SESPC Meeting ICES 2015 July 14, 2015 Bellevue, Washington

2 Agenda Welcome Annual Report AIAA Health Assessment Subcommittee Review PC Logo Issue and Concerns

01/01/2015 Recent Conference Performance Issues / Help Needed ICES 2014ICES 2015 Abstracts Received: 327 Abstracts Accepted: N/A Sessions: 12 Withdrawals/No-Shows: N/A Presented: N/A Increase conference attendance and paper submissions Work with travel restrictions for conference attendance Promote early career participation Sponsorship for student participation in the conference Accomplishments International Conference on Environmental Systems (ICES) in 2014 Published 194 papers through Texas Tech University Supported student poster session and awards Contributed to ICES award nominees Committee meeting (leadership + complete) Planning for ICES 2015 Updated committee charter Elected new vice-chair 2014 Year-In-Review Article, Space Environmental Systems Continued interaction with AIAA, AIAA L&S TC, ASME, AIChe, INT, and Texas Tech University Updated PC website with meeting minutes Updated roster Increased meeting and membership involvement CHAIR ICES Year-In-Review Article Increase SES community involvement Increase new memberships and involvement Initiatives & Plans Financial Status Abstracts Received: 310 Abstracts Accepted: ~300 No. of Sessions: 11 Withdrawals/No-Shows: 4 Papers presented: 194 (0 ITAR) Annual Report Summary (submitted to AIAA January 2015)

4 AIAA Health Assessment SESPC Assessment 6/13/2014 -Focused on role of committee within AIAA Provided committee details -Membership -Schedule -Accomplishments -Goals Discussed support needed from AIAA AIAA feedback due August 2015

5 Subcommittees Conferences and Workshops – Tom Liemkuehler -Participation in relative conferences -Focus on ICES External Affairs/Public Policy - Jose Roman Awards – Joe Chambliss -Student Poster Competition -Candidates for ICES award Membership – Brian O’Connor -Review of roster -Outreach to new members Education and Outreach – Hume Peabody -Development of ICES panel Website and Publications – Jen Miller/Brian O’Connor Year in Review article

6 Education and Outreach – ICES Panel Draw on SESPC experience and to create an interactive forum to share and educate the community Focused on design and test margins Participation from NASA, industry, and international committee members Not able to be accommodated this year, but looking forward to moving forward with this in the future -Possible to have this after daily sessions so as not to conflict with papers -Need to plan in advance to make sure this is in the schedule for next year

Should we have a Program Committee Logo? Other Program Committees have logos These can be useful branding the PC -For reports, -For presentations -For posters -For recruitment 7

Program Committee Group 8 1: inactive with revival hopes; 2: inactive - no expected revival

Energy Optimized Aircraft and equipment Systems January 2014 to December 2014 Annual Report

Pressure Gain Combustion Program Committee January 2014 to December 2014 Annual Report

Hypersonic Technologies and Spaceplanes (HyTASP) January 2014 to December 2014 Annual Report

Green Engineering Program Committee January 2014 to December 2014 Annual Report Due 1/31/2015

SESPC – example

Thoughts? Can be championed by -The Education & Outreach Subcommittee -The Website & Publication Subcommittee Thoughts or recommendations? 14

15 Issues and Concerns OPEN FORUM

16 BACKUP

Proposed Panel Description Testing margins beyond expected temperatures and numbers of cycles are often a topic of discussion near the end of a program to preserve schedule and cost with the large amount of support staff necessary. However, design margins prior to the manufacture of a design have not been given as much scrutiny in the thermal community. It can be argued that the design margins could have a greater impact on power, mass, and cost (via complexity) margins over the life of a program than the testing margins near the end. Since the design margins necessitate the commitment of resources and consequently can impact other subsystems, it is important to design a system that is robust enough to meet requirements but not so over-designed as to erode cost and schedule margins to implement the design. This session seeks to provide some transparency to the design process and margins held in a design among various organizations and to open the topic for discussion as to what are appropriate levels of margin and risk to incur on flight programs. 17