Security in International Relations Prepared for Junior Int'l Politics class at NENU, Fall 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding IR Theories I: Liberalism and Realism
Advertisements

POSC 2200 – Theoretical Approaches
RealPolitik or Power Politics
The best US foreign policy is one based on contemporary understandings of realism. Such a policy would be more successful, particularly in avoiding wars,
The Prisoners’ Dilemma and IR theories International Relations.
Fundamental Question What is the fundamental difference between international politics and those that occur within states? It is the lack of institutions.
Realism International Security in the Modern World Masaryk University in Brno 1-2 July 2012 Věra Stojarová.
Realist and Neorealist Theories of War
Today  Updates: Kenya and Chad  Simulation: your country assignments  The Cold War, /91 Causes of the Cold War  Cuban Missile Crisis  The.
Plan for Today: Understanding Classical Realism and Neorealism
Realism Kenneth Waltz Kaisa Ellandi Lecture 2.
Realism.
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORY IN POLICY DEBATE Houston Urban Debate League.
What are the properties of a billiard (or pool or snooker) ball? How do they behave?
 Realists see the world as it is  Basic assumptions of realism  Groupism; group cohesion to survive, nation state and nationalism, anarchic social.
IR 501 Lecture Notes (2) Realism
ESSENTIALS OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
4.3. Armed Conflict in Global Politics Learning Objectives –Apply the level of analysis tool to explain armed conflict –Familiar with the central trends.
Finishing classical realism. Neorealism. Other contemporary realism.
States and International Environmental Regimes. Today: Examine IR theories that focus on states as units of analysis in explaining cooperation Are these.
International Relations
Foreign Policy and National Security
WHAT ARE WE GOING TO DO IN THIS CLASS? What three big questions (units) will we study? – Why do countries do what they do? When/how do states work together,
Chapter 15 Comparative International Relations. This (that is the LAST!) Week.
Liberalism: Conclusion Lecture 14. The Question of the Month How Can Countries Move from Anarchy, War of All Against All, to Cooperation? Security Dilemma.
1 Understanding Global Politics Lecture 3: Classical Realism.
 Intro, readings, etc.  Theoretical introduction / intro to alternative theories of IR  How international relations differ from domestic politics 
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORY INTRODUCTION HC 35.
Definitions (Defensive)  Defending territory  Defending citizens  Defending values  Defending allies  Defending preferred world order.
TO WHAT EXTENT ARE NON- DEMOCRATIC LEADERS MORE PRONE TO WAR?
Chapter 8 War and Strife.
Internationalism and Contemporary Global Affairs Unit 3.
Homework 1. What is this study based on? How did the group determine levels of corruption? 2. How have the countries at the top of the list (least corrupt.
POSC 1000(056) Introduction to Politics Politics and Governance the Global Level/Conclusions and Exam Advice Russell Alan Williams.
Three perspectives on international politics IR theories: Realism.
International Security and Peace
SeungJu Kim I Realism  State is the pre-eminent actor in the international system.  Self-help: state must build up its military power to ensure.
1 Understanding Global Politics Lecture 4: Neo-Realism/ Structural Realism.
The Third Level of Analysis The System, or War Krieg ist die Fortsetzung der Politik mit anderen Mitteln (Clausewitz)
Introduction to International Relations International Security Prof. Jaechun Kim.
PLS 341: American Foreign Policy Theories in IR The Idea-Based -isms.
Today’s Topics Realism and Liberalism 1.Finishing group discussion activity on realism in Rice speech. 2.Evaluating realism as a theory. 3.Introducing.
Introducing the IR Paradigms
POL 3080 Approaches to International Relations Introduction
What Is International Relations (IR) Theory? Prepared for Junior Int'l Politics class at NENU, Fall 2015.
WHY DO STATES DO WHAT THEY DO? THE REALIST (I.E., THE DOMINANT) PERSPECTIVE States have primacy as unitary intl. actors (while leaders come and go, states.
Alternative theories of Small State Studies Máté Szalai Máté Szalai
Liberal Approaches to International Relations POL 3080 Approaches to IR.
Introducing the IR Paradigms 1: Liberalism(s) in IR Prepared for Junior International Politics Class at NENU, Fall 2015.
IR: The New World of International Relations Chapter 13 In Pursuit of National Security 2012, 2010, 2008 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights.
Constructivism in IR Theory Prepared for Junior Int'l Politics class at NENU, Fall 2015 “Introducing the IR Paradigms: 3”
WHY DO ALL STATES FIGHT? THE THIRD IMAGE -Even nice leaders and nice states fight. -Very different states and people behave similarly and predictably -Some.
‘Anarchy is What States Make of It’
Unit 3 Seminar.  You will be getting a break during Unit 4- there are no grade assignments due  The exam that you took for Unit 3 was not graded-I am.
NEO-REALISM AND NEO-LIBERALISM THEORIES
Topics for today Events of the day/week Review: Constructivist theory Wednesday, 2/27/2008Hans Peter Schmitz.
Chapter 8 War and Strife. Security Issues Global trends, see: –Human security.
WHAT IS “SECURITY”; WHAT IS CONFLICT? Why does “intl.” security matter to us? What is “world peace”? Should we always prefer peace? “War isn’t the answer”
Prof. Murat Arik School of Legal Studies Kaplan University PO420 Global Politics Unit 2 Approaches to World Politics and Analyzing World Politics.
Prof. Murat Arik School of Legal Studies Kaplan University PO420 Global Politics Unit 2 Approaches to World Politics and Analyzing World Politics.
Presented by Mijin Yoon & Minyoung Jeong September 15, 2010
Introduction to Political Science (IRE 101) Week 3 Political Theories
Balance of Power Theory
** Emergence of Realism
Introduction to Global Politics
IR Theory No Limits Debate.
International Security and Peace
Introduction to Global Politics
Theories of International Relations
Presentation transcript:

Security in International Relations Prepared for Junior Int'l Politics class at NENU, Fall 2015

Assumptions: State Security under Anarchy Do states want survival, security, or power?

Survival: Ability to Defend against Existential Threat Mearshimer's Offensive Realism: Existential threat is constant & present everywhere. What states face existential threat? When do states disappear?  “Buffer” states  Weak states with strong enemies nearby  Internal collapse  World & regional wars Do the above conditions describe the current global situation?

States Are “Security-Seekers”? Survival & Lack of Major Threats  Minimize “sensitivity” to threats  Eliminate ALL “vulnerability” Military Security (National Defense) Energy Security

International Security & “The Security Dilemma” How can states know whether military build-up is for defensive or offensive purposes?  The Security Dilemma: Your attempt to increase your security by building your military makes me feel less secure.  If unchecked, the Security Dilemma can lead to an “Arms Race” State security as a “Zero-Sum Game”  A “+win+” for me is a “-loss-” for you  A “+win+” for you is a “-loss-” for me  1 – 1 = 0! Goal of Int'l Security Institutions: Build trust & make security a “Positive-Sum Game” (Our actions make each other more secure.)

States Are “Power-Seekers”? Realism : The best (or only) way to be secure is to be powerful. Seek security through power. Power in IR = Money in Economics  Under anarchy, pursue “self-help” via military power  Form alliances to create a stable “balance of power”  Try to become a (regional or global) hegemon Liberalism, Idealism, Constructivism, “Social” Theories, Etc.: “Collective Security” is possible & preferable to endless power competition & warfare.  A universal organization (global institution) to which both the aggressor and its opponents belong can manage global conflict and provide security for all.

Alternative Conceptions of Security “Human Security”: State provides basic human rights & enjoys high domestic legitimacy Prosperity: States promote “human flourishing”  Today we can have both “butter” and “guns” “Ontological Security”: Being secure in one's identity in the “international community.”