Traffic model for the Bonn Agreement Area BE-AWARE II Final Conference, 18-19 November, Ronneby, Sweden Co-financed by the EU – Civil Protection Financial.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Safer lives, safer ships, cleaner seas NAV 53 – UK Proposals Dover Strait and Adjacent Waters in vicinity of the Foxtrot Harmonisation of.
Advertisements

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO Sjøsikkerhetsseminaret Lysebu, 29 January 2008 Alla Pozdnakova Post. doc. NIFS Russian shipping safety regulation:
BE-AWARE II What are the most appropriate response and risk reducing measures to address the risk of oil pollution in 2020? Co-financed by the EU – Civil.
The National Marine Sanctuary Program Moving America: Ensuring Safe Marine Transportation in Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary George Galasso NOAA.
Ryszard Warzocha President of the Board PORT SZCZECIN-ŚWINOUJŚCIE Gate for Czech Republic adapted to the transport trends Szczecin and Świnoujscie SeaportsAuthority.
Tankers’ transit route trough the end of Kadetrenden to the Swedish deep-water route. Tankers’ transit route trough the end of Kadetrenden to the Swedish.
Setting the scene: The ACCSEAS Project Dr Alwyn I. Williams ACCSEAS Project Manager ACCSEAS Conference th February 2015.
An Ocean of Opportunity: An integrated maritime policy for the EU 1 Places of refuge: General legal framework and developments within IMO and the EU Alexandros.
Hot issues for Poland in relation with oil bussiness on the Baltic Sea Robert Cyglicki Coalition Clean Baltic Conference, 2004.
HELCOM proposal on project aiming at BSAP development and implementation Baltic Sea Region Programme Conference May 2007, Hamburg HELCOM.
COAST Norway v.2002 (COmputer Assisted Shipping Traffic Database) Bjørn Øygarden.
FPS PUBLIC HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENT « Provinciaal Hof », Bruges, Belgium October MIMAC 2006 : International conference on.
Conference on « Safe Seas: can an Integrated Maritime Surveillance be achieved by the EU? » EESC - Brussels, 24 March 2015.
WP 6 Exchange of dynamic predictor Two ships operation, Tug and ship Peter Grundevik, SSPA Sweden AB.
BE-AWARE Project BONN AGREEMENT
© 2005 EU-MOP Consortium Athens, 9 June 06 Elimination Units for Marine Oil Pollution Oil Pollution Risk in EU Waters: Analysis & Results Nikolaos P. Ventikos.
Legal aspects of the marine environment protection and oil transportation: example of the Baltic Sea.
TYPE II ERROR ON THE GRAND BANKS INADEQUATE MONITORING OF MARINE BIRDS AND MAMMALS AT HIBERNIA AND TERRA NOVA TYPE II ERROR ON THE GRAND BANKS INADEQUATE.
W w w. b a l t i c m a s t e r. o r g WORK PACKAGE 2- FINAL RESULTS WP2 Seminar / Baltic Master II Partner Search The 19th of Dec., 2007 Prepared by Jakub.
09.35 Task 1: Overall monitoring objectives. Andy Chadwick, BGS (10 mins) 1.
October 2009 Klaus Grensemann, Division WS 23 St. Petersburg 1 Development and Implementation of an Overall E-Navigation Strategy.
2007 TRB Planning Application Conference D ELDOT S TATEWIDE E VACUATION M ODEL.
MARINTEK Improving safety at sea in cold climate regions Presentation at TRANSBALTIC Foresight Debate Bodø By Tor Husjord Maritime Forum North.
Ship Emission Inventories Chris Whall & Andriana Stavrakaki.
OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME
ILO Department of Statistics1 ILO experience in quickly estimating the impact of financial crisis on the global labour market International Seminar on.
Maritime Security and Cooperation DCOM Croatian Navy Commodore Tihomir Erceg.
SINTEF Fisheries and Aquaculture 28. februar – 1. mars Development and use of ” State-of-the-Art” project databases Why How Examples Conclusions.
Fusion Centres in Selected Countries Borders & Globalization Conference September 25-27, 2014 Elaine Koren, Research & Analysis Division Fusion Centres.
SICENTER Ljubljana, Slovenia TRACKING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MDGs WITH TIME DISTANCE MEASURE Professor Pavle Sicherl SICENTER and University of Ljubljana.
Martitime Traffic Monitoring Baltic Master midterm conference Snekkersten October 2006 Łukasz Bibik, Maritime Office Gdynia.
Regional Resource / Global Gateway Colin Parker, Chief Executive | 27 August 2008.
1 The statistical approach for monitoring maritime safety used and developed by EMSA Béatrice Comby Project Officer - Production and development of maritime.
1 IRIS Europe II – Implementation of River Information Services in Europe This project is co-funded by the European Commission / DG-TREN / TEN-T A project.
W w w. b a l t i c m a s t e r. o r g Lead Partner.
Cooperation on Oil Spill Response in the Arctic Background and possible future steps Ole Kristian Bjerkemo, Norway.
Capacity Building in Analytical Tools for Estimating and Comparing Costs and Benefits of Adaptation Projects in Africa.
Oil drift modelling BE-AWARE II Final Conference, November, Ronneby, Sweden Co-financed by the EU – Civil Protection Financial Instrument.
BE-AWARE I HNS Risk Assessment Bonn Agreement: Area-wide Assessment of Risk Evaluations Co-financed by the EU – Civil Protection Financial Instrument.
Risk reduction and response scenarios BE-AWARE II Final Conference, November, Ronneby, Sweden Co-financed by the EU – Civil Protection Financial.
Accidents and potential releases of mineral oil the Bonn Agreement Area Co-financed by the EU – Civil Protection Financial Instrument BE-AWARE II Final.
Environmental damage: Combining impact and vulnerability BE-AWARE II Final Conference, November, Ronneby, Sweden Co-financed by the EU – Civil Protection.
ACCSEAS: e-Navigation and its benefits to the environment Dr Alwyn I. Williams ACCSEAS Project Manager BE-AWARE II Final Conference Ronneby, Sweden 18.
Risk Management Conclusions BE-AWARE II Final Conference, November, Ronneby, Sweden Co-financed by the EU – Civil Protection Financial Instrument.
Scenario Comparison Which are the most effective scenarios for the BE-AWARE project regions? BE-AWARE II Final Conference, November, Rönneby, Sweden.
Offshore Wind Energy in the region – EMDEN (Germany)
Response modelling including dispersants BE-AWARE II Final Conference, November, Ronneby, Sweden Co-financed by the EU – Civil Protection Financial.
2010 FAA Worldwide Airport Technology Transfer Conference Risk Assessment of RSA Alternatives at San Francisco International Airport Manuel Ayres Regis.
1 CCB - Activities Enforcing Sustainable Oil Business Development in the Baltic Sea Region SOLUTIONS - Mr Gunnar Norén Executive Secretary to Coalition.
North Sea Region Challenges Thomas Porathe Professor Interaction Design Norwegian University of Science and Technology Maritime.
Protection assessment of Natura 2000 network areas in Poland – main problems Marzena Modrowska Krzysztof Suliński Ministry of the environment in Poland.
Stela Barova, senior expert, “Marine environmental protection and Monitoring” Department, “Plans and Permits” Directorate State of play of MSFD implementation.
Next Steps: Implementing the BE-AWARE Project Results.
BALTICOM- BALTIC Transport Communication and Regional Development WP12 Spatial Evaluation of Transport Chains and General Recommendations for Baltic Sea.
Procedures and Technics of Investigation in the United Kingdom TAIEX Workshop on Marine Casualty Investigation 5-6 September 2012 David Wheal Principal.
ACCSEAS: e-Navigation Test-Bed in the North Sea Region SUCG Northern Lighthouse Board 1 st November 2012.
HELCOM objectives in shipping field
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
State of play: Refugee situation in and beyond Europe Senior Specialist Tuomas Koljonen Finnish Immigration Service
Marine Expert Group meeting Brussels, 6 November 2015
3. SafeSeaNet A data exchange network and a standardisation of the main information available on ships (all flags) and their cargo Providing a clear picture.
Feedback received on the establishment of fisheries management measures in Natura 2000 sites (Document 4.1) Exchange information on ongoing activities.
Norwegian presentation on LRIT from a Coastal State perspective
Vector Voyages Unit 8 – Day 2.
ESSnet on Big Data: AIS-data
Hydrographic Awareness and Its Economic Benefits
Evaluation from a Corridor perspective: methods and results Merja Penttinen, VTT
Goods for processing abroad
Oil Spill in Mexican Gulf
표준해사통신용어 (SMCP) 용어 5.
Presentation transcript:

Traffic model for the Bonn Agreement Area BE-AWARE II Final Conference, November, Ronneby, Sweden Co-financed by the EU – Civil Protection Financial Instrument

Background Task H Traffic Analysis Overall objective: To develop a model that describes the traffic in the area This is later applied with the cargo model to simulate accidents and consequences – Accident type – Location – Spill size – Spill substance Basis: AIS data IHS Fairplay (representative ships) Traffic Analysis

Background Process AIS data Definition of route net Idealised traffic Obstacles to be treated Areas with no/low AIS coverage or missing data – Middle of North Sea – German Bight – Other fallouts Future traffic Traffic Analysis

Background Project area and sub regions: 1: Atlantic 2: Northern North Sea 3: Eastern North Sea 4: Southern North Sea 5: Channel Traffic Analysis

AIS basis - Period The true traffic - Local differences Traffic Analysis

AIS basis - Clear routes are used -TSS -Reefs/shallow water -Vessels take the shortest journey Traffic Analysis

AIS basis - Various vessel types Traffic Analysis No offshore or fishing Only offshore

Route Net routes Traffic Analysis

Idealised traffic Traffic Analysis

Idealised traffic For every route -Representative vessels using route -Mean value -Standard deviation Traffic Analysis

Idealised traffic What do we want do capture: Actual movement of vessels Harbour to harbour combinations Traffic Analysis

Areas with low coverage North sea and German Bight General approch Closure of gaps of up to 36 hours except vessels at the area around Kiel Canal Closure of all <23 hours gaps Manuel correction of the number of vessels on the routes in the German Bight based on Accseas project traffic. Traffic Analysis

Areas with low coverage Procedure The individual vessel is followed Routes are closed by algorithm finding the shortest path Routes begins and ends at harbours Traffic Analysis

Idealised traffic What do we have in our traffic model: Actual movement of vessels Harbour to harbour combinations For every route: -Vessel information -Type -Size -Distribution -From/to port Traffic Analysis

Idealised traffic How do we apply this later: Traffic Analysis + Traffic modelCargo model

Route Net 2020 Changes caused by: Windfarms New TSS Traffic Analysis

Route Net 2020 Changes caused by: Windfarms New TSS Traffic Analysis

Idealised traffic 2020 Process Make new route net Identify ships affected Identify alternative route + Future traffic changes Changes in the size of vessels Changes in the number of voyages Traffic Analysis

Idealised traffic 2020 Routes affected by wind parks New TSS routes implemented New tracks have been found for all vessels affected Prognosis implemented by adjusting 2011 traffic. Traffic Analysis

Methodology Summary and conclusion Traffic based on current situation 2011 Best estimate of future traffic based on adjusted tracks, sizes, voyages of vessels Port-to-port cargo model a challenge – but possible Connected with the other models (Cargo/Pilotage/other RRM) Input for the accident model

Questions? Thank you beaware.bonnagreement.org