Equity Center Promoting the Achievement of Students of Color:
Grandview Heights Schools Dr. Jamie Lusher September 2015.
Winston/Salem Forsyth County Schools RESPONSIVENESS TO INSTRUCTION (RTI)
RTI: Response To Instruction NEA NH Presentation Madison Elementary School
Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.
Kent ISD Collaborative Five Year Transition Plan to the Common Core State Standards Collaboration + Communication = Success!
Berkshire Local School District Strategic Plan Update Fourth Update, 10/14/09.
TRHS Action Plan Goal 1 O Goal #1: In the School Year TRHS will further develop our Response to Instruction (RTI) model to ensure.
Making Plans for the Future April 29, 2013 Brenda M. Tanner, Ed.D.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
Integrated Media and Technology Program with an Emphasis on Student Achievement.
The Professional School Counselor’s Role in CCRPI Nicole Weber Nickajack Elementary School Cobb County School District 2012 ASCA School Counselor of the.
Drewry Mason Elementary Annual Title I Meeting 12:00-1:00, 3:00-4:00, 6:00-7:00 August 9, 2012.
District Leadership Team Process. Leadership Team Active Coordination FUNCTIONS Implementation support Data-based action plan Coordination Capacity building.
Response to Intervention in a Nutshell August 26, 2009.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
NEASC SITE VISIT SEPTEMBER 30-OCTOBER 3, Standards of Accreditation 4 standards of Teaching and Learning 1- Mission and Expectations for Student.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
SARAH SCHOLL TOWSON UNIVERSITY, SUMMER 2010 EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP AND TECHNOLOGY Integrating Technology: Windows Movie Maker in the Language Arts Classroom.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
If you want great schools…. Essential Questions What can we do to organize schools to maximize student learning? What will it take to make every Alabama.
JOSHUA WORLEY NOVEMBER 11, 2013 ITEC 7445 – FALL 2013 DR. GOETZEL EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES PROJECT GradeCam.
“. BEAR VALLEY ELEMENTARY API: OVERALL AYP : ELA % of students scoring prof or adv on CST.
 RtII is a comprehensive multi-tiered prevention model that provides services and interventions as early as possible to meet the instructional needs.
1 Update on Teacher Effectiveness July 25, 2011 Dr. Rebecca Garland Chief Academic Officer.
Responsiveness to Instruction: Using a Problem Solving Model to Guide Student Support Team Decision Making Pender County Schools Summer 2009.
“An Impact School Partnership”
National Board Certified Teacher
Bennett County School District
Worlds Best Workforce Annual Report
Mansfield Elementary School Title I stakeholders’ input & Revision MEETING March 5-9, 2018.
Academically Intellectually Gifted Program
Colchester Public Schools
Improve IEP Project IEP Form Improvement Project
Mary Weck, Ed. D Danielson Group Member
Using data for instructional decision-making
Integrating Technology in the 4th grade Curriculum for Reading Success
Presentation transcript:

Janet Corbin Education and Technology Summer 2010

Use Google Docs as an online school-wide collaboration to narrow the academic achievement gap for African American males at Pocomoke Elementary School.

OUR ACADEMIC AFG PLANINDICATORS OF SUCCESS  Differentiate Math & Reading Instruction  Plans for Success  Intervention Groups  Project Intervene  Success Maker Lab Improved Student Performance:  Reading Inventories  Selected Responses  Brief Constructed Responses  Benchmarks  Formatives

Implement Collaborative Teaching Model Indicators of Initiative Success  School Collaboration  Team Planning  School/Community Communication  Meet student needs  Improved student academic and behavioral performance  School Web Page

 Only Team Members  Time Element  Lack of Specialists Input  Needed Support and Ideas  Information Sharing  Efficient Communication

Online Collaboration Free Edits Simultaneously Many Viewers Instantly Saves Revisions Prints Documents

 Share instructional plans  Specialists participation  Available resources and ideas  Collaboration made easy

 Set purpose  Introduce Google Docs  Demonstrate  Actively Engage  Practice

Awareness InformationalPersonalManagementConsequenceCollaborationRefocusing

Multiple Intelligences Time Personal Meaning Conflict Technological Ability

 School leader  Implement Professional Development  Collaborate with Others  Technical Support for Google Docs

 Weekly Use  School-Wide Collaboration  Improvement in African American male academic scores

 Free  Title 1Funds

II. Communication IV. Assessment for Administration and Instruction VII. Professional Growth

Google Docs will be used as a school- wide based collaboration to enhance efficient and effective communication. All stakeholders will play an essential role in student learning and classroom instruction. This will attribute to building academic achievement and narrowing the gap for our African American males.

 2009 Maryland report card: worcester county- pocomoke elementary school third grade Adequate Yearly Progress." 2009 Maryland Report Card””.Version Oct Web. (Retrieved July 8, 2010)  Accelerating the achievement of african american students, December 12,2000 Worcester County Board of Education  Accreditation for growth (AFG) ( ) Pocomoke Elementary School Strategic Improvement Plan Team Members of Pocomoke Elementary School  Assumptions about Change (Fullan, 1991; Glickman et al., 2001) Administrator as a Changed Leader Iowa School Administrators Retrieved July 11, iowa.org/change/assumptions.html iowa.org/change/assumptions.html  Goggle Docs (web) Retrieved July 6, 2010  cs.google.com/?hl%3Den%26tab%3Dwo&followup= pl=homepage&hl=en cs.google.com/?hl%3Den%26tab%3Dwo&followup= pl=homepage&hl=en  Maryland department of education. (2008). Maryland Teacher Professional Development Planning Guide. Retrieved July 8, 2010, from  Maryland Educational Technology Plan for the New Millennium Maryland State Department of Education  Mtts maryland teacher technology standards online. (n.d.). Retrieved from  Stages of concern. (2004). Retrieved from  Teachweb 2.0 [Web log message]. Retrieved from  Worcester county public schools technology plan for (May 2009) Members of the Worcester County Public Schools Board of Education