NACTEI 2011 BY FIDELIS N UBADIGBO, Ph.D..  The Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 (Perkins IV) supports career and technical.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Association for Career and Technical Education 1 Changes and Implications of the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006.
Advertisements

Perkins IV Update Legislation and Funding Legislation and Funding Technical Skill Attainment Indicator Technical Skill Attainment Indicator Accountability.
Perkins IV National Definitions and State Reporting: The Impact on Data Collection in Texas Gabriela Borcoman Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board.
Criteria for High Quality Career and Technical Education Programs National Career Pathways Network Orlando, FL November 14, 2014.
Career and Technical Education in Minnesota Presentation to the Governor’s Workforce Development Council March 13, 2008 Minnesota Perkins State Career.
Perkins Fiscal Training October 19,2009 Daniel Smith, Minnesota Department of Education JoAnn Simser, Minnesota State Colleges and Universities.
IL State Board of Education - 9/18/2007 Perkins IV - Secondary Indicators Carol Brooks Illinois State Board of Education.
WEDNESDAY, APRIL 2, 2008 OHIO RESOURCE CENTER The OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY 10:00 A.M. – 3:00 P.M.
Perkins Postsecondary Reserve Fund Grants WELDING PROGRAM OF STUDY.
CTE Accountability and Planning Perkins Planning Meeting March 2013 MSDE/DCCR Accountability Team Pat Mikos, Program Manager George Comegys, CTE Specialist.
CATE UPDATE Susan Flanagan, Director Office of Career and Technology Education March 12, 2013.
Where does data come from and how it is used
Perkins Accountability and the Program Improvement Process.
Navigating the changes to the Carl Perkins State Plan. Josh Miller Federal Applications Specialist August 2014 Oklahoma Department of Career and Technology.
DQI State Plan Accountability Requirements, Guidelines, Timeline, Student Definitions and Indicators John Haigh, U.S. Department of Education Savannah,
11/15/07 1 Career-Technical Education Accountability Ohio Department of Education Sharon Enright Dave Ozvat Erica Cheyney Ohio School Improvement Institute.
Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 “…will allow students … to get a vision of what can be achieved, what they can do in technical.
Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Using CTE/Perkins Data to drive Program Improvement Program.
1 OREGON. The Perkins Act – bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=109_cong_bills&docid=f:s250enr.tx t.pdf Your OMB Circulars
S TATEWIDE P ERKINS G RANT C ONTACTS M EETING Fall 2012 Polk County River Place October 9, 2012.
CARL D. PERKINS SPRING INFORMATIONAL SESSION for NEW PERKINS COORDINATORS TUESDAY, MAY 6, 2003 OHIO BOARD OF REGENTS MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM NEW PERKINS COORDINATORS.
TECH PREP PERFORMANCE MEASURES & PROGRAMS OF STUDY NACTEI Annual Conference May 2012.
New CATE Administrators September 26, 2013 Pat T. Flora Office of Career and Technology Education.
The Carl D. Perkins Act of 2006 An Overview for Career and Technical Education WI Dept. of Public Instruction Academic Excellence Division Deborah Mahaffey,
PREPARING FOR SUPPLEMENTAL MONITORING PERKINS COMPLIANCE Monieca West ADHE Federal Program Manager October 19, 2012.
Perkins Basic & Regional Reserve Grants Annual Report Directions October 30, 2009.
1. The Perkins Act – bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=109_cong_bills&docid=f:s250enr.tx t.pdf Your OMB Circulars
Perkins Update FY16 Federal Legislation Assistance Division Josh Miller Janet Cooper.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Vocational and Adult Education Division of Academic and Technical Education Progress of the State Perkins Accountability.
111 TECH PREP ACCOUNTABILITY IN PERKINS IV National Association of Tech Prep Leadership September 30, 2009 NCPN October 2, 2009.
Perkins Update July 9, 2015 Federal Legislation Assistance Division Josh Miller Janet Cooper.
Perkins Technical Assistance Webinar January 15, 2014 Oregon Department of Education | Department of Community Colleges and Workforce Development.
PREPARING FOR A COMPLIANCE REVIEW PERKINS COMPLIANCE Monieca West ADHE Federal Program Manager October 19, 2012.
Click to edit Master title style 1 Foundations for Perkins Accountability: Core Indicators, Annual Reports, Targets, and Gap Evaluation Carl D Perkins.
Perkins Governance Funding, Requirements Perkins Fiscal Training Part I, October 9, 2012.
State Longitudinal Data Systems and CTE Sharon Enright, Ph.D. Ohio Department of Education Office of Career-Technical Education 1 NACTEI Conference May.
Georgia Department of Education Bradley Bryant, State Superintendent All Rights Reserved 1.
Perkins Fiscal Procedures and Requirements for Managing the Funds-Postsecondary Carl D. Perkins Career Technical Education Act of
Perkins IV FY 2010 Plan ITV Meetings February 23, 2009 March 6, 2009 March 19, 2009 Daniel Smith, Education Supervisor Adult & Career Education
Application Amendments and Budget Transfers (Part 1) Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Title I University,
PERKINS ACCOUNTABILITY New Administrator’s Meeting September 23, 2011 Krishnan Sudharsan Office of Career and Technical Education Michigan Department of.
Adult Education Block Grant Webinar October 23, 2015
Adult Education Block Grant Webinar November 20, 2015.
Administering Perkins Grants. PI-1303-F Carl Perkins Formula Allocation Application (Single) 1PI-1303-FSection IXNon-Compliance with Core Indicators and.
NACTEI – May 17, 2007 Perkins in a Binder: How to GET and STAY Organized! Renee Kuharski – Dean of Career & Technical Education Colorado Mountain College.
Convention Center B213 2:15-3:15 Perkins Implementation Update Changes That Will Impact Your Program.
Adult Education Block Grant Webinar November 6, 2015
Perkins Fiscal Procedures and Requirements for Managing the Funds-Postsecondary Carl D. Perkins Career Technical Education Act of 2006.
What is Perkins About and Why Should I Care? Student Services Endorsement Program November 3, 2015 Federal Legislation Assistance Division Janet Cooper.
Application Amendments and Budget Transfers Title I University Chris McLaughlin, Title I Specialist Office of Program Administration and Accountability.
University of Hawai‘i Community Colleges Use of Perkins Funds Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006.
Click to edit Master title style 1 Core Indicator Cohort Selection Carl D Perkins (Perkins IV) Career and Technical Education Act Dr. W. Charles Wiseley.
Adult Education Block Grant Webinar October 30, 2015
Agenda I.Welcome and Agenda Review II.Direct Funding Information III.Overarching Themes IV. Priorities and Strategies Review I.Snapshot of regional data.
SESSION TWO: GRANT GUIDELINES WEBINAR/MEETING October 7,
Programs of Study. Program of Study A Program of Study is a sequence of instruction (based on recommended standards and knowledge and skills) consisting.
ADE’S GRANTS MANAGEMENT ENTERPRISE (GME) SYSTEM Home-grown: Went on-line in 1998 Used for most of ADE’s federal and state assistance grants In its day,
Federal - Perkins IV Programs of Study (Pathways) Secondary/Postsecondary Links Improving Student Performance –Academic and Technical Skills –Graduation/Completion.
California Career Technical Education Incentive Grant Program (CTEIG)
Annual Perkins Planning Meeting
October 17, 2012 JoAnn Simser Shannon Kohlman State Director, CTE
Perkins 101 Review Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006 Purpose and Expectations Act aims to increase the quality of.
REPORTS CTE 103.
$164 million K12 Strong Workforce Program and Funding Overview
TECH PREP ACCOUNTABILITY IN PERKINS IV
Reallocation of Perkins Funds
Reallocation of Perkins Funds
CNM Carl D. Perkins Grant
Presentation transcript:

NACTEI 2011 BY FIDELIS N UBADIGBO, Ph.D.

 The Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 (Perkins IV) supports career and technical education (CTE) in high schools and postsecondary institutions, such as community colleges (GAO July 29, 2009)

 ACCOUNTABILITY:  PLEASE WRITE DOWN THREE THINGS THAT COMES TO YOUR MIND

 SYSTEMS & ASSESSMENT  DATA & DATA COLLECTION  PERFORMANCE MEASURES  PERFORMANCE TARGETS  ANALYSIS AND DISAGGREGATION  REPORTING (CAR)  IMPROVEMENT AND CONTINUOUS REVIEW

 DATA TEAM  PERFORMANCE MEASURES  PERFORMANCE INDICATORS  BUDGET SUMMARY  REGIONAL CONSULTANTS (15 REGIONS)  MONITORING, EQUITY & SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT  CAR REPORT, REVIEW & IMPROVEMENT

 Establish and Support State and local performance accountability systems:  To assess the effectiveness of the state and the eligible recipients of the State in achieving statewide progress in career and technical education  Optimize the return of investment of Federal funds in CTE

 Added Emphasis on Academic Achievement  Emphasizes Accountability and Improved results  It improves monitoring and enforcement  High school, industry and higher education institutions work together

 STATES HAVE BROAD FLEXIBILITY IN IMPLEMENTING PERKINS IV  (Highlights of GAO to Congress)

 EASIER  CTE-Plus  MIS  UI

 States negotiate specific performance targets with Education  State report their performance to Education  Local recipients negotiate performance targets with their States and annually report their progress toward meeting the targets

SECONDARYCOMMON TO BOTHPOSTSECONDARY Academic Attainment in reading/language arts and mathematics Credential, Certificate or Degree Attainment Technical Skill Attainment Secondary School Completion Student Placement Student Graduation RateStudent Retention and Transfer Nontraditional Participation and Completion

Date ReceivedConsortium Code _____ Date Forwarded to Cons.Consultant: ________ Category of ApplicationSecondaryPostsecondaryTech Prep Applicant/Fiscal Agent____________________AREA NUMBER _______ Fiscal Agent & Address________________ Contact Person(s) _______________ FY 2011 Allocation _____FY 2011 Approved Budget Tracking (Name)Budget and Indicators approval Consultant –Sign/Date Original App. Scanned ___ Copy to Consultant ____ Full Approval: Budget/Perform Indicators Approved as Submitted Signature/Date Conditional Approval Approved as Amended Full/Amended Approval Approved Conditional to Full Approved as Conditional __ Appr. Conditional to Full __

 Adopted from the Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (1S1, 1S2)  Aligned with industry-recognized standards, if available and appropriate (2S1)  As described in Title I of the ESEA (4S1)

 Education can withheld all or portion of funds if a state does not implement a program improvement plan  Show improvement in meeting the failing performance measures or  Meet target for the same performance measure for 3 consecutive years

 Perkins application  Budget summary  Performance targets  Action plan  Improvement plan  Technical assistance

 Action:  Education addresses action(s) to be taken by States that did not meet targets or meet at least 90% of agreed upon targets  States address action(s) on local recipient that did not meet performance targets or meet at least 90% of agreed upon targets

Performance IndicatorState Target 7/1/10-6/30/09 Baseline 7/1/08-6/30/09 Local Target 7/1/10-6/30/11 1S1 AA Reading/LA79.38%75.38%79.30% 1S2 AA Mathematics79.30%86.15% 2S1 Tech Skill Attainment70.67%69.86%70.67% 3S1 Sec Sch. Completion93.39%88.24%93.39% 4S1Student Grad Rates92.20%88.24%92.20% 5S1 Sec. Placement90.67%86.76%90.67% 6S1 Nontrad Participation 30.16%31.71% 6S2 Nontrad Completion32.37%13.52%14.51%

We are pleased to attach your copy of the approved grant agreement between (Recipient) and the Iowa Department of Education (DE) for the (POS) Technical Skill Attainment Assessment Grant. The approval and reimbursement of expenditures incurred conducting the activity of the grant award are contingent upon: 1) the activities being operated in accordance with the plans within the application; 2) the assurances provided via the application; 3) the rules and regulations per the U.S. Department of Education General Administrative Rules, EDGAR, and PL , and 4) the submittal of a mid-point and final report. The Department’s guidelines for reimbursement of expenditures incurred by the fiscal agent of this grant allow for quarterly reimbursement of up to a maximum of 80% of the Grant Award. Final payment shall be made upon receipt of final report and online expenditure reporting for the remaining funds spent. Final report is due July 1, 2011.

Per kins Allocations 2012 Note: Reported on after notification of allocation. Note: This becomes column 10 on FY12 FSR Basic:11,963, Administration: (5%)598,197.00Total Leadership: (10%)1,196,394.00Allocations Program: (85%)10,169,355.00w/Carryover Reserve Fund:150, Secondary: (50.6%) See State Plan5,069,794.00Secondary Carryover:106, ,175, Post Secondary: (49.4%) See State Plan4,949,561.00Post Secondary Carryover:41, ,991, Tech Prep:1,244, TP Administration:62, TP Program:1,182,089.00Tech Prep Carryover:5, ,187, Non-Traditional 100,000.00Same as previous year - FY11 Budget Corrections 100,000.00Same as previous year - FY11 Budget State Match (I52) 559,797.00FY12 Appropriation I52 per Jeff Berger State Match (I51) 38,400.00will need additional to match 50/50 598, Allocations to Schools by 04/15 (Yr 1) - PDF to Roger Foelske, Roger Utman, Jennifer Mcabee, & Pat Thieben when final. - Secondary - allocated based on census data (see page 76 of State Plan) - Postsecondary - allocated based on pell counts (see page 77 of State Plan) - Reserve - (see page 80 of State Plan) - Tech Prep - allocated w/$50K to each consortia and remainder based on # LEAs per region (see page 65 of State Plan) Partial Payments (no more than 80%) - can be requested starting 07/01 (Yr 1) and ending 06/01 (Yr 1) - At 06/01, create listing in Excel of District #, Prog CIP# (Basic # or Tech Prep # ), Partial Pmt $ Amt, Warrant #, Date to Dave Krieger for Upload to CTE on-line system. Schools report Financial (State & Federal) Perkins information on-line by 08/01 (Yr 2) Final Payments made on PROD from Fund 0475 and payments made from I58 (based on ProRata) by end of Hold Open 08/31 (Yr 2) - Federal PROD can be done without all schools reporting, but State PROD must have all districts reporting or no funding. - Compare State PROD figures with prior 2 years (Query) for reasonableness.