This presentation, including any supporting materials, is owned by Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates and is for the sole use of the intended Gartner.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How Will it Help Me Do My Job?
Advertisements

This presentation, including any supporting materials, is owned by Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates and is for the sole use of the intended Gartner.
School Systems Learn the Value of Document Management to Better Serve Students, Parents and Staff and Presented By:
1 MICHIGAN MUNICIPAL SERVICES AUTHORITY COLLABORATE INNOVATE SERVE Michigan Local Government Benchmarking Consortium Conference: Benchmarking for Success.
UT San Antonio PeopleSoft Project September 2010.
This presentation, including any supporting materials, is owned by CIO Council Romania and is for the sole use of the intended CIO Council Romania audience.
CtcLink Project Update Kelly Blackwood October 24, 2014.
1 State of Connecticut Core-CT Project HRMS Training Registration July, 2003.
“High Performing Financial Institutions and the Keys to Success in an Uncertain Environment”
Copyright Dickinson College This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non-commercial,
Corporate Service Review DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND EMPLOYMENT.
South Carolina Finance Workshop for Small Water Systems June 4, 2013 Water Partnerships: Financial Advantages and Challenges SC Case Study: Lowcountry.
Dr. Julian Lo Consulting Director ITIL v3 Expert
1 LBNL Enterprise Computing (EC) January 2003 LBNL Enterprise Computing.
Panorama Consulting Group LLC ERP Assessment, Selection, and Planning SAMPLE APPROACH.
A framework for describing IT Project Management Processes and Tool Set Features Enterprise Project Management Framework.
Centralized vs. Decentralized: Pros, Cons & Best Practices
Technology Steering Group January 31, 2007 Academic Affairs Technology Steering Group February 13, 2008.
IUC Shared Services Project Commissioned by Ohio Intra-University Council Commissioned by Ohio Intra-University Council Involving all 14 four year public.
This presentation, including any supporting materials, is owned by Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates and is for the sole use of the intended Gartner.
Shared Learning Services : Key Learnings Session 102 November 9, 2009.
Northshore Community College Public MA Community College 4 campus locations –4200 FTE –2500+ non-credit –90+ progams of study Career,LA,Transfer Technical.
Affiliated Information Security Collaborative An Affiliated Enterprise Approach to Information Security Deans and Vice Presidents Meeting April 17, 2014.
Copyright Prosci All rights reserved. Library of Figures 1 Prosci Change Management ® Please read Right to use this content is governed by the licensing.
State of Kansas Statewide Financial Management System Pre-Implementation Project Steering Committee Meeting January 11, 2008.
Charting a course PROCESS.
Privileged and Confidential Strategic Approach to Asset Management Presented to October Urban Water Council Regional Seminar.
Microsoft Office Project Portfolio Server
May Agenda  PeopleSoft History at Emory  Program Governance  Why Upgrade Now?  Program Guiding Principles  High-Level Roadmap  What Does This.
QAD's Customer Engagement Dan Blake Consultancy Development Director, QAD QAD Explore 2012.
Financials – Phase II Kick-Off Meeting September 11, 2008 Brenda Bolander, State Comptroller Michael Grisser, Project Manager.
This presentation, including any supporting materials, is owned by Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates and is for the sole use of the intended Gartner.
The rSmart Group Kuali Days Successful Financial System Implementation Indianapolis April 11,
PROJECT OBJECTIVES Identify, procure, and implement software that provided a common system for students, faculty, and staff to enter and measure.
This presentation, including any supporting materials, is owned by Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates and is for the sole use of the intended Gartner.
Training of Process Facilitators Training of Process Facilitators.
Do it pro bono. Strategic Scorecard Service Grant The Strategy Management Practice is presented by Wells Fargo. The design of the Strategic Scorecard Service.
Organize to improve Data Quality Data Quality?. © 2012 GS1 To fully exploit and utilize the data available, a strategic approach to data governance at.
Defining the Purpose of ERP
University of Wisconsin System HRS Project Update to ITC November 19, 2010.
1 Prosci ® Image Library. 2 Guidelines This library is not designed as a presentation, but rather a collection of available slides for potential use in.
Top Issues Facing Information Technology at UAB Sheila M. Sanders UAB Vice President Information Technology February 8, 2007.
1 Local Readiness Team Lead Kick-Off Meeting May 16, 2007.
Capture the Movement: Banner 7.0 and Beyond Susan LaCour, Senior Vice President, Solutions Development California Community Colleges Banner Group.
1-2 Training of Process Facilitators 3-1. Training of Process Facilitators 1- Provide an overview of the role and skills of a Communities That Care Process.
Management in relation to learning processes Proposal Sources: ANECA, CHEA, DETC.
This presentation, including any supporting materials, is owned by Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates and is for the sole use of the intended Gartner.
Role of Montana State Fund. Montana State Fund is committed to the health and economic prosperity of Montana through superior service, leadership and.
Chapter 7 Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP). Objectives After studying the chapter, students should be able to.. Explain definition of Enterprise Resource.
This presentation, including any supporting materials, is owned by Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates and is for the sole use of the intended Gartner.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Assessment Entry Module (AEM) Kick-off November 15, 2012 interRAI Preliminary Screener Toronto Central LHIN.
1 Financials Advisory Board April 06, Office of State Finance Agenda FAB Purpose Responsibilities Project Updates Introductions/ New FAB Members.
BGSU/PeopleSoft Introducing Financial Management Solutions & Enterprise Performance Management.
Management Information Systems Islamia University of Bahawalpur Delivered by: Tasawar Javed Lecture 3b.
Introducing Novell ® Identity Manager 4 Insert Presenter's Name (16pt) Insert Presenter's Title (14pt) Insert Company/ (14pt)
This presentation, including any supporting materials, is owned by Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates and is for the sole use of the intended Gartner.
© CGI Group Inc. “Modernizing your ERP – Getting there and continual improvement” State panelist: Doug Cotnoir, Maine, Controller Tom White, Alabama, Comptroller.
Education Portal Solutions for Higher Education Education portals create a common gateway to the data and services that the people throughout your university.
Create a system that reflects higher education best practices
Portal Content Management (PCM) & Portal Site Management (PSM)
Building Partnerships:  How the Office of Assessment and Accreditation Can Help You and Your Program Be Successful.
Shared Services Open Forum
Joan Angel Deputy Registrar, Student Administration HOSA 2018
By Jeff Burklo, Director
Employee engagement Delivery guide
Agenda Purpose for Project Goals & Objectives Project Process & Status Common Themes Outcomes & Deliverables Next steps.
Strategic Planning in Dynamic Times
WORK STREAM TEAM DELIVERABLES
Presentation transcript:

This presentation, including any supporting materials, is owned by Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates and is for the sole use of the intended Gartner audience or other authorized recipients. This presentation may contain information that is confidential, proprietary or otherwise legally protected, and it may not be further copied, distributed or publicly displayed without the express written permission of Gartner, Inc. or its affiliates. © 2011 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. GARTNER CONSULTING Engagement: Washington State Board for Community & Technical Colleges (SBCTC) ERP Overview Prepared for: WACTC Academy April 29, 2011

Engagement: © 2011 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. or its affiliates. 1 Agenda ■What will an ERP provide? ■What won’t it do? ■What are the benefits we can expect? ■What can colleges expect? ■What is the role of the President?

Engagement: © 2011 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. or its affiliates. 2 What will an ERP provide?

Engagement: © 2011 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. or its affiliates. 3 What will an ERP Provide? Drivers Student-centric service model WCTC-wide Collaboration Process Streamlining Compliance and Security Concerns Competitive Advantage ERP Delivers Enhanced Student Service Consistent View of Key Data: “Single View of the Truth” Embedded ‘best practice’ business processes Foundational application architecture and upgrade path for future releases Challenges Compete View of ALL Enterprise/Organizational Data WCTC-wide Implementation and Execution of Common Processes

Engagement: © 2011 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. or its affiliates. 4 What will an ERP provide? Reporting & Analytics Management Dashboard Health & Safety Compliance Document Management Portal Workflow Recruiting Workforce Management Payroll General Ledger (GL) Accounts Payable (AP) Accounts Receivable (AR) Asset & Inventory Treasury (Cash Management) Budget Devt & Position Control Research & Project Accounting Student & Academic Records Recruiting & Admissions Scheduling & Registration Academic Affairs Student Services Financial Aid Student Financials Student Finance Enterprise Mgmt HR/Payroll

Engagement: © 2011 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. or its affiliates. 5 The World as we have known it Cross functional processes(internal & external) End-to-end process support All content types Embedded Analytics Modular but integrated “As Is” Systems targeting discrete business functions Systems targeting common (simple) processes “To Be”

Engagement: © 2011 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. or its affiliates. 6 The World as we have known it “To Be”

Engagement: © 2011 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. or its affiliates. 7 What will it not do?

Engagement: © 2011 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. or its affiliates. 8 Not included: What will it not do? Auxiliary Point-of-Sale Related inventory Smart card E-commerce Library Library Info Systems Content Databases Virtual Libraries Instruction Content Dev’t Distributed Learning Academic Support Instructional Management Research Data Analysis Software Development Tools Investigator Grants Admin

Engagement: © 2011 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. or its affiliates. 9 What are the benefits we can expect?

Engagement: © 2011 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. or its affiliates. 10 What benefits we can expect? ■ Improved level of service to students ■ Enhanced tools for faculty and staff at colleges and board level ■ Common, simplified processes ■ Consistency and integrity of data ■ Availability of Information and enhanced reporting capabilities ■ Foundation for future growth and evolution ■ Integration with other applications ■ Measurement of activity and project performance ■ Attraction and retention of employees ■ Lower application maintenance costs

Engagement: © 2011 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. or its affiliates. 11 What can colleges expect?

Engagement: © 2011 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. or its affiliates. 12 What can colleges expect? Different screens Different terminology Different data to enter Different reports New Systems Different info coming from different places Different approval paths Reduced steps in a process New Processes Potential for delegated authorities Automated approvals Different people entering data New Responsibilities

Engagement: © 2011 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. or its affiliates. 13 What can colleges expect ? Page 13

Engagement: © 2011 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. or its affiliates. 14 What can colleges expect? ■A communication and coordination structure will be developed (similar to Lift and Shift) to ensure colleges have a direct communication link to the project. A recommended structure will be included in the project charter. ■Varying degree of involvement of staff during the implementation depending on the desired level of commitment to the design and implementation of the solution ■Requirement to initiate and manage change to the business processes, roles and responsibilities, and, potentially organizational model ■Requirement to backfill positions where staff have been appointed to the implementation team ■Staff’s participation in testing and training effort

Engagement: © 2011 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. or its affiliates. 15 A Focus on the Readiness Assessment Will Ensure SBCTC Is Prepared For The People Side Of An ERP Initiative ■Commit to common vision and business case ■Supplement team weaknesses with external hires or services ■Define and implement project governance structure ■Create Change Management Program ■Determine and execute resource backfill strategy ■Secure/build out team facilities ■Initiate data cleansing analysis ■Develop Enterprise Architecture Strategy ■Refine project budget ■Finalize solution implementation strategy and project plan Project Preparation Checklist 65-75% 5-10% 20-25% Typical breakdown of investment for similarly scoped ERP Projects Hardware Software People 65-75% 5-10% 10-25%

Engagement: © 2011 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. or its affiliates. 16 ERP Systems Overview (Examples) Implementation Approach Is Driven by Scope of Change Implementing new “best” practices Removing non value-added activities from processes Standardizing nomenclature / data across the enterprise Restructuring where processes get done e.g., activity-based analysis, procurement cards, workflow e.g., common chart of accounts e.g., shared services e.g., move from three-way matching to payment on receipt

Engagement: © 2011 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. or its affiliates. 17 Description of Participants Functional Experts Admissions / Enrollment Registrar Bursar Academic Advising Faculty Financial Aid Process Integration Organization Change Mgmt Training Reporting / Information Access Project Sponsors Business Sponsor IT Sponsor College Presidents Steering Committee Members Trustees College Representatives Functional Curriculum Faculty Academic Advising Process Organizational Change Mgmt Technical Experts Architecture Development Data Migration & Integration Security IT Operations

Engagement: © 2011 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. or its affiliates. 18 What is the role of College Presidents?

Engagement: © 2011 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. or its affiliates. 19 What is the role of the President? Executive champions within the respective colleges Facilitate communications throughout the college to trustees, students, faculty and staff Support decision-making with respect to implementation approach, best practice adoption, training, etc. Collaborate with other colleges to achieve common processes, implement best practices and enable “board-wide” reporting and analysis Appoint delegates to project steering committees, and implementation teams where appropriate