Of course, we ALL know that the Moon landings were faked, right…? …‘cause they said so on television… and “talk radio”! Landing on the Moon! What a tremendous achievement!

SUPPOSEDLY… NASA faked the flight, and faked the pictures… Only a few “discerning” people have penetrated this hoax with their sharp eyes and vast knowledge! I don’t know… DO those models look fake?

Like this video picture! The quality was so poor that it HAS to be a fake… with the poor quality hiding the fact it was shot in a studio. …But only IF you are used to today’s modern electronics! Things WERE different 40 years ago…we were amazed to get ANY picture from the Moon! Many of those fooled by Moon Hoax fanatics are too young to have seen the Moon program unfold, and compare it to today’s technology! One small step for man…

For instance… this picture lacks stars! …and that some object is casting a shadow on the Lunar surface. (Probably movie studio scaffolding!) And these defects clearly show this picture to be a fake!

In fact… this is an unlit portion of the Lunar surface… …and this is the silhouette of a cluster of thrusters on the Lunar Module. When you lack basic knowledge… it’s easy to be fooled!

Here’s the object that made the strange silhouette…

Stars, by the way, rarely show up in Moon landing pictures… …because they are relatively faint compared to the lunar surface or the Earth. It’s due to the limitations of the film!

Notice the different lengths and directions of the astronauts shadows? Some have claimed that this indicates two light sources… like on a movie stage or on-location shot! But… multiple light sources make MULTIPLE shadows… NOT single shadows of different lengths! The correct answer is, of course, that changes in topography produces shadows of different lengths and directions!

The correct answer is, of course, that changes in topography produce shadows of different lengths and directions!

And everyone “knows” that moisture is required to produce such a crisp footprint… There’s no atmosphere or moisture on the Moon. Oh really…? Try leaving a handprint in dry flour It is common for people to make a statement that is completely wrong… figuring that no one will challenge them. And ANY time some one claims that “it’s obvious”… beware! That should be obvious!

Why isn’t the astronaut’s spacesuit ‘in the dark” like this model? Doesn’t the lack of atmosphere mean that light won’t scatter, and that shadows should be REALLY dark? No… not with such a bright reflector like the sunlit lunar surface!

Same situation here! The astronaut is lit by reflected light from the bright lunar surface. Bright surface lights up the astronaut… …Dark surface leaves him in shadow !

Spotlights on the Lunar movie set…? Internal reflections in the camera…

I have actually seen a claim that this picture is faked because the astronaut shadow doesn’t extend from his body…! He’s jumping up, of course… it’s that low lunar gravity

And, of course, you have ALL heard about claims that the flag shouldn’t be extended, or can’t wave on the Moon… The flag has a rod holding it out, and the flag “waved” when the astronauts adjusted the pole!

More “proof” that the landing pictures were faked How did astronauts take pictures of the lunar surface before they arrived? The lack of an atmosphere interferes with our ability to discern distance; on Earth, objects in the distance are faded and blurred by the atmosphere… The “hills” on the horizon are actually mountains many miles away!

The backgrounds in both picture are the same because the distance is too great to show any changes due to a small amount of movement.

Notice that the background is unchanged… …even though the foreground is utterly different.

And, of course, some complain that the car wouldn’t work on the Moon, that it couldn’t fit on the Lunar Lander, etc…! Let’s see if you can find the error in the following photograph… the error that PROVES that the Lunar landings were faked!

Did you find it? Yep! The shadow of the gas pump is going the wrong way! How DID they miss that?