ADULT REDEPLOY ILLINOIS Mary Ann Dyar, Program Administrator National Association of Sentencing Commissions August 7, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
California Community Corrections Performance Incentive Act Overview SB 678 Briefing San Francisco Regional AOC Office November 29, 2010 SB 678.
Advertisements

Department of Corrections Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission “Prison Bound Offenders” Appropriations Act Item 387 D September 8, 2008.
Public Safety Performance Project October 2, 2012 Less Crime at Lower Costs Special Council on Criminal Justice Reform for Georgians.
1 Michigan Department of Corrections Office of Community Corrections  Office of Community Corrections was created pursuant to Public Act 511 of 1988,
South Carolina’s Prison System Report to the Sentencing Reform Oversight Committee Bryan P. Stirling, Acting Director November 18, 2013.
Criminal Justice, Substance Abuse & Mental Health Reinvestment Grant
NOW is the time for Transformation of our Criminal Justice System NOW is the time for 11X15 “The time is always right to do what is right” - MLK.
Yamhill County: Evidence-Based Decision Making (EBDM)
Goals of Justice Reinvestment Manage growth of the prison population and reduce spending on corrections Increase the cost- effectiveness of existing criminal.
Drug Offender Sentencing Alternative (DOSA): Treatment and Supervision
“Justice Reinvestment through Policy Analysis in South Carolina” South Carolina State Senator Gerald Malloy 1.
Keir Boettcher Deputy District Attorney
Bernard Warner, Secretary.  Over 7 million people in the US are under community supervision.  More than 50% of parolees and 37% of probationers fail.
State Administrative Agency (SAA) 2007 Re-Entry Grant Training Workshop The Governor’s Crime Commission Re-Entry Grants and Federal Resource Support Programs.
DRAFT PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF CORRECTIONS Mark Rubin – Muskie School of Public Service, University of Southern Maine.
Alternatives to Incarceration and Care Coordination May 12, 2015.
Sheila C. Casey Specialty Courts Administrator Specialty Courts.
Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Michael Thompson, Director Council of State Governments Justice Center July 28, 2014 Washington, D.C. Measuring.
Implementing Evidence Based Principles into Supervision March 20,2013 Mack Jenkins, Chief Probation Officer County of San Diego.
Probation Operations Department of Corrections GEORGIA House Bill 1176 Implementation Presented by: Jay Sanders Special Assistant to the Director of Probation.
Drug Court ♦The alternative to incarceration  History žHow and why the experiment evolved  Main Features of Drug Court žCooperation within the adversarial.
NASC 2012 ANNUAL CONFERENCE AUGUST 6, 2012 NASC 2012 ANNUAL CONFERENCE AUGUST 6, 2012 Ray Wahl Deputy State Court Administrator.
Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Michael Thompson, Director June 22,
Presentation Outline Why we need a prisoner reentry program What is happening with MPRI statewide What is happening locally How you can help Questions.
Criminal Justice Reform in California Challenges and Opportunities Mia Bird Northern California Grantmakers Annual Conference – From Ideas to Action May.
Partners in Crisis: 2011 Annual Conference 1 Improving Responses to People with Mental Illnesses in the Criminal Justice System: Getting to the Next Level.
© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Chapter 5 Intermediate Sanctions: Between Probation and Incarceration 1.
1 The MDOC Five Year Plan to Control Prison Growth Phase III: Long Term Policy Options SUMMARY BRIEF SUMMARY BRIEF Preliminary MDOC Proposal Revising Michigan’s.
California Statewide Prevention and Early Intervention (PEI) Projects Overview May 20, 2010.
Maine Board of Corrections March 25, 2009 Maine’s Unified Correctional System Design Development Process Discussion Presents: ONE MAINE ONE MAINE ONE SYSTEM.
The Ohio Parole Board’s implementation of Select Strategies Presented by: Cynthia Mausser Chair.
ANALYSIS OF LOUISIANA PRISON SYSTEM 1 Main Office: 720 Kearney St. Denver, CO Ph Wendy Naro-Ware October2012.
North Carolina TASC NC TASC Bridging Systems for Effective Offender Care Management.
Public Safety Improvement Act. Criminal Justice Initiative Work Group Process 35+ stakeholder meetings 6 meetings from July through October 2012 – Analyzed.
The Need For Evidence Based Sentencing Chief Justice William Ray Price, Jr.
State Of Idaho Juvenile Justice Commission District Strategic Plan Strategic Areas, Goals, and Objectives September 30 – October 1, 2014 Twin Falls,
Michigan Department of Corrections Updated Prison Bed Space Projections Impact from Probation, Community Corrections, Parole and the MPRI Presentation.
And They All Come Home. Shawshank Redemption watch?v=KtwXlIwozog.
Maine Board of Corrections March 18, 2009 Maine’s Unified Correctional System Design Development Process Discussion Corrections Working Group Presents:
2 3 Texas has one of the largest Probation Populations in the United States (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2007) 4 Selected StatesProbation Population.
Presentation to the Orange County Board of County Commissioners Chief Judge Belvin Perry, Jr. February 22, 2011.
OFFENDER REENTRY: A PUBLIC SAFETY STRATEGY Court Support Services Division.
HB 3194 CRAIG PRINS3/5/14 OREGON CRIMINAL JUSTICE COMMISSION NEVADA ADVISORY COMMISSION ON THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE.
Justice Alternatives for Wisconsin: Reducing the Costs of the Criminal Justice System Presentation to the Wisconsin Joint Legislative Council May 9, 2007.
March 12,  May 2010 Governor Bob McDonnell signed Executive Order 10 calling for a Housing Policy Framework  The Homeless Outcomes Policy Report.
Understanding the Criminal Justice System CJUS 101 Community-Based Corrections.
Immediate Sanction Probation Pilot Project Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission June 8, 2015.
SB 678: Findings from the Field Association for Criminal Justice Research (California) March 20, 2014 Jay Fraser Administrative Office of the Courts Criminal.
Task Force on Public Safety OREGON CRIMINAL JUSTICE COMMISSION OCTOBER 30, 2013.
Yavapai County Jail Planning Services Presentation to: Yavapai County Board of Supervisors January 6, 2016.
Task Force on Public Safety Oregon Criminal Justice Commission November 22, 2013.
 State leadership created the bipartisan, inter-branch, inter- governmental Missouri Working Group on Sentencing and Corrections.
Improving Outcomes for Young Adults in the Justice System Challenges and Opportunities.
Comprehensive Youth Services Assessment and Plan February 21, 2014.
 As of July 1, 2014, 61 operational courts: › 28 Adult Drug Courts  5 Hybrid Drug/OWI Courts › 14 OWI Courts › 9 Veterans Treatment Courts › 4 Mental.
Court Services A Continuum of Behavioral, Therapeutic and Supervision Programs.
Welcome to Workforce 3 One U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration Webinar Date: April 30, 2014 Presented by: U.S. Departments.
Criminal Justice Policy Development and Resource Reinvestment Len Engel, Esq. December 10, 2010 What Works Conference Portland, OR Crime and Justice Institute.
South Dakota: Criminal Justice Reform
Probation and Community Justice Program Overview
Promising Practices in Criminal Justice Reform
Evidence Based Practices in Napa County Probation
Juvenile Reentry Programs Palm Beach County
Summit County Probation Services
Use Of Risk Assessments in Utah Sentencing
Justice Division Strategic Planning
TEXAS STUDY USED MORE THAN 1
24-hours a day 7-days a week 365 days per year
Presentation transcript:

ADULT REDEPLOY ILLINOIS Mary Ann Dyar, Program Administrator National Association of Sentencing Commissions August 7, 2012

Prison Admissions by Felony Class

Crime Reduction Act (Public Act ) Current criminal justice system is not effective and is unsustainable – more than half of people released from prison return within 3 years Being smart on crime involves understanding why people commit crimes and addressing underlying criminogenic needs Statewide information sharing across the criminal justice system is mandated, calling for the adoption of standardized validated assessment system (RANA) It is less expensive and more effective to treat low-level offenders in their communities, reserving prison space for violent criminals Adult Redeploy Illinois, based on successful juvenile model, increases alternatives to incarceration for non-violent offenders

Stated Goals Reduce crime and recidivism at a lower cost to taxpayers Provide financial incentives to counties or judicial circuits to create effective local ‑ level evidence ‑ based services Encourage the successful local supervision of eligible offenders and their reintegration into the locality

Program Infrastructure Adult Redeploy Illinois Oversight Board Funding (Governor appropriation, ARRA JAG grant) Staffing (1 F-T Program Administrator, 2 P-T Technical Assistance Providers -retired judges) Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority support with data, research, evaluation Application process (planning and pilot site implementation grants) Performance measurement plan

Application Process Initial planning grant phase – up to $30,000 (non- competitive) for 90 days – to convene stakeholders and analyze data Completion of local plan – using Standard Plan Template – submitted to ARIOB for approval Pilot site implementation grant phase – competitive grants of up to $1,000,000 (based on population) for 15 to 18 months Performance measured as to progress toward 25% reduction goal in prison commitments from defined target population (or else risk penalty)

Standard Plan Template “Mini-strategic plan” Executive Summary Description of and Justification for the Target Population Description of the Planning Partners Gaps in Sanctions and Services Description of the Proposed Adult Redeploy Illinois Program Model (including incorporation of existing ATIs and human services, and use of EBPs) Timeline Budget and Compliance with the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act

Planning and Implementation Grants In two rounds, planning grants were provided to 11 jurisdictions covering 22 counties Of the planning grant sites, 6 requested pilot site implementation grants to implement their local plans. Additionally, 4 counties submitted proposals to be pilot sites. As of August 2011, there are 10 pilot sites.

Different Adult Redeploy Illinois Local Models Specialty courts Drug Courts Mental Health Courts Veterans Courts Specialized probation Probation violator caseloads Intensive probation supervision

Performance Measurement Crime Reduction Act: – 25% reduction in eligible prison commitments – Recidivism – Rate of revocations (probation) – Employment rates – Educational attainment – Successful SA treatment – Restitution payments Site-specific – Number of face-to-face meetings – Caseload sizes – Treatment engagement/re- engagement – Drug court graduation rates – Intervention-specific outcomes

Key Indicators (As of June 2012): 10 sites implemented (out of 10 approved sites) 683 people enrolled (toward total diversion goal of 394) $11 million saved (based on annual per capita prison costs, less the cost of ARI interventions)

LESS EXPENSIVE Cost of a year in prison (FY10): $22,000 Cost of an average ARI intervention: $5,900

MORE EFFECTIVE Evidence-based practices utilized by Adult Redeploy Illinois sites can reduce recidivism up to 20%.

22 EBPs and Promising Practices Currently in Use by Sites 3 assessments 7 general models or methods 12 specific programs or curricula Now available on Adult Redeploy Illinois website:

For more information on Adult Redeploy Illinois, please contact Mary Ann Dyar, Program Administrator, at (312) or Also, visit the web site at